Online first
Original article
Published online: 2024-01-22

open access

Page views 321
Article views/downloads 248
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Quantitative study of the popliteal fossa in the human fetus

Mateusz Badura1, Maria Dąbrowska1, Anna Badura2, Monika Paruszewska-Achtel1, Magdalena Grzonkowska1, Mariusz Baumgart1, Michał Szpinda13
Pubmed: 38258613

Abstract

The popliteal fossa presents an extensive diamond-shaped topographical element on the posterior aspect of the knee. With the use of classical anatomical dissection, digital image analysis of NIS Elements AR 3.0 and statistics we morphometrically analyzed the size of the popliteal fossa in human fetuses aged 17–29 weeks of gestation. Morphometric parameters of the popliteal fossa increased logarithmically with fetal age: y = –44.421 + 24.301 × ln (Age) for length of superomedial boundary, y = –41.379 + 22.777 × ln (Age) for length of superolateral boundary, y = –39.019 + 20.981 × ln (Age) for inferomedial boundary, y = –37.547 + 20.319 × ln (Age), for length of inferolateral boundary, y = –28.915 + 15.822 × ln (Age) for transverse diameter, y = –69.790 + 38.73 × ln (Age) for vertical diameter and y = –485.631 + 240.844 × ln (Age) for projection surface area. Out of the four angles of the popliteal fossa the medial one was greatest, the inferior one the smallest, while the lateral one was somewhat smaller than the medial one and approximately three times greater than the superior one, with no difference with fetal age. In terms of morphometric parameters the popliteal fossa in the human fetus displays neither male-female nor right-left differences. In the popliteal fossa, growth patterns of its four boundaries, vertical and transverse diameters, and projection surface area all follow natural logarithmic functions. All the morphometric data is considered age-specific reference intervals, which may be conducive in the diagnostics of congenital abnormalities in the human fetus.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Aktan Ikiz ZA, Ucerler H, Ozgur Z. Anatomic variations of popliteal artery that may be a reason for entrapment. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009; 31(9): 695–700.
  2. Badura M, Wiśniewski M, Szpinda M, et al. Developmental dynamics of the semimembranosus muscle in human foetuses. Med Biol Sci. 2011; 25: 13–16.
  3. Badura M, Wiśniewski M, Szpinda M, et al. The growth of the semitendinosus muscle in human foetuses. Med Biol Sci. 2011; 25: 17–21.
  4. Benninger B, Delamarter T. Distal semimembranosus muscle-tendon-unit review: morphology, accurate terminology, and clinical relevance. Folia Morphol. 2013; 72(1): 1–9.
  5. Bergman RA. Compendium of human anatomic variation: text, atlas and world literature. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore 1988.
  6. Bergman RA, Walker CW, el-Khour GY. The third head of gastrocnemius in CT images. Ann Anat. 1995; 177(3): 291–294.
  7. Chason DP, Schultz SM, Fleckenstein JL. Tensor fasciae suralis: depiction on MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995; 165(5): 1220–1221.
  8. Chetty D, Pillay P, Lazarus L, et al. The Common Fibular Nerve (and its Branches) in Fetuses. Int J Morphol. 2014; 32(2): 455–460.
  9. Covey DC. Injuries of the posterolateral corner of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(1): 106–118.
  10. Dave MR, Yagain V, Anadkat S. Unilateral third/accessory head of the gastrocnemius muscle: a case report. Int J Morphol. 2012; 30(3): 1061–1064.
  11. Derzsi Z, Gurzu S, Jung I, et al. Arteriovenous synovial hemangioma of the popliteal fossa diagnosed in an adolescent with history of unilateral congenital clubfoot: case report and a single-institution retrospective review. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2015; 56(2): 549–552.
  12. Dudek K, Kędzia W, Kędzia E, et al. Mathematical modelling of the growth of human fetus anatomical structures. Anat Sci Int. 2017; 92(4): 521–529.
  13. Grzonkowska M, Badura M, Lisiecki J, et al. Growth dynamics of the triceps brachii muscle in the human fetus. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2014; 23(2): 177–184.
  14. Iwai T, Sato S, Yamada T, et al. Popliteal vein entrapment caused by the third head of the gastrocnemius muscle. Br J Surg. 1987; 74(11): 1006–1008.
  15. Kadir D, Ceren U, Busra S, et al. A study on the structure and morphologic development of calcaneal tendon and triceps surae muscle in human fetuses during the fetal period and the evaluation of clinical importance of calcaneal tendon. Int J Morphol. 2015; 33(3): 920–929.
  16. Kim DI, Kim HJ, Shin C, et al. An abnormal muscle in the superficial region of the popliteal fossa. Anat Sci Int. 2009; 84(1-2): 61–63.
  17. Kotian SR, Sachin KS, Bhat KMR. Bifurcated plantaris with rare relations to the neurovascular bundle in the popliteal fossa. Anat Sci Int. 2013; 88(4): 239–241.
  18. Liu H, Fletcher J, Garrison MK, et al. Bilateral absence of quadratus femoris and semimembranosus. Int J Anat Var. 2011; 4: 40–42.
  19. Montet X, Sandoz A, Mauget D, et al. Sonographic and MRI appearance of tensor fasciae suralis muscle, an uncommon cause of popliteal swelling. Skeletal Radiol. 2002; 31(9): 536–538.
  20. Okamoto K, Wakebe T, Saiki K, et al. An anomalous muscle in the superficial region of the popliteal fossa, with special reference to its innervation and derivation. Ann Anat. 2004; 186(5-6): 555–559.
  21. Olewnik Ł, Podgórski M, Polguj M, et al. The plantaris muscle — rare relations to the neurovascular bundle in the popliteal fossa. Folia Morphol. 2018; 77(4): 785–788.
  22. Rowicki K, Płomiński J, Bachta A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of platelet rich plasma in treatment of chronic pes anserinus pain syndrome. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2014; 16(3): 307–318.
  23. Sinav A, Gümüşalan Y, Arifoğlu Y, et al. Accessory muscular bundles arising from biceps femoris muscle. Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1995; 70(3): 245–247.
  24. Spina AA. The plantaris muscle: anatomy, injury, imaging, and treatment. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2007; 51(3): 158–165.
  25. Standring S. Gray's Anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 44th ed. Elsevier, London 2021.
  26. Sussmann AR. Congenital bilateral absence of the semimembranosus muscles. Skeletal Radiol. 2019; 48(10): 1651–1655.
  27. Szpinda M. Anatomia prawidłowa człowieka. vol. 1. Edra Urban & Partner, Wrocław 2022.
  28. Szpinda M, Paruszewska-Achtel M, Dąbrowska M, et al. The normal growth of the biceps brachii muscle in human fetuses. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2013; 22(1): 17–26.
  29. Szpinda M, Wiśniewski M, Rolka Ł. The biceps femoris muscle in human fetuses — a morphometric, digital and statistical study. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2011; 20(5): 575–582.
  30. Tubbs RS, Caycedo FJ, Oakes WJ, et al. Descriptive anatomy of the insertion of the biceps femoris muscle. Clin Anat. 2006; 19(6): 517–521.
  31. Weschenfelder W, Lindner R, Spiegel C, et al. Desmoid tumor of the popliteal fossa during pregnancy. Case Rep Surg. 2015; 2015: 262654.
  32. Yıldız S, Kocabıyık N, Çilingiroğlu S, et al. Morphometry of plantaris muscle in human fetuses. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi. 2011; 53(3): 149–153.