Online first
Original article
Published online: 2023-11-08

open access

Page views 298
Article views/downloads 241
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The complete anatomy of the mandibular lingula: a meta-analysis with clinical implications

Kinga Glądys1, Patryk Ostrowski12, Michał Bonczar12, Maria Kwiecińska1, Jakub Gliwa1, Ameen Nasser1, Kamil Możdżeń1, Mateusz Trzeciak1, Iwona Gregorczyk-Maga3, Agata Musiał1, Marcin Lipski1, Jerzy Walocha12, Mateusz Koziej12
Pubmed: 37957933

Abstract

Background: The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the anatomical variations of the mandibular lingula (ML) and its relationship to surrounding anatomical structures. Understanding such variations is crucial to help determine the site and depth of a successful inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) anesthetic block as well as a safe area for oral and maxillofacial invasive procedures in order to minimize the risk of neurological or hematological damage to the inferior alveolar nerve. Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted in which all studies were searched on the anatomy of ML. Major medical databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library were searched. Results: All of the results were based on a total of 4694 subjects. The overall height of the ML was found to be 8.17 mm (SE =0.22). The Triangular Type of the ML was found to be the most common one. The pooled prevalence of this variation was found to be 29.33% (LCI = 23.57% ; HCI = 35.24%). The pooled prevalence of the Nodular Type was set to be 27.99% (LCI = 22.64% ; HCI = 33.67%). Conclusions: The present meta-analysis provides clinically relevant information regarding the shape, location, and height variations of the ML. Understanding such variations of the ML is crucial when performing malocclusion corrections procedures that require the ML as a landmark, namely sagittal split ramus osteotomy, and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Furthermore, effective anesthetic blocks during oral and maxillofacial procedures can be accomplished with a higher success rate if the correct site of injection is identified. The possible locations of the ML should be considered in order to determine the location of the mandibular foramen and, therefore, inferior alveolar bundle in order to prevent motor, sensory, or perfusion pathology during maxillofacial and oral procedures of the lower jaw. 

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Ahn BS, Oh S, Heo CK, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography of mandibular foramen and lingula for mandibular anesthesia. Imaging Sci Dent. 2020; 50(2): 125.
  2. Akcay H, Kalabalık F, Tatar B, et al. Location of the mandibular lingula: Comparison of skeletal Class I and Class III patients in relation to ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomography. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 120(6): 504–508.
  3. Aljamani S, Youngson C, Jarad F, et al. Development of a method to clinically identify the position of the lingual nerve relative to the third molar region. Transl Res Anat. 2020; 19: 100069.
  4. Alves N, Deana N. Morphological study of the lingula in adult human mandibles of brazilians individuals and clinical implications. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 1–7.
  5. Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S, Jansisyanont P, et al. The study of position of antilingula, midwaist of mandibular ramus and midpoint between coronoid process and gonion in relation to lingula of 92 Thai dried mandibles as potential surgical landmarks for vertical ramus osteotomy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010; 33(4): 337–343.
  6. Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S, Jansisyanont P. Alternative landmarks of the mandibular foramen to prevent nerve injury during ramus surgery. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015; 98: 574–81.
  7. ArunKumar G, Chinagudi M, Bhagyashree MP, et al. The morphology and location of the mandibular lingula in south indian population using cone-beam computed tomography-a retro-sectional study. Int J Curr Res. 2016; 8(3): 28466–28469.
  8. Asdullah M, Ansari A, Khan M, et al. Morphological variations of lingula and prevalence of accessory mandibular foramina in mandibles: A study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 9(2): 129–133.
  9. Assis FP, Sudhakar AS, C R, et al. Varying shapes of lingula and its prevalence in dry adult human mandible. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2019; 6(2): 224–228.
  10. Chenna D, Hosapatna M, D’Souza AS, et al. Lingula and antilingula as anatomic reference points for ramus osteotomies. Int J Dent Sci Res. 2014; 3(1): 1–3.
  11. Choi DY, Hur MS. Anatomical review of the mandibular lingula for inferior alveolar nerve block. Folia Morphol. 2021; 80(4): 786–791.
  12. D'Antoni AV, Tubbs R, Patti A, et al. The critical appraisal tool for anatomical meta‐analysis: a framework for critically appraising anatomical meta‐analyses. Clin Anat. 2022; 35(3): 323–331.
  13. Devi R, Arna N, Manjunath KY. Balasubramanyam Incidence of morphological variants of mandibular lingula. Indian J Dent Res. 2003; 14(4): 210–213.
  14. Direk F, Uysal I, Kivrak A, et al. Reevaluation of mandibular morphometry according to age, gender, and side. J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 29(4): 1054–1059.
  15. Durgesh V, Rani.Ch R. A study of the shapes of mandibular lingula in North Coastal Andhra Pradesh. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2016; 15(09): 96–98.
  16. Fabian FM. Observation of the position of the lingula in relation to the mandibular foramen and the mylohyoid groove. Ital J Anat Embryol. 2006; 111(3): 151–158.
  17. Findik Y, Yildirim D, Baykul T. Three-dimensional anatomic analysis of the lingula and mandibular foramen. J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25(2): 607–610.
  18. Gupta S, Pandey K. Morphological analysis of the lingula in dry mandibles of individuals in North India. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2014; 13(1): 04–06.
  19. Henry B, Tomaszewski K, Ramakrishnan P, et al. Development of the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) Tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta‐analyses and systematic reviews. Clin Anat. 2016; 30(1): 6–13.
  20. Henry B, Tomaszewski K, Walocha J. Methods of Evidence-Based Anatomy: a guide to conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis of anatomical studies. Ann Anat — Anat Anz. 2016; 205: 16–21.
  21. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester 2019.
  22. Hosapatna M, Ankolekar V, D’Souza A, et al. The study of antilingula and its relation to the lingula and mandibular foramen, the presence of mylohyoid bridging in dry mandibles of south indian population. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014; 14(2): 308–311.
  23. Hsiao SY, Hsu KJ, Liang SW, et al. The presence probability of mandibular lingla and antilingula. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 121(6): 621–625.
  24. Hsu KJ, Lee HN, Chen CM. Morphological investigation of mandibular lingula: a literature review. J Pers Med. 2022; 12(6): 1015.
  25. Hsu KJ, Tseng YC, Liang SW, et al. Dimension and location of the mandibular lingula: comparisons of gender and skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020: 1–6.
  26. Huang CY, Liao YF. Anatomical position of the mandibular canal in relation to the buccal cortical bone in Chinese patients with different dentofacial relationships. J Formos Med Assoc. 2016; 115(11): 981–990.
  27. Jang HY, Han SJ. Measurement of mandibular lingula location using cone-beam computed tomography and internal oblique ridge-guided inferior alveolar nerve block. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 45(3): 158.
  28. Jansisyanont P, Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S. Shape, height, and location of the lingula for sagittal ramus osteotomy in Thais. Clin Anat. 2009; 22(7): 787–793.
  29. Jung S, Yun H, Chung C, et al. A computed tomography-based analysis of the structure of the mandible according to age and sex. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2022; 23(3): 103–110.
  30. Jung YH, Cho BH, Hwang J. Location and shape of the mandibular lingula: Comparison of skeletal class I and class III patients using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2018; 48(3): 185.
  31. Kim HJ, Lee HY, Chung InH, et al. Mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split ramus osteotomy in Koreans. Yonsei Med J. 1997; 38(1): 19.
  32. Kositbowornchai S, Siritapetawee M, Damrongrungruang T, et al. Shape of the lingula and its localization by panoramic radiograph versus dry mandibular measurement. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007; 29(8): 689–694.
  33. Kronseder K, Runte C, Kleinheinz J, et al. Distribution of bone thickness in the human mandibular ramus — a CBCT-based study. Head Face Med. 2020; 16(1): 13.
  34. Lima F, Neto OBO, Barbosa FT, et al. Location, shape and anatomic relations of the mandibular foramen and the mandibular lingula: a contribution to surgical procedures in the ramus of the mandible. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 20(2): 177–182.
  35. Lopes PTC, Pereira GAM, Santos AM. Morphological analysis of the lingula in dry mandibles of individuals in Southern Brazil. J Morphol Sci. 2010; 27: 136–138.
  36. Lupi S, Landini J, Olivieri G, et al. Correlation between the mandibular lingula position and some anatomical landmarks in cone beam CT. Healthcare. 2021; 9(12): 1747.
  37. Madiraju G, Mohan R. Morphological analysis of the mandibular lingula and its relation to antilingula using cone-beam computed tomography in the Saudi population. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(3): 419.
  38. Modasiya U, Kanani SD. Study of the lingula in dry human mandibles and its clinical significance. Int J Anat Res. 2018; 6(2.2): 5218–5221.
  39. Monnazzi MS, Passeri LA, Gabrielli M, et al. Anatomic study of the mandibular foramen, lingula and antilingula in dry mandibles, and its statistical relationship between the true lingula and the antilingula. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41(1): 74–78.
  40. Murlimanju BV, Prabhu LV, Pai MM, et al. Morphological study of lingula of the mandibles in South Indian population. Morphologie. 2012; 96(312): 16–20.
  41. Nirmale V, Mane U, Sukre S, et al. Morphological features of human mandible. IJRTSAT. 2012; 3(2): 38–43.
  42. Özalp Ö, Salım H, Bilgin B, et al. Morphologic and morphometric analysis of mandibular lingula. Anatomy. 2020; 14(1): 16–221.
  43. Padmavathi G, Varalakshmi K, Suman T, et al. Morphological and morphometric study of the lingula in dry adult human mandibles of south indian origin and its clinical significance. Int J Health Sci Res. 2014; 4: 56–61.
  44. Park J, Jung HD, Kim H, et al. Anatomical study of the location of the antilingula, lingula, and mandibular foramen for vertical ramus osteotomy. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 40(1).
  45. Rikhotso RE, Munsamy C. A morphological study of the lingula in South Africans in relation to sagittal split osteotomy. S Afr Dent J. 2017; 72(9).
  46. Samanta P, Kharb P. Morphological analysis of the lingula in dry adult human mandibles of north Indian population. J Craniomaxillofac Dis. 2012; 1(1): 7.
  47. Sanmugam KA. Study of Morphological Variation of Lingula and Coronoid Process of Adult Human Dry Mandibles. J Pharm Sci Res. 2015; 7: 1017–1020.
  48. Sekerci A, Sahman H. Cone beam computed tomographic analyses of the position and course of the mandibular canal: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 1–11.
  49. Sekerci A, Sisman Y. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the shape, height, and location of the mandibular lingula. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013; 36(2): 155–162.
  50. Senel B, Ozkan A, Altug HA. Morphological evaluation of the mandibular lingula using cone-beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol. 2015; 74(4): 497–502.
  51. Sinanoglu A, Seki U, Tokuc B. A detailed radiomorphometric analysis of the mandibular foramen, lingula and anti-lingula with a special emphasis on mandibular prognathism. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023; 124(1): 101260.
  52. Smith BR, Rajchel J, Waite D, et al. Mandibular ramus anatomy as it relates to the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991; 49(2): 112–116.
  53. Sophia D, Anupriya D, Kalpana D, et al. A Morphometric and Morphological Study of mandibular lingula and its Clinical Significance. Int J Med Res Rev. 2015; 3(2): 141–148.
  54. Srimani P, Goswami B, Mazumdar S. Morphologic and morphometric analysis of lingula in localizing mandibular foramen with its surgical importance. Int J Anat Radiol Surg. 2017; 6: A001–A006.
  55. Stipo AR, Bertoglio B, Biehler-Gomez L, et al. Morphological analysis of lingula shape in a modern Italian cemeterial population: Clinical and forensic considerations. Leg Med. 2022; 55: 102027.
  56. Tuli A, Choudhry R, Choudhry S, et al. Variation in shape of the lingula in the adult human mandible. J Anat. 2002; 197(2): 313–317.
  57. Varma CL, Sameer P. Morphological variations of lingula in south indian mandibles. Res Rev J Med Health Sci. 2013; 2: 31–34.
  58. Woo SS, Cho JY, Park WH. A study of mandibular anatomy for orthognathic surgery in Koreans. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 28: 126–131.
  59. Yeh A, Finn B, Jones R, et al. The variable position of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) in the mandibular ramus: a computed tomography (CT) study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018; 40(6): 653–665.
  60. Zhao K, Zhang Bo, Hou Y, et al. Imaging study on relationship between the location of lingula and the Gonial angle in a Chinese population. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019; 41(4): 455–460.
  61. Zhou C, Jeon TH, Jun SH, et al. Evaluation of mandibular lingula and foramen location using 3-dimensional mandible models reconstructed by cone-beam computed tomography. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 39(1).