Online first
Original article
Published online: 2024-04-03

open access

Page views 360
Article views/downloads 274
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The morphological variability of the piriformis muscle

Łukasz Olewnik1, Nicol Zielinska1, Kacper Ruzik1, Michał Podgórski2, Krzysztof Koptas1, Piotr Karauda1, Adrian Balcerzak1, Bartosz Gonera1, Richard Shane Tubbs345678
Pubmed: 38567936

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study is to create several classifications of the piriformis muscle (PM): proximal and distal attachments, potential fusions, and the relationship with the sciatic nerve. It is the first comprehensive anatomical examination of this subject. Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty-four lower limbs from 62 cadavers, fixed in 10% formalin, were examined. Results: The piriformis muscle was present in 120 limbs (96.8% of cases). Four types of proximal attachment were described (I–IV). The most common type was Type I, in which the proximal attachment was at the anterior surface of the sacrum, between S2 and S4 (52 lower limbs; 43.3%). The rarest type was Type IV, in which the proximal attachment was at the gluteal surface of the ilium near the margin of the greater sciatic notch and from the gluteus medius (12 cases; 10%). Three types of distal attachment were distinguished. The most common was Type 1, a single tendon. This type comprised two subtypes: A and B (105 lower limbs; 87.5%). The other two types accounted for 12.5% of the total. Fusions were noted between the piriformis muscle and adjacent muscles in 31.7%. Four patterns were observed in which the sciatic nerve ran against the piriformis muscle. The most common variation in the relationship was the common fibular nerve exiting superior to the piriformis muscle and the tibial nerve passing inferior to it (10 cases; 8.3%). Conclusions: The piriformis muscle is highly morphologically variable in both its proximal and distal attachments and its relationship with the sciatic nerve. There are four types of proximal attachment and three types of distal attachment. The piriformis muscle shows numerous fusions with its adjacent muscles: gluteus medius or minimus or superior gemellus. A new (fourth) type of relationship was demonstrated between the piriformis muscle and sciatic nerve. The piriformis muscle was absent in four cases.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Akita K, Sakamoto H, Sato T. Arrangement and innervation of the glutei medius and minimus and the piriformis: a morphological analysis. Anat Rec. 1994; 238(1): 125–130.
  2. Anson B. An Atlas of Human Anatomy. Saunders Company, Philadelphia 1963.
  3. Bardeen CR. Development and variation of the nerves and the musculature of the inferior extremity and of the neighboring regions of the trunk in man. Am J Anat. 2005; 6(1): 259–390.
  4. Bardeen C. Studies of the development of the human skeleton. Am J Anat. 1905; 4: 265–302.
  5. Beaton LE, Anson B. The relation of the sciatic nerve and of its subdivisions to the piriformis muscle. Anat Rec. 2005; 70(1): 1–5.
  6. Bergman R, Afifi A, Miyauchi R. Illustrated encyclopedia of human anatomic variations. Anatomy Atlas [online], 2006.
  7. Bergman R, Thompson S, Afifi A, Saadeh F. Compendium of human anatomic variation. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore 2018.
  8. Brenner E, Tripoli M, Scavo E, et al. Case report: absence of the right piriformis muscle in a woman. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019; 41(7): 845–848.
  9. Calori L. Memorie Della Academia Della Scienze Dell’Instituto Di Bologna. Tipografia Gamberini E Parmeggiani, Bologna 1866.
  10. Chiba S. Multiple positional relationships of nerves arising from the sacral plexus to the piriformis muscle in humans. Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1992; 67(6): 691–724.
  11. Le Double AF. Traité des Variations du Systéme Musculaire de l’homme et de leur Signification au Point de Vue de l’Anthropologie Zoologique. Schleicher freres ED, Paris 1897.
  12. Drake R, Vogl A, Mitchell AWM. Gray’s basic anatomy. Elsevier, Edinburgh 2012.
  13. Duda G, Brand D, Freitag S, et al. Variability of femoral muscle attachments. J Biomech. 1996; 29(9): 1185–1190.
  14. Flack NA, Nicholson HD, Woodley SJ. The anatomy of the hip abductor muscles. Clin Anat. 2014; 27(2): 241–253.
  15. Frazer E. The insertion of the pyriformis and obturator internus, and formation of the posterior circular capsular fibers and upper retinaculum of Weitbrecht. J Anat Physiol. 1904; 38: 170–185.
  16. Grafekberg E. Die Entwieklung der mensehl. Beckenmuskulatur. Anat Hefte. 1904; 23.
  17. Haładaj R, Pingot M, Polguj M, et al. Anthropometric study of the piriformis muscle and sciatic nerve: a morphological analysis in a polish population. Med Sci Monit. 2015; 21: 3760–3768.
  18. Knott J. Muscular anomalies, including those of the diaphragm, and subdiapgramtic regions of the human body. Proc R Ir Acad. 1883; 3: 627–641.
  19. MacAlister A. Observations on the mucular variations in the human anatomy. Third series with a catalogue of the principal muscular variations hitherto published.”. Trans Rov Irish Acad Sci. 1875; 25: 1–134.
  20. Machado FA, Babinski MA, Brasil FB, et al. Variaciones anatómicas entre el nervio isquiático y el músculo piriforme durante el período fetal humano. Int J Morphol. 2003; 21(1).
  21. Mbaka G, Osinubi A. Morphometric study of sciatic nerve and its topographic anatomical variations in relation to landmark structures around pelvis: a Nigerian population study. Folia Morphol. 2022; 81(1): 44–51.
  22. Natsis K, Totlis T, Konstantinidis GA, et al. Anatomical variations between the sciatic nerve and the piriformis muscle: a contribution to surgical anatomy in piriformis syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36(3): 273–280.
  23. Ogeng’O JA, El-Busaidy H, Mwika PM, et al. Variant anatomy of sciatic nerve in a black Kenyan population. Folia Morphol. 2011; 70(3): 175–179.
  24. Okraszewska E, Migdalski Ł, Jȩdrzejewski KS, et al. Sciatic nerve variations in some studies on the polish population and its statistical significance. Folia Morphol. 2002; 61(4): 277–282.
  25. Olewnik Ł, Gonera B, Podgórski M, et al. A proposal for a new classification of pes anserinus morphology. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27(9): 2984–2993.
  26. Olewnik Ł, Karauda P, Gonera B, et al. Impact of plantaris ligamentous tendon. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1): 4550.
  27. Pokorný D, Jahoda D, Veigl D, et al. Topographic variations of the relationship of the sciatic nerve and the piriformis muscle and its relevance to palsy after total hip arthroplasty. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006; 28(1): 88–91.
  28. Prasad AM, Nayak BS, Deepthinath R. Clinically important variations in the lower limb — a case report. Eur J Anat. 2005; 9(3): 167–169.
  29. Ravindranath Y, Manjunath KY, Ravindranath R. Accessory origin of the piriformis muscle. Singapore Med. J. 2008; 49(8): 18756338.
  30. Roche JJW, Jones CDS, Khan RJK, et al. The surgical anatomy of the piriformis tendon, with particular reference to total hip replacement: a cadaver study. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(6): 764–769.
  31. Testut L. Les anomalies musculaires chez l’ Homme, expliquées par la anatomie comparée. Leur importance en anthropologie. G. Masson, Paris 1884.
  32. Windisch G, Braun EM, Anderhuber F. Piriformis muscle: clinical anatomy and consideration of the piriformis syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007; 29(1): 37–45.