open access
Reappraisal of the morphological and morphometric study of the psoas minor muscle with clinical and developmental insights: cadaveric study
, 2, 3, 1, 4, 5, 6, 6, 67
Affiliations- Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences,, Bathinda, India
- Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences,, Patna, India
- Department of Anatomy, JSS Medical College, JSSHER, Mysore, India
- Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, India
- Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College,, Patiala, India
- Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Anatomy, UJ CM, Cracow
open access
Abstract
Background: The Psoas Minor (PMi) is the most unstable muscle of the psoas group of the posterior abdominal muscle. This muscle has a fusiform shape and consists of a short fusiform belly continuing distally as a long tendon inserted on the pecten pubis and the iliopectineal arch. The present study was conducted to obtain more detailed information about the muscle and to expand knowledge about its morphology and morphometry.
Materials and methods: The posterior abdominal wall of 30 adult cadavers was dissected. Anatomical variabilities in origin, insertion, length, width, and muscle-to-cone ratio were measured when PMi was found. The data collected was interpreted descriptively.
Results: PMi was found in 12 cases, ten bilateral and two unilateral. The origin was constant in all cases and, except for three cases, extended into the iliac fascia and the iliopubic eminence. Morphometric analysis revealed that the average length of the proximal muscle belly and distal tendons was 4.52 ± 1.35 cm and 13.05 ± 0.90 cm, respectively. The mean width of the muscle belly was 1.71 ± 0.17 cm, and that of the tendon was 0.47 ± 0.10 cm. On average, the muscle belly occupied the proximal 33.71 ± 6.15% of the total musculotendinous unit.
Conclusions: Findings confirm the inconsistency of PMi in the study population. Morphological variations became more evident as the tendon approached the insertion level. The muscle’s distal attachment to the iliac fascia may partially control the position, mechanical stability of the underlying iliopsoas and this circumstantial function may be clinically related to iliopsoas inflammation and pathology. However, further studies recommended to determine biomechanical validity and clinical applicability of this vestigial muscle in human.
Abstract
Background: The Psoas Minor (PMi) is the most unstable muscle of the psoas group of the posterior abdominal muscle. This muscle has a fusiform shape and consists of a short fusiform belly continuing distally as a long tendon inserted on the pecten pubis and the iliopectineal arch. The present study was conducted to obtain more detailed information about the muscle and to expand knowledge about its morphology and morphometry.
Materials and methods: The posterior abdominal wall of 30 adult cadavers was dissected. Anatomical variabilities in origin, insertion, length, width, and muscle-to-cone ratio were measured when PMi was found. The data collected was interpreted descriptively.
Results: PMi was found in 12 cases, ten bilateral and two unilateral. The origin was constant in all cases and, except for three cases, extended into the iliac fascia and the iliopubic eminence. Morphometric analysis revealed that the average length of the proximal muscle belly and distal tendons was 4.52 ± 1.35 cm and 13.05 ± 0.90 cm, respectively. The mean width of the muscle belly was 1.71 ± 0.17 cm, and that of the tendon was 0.47 ± 0.10 cm. On average, the muscle belly occupied the proximal 33.71 ± 6.15% of the total musculotendinous unit.
Conclusions: Findings confirm the inconsistency of PMi in the study population. Morphological variations became more evident as the tendon approached the insertion level. The muscle’s distal attachment to the iliac fascia may partially control the position, mechanical stability of the underlying iliopsoas and this circumstantial function may be clinically related to iliopsoas inflammation and pathology. However, further studies recommended to determine biomechanical validity and clinical applicability of this vestigial muscle in human.
Keywords
biomechanics, iliopsoas, morphology, morphometry, variations
Supp./Additional Files (1)
About this articleTitle
Reappraisal of the morphological and morphometric study of the psoas minor muscle with clinical and developmental insights: cadaveric study
Journal
Issue
Article type
Original article
Published online
2024-04-11
Page views
118
Article views/downloads
66
DOI
Pubmed
Keywords
biomechanics
iliopsoas
morphology
morphometry
variations
Authors
Apurba Patra
Adil Asghar
NB Pushpa
Preeti Chaudhary
Kumar Satish Ravi
Harsimarjit Kaur
Wojciech Przybycień
Agata Musiał
Jerzy Andrzej Walocha
References (25)- Agichani S, Sontakke Y, Joshi SS, et al. Morphology of psoas minor muscle-reviewed. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2013; 2: 5867–5869.
- Bergman RA. Thoughts on human variations. Clin Anat. 2011; 24(8): 938–940.
- Bergman RA, Tubbs RS, Shoja MM. Bergman’s comprehensive encyclopedia of human anatomic variation. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken 2016.
- Clarkson RD, Rainy H. Unusual arrangement of the psoas muscle. J Anat Physiol. 1889; 23(Pt 3): 504–506.
- Dragieva P, Zaharieva M, Kozhuharov Y, et al. Psoas minor muscle: a cadaveric morphometric study. Cureus. 2018; 10(4): e2447.
- Farias MCG, de Ol, Rocha TDS, et al. Morphological and morphometric analysis of psoas minor muscle in cadavers. J Morphol Sci. 2012; 29(4): 202–205.
- Garg P, Dadhich A, Chauhan S. Morphology and morphometry of psoas minor: a cadaveric study. Int J Med Res Prof. 2016; 2: 128–130.
- Guerra D, Reis F, Bastos A, et al. Anatomical study on the psoas minor muscle in human fetuses. Int J Morphol. 2012; 30(1): 136–139.
- Hamilton WJ. Textbook of Human Anatomy. Springer, New York 1982.
- Hanson P, Magnusson SP, Sorensen H, et al. Anatomical differences in the psoas muscles in young black and white men. J Anat. 1999; 194 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2): 303–307.
- Joshi SD, Joshi SS, Dandekar UK, et al. Morphology of psoas minor and psoas accessorius. J Anat Soc Ind. 2010; 59(1): 31–34.
- Koshi R, Cunningham DJ. Cunningham’s manual of practical anatomy. Sixteenth edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2018.
- Kraychete D, Rocha A, Castro P. Abscesso do músculo psoas em paciente submetida à analgesia por via peridural: relato de caso. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2007; 57(2).
- Macalister A. Additional observations on muscular anomalies in human anatomy. (Third Series) With a catalogue of the principal muscular variations hitherto published. The Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy, Dublin 1875: 1–134.
- Markov K, Zaharieva M, Dragieva P, et al. Unilateral psoas minor: a case report. Scr Sci Vox Stud. 2017; 1(1): 47.
- Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically oriented anatomy. 7th ed. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health, Philadelphia 2014.
- MORI M. Statistics on the musculature of the Japanese. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1964; 40: 195–300.
- Neumann DA, Garceau LR. A proposed novel function of the psoas minor revealed through cadaver dissection. Clin Anat. 2015; 28(2): 243–252.
- Ojha P, Prakash S, Jain A. Morphology of psoas minor muscle-a cadaveric study. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2016; 8(16): 35–39.
- Protas M, Voin V, Wang JMh, et al. A rare case of double-headed psoas minor muscle with review of its known variants. Cureus. 2017; 9(6): e1312.
- Seib G. Incidence of the m. psoas minor in man. American J Phys Anthropol. 1934; 19(2): 229–246.
- Singh D, Agarwal S. Morphological study of psoas minor muscles with embryological basis and clinical insights. J Clin Diagn Res. 2021; 15(4): 10–14.
- Snell RS. Clinical anatomy by regions. 9th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 2012: MD.
- Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy E-Book: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam 2015.
- Wysiadecki G, Varga I, Klejbor I, et al. Reporting anatomical variations: Should unified standards and protocol (checklist) for anatomical studies and case reports be established? Transl Res Anat. 2024; 35: 100284.
