Online first
Original article
Published online: 2023-09-07

open access

Page views 331
Article views/downloads 425
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Reappraisal of the variational anatomy of the vermiform appendix and their possible clinical applicability: a cadaveric analysis

Apurba Patra1, Harsimarjit Kaur2, Usha Chhabra2, Adil Sghar3, Krzysztof Balawender4, Artur Pasternak5, Jerzy A. Walocha5
Pubmed: 37691509

Abstract

Background: The anatomical variations in the position, length, arterial supply and extension of mesoappendix of the vermiform appendix (VA) are pivotal to establishing a standard pattern in the study population of known ethnicity and their clinical applicability.

Materials and methods: The present study was conducted on 47 adult human cadavers, thirty-five males and twelve female subjects of North Indian ethnicity.

Results: Retrocaecal appendix was found in 23 cases (48.9%) followed by pelvic in 13 (27.7%), three cases each of pre-ileal, post-ileal, and promontoric (6.4%), one case (2.1%) each of paracaecal and subcaecal reported. The length of VA varied from three to ten centimetres, averaging about 7.37±1.67 cm, both the shortest (2.9 cm) (female) and longest (10 cm) (male) were of retrocaecal type. The main appendicular artery (MAA) showed a widely varied branching pattern within the mesoappendix, ranging from three to seven. Fourteen cases (29.78%) showed the accessory appendicular artery (AAA) or dual arterial supply, arising from the ileocolic artery in ten (21%) and in four from the post-caecal (9%). In the specimens with dual arterial supply, the estimated portions of the VA supplied by the MAA also vary with distal ¾th being supplied in 57.14%. In ten cases (21%), the mesoappendix failed to reach the tip of the VF.

Conclusions: Knowledge of anatomical diversities in position, length, course, arterial supply, branching pattern, and mesoappendix is potentially crucial in avoiding surgical catastrophes. Atypical positions of the organ can cause diagnostic confusion and result in delayed treatment. VF supplied by an end artery is one of the causes of the occurrence of appendicitis and mesoappendix not reaching the tip making the organ more vulnerable to necrosis. Vascular variations and anomalies involving the main or accessory appendicular artery are critical to prevent haemorrhage or faulty ligatures.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Ahmed I, Asgeirsson KS, Beckingham IJ, et al. The position of the vermiform appendix at laparoscopy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007; 29(2): 165–168.
  2. Ajmani ML, Ajmani K. The position, length and arterial supply of vermiform appendix. Anat Anz. 1983; 153(4): 369–374.
  3. Anderson RE, Houganer A, Thalin AJD. Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patients and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg. 1992; 158: 37–41.
  4. Bakheit MA, Warille AA. Anomalies of the vermiform appendix and prevalence of acute appendicitis in Khartoum. East Afr Med J. 1999; 76(6): 338–340.
  5. Beaton A, Swigart J. Quoted by BJ Anson and WG Maddock in Callender's. Surgical Anatomy. Saunders, Philadelphia 1953.
  6. Bhasin SK, Khan AB, Sharma VS, et al. Vermiform appendix and acute appendicitis. JK Science J. 2007; 9(4): 167–170.
  7. Bruce J, Walmsley R, Ross JA. Manual of Surgical Anatomy. E. and S. Livingstone, Edinburgh and London 1964: 377.
  8. Chaisiwamongkol K, Chantaupalee T, Techataweewan N, et al. Position variation of vermiform appendix in northeast Thai cadavers. Srinagarind Med J. 2010; 25(3): 250–255.
  9. Clegg-Lamptey JNA, Armah H, Naaeder SB, et al. Position and susceptibility to inflammation of vermiform appendix in Accra, Ghana. East Afr Med J. 2006; 83(12): 670–673.
  10. Corzo EG, Forero EL, Amaya L, et al. Anatomical position and length in mixed population of Bucaramanga. Med UNAB. 2009; 12: 116–120.
  11. Courtney MT. Sabiston: tratado de cirurgia. 17th ed. Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro 2005.
  12. Davis L. Christopher’s Textbook of Surgery. 8th ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia and London 1964: 679.
  13. Garis CDe. Topography and development of the cecum-appendix. Ann Surg. 1941; 113(4): 540–548.
  14. Delić J, Savković A, Isaković E. [Variations in the position and point of origin of the vermiform appendix]. Med Arh. 2002; 56(1): 5–8.
  15. Geethanjali HT, Subhash LPA. A study of variations in the position of vermiform appendix. Anatomica Karnataka. 2011; 5(2): 17–23.
  16. Golalipur MJ, Arya B, Azarhoosh R, et al. Anatomical variations of vermiform appendix in South East Caspian sea [Gorgaon – Iran]. J. Anat Soc Ind. 2003; 52(2): 141–3.
  17. Herrinton JL. The Vermiform Appendix: Its surgical history. Contemp Surg. 1991; 39: 36–44.
  18. Hollinshead WH. Anatomy for Surgeons: The Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis, vol. 2. London, Cassel 1956: 501.
  19. Hosmani V, Halasagi SS, Shakuntala R, et al. A study of arterial supply of vermiform appendix in humans. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2012; 1(5): 807–810.
  20. Iqbal T, Amanullah A, Nawaz R. Pattern and positions of vermiform appendix in people of bannu district. Gomal J Med Sci. 2012; 10: 100–3.
  21. Katzarski M, Gopal Rao UK, Brady K. Blood supply and position of the vermiform appendix in Zambians. Med J Zambia. 1979; 13(2): 32–34.
  22. Koster H, Weintrob M. The blood supply to the appendix. Archs Surg. 1928; 17(4): 577.
  23. Maingot R. Postgraduate surgery, vol. 1. D. Appleton CenturyCo.; 1938.
  24. Mwachaka P, El-Busaidy H, Sinkeet S, et al. Variations in the position and length of the vermiform appendix in a black kenyan population. ISRN Anat. 2014; 2014: 871048.
  25. Naguib N. Simple technique for laparoscopic appendicectomy to ensure safe division of the mesoappendix. Scand J Surg. 2014; 103(1): 73–74.
  26. Nelikanti JP, Kala M, Chadaram BK, et al. Study of suprior mesentric artery and blood supply of caecum and appendix in dead fetuses. Int J Pharm Med Res. 2015; 3(2): 23–30.
  27. Ojeifo JO, Ejiwunmi AB, Iklaki J. The position of the vermiform appendix in Nigerians with a review of the literature. West Afr J Med. 1989; 8(3): 198–204.
  28. Nigah S, Patra A, Chumber S. Analysis of the variations in the colic branching pattern of the superior mesenteric artery: a cadaveric study with proposal to modify its current anatomical classification. Cureus. 2022; 14(5): e25025.
  29. Pityński K, Skawina A, Gorczyca J, et al. Arterial vascularization of the vermiform appendix in human fetus. Folia Morphol. 1992; 51(2): 159–164.
  30. Rahman MM, Khalil M, Rahman H, et al. Anatomical positions of vermiform appendix in Bangladeshi people. J Bangladesh Soc Physiol. 2006; 1: 5–9.
  31. Rahman M, Khalil M, Khalil M, et al. Length of human vermiform appendix in Bangladeshi people. J Bangladesh Soc Physiol. 2007; 2: 13–16.
  32. Rahman MM, Khalil M, Sultana SZ, et al. Extent of meso appendix in Bangladeshi people. J Bangladesh Soc Physiol. 2009; 4(1): 20–23.
  33. Rains AJ, Capper WM, Charnley J. et al. The vermiform aendix. In: Williams N, Bulstrode CJK, O'Connell PR. ed. Bailey and Loves short ractice of surgery. 3rd ed. H.K Lewis and Co. Ltd, London 1965: 987–995.
  34. Rait JS, McGillicuddy J, Ajzajian J. Appendiceal neoplasms and histological involvement of the mesoappendix: A case series. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020; 56: 64–67.
  35. Robinson JO. Surgery 1st ed. London, Longmans, Green 1965: 227.
  36. Seshachalam T, Gorur SR. The arterial supply of the appendix: from the Department of Anatomy, University Medical College, Mysore. Ind Med Gaz. 1930; 65(12): 693–694.
  37. Scott GB. The primate caecum and appendix vermiformis: a comparative study. J Anat. 1980; 131(Pt 3): 549–563.
  38. Shah MA, Shah M. The position of the vermiform appendix. Ind Med Gaz. 1945; 80(10): 494.
  39. Smith G. A statistical review of the variations in the anatomic positions of the caecum and the processus vermiformis in the infant. Anat Rec. 2005; 5(12): 549–556.
  40. Solanke TF. The blood supply of the vermiform appendix in Nigerians. 1968;102(Pt 2):353-61. J Anat. 1968; 102(pt 2): 353–361.
  41. Solanke TF. The position, length, and content of the vermiform appendix in Nigerians. Br J Surg. 1970; 57(2): 100–102.
  42. de Souza SC, da Costa SRMR, de Souza IGS. Vermiform appendix: positions and length — a study of 377 cases and literature review. J Coloproctol. 2021; 35(4): 212–216.
  43. Sumi SA, Sultana SZ, Mannan S, et al. Variations in the position of vermiform appendix in Bangladeshi people. Mymensingh Med J. 2019; 28(1): 54–59.
  44. Swathipriyadarshini C, Rajilarajendran H, Balaji T, et al. A comprehensive study of mesoappendix and arterial pattern of appendix. Turk J Surg. 2022; 38(1): 55–59.
  45. Tofighi H, Taghadosi-Nejad F, Abbaspour A, et al. The anatomical position of appendix in Iranian cadavers. Int J Med Toxicology and Forensic Med. 2013; 3(4): 126–30.
  46. Vandamme J, Bonte J. A new look at the blood supply of the ileocolic angle. Acta Anat. 1982; 113(1): 1–14.
  47. Vasantha K, Saraswathi GA. study of blood supply of vermiform appendix in human. Int J Life Sc Bt & Pharm Res. 2014; 3(2): 131–5.
  48. Wakely CPS. The position of the vermiform appendix as described by analysis of 10, 000 cases. J Anat. 1933; 67: 277–283.
  49. Williamson WA, Bush RD, Williams LF. Retrocecal appendicitis. Am J Surg. 1981; 141(4): 507–509.
  50. Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM. et al. Alimentary system. In: Gray H, Williams PL, Bannister LH. ed. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of medicine and surgery. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1995: 1775–1776.
  51. Zern JT. The apêndix: little, big trouble. Del Med Jrl. 1995; 67: 326–334.
  52. Żytkowski A, Tubbs R, Iwanaga J, et al. Anatomical normality and variability: historical perspective and methodological considerations. Transl Res Anat. 2021; 23: 100105.