Online first
Original article
Published online: 2023-12-06

open access

Page views 253
Article views/downloads 268
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The complete anatomy of the prostatic artery: a meta-analysis based on 7421 arteries with implications for embolization and urological procedures

Kyrylo Shafarenko12, Michał Bonczar12, Patryk Ostrowski12, Mateusz Michalczak12, Jerzy Walocha12, Mateusz Koziej12
Pubmed: 38078735

Abstract

Background: The goal of the present meta-analysis was to offer physicians the most evidence-based data concerning the anatomical characteristics of the prostatic artery (PA).

Materials and methods: Medical databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library were searched trough. The overall search process was performed in 3 stages.

Results: The results were established based on a total of 7421 arteries. PA was found to originate from an internal pudendal artery with a pooled prevalence of 28.81% (95% CI: 26.23% - 31.46%). Mean diameter of the PA was found to be 1.52 mm (SE = 0.07). . Single PA was found to occur in 76.43% of the patients (95% CI: 60.96% - 89.12%).

Conclusions: In conclusion, the authors of the present study believe that this is the most accurate and up-to-date analysis regarding the highly variable anatomy of the PA. The PA originates most commonly from the internal pudendal artery (28.81%); however, it may also originate from other pelvic arteries, including the middle anorectal or the superior gluteal arteries. Moreover, accessory PAs may occur, yet, a single main PA supplying the prostate gland is most frequently observed (76.43%). The PA may also form anastomoses with the adjacent arteries (pooled prevalence of 45.20%), which may create a complex vascular network in the pelvis. It is hoped that the current meta-analysis may help to decrease the potential complications that may emerge from diverse endovascular and urological procedures.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Amouyal G, Pellerin O, Del Giudice C, et al. Variants of patterns of intra- and extra-prostatic arterial distribution of the prostatic artery applied to prostatic artery embolization: proposal of a classification. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018; 41(11): 1664–1673.
  2. Anract J, Amouyal G, Peyromaure M, et al. Study of the intra-prostatic arterial anatomy and implications for arterial embolization of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prog Urol. 2019; 29(5): 263–269.
  3. de Assis AM, Moreira AM, de Paula Rodrigues VC, et al. Pelvic arterial anatomy relevant to prostatic artery embolisation and proposal for angiographic classification. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015; 38(4): 855–861.
  4. Bagla S, Rholl KS, Sterling KM, et al. Utility of cone-beam CT imaging in prostatic artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013; 24(11): 1603–1607.
  5. Barral M, Gardavaud F, Lassalle L, et al. Limiting radiation exposure during prostatic arteries embolization: influence of patient characteristics, anatomical conditions, and technical factors. Eur Radiol. 2021; 31(9): 6471–6479.
  6. Bilhim T, Pisco JM, Furtado A, et al. Prostatic arterial supply: demonstration by multirow detector angio CT and catheter angiography. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(5): 1119–1126.
  7. Bilhim T, Tinto HR, Fernandes L, et al. Radiological anatomy of prostatic arteries. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012; 15(4): 276–285.
  8. Boeken T, Gautier A, Moussa N, et al. Impact of anatomy type of prostatic artery on the number of catheters needed for prostatic artery embolization. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021; 102(3): 147–152.
  9. Çelebioğlu E, Akkaşoğlu S, Çalışkan S, et al. Evaluation of the prostatic artery origin using computed tomography angiography. Anatomy. 2019; 12(3): 140–144.
  10. Clegg EJ. The arterial supply of the human prostate and seminal vesicles. J Anat. 1955; 89(2): 209–216.
  11. D'Antoni AV, Tubbs RS, Patti AC, et al. The critical appraisal tool for anatomical meta-analysis: a framework for critically appraising anatomical meta-analyses. Clin Anat. 2022; 35(3): 323–331.
  12. Eldem FG, Atak F, Öcal O, et al. Angiographic prostatic arterial anatomy in a Turkish population with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Turk J Med Sci. 2021; 51(2): 518–522.
  13. Enderlein GF, Lehmann T, von Rundstedt FC, et al. Prostatic artery embolization — anatomic predictors of technical outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020; 31(3): 378–387.
  14. Fenter TC, Naslund MJ, Shah MB, et al. The cost of treating the 10 most prevalent diseases in men 50 years of age or older. Am J Manag Care. 2006; 12(4 Suppl): S90–S98.
  15. Fu JX, Wang M, Duan F, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the identification of prostatic arterial anatomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Clin Radiol. 2023; 78(3): e169–e176.
  16. Garcia-Monaco RD, Garategui LG, Onorati MV, et al. Human cadaveric specimen study of the prostatic arterial anatomy: implications for arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014; 25(2): 315–322.
  17. Garcia-Monaco RD, Garategui LG, Onorati MV, et al. Cadaveric specimen study of prostate microvasculature: implications for arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019; 30(9): 1471–1479.e3.
  18. Groh A, Moore C, El-Warrak A, et al. Electroejaculation functions primarily by direct activation of pelvic musculature: Perspectives from a porcine model. Transl Res Anat. 2018; 10: 10–17.
  19. Hashem E, Elsobky S, Khalifa M. Prostate artery embolization for benign prostate hyperplasia review: patient selection, outcomes, and technique. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2020; 41(4): 357–365.
  20. Henry BM, Tomaszewski KA, Walocha JA. Methods of evidence-based anatomy: a guide to conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of anatomical studies. Ann Anat. 2016; 205: 16–21.
  21. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J. et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken 2019.
  22. Iwanaga J, Singh V, Takeda S, et al. Acknowledging the use of human cadaveric tissues in research papers: Recommendations from anatomical journal editors. Clin Anat. 2021; 34(1): 2–4.
  23. Khan R, Naidoo N, Lazarus L. Unique vascular patterns of the internal iliac artery and its clinical import in pelvic surgery. Transl Res Anat. 2021; 25: 100151.
  24. Knight GM, Talwar A, Salem R, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing prostatic artery embolization to gold-standard transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021; 44(2): 183–193.
  25. Kurbatov D, Russo GI, Lepetukhin A, et al. Prostatic artery embolization for prostate volume greater than 80 cm3: results from a single-center prospective study. Urology. 2014; 84(2): 400–404.
  26. Maclean D, Maher B, Harris M, et al. Planning prostate artery embolisation: is it essential to perform a pre-procedural CTA? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018; 41(4): 628–632.
  27. Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur A. Clinically oriented anatomy (8th ed). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2017.
  28. Moulin B, Di Primio M, Vignaux O, et al. Prostate artery embolization: challenges, tips, tricks, and perspectives. J Pers Med. 2022; 13(1).
  29. Moya C, Cuesta J, Friera A, et al. Cadaveric and radiologic study of the anatomical variations of the prostatic arteries: A review of the literature and a new classification proposal with application to prostatectomy. Clin Anat. 2017; 30(1): 71–80.
  30. Nehra A, Kumar R, Ramakumar S, et al. Pharmacoangiographic evidence of the presence and anatomical dominance of accessory pudendal artery(s). J Urol. 2008; 179(6): 2317–2320.
  31. Ogawa Y, Hinata N, Murakami G, et al. Aspects of lymphatic vessel configuration of the human male urinary bladder and adjacent organs: A histological basis for understanding the spread of cancer metastases. Transl Res Anat. 2018; 11: 10–17.
  32. Ongidi I, Amuti TM, Abdulsalaam FY, et al. Variability in morphology and branching of the internal iliac artery: Implications for pelvic surgery. Transl Res Anat. 2021; 22: 100097.
  33. Ostrowski P, Bonczar M, Michalczak M, et al. The anatomy of the uterine artery: A meta-analysis with implications for gynecological procedures. Clin Anat. 2023; 36(3): 457–464.
  34. Schnapauff D, Maxeiner A, Wieners G, et al. Semi-automatic prostatic artery detection using cone-beam CT during prostatic arterial embolization. Acta Radiol. 2020; 61(8): 1116–1124.
  35. Secin FP, Karanikolas N, Kuroiwa K, et al. Anatomy of accessory pudendal arteries in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005; 174(2): 523–6; discussion 526.
  36. Secin FP, Touijer K, Mulhall J, et al. Anatomy and preservation of accessory pudendal arteries in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007; 51(5): 1229–1235.
  37. Wang MQ, Duan F, Yuan K, et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: cone-beam CT in conjunction with DSA for identifying prostatic arterial anatomy. Radiology. 2017; 282(1): 271–280.
  38. Xu ZW, Zhou CG, Tian W, et al. Angiographic findings relevant to prostatic artery embolization in patients with prostate cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020; 31(6): 899–902.e1.
  39. Xuan HN, Huy HDo, Bich NN, et al. Anatomical characteristics and variants of prostatic artery in patients of benign hyperplasia prostate by digital subtraction angiography. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019; 7(24): 4204–4208.
  40. Zarzecki MP, Ostrowski P, Wałęga P, et al. The middle anorectal artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 880 patients/1905 pelvic sides. Clin Anat. 2022; 35(7): 934–945.
  41. Zelefsky MJ, Eid JF. Elucidating the etiology of erectile dysfunction after definitive therapy for prostatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998; 40(1): 129–133.
  42. Zhang G, Wang M, Duan F, et al. Radiological Findings of Prostatic Arterial Anatomy for Prostatic Arterial Embolization: Preliminary Study in 55 Chinese Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7): e0132678.
  43. Zhang JL, Wang MQ, Shen YG, et al. Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for visualization of the prostatic artery prior to prostatic arterial embolization. Radiology. 2019; 291(2): 370–378.