INTRODUCTION
The lateral rotator muscles of the thigh include the piriformis (PM), gemellus superior (GS) and inferior (GI), obturator externus (OE) and internus (OI), and quadratus femoris (QF) muscles [17]. These muscles can be morphologically variable. For example, the GS or GI can be absent (very rarely, both the GS and GI are lacking) [2, 8, 16]. These muscles can be also doubled [15]. Cases have been reported in which the GS is fused with the PM or gluteus minimus, or the GI is fused with the QF [12]. The OI is not as variable, though it can be divided into two distinct parts [9]. The PM, in contrast, is morphologically highly variable. For example, it can be fused with the GS, or OI, or gluteus medius [3].
Morphological variations in this region can have clinical implications. For example, additional structures such as an accessory head of the PM can compress nearby nerves or arteries. In cases of a three-headed PM, with the common fibular nerve passing between the first and second heads and the tibial nerves passing between the second and the third, there can be paraesthesia, loss of sensation, or lack or weakened function of the muscles [13].
Here, we report an unusual muscle found in the gluteal region during dissection and discuss the potential clinical ramifications.
CASE REPORT
An 84-year-old at death female cadaver donated to science was subjected to routine anatomical dissection for research and teaching purposes at the Department of Anatomical Dissection and Donation Medical University of Lodz, Poland. The left lower limb and its gluteal region were dissected traditionally and two interesting structures were found.
The next stage of the investigation involved detailed assessment of these variant muscles. The first muscle had only a muscular part, originating from the external surface of the ramus of the ischium (near the ischiopubic ramus). At the proximal attachment it was 7.46 mm wide and 2.17 mm thick. It was 79.90 mm long. Distally, this accessory muscle was fused with the GI, attached to the trochanteric fossa. At the point of fusion the width was 3.97 mm and the thickness 1.11 mm.
The second structure comprised tendinous and muscular parts. The proximal part originated from the external part of the ischiopubic ramus. At this point was 3.36 mm wide and 1.08 mm thick. The muscular part was 89.00 mm long, after which it passed into the tendinous part. The width at the myotendinous junction was 2.97 mm and the thickness was 1.64 mm. The tendon of this variant structure was 25.91 mm long, and it inserted on the trochanteric fossa. At this point it was 2.62 mm wide and 1.18 mm thick. Both structures were innervated by small branches of the obturator nerve. Blood was supplied by branches of the inferior gluteal artery (Fig. 1).
An electronic calliper (Mitutoyo Corporation, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan) was used for these measurements. Each measurement was repeated twice with an accuracy of up to 0.1 mm. No other morphological variants were found during dissection of the lower limb. Table 1 shows the morphometric measurements of the present case.
1st |
2nd |
|
LENGTH |
79.90 mm |
114.91 mm (89.00 mm — muscular part 25.91 mm — tendinous part) |
WIDTH |
||
PP |
7.46 mm |
3.36 mm |
MJ |
– |
2.97 mm |
PK |
3.97 mm |
2.62 mm |
THICKNESS |
||
PP |
2.17 mm |
1.08 mm |
MJ |
– |
1.34 mm |
PK |
1.11 mm |
1.18 mm |
DISCUSSION
Muscles of pelvic region are morphologically variable. Sometimes there is no GS, or no GI, and in rare cases, both are lacking [2, 8, 16]. The QF can also be absent, and in most such cases there is an associated increase in the volume of the GI [16].
Some fusions have also been described in this region. For example, the GI can be fused with the QF. Leal et al. [12] also described fusion between the GS and the gluteus minimus. Charpy and Nicolas [5] found a muscular connection between the QF and the GI, and between the QF and the adductor magnus [5].
Macalister [10] reported that the QF can have two or three distinct parts. It is not known whether this was a divided muscle belly or duplication [13], though there are more detailed descriptions in the literature. For example, Natsis et al. [14] found two-headed PMs in 12 (4.1%) cases. Curiously, these two heads showed different arrangements. In five cases the first belly was not located superiorly to the second (as it is in most cases); it was positioned superficially and the other one more deeply [14]. Cassidy et al. [4] found cases in which the superior belly was partially superposed on the inferior belly [4]. Such arrangements of two bellies can also occur in morphological variants of other pelvic muscles.
Tanyeli et al. [15] described an interesting case with a double PM, double GS, double GI, and double QF. The superior part of the PM originated from the anterior surface of the sacrum and the inferior part from the sacrotuberous ligament. Their common distal attachment was on the greater trochanter. The upper head of the GS was proximally attached on the body of the ischium and the lower head was attached to the ischial spine. The first head of the GI was proximally attached to the ischiadic spine and the second head to the ischial tuberosity. These four structures were inserted on to the greater trochanter. The final variation was the double QF, both parts originating from the ischial tuberosity and attaching distally on the intertrochanteric crest [15].
Analysing the attachments described above, we excluded the possibility that the present case involved an additional head of the PM or GS. However, a double GI and double QF seemed possible. We found two accessory structures. The first (superior) was fused with the GI, so it could either be an additional head of the GI or something never previously described in the literature. However, the second structure (inferior) was not connected to either the superior variant structure or the QF, so we cannot call it an accessory head of the QF or GI.
Interestingly, the volume of the QF was smaller than normal. In most cases, when the QF is absent, the volume of the GI is increased [16]. We can therefore infer that the additional structures described herein could be associated with incomplete development of the QF.
Moreover, the QF can be fused with the adductor magnus or adductor minimus, as it was in the present case. It is hard to say with which muscle it was fused because the adductor minimus is controversial in the literature. Some authors describe it as only a part of the adductor magnus [6], some as partially separate from the adductor magnus [14], and some as a completely separate accessory muscle. In our opinion, there was fusion between the superior part of the adductor magnus and the QF [7].
To assess the clinical significance of these variant structures, we should consider their position and morphological features. Usually, accessory structures are connected with some kind of neurovascular compression. For example, Arifoglu et al. [1] described a case with double GS and double PF. The sciatic nerve passed between the two heads of the PF. In such variants there is a risk of piriformis syndrome, represented by chronic pain in the buttocks and hip with sporadic referred pain along the sciatic nerve distribution, external tenderness over the greater sciatic notch, aggravation of the pain through sitting, augmentation of it with manoeuvres that increase PM tension, and sometimes dyspareunia [10].
However, in the present case, the PM was anatomically normal and the sciatic nerve passed under it. Because the sciatic nerve was located under the described structures, the risk of PM syndrome was not high.
Taking everything into consideration, it is hard to say whether we should describe the superior variant muscle as an additional head of the GI or as something not previously described. In view of its course and morphological characteristics, the other variant muscle does not look like an accessory head of any pelvic muscle; it looks like a separate structure that is not a feature of normal anatomy.
CONCLUSIONS
The pelvic region shows several morphological variations. Accessory muscles can be associated with compression of nerves or vessels, and knowledge of them can therefore be important for clinicians, especially orthopaedists, neurologists, and physiotherapists. However, neurovascular compression depends on the arrangement and morphological characteristics of the variant muscles.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was accepted by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Lodz. The cadavers were the property of the Department of Anatomical Dissection and Donation, Medical University of Lodz. Informed consents were obtained from all participants before they died.
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science so that anatomical research could be performed. Results from such research can potentially increase mankind’s overall knowledge that can then improve patient care. Therefore, these donors and their families deserve our highest gratitude [11].