Vol 83, No 4 (2024): Folia Morphologica
Review article
Published online: 2024-04-03

open access

Page views 489
Article views/downloads 293
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The morphological variability of the pelvic girdle muscles: a potential trap during ultrasound

Marta Pośnik1, Nicol Zielinska2, Kacper Ruzik1, Łukasz Olewnik2
Pubmed: 38567935
Folia Morphol 2024;83(4):789-801.

Abstract

Background: The muscles present in the pelvic girdle compartment demonstrate clinically significant anatomical variation regarding both their site of attachment and additions, such as accessory heads, muscles, or tendinous slips. Many of those variations might be considered potential traps during ultrasound examination, which may result in misdiagnosis. The aim of this study was to raise awareness of such a possibility.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive search for morphological variations was performed in PubMed and NIH. Relevant papers were listed, and citation tracking was accomplished.

Results: Although several anatomical variations of pelvic girdle muscles have been presented, few studies have examined their relevance in ultrasound imaging.

Conclusions: The morphological variability of the pelvic girdle muscles does not vary from such incidence in other regions of the human body; however, further ultrasound studies are needed of the numerous morphological variants that can be found in this region.

REVIEW ARTICLE

Folia Morphol.

Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 789–801

DOI: 10.5603/fm.94434

Copyright © 2024 Via Medica

ISSN 0015–5659

eISSN 1644–3284

journals.viamedica.pl

The morphological variability of the pelvic girdle muscles: a potential trap during ultrasound

Marta Pośnik1Nicol Zielinska2Kacper Ruzik1Łukasz Olewnik2
1Department of Anatomical Dissection and Donation, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland
2Department of Clinical Anatomy, Masovian Academy in Plock, Płock, Poland

[Received: 27 February 2023; Accepted: 6 October 2023; Early publication date: 3 April 2024]

Address for correspondence: Łukasz Olewnik, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Anatomy, Masovian Academy in Plock, Plac Dąbrowskiego 2, 09–402 Płock, Poland; e-mail: lukaszolewnik@gmail.com

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.

Background: The muscles present in the pelvic girdle compartment demonstrate clinically significant anatomical variation regarding both their site of attachment and additions, such as accessory heads, muscles, or tendinous slips. Many of those variations might be considered potential traps during ultrasound examination, which may result in misdiagnosis. The aim of this study was to raise awareness of such a possibility.
Materials and methods: A comprehensive search for morphological variations was performed in PubMed and NIH. Relevant papers were listed, and citation tracking was accomplished.
Results: Although several anatomical variations of pelvic girdle muscles have been presented, few studies have examined their relevance in ultrasound imaging.
Conclusions: The morphological variability of the pelvic girdle muscles does not vary from such incidence in other regions of the human body; however, further ultrasound studies are needed of the numerous morphological variants that can be found in this region. (Folia Morphol 2024; 83, 4: 789–801)
Keywords: morphological variability, ultrasound, pelvic girdle, iliopsoas muscle complex, superficial gluteal muscles, deep gluteal muscles, iliacus muscle, psoas major, psoas minor, gluteal muscles, piriformis muscle, obturator internus muscle, superior gemellus muscle, inferior gemellus muscle, quadratus femoris muscle

INTRODUCTION

Numerous muscles in several compartments of the human body have been found to demonstrate anatomical variations [22, 35, 43, 44, 46, 58, 80], and these include the muscular part of the pelvic girdle, which can display additional muscles, anomalous heads, accessory tendinous slips or both unilateral and bilateral absence [6, 37, 61, 67]. As such variation is commonly associated with clinical conditions, there is a need to better understand their occurrence.

A diagnostic method finding increasing use among clinicians around the world is ultrasound imaging. This method is progressively used in musculoskeletal imaging because it shows muscles, tendons, and joints during movement, shows tendon clearly, can be used during invasive procedures, and is painless, non-invasive, cheaper, and easier to perform than MRI [36].

The aim of this review was to present some of many variations of the pelvic girdle muscles that might surprise clinicians during imaging by their diverse morphology. Descriptions of morphological variability of presented structures were assigned according to the most frequent nomenclature as parts of respective compartments — iliopsoas muscle complex, superficial gluteal muscles, and deep gluteal muscles.

ILIOPSOAS MUSCLE COMPLEX

Iliacus muscle and psoas major

The iliopsoas muscle complex, comprising the iliacus muscle and psoas major, is known as the strongest hip flexor. In some cases, the complex also includes the psoas minor (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Schematic drawing depicting iliopsoas muscle complex. Ilm — iliacus muscle; LT — lesser trochanter; Pma — psoas major; Pmi — psoas minor; Pmt — psoas major tendon; PB — pubic bone; QL — quadratus lumborum muscle.

The iliacus muscle is a triangular muscle with a vast origin from the superior two-thirds of the iliac fossa, as well as the inner lip of the iliac crest, lateral aspect of the sacrum, anterior sacroiliac ligament, and iliolumbar ligament, which inserts onto the lesser trochanter of the femur [40].

The psoas major fibrous origin can be divided into 2 groups: the anterior group including all anteromedial aspects of the lumbar discs and bodies except the disc between fifth lumbar/first sacral vertebrae, and the posterior group including all transverse processes of lumbar vertebrae [59]. Those sites of origin constitute individual fascicles that join and form a common tendon that inserts together with the iliacus tendon onto the lesser trochanter of the femur [59].

Numerous variations of both the iliacus muscle and psoas major have been reported. Aleksandrova et al. [2] introduced a 10-type classification of the iliacus muscle based on dissectional findings and extensive literature search, that considers accessory slips of both iliacus muscle, the psoas major, and their relation to the femoral nerve (FN). The mentioned types are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Classification of iliacus muscle conducted by Aleksandrova et al. [2].

Type

Description

Mentioned by

A

Partial agenesis — missing slips from the anterior and middle parts of the iliacus muscle, replaced by fibrous slip.

Aleksandrova et al. [2]

B

Complete separation of psoas major and iliacus muscle.

Le Double [14]

Kopsh et al. [34]

Macalister [39]

C

Complete fusion of iliacus muscle and psoas major with normal course of femoral nerve.

Fabrizio [18]

D

Additional, aberrant slips of higher origin, which can also include extremely rare psoas quartus and rare psoas tertius.

Clarkson and Rainy [11]

Tubbs et al. [70]

E

Presence of iliacus minor - detached portion of iliacus that arises from anterior inferior spine of the ilium with site of insertion onto anterior-trochanteric line, or ilio-capsularis, with a similar origin but different insertion, i.e. into the ilio-femoral ligament.

Babst et al. [7]

Ward et al. [76]

F

An iliacus muscle that consists of deep and superficial layers.

Macalister [39]

Jelev et al. [26]

G

Presence of large, aberrant, superficial slips of iliacus muscle.

Rao et al. [56]

H

Presence of one, large aberrant slip with femoral nerve that runs between the slip and iliacus.

D’Costa et al. [12]

I

Presence of two muscular slips with a split femoral nerve.

Jelev et al. [26]

J

Presence of a small muscular slip piercing through the femoral nerve.

Aleksandrova et al. [2]

The psoas tertius and psoas quartus are both quite rare. The latter, first described by Clarkson and Rainy [11], arises as a slip from the quadratus lumborum muscle and fifth lumbar vertebra transverse process, which fused with other psoas tendons at the inguinal ligament level. In the same cadaver, Clarkson and Rainy [11] reported the presence of a psoas tertius that arose from the 12th rib and first lumbar vertebra transverse process; this also fused with other psoas tendons at the level of the inguinal ligament. Tubbs et al. [70] also described a psoas quartus that arose from the third lumbar vertebra transverse process and the quadratus lumborum, and then fused with the psoas major and iliacus muscle via muscular fibres at the level of the inguinal ligament (Fig. 2). Wong et al. [79] found a multiple FN to be associated with the presence of the psoas quartus. In this case, the anomalous muscle originated only from the anteromedial surface of the quadratus lumborum muscle and fused with the psoas major tendon at the inguinal ligament level. However, a split FN was found, but due to the presence of the psoas tertius [28], in this case, the muscle variant arose from 12th rib and first lumbar vertebra transverse process, as noted by Clarkson and Rainy [11], but pierced the FN and joined the iliopsoas tendon. The psoas tertius and quartus match type D in the Aleksandrova et al. [2] classification.

Figure 2. Schematic drawing depicting psoas quartus. *Femoral nerve Pmt psoas major tendon PB pubic bone LT lesser trochanter. Ilm — iliacus muscle; Pma — psoas major; Pmi — psoas minor; PQ — psoas quartus; QL — quadratus lumborum muscle.

Jelev et al. [26] present a psoas major divided longitudinally into 3 parts: a superior part originating from the first lumbar vertebral body and the intervertebral disc between the first and second lumbar vertebrae, a middle part arising from the second and third intervertebral disc, and an inferior part originating from the third lumbar to third sacral lower borders of the vertebrae. In the same cadaver, Jelev et al. also reported the presence of an accessory iliopsoas muscle; this originated from the left transverse process of the third lumbar vertebra and from the intertransverse ligament between the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae, and inserted via a common tendon with an accessory iliacus muscle between the iliacus muscle and psoas major (Fig. 3). An accessory iliacus muscle arose from the middle third of the iliac crest and inserted as previously described [26]. This case was classified as type I in the classification by Aleksandrova et al. [2].

Figure 3. Schematic representation of the accessory iliopsoas muscle complex. *,**Divisions of the divided femoral nerve. aIlm — accessory iliacus muscle; aPma — accessory psoas major; Ilm — iliacus muscle; LT — lesser trochanter; PB — pubic bone; Pma — psoas major; Pmi — psoas minor; Pmt — psoas major tendon; QL — quadratus lumborum muscle.

Some studies have examined the muscular bundles of accessory iliopsoas muscle that cover the FN. Unat et al. [73] classified those into 2 main types based on dissections of 50 cadavers and distinguished a sheet muscle pattern (89.5%) and a slip muscle pattern (10.5%). A detailed description of the mentioned classification is provided in Table 2.

Table 2. Classification of the muscular bundles of accessory iliopsoas muscle that cover the FN presented by Unat et al. [73].

Pattern

Description

Occurrence

1 — sheet muscle pattern

Iliac type

Accessory muscle formed mostly from the front fibres of the iliacus originating from the middle third of inner lip of iliac crest, which covered the FN like a sheet.

42%

Psoas type

Accessory psoas formed mostly from posterior bundles of the psoas and formed dense muscle bundles, which covered the FN like a sheet.

25%

Iliacus and psoas major origin type

Sheet-like, wide accessory muscle comprising both the anterior iliacus muscle bundles and posterior bundles of the psoas.

22.5%

2 — slip muscle pattern

Found only in 2 cases: first — the muscular slip originated from the iliacus muscle, crossed the FN and then rejoined the iliacus muscle; in the second instance, the muscular slips were extensive and divided into branches in the iliac fossa, with the accessory muscle connected to the anterior site of quadratus lumborum via an aponeurosis band

10.5%

The presence of an accessory iliacus muscle or accessory psoas major, like additional muscular slips or sheets, psoas tertius, or quartus, may cause tension of the FN, resulting in neuropathy [26, 73]. The existence of such variants that could additionally compress the FN should be especially considered and ruled out in patients with FN paralysis/neuropathy caused by iliac haematoma, trauma, or vessel catheterization [51, 64]. The ilio-capsularis may have clinical significance during hip surgery. Babst et al. [7] suggest that it may be important in dysplastic hips, where it could help support the femoral head in a deficient acetabulum. They note that it could be atrophied in stable or well-constrained hips and hypertrophic in dysplastic ones.

The iliopsoas tendon also presents certain variability. It was found to be present as a double band in 64% of cases, a single band in 28.3%, and a triple band in 7.5% [49]. The morphological variability of iliopsoas might cause several clinical problems in patients complaining of pain referred from the hip joint to the knee joint and lumbar dermatomes [26].

Variations in the number of the bands forming the iliopsoas tendon can also be considered as clinically significant, especially in patients with internal snapping hip, which occurs during flexion or abduction or external rotation, when the medial part of the iliacus is restricted between the pubic bone and the iliopsoas tendon [13]. Interestingly, snapping hip syndrome is treated by iliopsoas tendon release and is associated with frequent recurrence of symptoms. According to Philippon et al. [49], this might be caused by overlooking the accessory tendinous slip during procedure.

The morphological variability of both iliacus muscle and psoas major might be considered as potential traps in ultrasonography. Firstly, additional muscular or tendinous bands could be overlooked during imaging, especially since such the structures tend to vary greatly in size. Fundamentally, as described by Olewnik et al. [45], some types of such slips are not even visible in US examination or occur only as secret anisotropy; however, there are no studies about the visibility of such bands of iliopsoas in ultrasound image to confirm these suspicions. Secondly, if additional heads or accessory muscles contribute to FN compression, it is possible that they could be mistaken as tumours or cysts because some can cause not only FN neuropathy but also contribute to snapping hip syndrome [74]. Unfortunately, there are no reports about the presence of additional muscular/tendinous bands of the iliopsoas muscle complex, neither the accessory iliacus nor psoas major, in ultrasound images; however, because ultrasound is needed to guide iliopsoas tendon release when treating internal snapping hip syndrome [35], further information regarding such imaging is needed.

Psoas minor

The psoas minor is located on the posterior abdominal wall. When present, it is included with the psoas major and iliacus in the iliopsoas muscle complex, i.e. the most powerful flexor of the thigh.

The psoas minor muscle is a small, flat, fusiform muscle that occurs in 30 to 60% of the population [30, 69]. It usually originates from the 12th thoracic vertebra, first lumbar vertebra, and the intervertebral disc between them; it forms a short and slender muscular belly that descends inferiorly and becomes a long tendon that inserts into the pectineal pubic line, iliopectineal eminence, and the iliac fascia [54].

Numerous morphological variations of the psoas minor have been noted. The muscle might be totally replaced by a tendon, or the tendinous portion might be exceptionally long, i.e. with the tendinous part comprising more than 57% of the total muscle length [69]. There are also mentions of alternative insertion sites including the inguinal ligament, neck of the femur, or lesser trochanter [21]. Additional attachment can be present between the fifth lumbar vertebra and the sacrum as a result of bifurcated tendinous insertion [21]. Psoas accessories have also been identified. Joshi et al. [27] present an instance of such a muscle that arose from the deep surface of psoas minor tendon and spread anteriorly to the psoas major.

A rarely observed variation is the occurrence of a double-headed muscle. Protas et al. [54] presented a case study in which such a variation was noticed on the left side of the posterior abdominal wall. The muscle was composed of a lateral head that originated from the first lumbar vertebral body and from the medial head that arose from the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebral bodies, and from the intervertebral disc between them [54]. The heads merged and formed a long tendon that attached onto the iliopectineal eminence [54] (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Schematic drawing of the double-headed psoas minor. Pmi — psoas minor (**) lateral head of the psoas minor (*) medial head of the psoas minor. Ilm — iliacus muscle; LT — lesser trochanter; PB — pubic bone; Pma — psoas major; Pmt — psoas major tendon; QL — quadratus lumborum muscle.

It is possible that anatomical variations of the psoas minor muscle may be responsible for psoas minor syndrome, manifesting as a pain in the iliac fossa usually caused by increased tension of the muscle [21]. These symptoms, which can be misdiagnosed as diverticulitis or appendicitis, occur due to compression of the retroperitoneal neurovascular structures [33, 54]. It can also be speculated that morphological variation might contribute to psoas compartment syndrome due to the anatomical locations; this seems quite likely because the psoas minor lies so close to the neurovascular structures of the posterior abdominal wall that the tendon of the psoas minor was previously mistaken for the genitofemoral nerve [3, 39]. However, to confirm these suspicions, further studies must be undertaken. These should also investigate the relationship between these variations and the spread of malignancies and infections to the retroperitoneal region [21].

In clinical situations such as those mentioned above, imaging studies are frequently employed in the diagnosis process, with ultrasound imaging being increasingly common due to its easy access and low cost. Although several morphological variabilities of the muscles and tendons were successfully noted and diagnosed with the use of US imaging, it might not be the best option when it comes to psoas minor variation: while both psoas muscles appear as typical instances of hyperechoic striations on a hypoechoic background, the psoas minor is not identified as a separate structure [30]. Therefore, it may be difficult to conform whether neurovascular compression is caused by morphological variability, e.g. psoas accessories or additional psoas minor heads. Nevertheless, at this point, anatomical variations can only be suspected to cause psoas minor syndrome or psoas compartment syndrome, and speculation about the use of imaging in such instances needs to be supported by evidence from scientific research and further investigations.

Although morphological variability of the described muscles might be hard to visualise during an ultrasound examination procedure, there are techniques used for imaging the structures of the described compartment. Muscles of iliopsoas muscle complex, especially the psoas major, can be observed during US procedure when the patient is positioned in a supine position and with the use of a high-frequency linear probe placed slightly cephalad to the iliac crest, or when the patient is positioned in lateral position, with the use of a low-frequency convex probe vertically attached above the iliac crest [72]. According to Balius et al. [9], the FABER manoeuvre can be used to achieve the long-axis view of the iliopsoas tendon. This technique involves placing the lateral aspect of the studied limb on top of the contralateral knee at the level of the suprapatellar recess, with involvement of hip flexion and adduction followed by external rotation of the hip. The transducer should be placed over the femoral head in a slightly oblique way, following the trajectory of the iliopsoas tendon distally to its insertion [9] (Tab. 3).

Table 3. Summary of described iliopsoas muscle complex morphological variations.

Muscle

Morphological variations presented in literature

Clinical meaning

Psoas major and iliacus muscle

Psoas tertius

Origin from the 12th rib and first lumbar vertebra transverse process; fusion with other psoas tendons at the level of inguinal ligament [11].

  • Possibility of adding additional tension onto the FN, depending on the relation between position of additional structure and FN, which could potentially lead to neuropathy [73].
  • Ilio-capsularis could additionally help support the femoral head in a deficient acetabulum during dysplastic hip surgery [7].
  • Accessory bands of the iliopsoas tendon could be connected with recurrence of symptoms after iliopsoas tendon release during snapping hip treatment, if they were overlooked during surgery [49].
  • If additional structures contribute to FN compression, it is possible that they could be mistaken during imaging as tumours or cysts, which also can cause FN neuropathy or snapping hip syndrome [74].

Psoas quartus

Origin — quadratus lumborum and fifth lumbar vertebra transverse process; fusion with other psoas tendons at the inguinal ligament level [11].

Origin — the third lumbar vertebra transverse process and the quadratus lumborum; fusion with the psoas major and iliacus muscle via muscular fibres at the level of inguinal ligament [70].

Origin only from the anteromedial surface of the quadratus lumborum muscle; fusion with the psoas major tendon at the inguinal ligament level [79].

Accessory iliacus muscle

Origin from the middle third of the iliac crest; insertion onto the lesser trochanter of the femur, between the psoas major and the iliacus muscle [26].

Iliacus minor

Detached portion of iliacus that originates from anterior inferior spine of the ilium and inserts onto anterior-trochanteric line [2].

Ilio-capsularis

Origin from anterior inferior spine of the ilium; insertion onto the ilio-femoral ligament [2].

Other types of additional muscular slips of iliacus muscle and psoas major presented in Table 1 and Table 2.

Divided tendon

Presence of tendon that consists of 2 or 3 bands [49].

Psoas minor

Psoas accessories

Origin from the deep surface of psoas minor tendon, muscle spread anteriorly to psoas major [27].

  • Possible contribution to psoas minor syndrome — pain in the iliac fossa usually caused by increased tension of the muscle, often misdiagnosed as diverticulitis or appendicitis [21].
  • Possible contribution to psoas compartment syndrome due to the close position to the neurovascular structures of the posterior abdominal wall [4].

Double-headed psoas minor

Lateral head — origin from the first lumbar vertebral body and from the medial head – origin from the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebral bodies and from the intervertebral disc between them; tendon attached onto the iliopectineal eminence [54].

SUPERFICIAL GLUTEAL MUSCLES

The superficial gluteal muscle group is composed of the gluteus maximus muscle, gluteus medius muscle, gluteus minimus muscle, and the tensor fasciae latae (Fig. 5). However, the tensor fasciae latae does not appear to present any clinically significant anatomical variability.

Figure 5. Schematic representation of the superficial gluteal muscles. GMa — gluteus maximus muscle; GMe — gluteus medius muscle; GMi — gluteus minimus muscle; ITT — iliotibial tract; MTFL — tensor fasciae latae.

The most superficial muscle of this region is the gluteus maximus muscle. It originates from the posterolateral aspect of the sacrum and coccyx, sacrotuberous ligament, gluteal surface of ilium, thoracolumbar fascia, and gluteal aponeurosis and inserts by broad aponeurosis onto gluteal tuberosity and the iliac tract [40]. There are many reports of additional origins, including the superficial lamina of the posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia, posterior sacroiliac ligament, aponeuroses of erector spinae, or latissimus dorsi [42]. A coccygeal attachment can be absent or wildly variable in size, origin from the gluteal aponeurosis [42]. The distal attachment can be either muscular or tendinous. An ascending tendon that attaches along the lateral lip of the linea aspera and extends down the femur length can be observed just as a direct insertion into the bone [55, 65]. The gluteus maximus muscle can also be divided into sacroiliac and coccygeofemoral parts [68] or cranial (fibrous) and caudal (muscular) parts, as reported by Kirici and Ozan [31].

Sen et al. [60] presented 2 cases of an accessory muscle originating from the gluteus maximus muscle: the gluteoperinealis. In the first case, the bilateral muscle originated from the posteromedial aspect of the gluteus maximus, extended alongside the ischial tuberosity, and inserted to the perineal body. In the second case, it extended from the fascia of the gluteus maximus and attached to the corpus cavernosum of the penis on the left side and perineal body on the right [60].

According to anatomy textbooks, the gluteus medius muscle arises as a broad insertion from the gluteal surface of the ilium between the anterior and posterior gluteal line and inserts onto the lateral side of the greater trochanter of the femur mainly by 2 tendinous components [40]. Most variabilities of this muscle concern its origin because it can arise from the entire length of the iliac crest as well as from the anterior three-quarters [19]. Distally it can attach to the superior, posterior, or posterosuperior trochanteric facet, or even the apex of the greater trochanter when 2 parts of the distal attachment are not distinguished [16, 19, 42]. The gluteus medius muscle might be composed of up to 4 anatomical compartments [19]. This muscle can also be fused with the gluteus minimus muscle distally with its tendon or with the creation of a separate muscular bundle; however, complete fusion of both muscles is rare [42]. There are also reports of fusion with the piriformis muscle, or continuity of the gluteus medius tendon alongside the vastus lateralis or gluteus minimus muscle [23].

The gluteus medius accessories has been described as arising from the iliac crest under the tensor fascia latae and gluteus medius muscle, with a distal attachment onto the greater trochanter [42]. This muscle was recently found by Orthaber et al. [47] alongside another variation of the gluteus minimus muscle: the gluteus quartus.

The gluteus minimus muscle originates from the gluteal surface of the ilium, between the anterior and inferior gluteal lines, and inserts into the anterolateral aspect of the greater trochanter [40]. The gluteus minimus muscle is mostly variable distally; some reports indicate the anterosuperior angle, and lateral and superior aspects of the greater trochanter as sites of distal attachment. This muscle can also attach to the anterior and/or superior aspect of the hip capsule via muscular or tendinous attachment.

An accessory muscle associated with the gluteus minimus muscle is the gluteus quartus, first described in humans by Macalister in 1866 [38]. Since its first description, many variants of this muscle have been described with variable origins, including the anterior inferior and superior iliac spine, deep inner lamina of gluteus minimus, or lateral edge of iliac crest, and various insertions, such as the hip joint capsule, gluteus minimus tendon, or great trochanter [42].

The morphological variability of the gluteal muscles is regarded as clinically significant, especially in surgery. The presence of additional muscles, such as the gluteus quartus or gluteus medius accessories, might contribute to hip joint instability because they cause an imbalance in muscle mass that leads to a mismatched pattern in force distribution during activities such as walking [47]. As such, imaging is crucial before total hip replacement, because such anomalous muscles can surprise clinicians during surgery, especially since the gluteus medius accessories might cross the lateral approach and the gluteus quartus in the antero-lateral approach [47]. The gluteoperinealis might also be an unwelcome surprise during radical perineal prostatectomy, gynaecological operations, urethroplasty, or perineal body reconstruction [60]. Importantly, in addition to the presence of additional muscles of the gluteal region, variations in their proximal and distal attachments might contribute to deep gluteal syndrome (DGS), a form of non-discogenic sciatic nerve entrapment in the subgluteal space known for its multifactorial aetiology [24].

During diagnostic imaging, a lack of awareness of the extreme anatomical variation of the gluteal muscles might easily lead to misinterpretation of such variability for other cause of DGS, such as tumour infiltration. It is also possible that when presenting as painless swelling, the presence of accessory muscles in the gluteal area might be misdiagnosed as soft-tissue Ewing sarcoma during imaging, because such a neoplasm might present itself as a gluteal mass [17]. However, further imaging studies, especially those associated with ultrasound, are needed to confirm these possibilities. Gluteus maximus muscle morphology can be visualised with use of a linear probe [29], and for imaging of the gluteus medius muscle and gluteus minimus muscle, a curvilinear transducer is advised [77]. To achieve a better view, the patient should be positioned lying on their side, test leg up, with the test-leg hip in neutral flexion/extension, neutral rotation, and 20° of adduction, and the knee in full extension [77] (Tab. 4).

Table 4. Summary of described superficial gluteal muscle morphological variations.

Muscle

Morphological variabilities presented in the literature

Clinical meaning

Gluteus maximus muscle

Gluteoperinealis

Origin from posteromedial aspect of the gluteus maximus, extension alongside ischial tuberosity; insertion to the perineal body [60].

  • Additional muscles might contribute to hip joint instability, due to imbalance in the muscle mass that impairs pattern of force distribution during activity [47].
  • Gluteus medius accessories and gluteus quartus can impair total hip replacement surgery by crossing the surgical approach [47].
  • Gluteoperinealis might cause difficulties during radical perineal prostatectomy, gynaecological operations, urethroplasty or perineal body reconstruction [60].
  • Additional structures and variability in attachments might contribute to DGS [24].

Origin from the fascia of the gluteus maximus and attachment to the corpus cavernosum of the penis [60].

Origin from the fascia of the gluteus maximus and attachment to the perineal body [60].

Gluteus medius muscle

Gluteus medius accessories

Arising from the iliac crest under the tensor fascia latae and gluteus medius muscle, with a distal attachment onto the greater trochanter [47].

Gluteus minimus muscle

Gluteus quartus

Variable origins: anterior inferior and superior iliac spine, deep inner lamina of gluteus minimus or lateral edge of iliac crest, and various insertions: hip joint capsule, gluteus minimus tendon or great trochanter [42].

DEEP GLUTEAL MUSCLES

According to current nomenclature, the group of deep gluteal muscles is composed of the piriformis muscle (PM), obturator internus (OI), superior gemellus muscle (GS), inferior gemellus muscle (GI), and quadratus femoris muscle (QF) (Fig. 6).

Figure 6. Schematic representation of the deep gluteal muscles. Gi — inferior gemellus muscle; GMa — gluteus maximus muscle; GMe — gluteus medius muscle; GMi — gluteus minimus muscle; Gs — superior gemellus muscle; ITT — iliotibial tract; MTFL — tensor fasciae latae muscle; Oi — obturator internus; Pm — piriformis muscle; QF — Quadratus femoris muscle.
Piriformis muscle

The PM originates from the anterior surface of the sacrum and the sacrotuberous ligament; it forms a pear-shaped belly and attaches to the superior border of the greater trochanter of femur [40]. Because the PM leaves the pelvis through the greater sciatic foramen and almost fills it, this muscle is considered as a landmark of the gluteal region: the superior gluteal nerve and vessels emerge superior, and the inferior nerve and vessels emerge inferior to the PM [40].

The PM presents extensive variability, and it can occur as undivided or divided or split into separate heads [42]. Natsis et al. [41] reported that the PM was doubled in 12 out of 294 (4.1%) studied limbs with different arrangements of the 2 heads: in 7 limbs, the second muscle belly was located inferior to the first, and in 5 cases, the second belly was located deeper than the first. Interestingly, 3 piriformis bellies were noted in 4 limbs (1.4%) [41]. Where separate bellies are present, each can produce separate tendons that blend to a common insertion [48].

The PM can be absent [15] or fused via fibers with other pelvic girdle muscles, including the gluteus minimus muscle [20], gluteus medius muscle [20], GS [78], or OI [50, 63]. Arora et al. [5] reported a rare conglomeration between the PM and gluteus maximus muscle called the gluteopiriformis. The proximal end of this anomalous muscle was attached to the inferomedial part of the gluteus maximus muscle and distally fused with PM above the apex of the greater trochanter of the femur [5]. It is also possible to find an additional muscle positioned above the PM (Fig. 7). This can be an additional slip, as noted by Ravindranath et al. [57], which arose from the sacrotuberous ligament in 2 cases and from the fascia overlaying the gluteus medius muscle in another case; all cases ran to a more significant muscle that arises from border/posterosuperior aspect of the greater sciatic foramen or inferior to posterior iliac spine [41, 53, 71]. Such a muscle was reported to attach onto the greater trochanter independently or together with the PM [53, 71].

The variability of PM is usually perceived relative to that of the sciatic nerve (SN) [41, 75]. In 1937 Beaton and Anson [10] conducted a classification that depicted anatomical variations between the SN and the PM, which is still applied in recent studies [41, 75]. The types introduced by Beaton and Anson [10] are presented in Table 5.

Table 5. Beaton and Anson [10] classification of morphological variants of PM in relation with SN.

Type

Description

I

Undivided SN below the undivided PM.

II

Undivided PM with SN nervous divisions below and between fibres.

III

Undivided PM with SN nervous divisions below and above the muscle.

IV

Undivided SN positioned between PMs heads.

V

SNs nervous divisions above and between PMs heads.

VI

Undivided SN positioned above the PM.

The relationship between the PM and sciatic nerve plays an important role in piriformis syndrome (PS), a subgroup of DGS [24]. The frequency of PS varies from 5% to 36%; however, it is speculated that this syndrome is rather underdiagnosed [24]. This condition manifests as chronic pain in the hip area, which is worsened by hip movement, and the inability to sit for a prolonged time; the patient also reports pain while getting up, which may radiate into the back of the thigh but may also occur in the lower leg at dermatomes L5 or S1 [25]. PS can have primary causes due to anatomical variations or variable attachments, and secondary causes associated with precipitant causes [24]. Clear anomalous variability of the PM, such as junctions between muscles, additional muscles, anomaly course, and numerous additional heads might result in compression of the sciatic nerve that results in the described symptoms [41, 63, 78].

Currently there is no gold standard method of visualisation when it comes to the PS diagnosis, although ultrasound imaging is widely applied for the evaluation of neuropathies caused by entrapments such as PS [62]. Since US can provide not only real-time but also dynamic assessment, it seems to be a good choice for imaging the surprising variability of the piriformis as a cause of entrapment. PM can be visualised as a deep hypoechoic structure characterised by marble appearance, using a curvilinear transducer firstly placed in the lateral margin of the sacrum and then moved inferolaterally toward the greater trochanter until the medial end of the transducer remains at the lateral end of the sacrum [66].

Quadratus femoris muscle, obturator internus, and gemelli muscles

The QF muscle is not considered as variable. It originates from the lateral border of the ischial tuberosity and inserts onto the intertrochanteric crest of the femur [40]. However, there are reports of unilateral and lateral absence [37] as well as duplication, where both muscles arise from the ischial tuberosity and are both attached to the intertrochanteric crest [67].

The OI originates from the inner surface of the obturator membrane and the bones that form the boundaries of obturator foramen, viz. the inferior ramen of the pubis, ischial ramus, pelvic surface of the hip bone, and upper part of the greater sciatic foramen, and insert onto the medial surface of the greater trochanter of the femur [40]. Accessory slips arising from the sacrotuberous ligament/inner surface of the ischium or from typical origin of the muscle have been observed [42]. Kirici et al. present a case of OI with variable course, i.e. the muscle passed posteriorly to the midpoint of the sacrotuberous ligament and not via the lesser sciatic foramen, as usual [32].

The GS originates from the ischial spine and attaches onto the medial surface of the greater trochanter of the femur [40]. This muscle has been found to be absent both bilaterally and unilaterally [8]. There are also reports about a doubled GS. Arifoglu et al. [1] presented an interesting case in which a doubled GS occurred together with a doubled PM. Two separate GSs originated at the posterior aspect of the ischial spine closely to one another and inserted more or less at the same point [1] (Fig. 8). Additionally, the prevalence of fusion of GS and PM was estimated as 29% [78].

GI originates from the ischial tuberosity and attaches to the medial surface of the greater trochanter of the femur [40]. Although reports about the absence of the GI are extremely rare, recently Abdulhameed et al. [1] presented an interesting case of the bilateral absence of both gemelli muscles, with no evidence of fusion with PM or QF. In the case of a doubled GI, the upper part might originate from the ischial spine and the inferior from the ischial tuberosity [42].

Because the site of insertion for both gemelli muscles and the obturator internus is the greater trochanter of the femur, they can fuse and attach as one tendon, as reported in 36% of cases by Shinohara [61]. In another study, 64% of identified gemelli tendons covered the obturator internus tendon [61]. Aung et al. [6] also found that gemelli tendons may fuse posteriorly to the obturator internus. Additionally, the obturator internus tendon might be fused with either the PM [63] or gluteus medius muscle [78].

Anatomical variability of deep gluteal muscles of the pelvic girdle might be a cause of gemelli-obturator internus syndrome, which is a possible diagnosis of previously described DGS [24]. The SN passes between the PM and GS or OI; as such, it is possible to observe a scissor-like type entrapment of the nerve [24]. Anomalous attachments of the described muscles might also cause penetration of the SN [24]. Supernumerary muscles such as the additional GS might place pressure on the nerve, which would probably be aggravated by external rotation of the hip [4]. Since diagnosis and management of such anomalies is identical to those that cause PS, it is highly probable that anomalies of the gemelli or OI might surprise clinicians during imaging in response to suspected PS (Tab. 6).

Table 6. Summary of described superficial gluteal muscles morphological variations.

Muscle

Morphological variations described in literature

Clinical meaning

PM

Gluteopiriformis

Proximal attachment — inferomedial part of the gluteus maximus muscle; distal fusion with PM above the apex of the greater trochanter of femur [5]

  • Depending on relation between additional muscle and SN — contribution to PS, DGS subgroup, caused by SN compression [24].

Unnamed additional muscle

Positioned above the PM; additional slip, arising from the sacrotuberous ligament/fascia overlaying the gluteus medius muscle, attached to another muscle, that arises from border/posterosuperior aspect of the greater sciatic foramen or inferior to posterior iliac spine and inserts onto the greater trochanter [41, 53, 57].

QF

Duplication of QF

Two muscles arising from the ischial tuberosity and attached to the intertrochanteric crest [67].

  • Gemelli-obturator syndrome — subgroup of DGS; SN passes between the PM and GS or OI; it is possible to observe a scissor-like entrapment of the nerve [24].

OI

Accessory slips

Arising from the sacrotuberous ligament/ inner surface of the ischium/ from typical origin of the muscle [42].

Variable course

Instead of typical passing through the lesser sciatic foramen, OI passes posteriorly to the midpoint of the sacrotuberous ligament [32].

GS

Duplication of GS

Two separate GS with origin onto posterior aspect of the ischial spine closely to one another; inserted at the medial surface of the greater trochanter of the femur [4].

GI

Duplication of GI

Upper part originates from the ischial spine and inferior from the ischial tuberosity; insertion: medial surface of the greater trochanter of the femur [1].

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic girdle muscles present certain anatomical variability that has been implicated in numerous clinical syndromes, especially those connected with nerve compression. There are procedures in which US imaging of muscles from described compartments is a typical method of evaluation, and there are standard techniques of such visualisation. However, anomalies in this region, such as additional bands, accessory muscles, and supernumerary heads are poorly documented in ultrasound and other imaging studies. Further imaging studies of the described structures are needed to properly distinguish such variabilities to prevent any confusion that may result in misdiagnoses and surprises on the operating table.

ARTICLE INFORMATION AND DECLARATIONS

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. Abdulhameed A, Ahmed IM, Bello SS. Bilateral absence: a rare anomaly of the gemelli muscles. Morphologie. 2022; 106(353): 132–135, doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2021.03.007, indexed in Pubmed: 33875371.
  2. Aleksandrova JN, Malinova L, Jelev L. Variations of the iliacus muscle: report of two cases and review of the literature. Int J Anat Var. 2013; 6: 149–152.
  3. Al-Zamil A, Christenson JT. Psoas muscle hematoma — an acute compartment syndrome. Report of a case. Vasa. 1988; 17(2): 141–143, indexed in Pubmed: 3407316.
  4. Arifoglu Y, Sürücü HS, Sargon MF, et al. Double superior gemellus together with double piriformis and high division of the sciatic nerve. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997; 19(6): 407–408, doi: 10.1007/BF01628510, indexed in Pubmed: 9479716.
  5. Arora J, Mehta V, Kumar H, et al. A rare bimuscular conglomeration gluteopiriformis case report. Morphologie. 2010; 94(305): 40–43, doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2009.12.001, indexed in Pubmed: 20149708.
  6. Aung HH, Sakamoto H, Akita K, et al. Anatomical study of the obturator internus, gemelli and quadratus femoris muscles with special reference to their innervation. Anat Rec. 2001; 263(1): 41–52, doi: 10.1002/ar.1075, indexed in Pubmed: 11331970.
  7. Babst D, Steppacher SD, Ganz R, et al. The iliocapsularis muscle: an important stabilizer in the dysplastic hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469(6): 1728–1734, doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1705-x, indexed in Pubmed: 21128036.
  8. Bajka M, Manestar M, Hug J, et al. Detailed anatomy of the abdomen and pelvis of the visible human female. Clin Anat. 2004; 17(3): 252–260, doi: 10.1002/ca.10215, indexed in Pubmed: 15042575.
  9. Balius R, Pedret C, Blasi M, et al. Sonographic evaluation of the distal iliopsoas tendon using a new approach. J Ultrasound Med. 2014; 33(11): 2021–2030, doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.11.2021, indexed in Pubmed: 25336491.
  10. Beaton L, Anson B. The relation of the sciatic nerve and of its subdivisions to the piriformis muscle. Anat Rec. 1937; 70: 1–5, doi: 10.1002/ar.1090700102.
  11. Clarkson RD, Rainy H. Unusual arrangement of the psoas muscle. J Anat Physiol. 1889; 23(Pt 3): 504–506, indexed in Pubmed: 17231810.
  12. D’Costa S, Ramanathan LA, Madhyastha S, et al. An accessory iliacus muscle: a case report. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2008; 49(3): 407–409, indexed in Pubmed: 18758649.
  13. Deslandes M, Guillin R, Cardinal E, et al. The snapping iliopsoas tendon: new mechanisms using dynamic sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190(3): 576–581, doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2375, indexed in Pubmed: 18287424.
  14. Le Double AF. Muscles de la fosse lombo-iliaque. In: Le Double AF. ed. Traité des variations du système musculaire de l’Homme. Schleicher Frères, Paris 1897: 325–332.
  15. Duda GN, Brand D, Freitag S, et al. Variability of femoral muscle attachments. J Biomech. 1996; 29(9): 1185–1190, doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)00025-5, indexed in Pub­med: 8872275.
  16. Duparc F, Thomine JM, Dujardin F, et al. Anatomic basis of the transgluteal approach to the hip-joint by anterior hemimyotomy of the gluteus medius. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997; 19(2): 61–67, doi: 10.1007/s00276-997-0061-3.
  17. Emilia S, Sharif T, Alzallal O, et al. Ewing sarcoma presenting as a gluteal mass in adult woman: diagnostic approach and its challenges. Malaysian J Pathol. 2020; 42(1): 121–125.
  18. Fabrizio PA. Anatomic variation of the iliacus and psoas major muscles. Int J Anat Var. 2011; 4: 28–30.
  19. Flack NA, Nicholson HD, Woodley SJ. A review of the anatomy of the hip abductor muscles, gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, and tensor fascia lata. Clin Anat. 2012; 25(6): 697–708, doi: 10.1002/ca.22004, indexed in Pubmed: 22109658.
  20. Flack NAMS, Nicholson HD, Woodley SJ, et al. The anatomy of the hip abductor muscles. Clin Anat. 2014; 27(2): 241–253, doi: 10.1002/ca.22248, indexed in Pub­med: 23625344.
  21. Gandhi S, Gupta N, Thakur A, et al. Anatomical and clinical insight of variant morphologies of psoas muscle: a case report. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2013; 14(5).
  22. Gonera B, Kurtys K, Karauda P, et al. Possible effect of morphological variations of plantaris muscle tendon on harvesting at reconstruction surgery-case report. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020; 42(10): 1183–1188, doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02463-1, indexed in Pubmed: 32248255.
  23. Heimkes B, Posel P, Plitz W, et al. Forces acting on the juvenile hip joint in the one-legged stance. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993; 13(4): 431–436, doi: 10.1097/01241398-199307000-00003, indexed in Pubmed: 8370775.
  24. Hernando MF, Cerezal L, Pérez-Carro L, et al. Deep gluteal syndrome: anatomy, imaging, and management of sciatic nerve entrapments in the subgluteal space. Skeletal Radiol. 2015; 44(7): 919–934, doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2124-6, indexed in Pubmed: 25739706.
  25. Hopayian K, Danielyan A. Four symptoms define the piriformis syndrome: an updated systematic review of its clinical features. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018; 28(2): 155–164, doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2031-8, indexed in Pubmed: 28836092.
  26. Jelev L, Shivarov V, Surchev L. Bilateral variations of the psoas major and the iliacus muscles and presence of an undescribed variant muscle — accessory iliopsoas muscle. Ann Anat. 2005; 187(3): 281–286, doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2004.10.006, indexed in Pubmed: 16130828.
  27. Joshi SD, Joshi SS, Dandekar UK, et al. Morphology of psoas minor and psoas accessorius. J Anat Soc India. 2010; 59(1): 31–34, doi: 10.1016/s0003-2778(10)80008-5.
  28. Khalid S, Iwanaga J, Loukas M, et al. Split femoral nerve due to psoas tertius muscle: a review with other cases of variant muscles traversing the femoral nerve. Cureus. 2017; 9(8): e1555, doi: 10.7759/cureus.1555, indexed in Pubmed: 29021927.
  29. Kim JB, Lee W, Chang MC. Ultrasonographic and magnetic resonance images of a gluteus maximus tear. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2021; 38(2): 157–159, doi: 10.12701/yujm.2020.00500, indexed in Pubmed: 32891077.
  30. King AD, Hine AL, McDonald C, et al. The ultrasound appearance of the normal psoas muscle. Clin Radiol. 1993; 48(5): 316–318, doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81238-3, indexed in Pubmed: 8258221.
  31. Kirici Y, Ozan H. Double gluteus maximus muscle with associated variations in the gluteal region. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999; 21(6): 397–400, doi: 10.1007/BF01631351, indexed in Pubmed: 10678734.
  32. Kirici Y, Yazar F, Ozan H. The neurovascular and muscular anomalies of the gluteal region: an atypical pudendal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999; 21(6): 393–396, doi: 10.1007/BF01631350, indexed in Pubmed: 10678733.
  33. Klammer A. Faszienlogensyndrom der iliakus-psoas-loge. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und ihre Grenzgebiete. 2008; 121(03): 298–304, doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1051361.
  34. Kopsch F. Rauber’s Lehrbuch der Anatomie des Menschen. Abt. 3: Muskeln, Gefäße, 10th ed. Verlag von Georg Thieme, Leipzig 1914: 153–154.
  35. Kurtys K, Gonera B, Olewnik Ł, et al. A highly complex variant of the plantaris tendon insertion and its potential clinical relevance. Anat Sci Int. 2020; 95(4): 553–558, doi: 10.1007/s12565-020-00540-4, indexed in Pub­med: 32248353.
  36. Lento PH, Primack S. Advances and utility of diagnostic ultrasound in musculoskeletal medicine. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008; 1(1): 24–31, doi: 10.1007/s12178-007-9002-3, indexed in Pubmed: 19468895.
  37. Liu H, Fletcher J, Garrison MK, et al. Bilateral absence of quadratus femoris and semimembranosus. Int J Anat Var. 2011; 4: 40–42.
  38. Macalister A. Notes on muscular anomalies in human anatomy. P Roy Irish Acad. 1866; 9: 444–469.
  39. Macalister A. Additional observations on muscular anomalies in human anatomy (third series): With a catalogue of the principal muscular variations hitherto published. Trans R Ir Acad. 1875; 26: 126–200.
  40. Moore K, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically Oriented Anatomy (7th ed.). Wilkins, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2014.
  41. Natsis K, Totlis T, Konstantinidis GA, et al. Anatomical variations between the sciatic nerve and the piriformis muscle: a contribution to surgical anatomy in piriformis syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36(3): 273–280, doi: 10.1007/s00276-013-1180-7, indexed in Pubmed: 23900507.
  42. Nicholson H, Woodley S, Flack N. Gluteal uscles and lateral rotators of the hip. In: Tubbs RS, Shoja MM, Loukas M. ed. Bergman’s comprehensive encyclopedia of human anatomic variation. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester 2016.
  43. Olewnik Ł. A proposal for a new classification for the tendon of insertion of tibialis posterior. Clin Anat. 2019; 32(4): 557–565, doi: 10.1002/ca.23350, indexed in Pubmed: 30758860.
  44. Olewnik Ł, Podgórski M, Polguj M, et al. A cadaveric and sonographic study of the morphology of the tibialis anterior tendon – a proposal for a new classification. J Foot Ankle Res. 2019; 12(1), doi: 10.1186/s13047-019-0319-0.
  45. Olewnik Ł, Podgórski M, Polguj M, et al. Is ultrasound effective in determining variation of the insertion of the extensor hallucis longus tendon? Clin Anat. 2020; 33(8): 1235–1239, doi: 10.1002/ca.23572, indexed in Pubmed: 32017249.
  46. Olewnik Ł, Podgórski M, Polguj M, et al. The plantaris muscle — rare relations to the neurovascular bundle in the popliteal fossa. Folia Morphol. 2018; 77(4): 785–788, doi: 10.5603/FM.a2018.0039, indexed in Pubmed: 29651792.
  47. Orthaber S, Pritsch A, Zach JL, et al. Gluteus medius accessorius and gluteus quartus scansorius in one specimen: case report of two rare variations. Eur J Anat. 2020; 24(2): 161–163.
  48. Pecina HI, Boric I, Smoljanovic T, et al. Surgical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging findings in piriformis muscle syndrome. Skeletal Radiol. 2008; 37(11): 1019–1023, doi: 10.1007/s00256-008-0538-0, indexed in Pubmed: 18622605.
  49. Philippon MJ, Devitt BM, Campbell KJ, et al. Anatomic variance of the iliopsoas tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(4): 807–811, doi: 10.1177/0363546513518414, indexed in Pubmed: 24451113.
  50. Pine J, Binns M, Wright P, et al. Piriformis and obturator internus morphology: a cadaveric study. Clin Anat. 2011; 24(1): 70–76, doi: 10.1002/ca.21053, indexed in Pubmed: 21154643.
  51. Pirouzmand F, Midha R. Subacute femoral compressive neuropathy from iliacus compartment hematoma. Can J Neurol Sci. 2001; 28(2): 155–158, doi: 10.1017/s0317167100052860, indexed in Pubmed: 11383942.
  52. du Plessis M, Loukas M. Thigh Muscles. In: Tubbs RS, Shoja M, Loukas M. ed. Bergman’s comprehensive encyclopedia of human anatomic variation. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester 2016: 410–420.
  53. Prasad AM, Nayak BS, Deepthinath R, et al. clinically important variations in the lower limb: a case report. Eur J Anat. 2005; 9: 167–169.
  54. Protas M, Voin V, Wang JMh, et al. A rare case of double-headed psoas minor muscle with review of its known variants. Cureus. 2017; 9(6): e1312, doi: 10.7759/cureus.1312, indexed in Pubmed: 28690946.
  55. Ramirez OM, Hurwitz DJ, Futrell JW. The expansive gluteus maximus flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984; 74(6): 757–770, doi: 10.1097/00006534-198412000-00003, indexed in Pubmed: 6505096.
  56. Rao TR, Kanyan PS, Rao S. Bilateral variation of iliacus muscle and splitting of femoral nerve. Neuroanatomy. 2008; 7: 72–75.
  57. Ravindranath Y, Manjunath KY, Ravindranath R. Accessory origin of the piriformis muscle. Singapore Med J. 2008; 49(8): e217–e218, indexed in Pubmed: 18756338.
  58. Ruzik K, Waśniewska A, Olewnik Ł, et al. Unusual case report of seven-headed quadriceps femoris muscle. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020; 42(10): 1225–1229, doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02472-0, indexed in Pubmed: 32318799.
  59. Sajko S, Stuber K. Psoas Major: a case report and review of its anatomy, biomechanics, and clinical implications. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2009; 53(4): 311–318.
  60. Sen S, Senol GB, Ormeci T, et al. Gluteoperinealis muscle: a surgically important variation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021; 43(9): 1467–1470, doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02766-x, indexed in Pubmed: 33993323.
  61. Shinohara H. Gemelli and obturator internus muscles: different heads of one muscle? Anat Rec. 1995; 243(1): 145–150, doi: 10.1002/ar.1092430116, indexed in Pubmed: 8540628.
  62. Siahaan YM, Tiffani P, Tanasia A. Ultrasound-guided measurement of piriformis muscle thickness to diagnose piriformis syndrome. Front Neurol. 2021; 12: 721966, doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.721966, indexed in Pubmed: 34557150.
  63. Solomon LB, Lee YC, Callary SA, et al. Anatomy of piriformis, obturator internus and obturator externus: implications for the posterior surgical approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(9): 1317–1324, doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.23893, indexed in Pubmed: 20798456.
  64. Spratt JD, Logan BM, Abrahams PH. Variant slips of psoas and iliacus muscles, with splitting of the femoral nerve. Clin Anat. 1996; 9(6): 401–404, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1996)9:6<401::AID-CA8>3.0.CO;2-D, indexed in Pubmed: 8915621.
  65. Stern JT. Anatomical and functional specializations of the human gluteus maximus. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1972; 36(3): 315–339, doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330360303, indexed in Pubmed: 4624653.
  66. Tabatabaiee A, Takamjani IE, Sarrafzadeh J, et al. Ultrasound-guided dry needling decreases pain in patients with piriformis syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2019; 60(5): 558–565, doi: 10.1002/mus.26671, indexed in Pubmed: 31415092.
  67. Tanyeli E, Pestemalci T, Uzel M, et al. The double deep gluteal muscles. Saudi Med J. 2006; 27(3): 385–386, indexed in Pubmed: 16532103.
  68. Tichý M, Grim M. Morphogenesis of the human gluteus maximus muscle arising from two muscle primordia. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1985; 173(2): 275–277, doi: 10.1007/BF00316309, indexed in Pubmed: 4083527.
  69. Tsuyoshi S, Nagahiro T. Abdominal wall uscles. In: Tubbs RS, Shoja MM, Loukas M. ed. Bergman’s Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Human Anatomic Variation. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester 2016.
  70. Tubbs RS, Oakes WJ, Salter EG. The psoas quartus muscle. Clin Anat. 2006; 19(7): 678–680, doi: 10.1002/ca.20288, indexed in Pubmed: 16506239.
  71. Tubbs RS, Salter G, Oakes WJ. Femoral head of the rectus femoris muscle. Clin Anat. 2004; 17(3): 276–278, doi: 10.1002/ca.10186, indexed in Pubmed: 15042578.
  72. Ueshima H, Otake H, Lin JA. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block: an updated review of anatomy and techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017: 2752876, doi: 10.1155/2017/2752876, indexed in Pubmed: 28154824.
  73. Unat F, Sirinturk S, Cagimni P, et al. Macroscopic observations of muscular bundles of accessory iliopsoas muscle as the cause of femoral nerve compression. J Orthop. 2019; 16(1): 64–68, doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.12.009, indexed in Pubmed: 30662241.
  74. Vervaecke AJ, Declercq H, Wetzels K, et al. Localized tenosynovial giant cell tumor: a rare case of snapping hip. Skeletal Radiol. 2022; 51(11): 2205–2210, doi: 10.1007/s00256-022-04064-y, indexed in Pub­med: 35536359.
  75. Vicente EDJ, Viotto MJS, Barbosa CAA, et al. Study on anatomical relationships and variations between the sciatic nerve and piriformis mscle. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2007; 11(3): 197–202.
  76. Ward WT, Fleisch ID, Ganz R. Anatomy of the iliocapsularis muscle. Relevance to surgery of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000(374): 278–285, doi: 10.1097/00003086-200005000-00025, indexed in Pubmed: 10818987.
  77. Whittaker JL, Emery CA. Sonographic measures of the gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, and vastus medialis muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 44(8): 627–632, doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5315, indexed in Pubmed: 25029916.
  78. Windisch G, Braun EM, Anderhuber F. Piriformis muscle: clinical anatomy and consideration of the piriformis syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007; 29(1): 37–45, doi: 10.1007/s00276-006-0169-x, indexed in Pubmed: 17216293.
  79. Wong TL, Kikuta S, Iwanaga J, et al. A multiply split femoral nerve and psoas quartus muscle. Anat Cell Biol. 2019; 52(2): 208–210, doi: 10.5115/acb.2019.52.2.208, indexed in Pubmed: 31338239.
  80. Zielinska N, Tubbs RS, Ruzik K, et al. Classifications of the extensor hallucis longus tendon variations: Updated and comprehensive narrative review. Ann Anat. 2021; 238: 151762, doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151762, indexed in Pubmed: 33992748.