Vol 83, No 2 (2024): Folia Morphologica
Original article
Published online: 2023-11-09

open access

Page views 312
Article views/downloads 240
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

A morphometric and morphological analysis of the foramen magnum, hypoglossal canal and occipital condyles in a select South African population

Seth Hendricks1, Sundika Ishwarkumar2, Pamela Pillay1
Pubmed: 37957931
Folia Morphol 2024;83(2):412-416.

Abstract

Background: The foramen magnum is a centralised structure found at the base of the skull. This orifice is a passageway that allows secondary structures, such as the medulla oblongata and meninges, to pass through. The occipital condyles
are small structures on either side of the foramen magnum, forming the craniovertebral joint. The hypoglossal canal is an orifice located on the occipital canal, providing a passageway for hypoglossal nerves. The study aimed to document
the morphology and morphometry of the foramen magnum, occipital condyles and hypoglossal canals within a South African population.

Materials and methods: Fifty skulls (n = 50) were randomly selected from the Department of Clinical Anatomy, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal. This study investigated the morphological and morphometric parameters of the foramen magnum, occipital condyles and hypoglossal canal. The morphometric parameters were measured using a digital Vernier calliper. The data was statistically analysed using SPSS, and a p-value of <0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Results: The mean length and width of the foramen magnum was found to be 35.19 mm and 27.77 mm, respectively. The mean index of the foramen magnum was 1.3, which indicated that the foramen magnum was predominantly oval-shaped within the selected sample. The occipital condyles have a mean length and width of 21.73 mm and 12.87 mm, respectively. Furthermore, the most prevalent shape of the occipital condyles was oval. The mean length and width of the hypoglossal canals were 5.14 mm and 3.87 mm, respectively. While the most prevalent shape of the hypoglossal canal was oval and round on the right and left sides, respectively.

Conclusions: The findings of this study may assist in reducing the risk of injury and mortalities during trans-condylar approach procedures.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Sengul G. Morphological analysis of occipital condyles and foramen magnum as a guide for lateral surgical approaches. MOJ Anat Physiol. 2017; 3(6): 188–194.
  2. Sharma A, Kaur R, Sharma MK. Foramen magnum: morphometry, possible variations in the shape and its clinical implication. Int J Sci Stud. 2019; 6(10): 13–16.
  3. Murshed KA, Cicekcibasi AE, Tuncer I. Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: A study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turk J Med Sci. 2003; 33(5): 301–306.
  4. Chethan P, Prakash KG, Murlimanju BV, et al. Morphological analysis and morphometry of the foramen magnum: an anatomical investigation. Turk Neurosurg. 2012; 22(4): 416–419.
  5. Zaidi SH, Dayal SS. Variations in the shape of foramen magnum in Indian skulls. Anat Anz. 1988; 167(4): 338–340.
  6. Farid SA, Fattah IOA. Morphometric study of human adult occipital condyle, hypoglossal canal and foramen magnum in dry skull of modern egyptians. IJCDA. 2018; 4(1): 19.
  7. Schwaber MK, Netterville JL, Maciunas R. Microsurgical anatomy of the lower skullbase — a morphometric analysis. Am J Otol. 1990; 11(6): 401–405.
  8. Bayat P, Bagheri M, Ghanbari A, et al. Characterization of occipital condyle and comparison of its dimensions with head and foramen magnum circumferences in dry skulls of iran. Int J Morphol. 2014; 32(2): 444–448.
  9. Muthukumar N, Swaminathan R, Venkatesh G, et al. A morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum region as it relates to the transcondylar approach. Acta Neurochir. 2005; 147(8): 889–895.
  10. Kizilkanat E, Boyan N, Soames R, et al. Morphometry of the hypoglossal canal, occipital condyle, and foramen magnum. Neurosurg Q. 2006; 16(3): 121–125.
  11. Pereira G, Lopes P, Santos A, et al. Morphometric analysis related to the transcondylar approach in dry skulls and computed tomography. Int J Morphol. 2012; 30(2): 399–404.
  12. Agnihotri G, Mahajan D, Sheth A. An anatomical perspective of human occipital condyles and foramen magnum with neurosurgical correlates. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2014; 3(17): 4497–4503.
  13. Refai D, Shin JH, Iannotti C, et al. Dorsal approaches to intradural extramedullary tumors of the craniovertebral junction. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2010; 1(1): 49–54.
  14. Ulcay T, Kamaşak B, Görgülü Ö, et al. A golden ratio for foramen magnum: an anatomical pilot study. Folia Morphol. 2022; 81(1): 220–226.