Vol 76, No 3 (2017)
Review article
Published online: 2016-12-20

open access

Page views 4694
Article views/downloads 2524
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The Terminologia Anatomica matters: examples from didactic, scientific, and clinical practice

B. Strzelec12, P. P. Chmielewski1, B. Gworys
Pubmed: 28026851
Folia Morphol 2017;76(3):340-347.

Abstract

The proper usage of the anatomical terminology is of paramount importance to all medical professionals. Although a multitude of studies have been devoted to issues associated with the use and application of the recent version of the anatomical terminology in both theoretical medicine and clinical practice, there are still many unresolved problems such as confusing terms, inconsistencies, and errors, including grammar and spelling mistakes. The aim of this article is to describe the current situation of the anatomical terminology and its usage in practice, as well as explain why it is so important to use precise, appropriate, and valid anatomical terms during the everyday communication among physicians from all medical branches. In this review, we discuss some confusing, obsolete, and erroneous terms that are still commonly used by many clinicians, and surgeons in particular, during the process of diagnosis and treatment. The use of these ambiguous, erroneous, and obsolete terms enhances the risk of miscommunication. We also provide some edifying examples from everyday clinical practice.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Aresti N, Ramachandran M. Nonoriginal Malappropriate Eponymous Nomenclature: examples relevant to paediatric orthopaedics. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2012; 21(6): 606–610.
  2. Chmielewski P, Borysławski K, Chmielowiec K, et al. Longitudinal and cross-sectional changes with age in selected anthropometric and physiological traits in hospitalized adults: an insight from the Polish Longitudinal Study of Aging (PLSA). Anthropol Rev. 2015; 78(3): 317–336.
  3. Conti AA. Calling the heart by name: distinguished eponyms in the history of cardiac anatomy. Heart Surg Forum. 2011; 14(3): E183–E187.
  4. DiPoce J, Jimenez G, Weintraub J. Historical perspective: eponyms of vascular radiology. Radiographics. 2014; 34(4): 1120–1140.
  5. FCAT Terminologia Anatomica. International Anatomical Terminology. 2nd edition. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart. 2011.
  6. Gielecki J, Zurada A, Osman N. Terminologia anatomica in the past and the future from perspective of 110th anniversary of Polish Anatomical Terminology. Folia Morphol. 2008; 67(2): 87–97.
  7. Golanó P, Vega J, de Leeuw PAJ, et al. Anatomy of the ankle ligaments: a pictorial essay. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18(5): 557–569.
  8. Hill M, Davis M. Local control of microvascular perfusion. Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences, New York. 2013.
  9. Hirsch BE. Does the Terminologia Anatomica really matter? Clin Anat. 2011; 24(4): 503–504.
  10. Kachlik D, Baca V, Bozdechova I, et al. Anatomical terminology and nomenclature: past, present and highlights. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008; 30(6): 459–466.
  11. Kachlík D, Bozdechová I, Cech P, et al. [Ten years after the latest revision International Anatomical Terminology]. Cas Lek Cesk. 2008; 147(5): 287–294.
  12. Kachlik D, Bozdechova I, Cech P, et al. Mistakes in the usage of anatomical terminology in clinical practice. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2009; 153(2): 157–161.
  13. Kachlik D, Musil V, Baca V. Terminologia Anatomica after 17 years: inconsistencies, mistakes and new proposals. Ann Anat. 2015; 201: 8–16.
  14. Kachlik D, Musil V, Baca V. Contribution to the anatomical nomenclature concerning general anatomy and anatomical variations. Surg Radiol Anat. 2016; 38(7): 757–765.
  15. Kumka M, Bonar J. Fascia: a morphological description and classification system based on a literature review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2012; 56(3): 179–191.
  16. Kutia SA. Eponyms in biliary tree. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2014(10): 106–110.
  17. Martin BD, Thorpe D, Barnes R, et al. Frequency in usage of FCAT-approved anatomical terms by North American anatomists. Anat Sci Educ. 2009; 2(3): 94–106.
  18. Martin B, Thorpe D, DeLuna V, et al. Frequency in Usage ofTerminologia AnatomicaTerms by Clinical Anatomists. J Biomed Edu. 2014; 2014: 1–9.
  19. Martin BD, Thorpe D, Merenda V, et al. Contrast in usage of FCAT-approved anatomical terminology between members of two anatomy associations in North America. Anat Sci Educ. 2010; 3(1): 25–32.
  20. Matusz P. Misleading Latin/English equivalents for some liver terms in Terminologia Anatomica. Anat Sci Educ. 2010; 3(3): 156–157.
  21. Mirilas P, Skandalakis JE. Benign anatomical mistakes: the correct anatomical term for the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Am Surg. 2002; 68(1): 95–97.
  22. Pawlina W, Drake R. Moving forward with Terminologia Anatomica. Anat Sci Educ. 2009; 2(3): 93.
  23. Sakai T. Historical evolution of anatomical terminology from ancient to modern. Anat Sci Int. 2007; 82(2): 65–81.
  24. Schaller O. Illustrated veterinary anatomical nomenclature. Enke Verlag, Stuttgart. 2007.
  25. Schleip R, Jäger H, Klingler W. What is 'fascia'? A review of different nomenclatures. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012; 16(4): 496–502.
  26. Urbanowicz Z. Mała encyclopedia anatomii człowieka. Czelej, Lublin. 2003.
  27. Vogl AW. Awareness of and access to a unified terminology by anatomists. Anat Sci Educ. 2009; 2(3): 139–140.
  28. Waseem M, Khan M, Hussain N, et al. Eponyms: errors in clinical practice and scientific writing. Acta Orthop Belg. 2005; 71(1): 1–8.
  29. Weber JC. Shearer’s manual of human dissection. McGraw-Hill, New York 1999.
  30. Wendell-Smith C. Terminological desiderata. Clin Anat. 2003; 16(1): 98–103.
  31. Whitmore I. Terminologia anatomica: new terminology for the new anatomist. Anat Rec. 1999; 257(2): 50–53.
  32. Yabuki Y. Clinical anatomy of the subserous layer: An amalgamation of gross and clinical anatomy. Clin Anat. 2016; 29(4): 508–515.