INTRODUCTION
The equine telencephalon recently attracted major scientific attention in veterinary medicine [16, 24, 34]; however, stereotactic manoeuvres were performed in dogs [30], but not in horses (Equus caballus). Accordingly, our morphometric study was designed to elucidate the topographical relations between extracranial landmarks and intracranial sites on the neopallium. Previously, the applicability and usefulness of such extra-intra measurements and calculations were demonstrated in the field of equine craniometry [7] with special emphasis on the so-called indirect distances in a three-dimensional coordinate system.
Data from numerous equine craniometric studies [7, 10, 18, 19, 22, 25, 26], various imaging procedures [2, 12, 16, 32, 33] and some electrophysiological approaches [1, 3, 6] are currently available. However, they appear limited in their methodical scope because a topographical link is missing between the two subjects of interest, i.e. skull (head surface) and brain. Kramer et al. [20] used extracranial landmarks for a surgical approach to the brain; Wijnberg et al. [35] used extracranial landmarks for the placement of electrodes for electroencephalography, but a comprehensive cartographic guideline is still not available.
This may, in part, be due to the lack of a uniform reference system for the horse’s head, and — in particular — to the very complex and heterogeneous surface architecture of the equine neopallium [4, 9, 24]. The recently elaborated cartographic pattern subdividing the surface of the equine neopallium [5, 13] was applied in this study as a promising tool to combine both, landmarks on the head and distinct sites on the brain’s surface, for a comprehensive description of the topographical extra-intra relations. In order to allow the unanimous identification of the sulci (i.e. their courses and depths; cartographic pattern) the isolation of the brain from the cranial cavity was assumed to be indispensable at the present early state of this pilot study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens
The heads of 16 adult warm-blooded horses were fixed by perfusion with 10% formalin via the left A. carotis communis shortly after euthanasia. The horses had been euthanized by medical staff at the Clinic for Horses (University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany) to be used in the dissection courses of the Institute of Anatomy at the same university. No animals were exclusively euthanized for this study. All related procedures were carried out in accordance with the German Federal Law, i.e. the Protection of Animals Act (Tierschutzgesetz §4, §7, §7a) as well as the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council for the Protection of Animals Used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes (2010/63/EU). The project was reported to and approved by the Animal Welfare Officer of the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany (TVO-2018-V-70 of 4 September 2018).
Settings
The heads were frozen and longitudinally cut 15 mm to the right side of the median plane (to avoid damage to the left hemisphere). Then, the left half was placed on the stereotactic apparatus (the section plane lying on a specimen table). A simple stereotactic apparatus was built as previously described in detail [13]. Briefly, the specimen table was flexibly connected with a fixed base plate; hence, it could be lifted and adjusted to standardized angles (0 and 90 degrees). It also had scaled guide bars (mm units) on its sides and, therefore, could be shifted precisely back and forth and side to side. Additionally, a drill machine was mounted in a stable vertical position above the specimen table (wood drill bit with a diameter of 3 mm).
To ensure a uniform positioning of the different heads on the specimen table, the establishing of a uniform extracranial reference line (like for example the Frankfurt line in human medicine) was indispensable. Hence, the Hannover line was established: This ran along the crista facialis and extended to the head’s caudal end. Accordingly, the head was placed in such a way that the Hannover line was always parallel to the longitudinal margin of the specimen table.
A three-dimensional anatomical coordinate system (Fig. 1) was established by using three extracranial reference planes, i.e. firstly, the horizontal plane called Hannover plane (at the level of the Hannover line); secondly, the transverse plane cutting the foramen supraorbitale; thirdly, the median plane. These planes were orthogonal, and all met in the so-called zero point of the head (ZP) and represented the three spatial axes: x, y and z (Fig. 1).
This setting allowed drilling at different angles (i.e. 90 degrees in the lateral view and 0 degrees in the dorsal view) and at different sites, i.e. at the so-called drilling points (D). The drilling points were topographically related to palpable anatomical landmarks, i.e. foramen supraorbitale, crista facialis, arcus zygomaticus, margo orbitalis, median plane. Three drilling points were placed parallel to the Hannover line, three parallel to the median plane (Fig. 2). This stereotactic drilling at the selected extracranial drilling points (D) yielded intracranial target points (T) at the internal surface of the calvaria and on the brain.
On the carefully removed brain, the facies convexa of the neopallium was subdivided into 15 sectors (Fig. 3), as previously described [5, 13]. The sectors were delineated by the primary sulci and by auxiliary lines topographically related to the primary sulci. The centre of each sector was designated as the sector centre point (SCP). Additionally, the rostral pole (RP) and the caudal pole (CP) of the neopallium were marked (Fig. 3).
Measurements and calculations
Measurements were performed on the outside of the head (craniometry) and — after brain removal from the cranial cavity — on the surface of the isolated brain (encephalometry) using the scales of the moveable specimen table of the stereotactic apparatus that was shifted in either the longitudinal or transversal direction. Measurements on the macerated skulls (craniometry) were performed by using the Faro® Fusion measurement device (Faro Europe, Stuttgart, GER) together with the operating software DELCAM PowerINSPECT (DELCAM, Birmingham, UK) as previously described [7, 22, 26].
The measured distances (Table 1) — designated as indirect distances — were strictly aligned parallel to the x-, y- and z-axes of the head/skull/brain in accordance with the anatomical coordinate system (Fig. 1). On the isolated brain, the longitudinal axis was recognized by the target points that lay on a line parallel to the Hannover line and median plane of the head/skull, respectively; the zero point was an essential reference point (Fig. 4).
Measurements on head and macerated skull |
Measurements on isolated neopallium |
Calculations of extra-intra distances |
From – To |
From – To |
From – To |
L – D |
T – SCP |
L – SCP |
ZP – L |
T – RP |
ZP – SCP |
ZP – D |
T – CP |
ZP – CP |
|
|
ZP – RP |
Determining the indirect distances between extracranial landmarks or the zero point head (ZP) and sites on the brain (SCPs) — “extra-intra distances” — was performed in three steps:
Finally, for the metric and arithmetic data of all 16 horses (Table 2), the mean values, the standard deviations and the differences between the longest and shortest indirect distances were calculated using Microsoft® Excel® 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Diagrams displaying the positions of the SCP in the coordinate system were generated with Microsoft Excel and subsequently graphically supplemented (Adobe Photoshop CS6 Extended 13.0.1; Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) to highlight distinct sites (Fig. 6).
Extracranial landmark |
SCP |
M [mm] |
SD [mm] |
Max–Min [mm] |
Indirect distances along the longitudinal axis (x-axis) |
|
|
|
|
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
I |
–47 |
5 |
14 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
II |
–29 |
5 |
16 |
Porus acusticus externus |
III |
–75 |
4 |
13 |
Most rostral point on margo orbitalis |
IV |
95 |
5 |
15 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
V |
–32 |
4 |
15 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
VI |
–18 |
5 |
15 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
VII |
–11 |
5 |
18 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
VIII |
9 |
6 |
19 |
Most rostral point on margo orbitalis |
IX |
80 |
4 |
14 |
Most ventral point on margo orbitalis |
X |
47 |
6 |
22 |
Porus acusticus externus |
XI |
–38 |
5 |
14 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
XII |
–3 |
5 |
16 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
XIII |
17 |
4 |
15 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
XIV |
1 |
5 |
18 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
XV |
23 |
4 |
14 |
Porus acusticus externus |
RP |
–102 |
5 |
18 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
CP |
35 |
4 |
13 |
Indirect distances along the vertical axis (y-axis) |
|
|
|
|
Most ventral point on margo orbitalis |
I |
25 |
6 |
17 |
Porus acusticus externus |
II |
30 |
5 |
15 |
Foramen supraorbitale |
III |
–43 |
6 |
18 |
Most ventral point on margo orbitalis |
IV |
51 |
6 |
18 |
Porus acusticus externus |
V |
63 |
5 |
17 |
Porus acusticus externus |
VI |
49 |
4 |
17 |
Most ventral point on margo orbitalis |
VII |
9 |
6 |
18 |
Porus acusticus externus |
VIII |
24 |
5 |
21 |
Most ventral point on margo orbitalis |
IX |
13 |
7 |
22 |
Foramen supraorbitale |
X |
–10 |
5 |
15 |
Porus acusticus externus |
XI |
73 |
4 |
14 |
Porus acusticus externus |
XII |
58 |
6 |
22 |
Most caudal point on arcus zygomaticus |
XIII |
11 |
6 |
22 |
Porus acusticus externus |
XIV |
65 |
5 |
18 |
Porus acusticus externus |
XV |
53 |
5 |
16 |
Porus acusticus externus |
RP |
38 |
5 |
13 |
Porus acusticus externus |
CP |
36 |
4 |
14 |
Indirect distances along the transverse axis (z-axis) |
|
|
|
|
Foramen supraorbitale |
I |
–33 |
4 |
12 |
Foramen supraorbitale |
II |
–27 |
5 |
14 |
Median plane |
III |
40 |
6 |
18 |
Most dorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
IV |
–50 |
4 |
13 |
Foramen supraorbitale |
V |
–41 |
4 |
11 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
VI |
–30 |
4 |
14 |
Median plane |
VII |
56 |
4 |
14 |
Median plane |
VIII |
49 |
4 |
14 |
Median plane |
IX |
34 |
3 |
12 |
Median plane |
X |
13 |
3 |
13 |
Median plane |
XI |
17 |
3 |
12 |
Median plane |
XII |
36 |
4 |
14 |
Median plane |
XIII |
40 |
3 |
11 |
Median plane |
XIV |
17 |
4 |
14 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
XV |
–60 |
4 |
13 |
Median plane |
RP |
18 |
4 |
14 |
Caudodorsal point on arcus zygomaticus |
CP |
–62 |
5 |
15 |
RESULTS
All SCP were always located dorsal and caudal to the zero point head (ZP), i.e. caudal to the foramen supraorbitale and dorsal to the Hannover plane. The rostral pole of the neopallium lay on average on the same transverse plane as the ZP. In the inter-individual comparison, the topographical relations between the SCPs of the neopallium and the ZP varied. However, a common basic pattern of localisation was obvious, meaning that each of the 15 SCPs (I-XV) — if compared in the 16 horses — had its position within a certain limited residence area (Fig. 6; see colour-coded areas).
These topographical relations between the SCPs of the neopallium and the ZP were visualised by using the mean values of the respective indirect distances mentioned above and by projecting their mean localisations onto the surface of the head (Figs. 7, 8). This allowed identifying the so-called mean localisation of each SCP with reference to the three reference planes.
The values of the indirect distances between extracranial landmarks and SCPs on the neopallium showed inter-individually variable characteristics, depending on the spatial axis and the selected landmark. Certain landmarks and the indirect distances related to them showed the least inter-individual differences, depending on the spatial axis (Table 2) and on the selected SCP. Such landmarks, one for each SCP in the respective spatial axis, are recommended as the guiding structure to the respective SCP. With reference to these guiding structures, each SCP could be located in an area smaller than 23 mm in diameter. The calculated indirect distances between landmarks and the SCPs other than those listed in Table 2 showed more inter-individual differences; these data (not listed here) are available on request.
Considering the longitudinal axis (Table 2), one landmark, i.e. the most dorsal and caudal point on the arcus zygomaticus, is particularly recommended to be used as the most suitable guiding structure to SCP I and all subsequent caudal SCPs. As for SCPs located further rostrally, other landmarks (Table 2) are recommended because the indirect distances starting from these landmarks showed smaller inter-individual differences. In the vertical axis (Table 2), the porus acusticus externus is particularly recommended for most of the ventral, dorsal and laterocaudal SCPs because the indirect distances related to these showed the least inter-individual differences. In contrast, the most ventral point on the margo orbitalis is recommended as the guiding structure for lateral SCPs (Table 2). The median plane was a suitable guiding structure for the indirect distances in the transversal direction (z-axis; Table 2). However, the foramen supraorbitale is also recommended, e.g. as the guiding structure to the SCPs near the fissura sylvia (Table 2).
DISCUSSION
Measurements and calculations of distances between extracranial landmarks and specific sites on the brain require appropriate anatomical reference systems in combination with an adequate stereotactic device to facilitate, firstly, the standardized and reproducible placement and probing/drilling on the head and, secondly, the reproducible placement of the isolated brain for the purpose of measurements on the neopallium.
The stereotactic apparatus used in this study differed from those that had been applied previously on pigs [27], cattle [21] or dogs [17, 30]. In those settings, a frame was attached to the intact head and the drill bit or probe was movably attached to it. Our setting was simpler and yet effective because it overcame the initial challenge in terms of uniform specimen positioning by using heads cut in the paramedian plane. This had several advantages. Firstly, it allowed removal of the brain (for separate measurements); secondly, it allowed adjusting of the median plane of the stereotactic system (i.e. the specimen table) with the paramedian plane of the specimen (i.e. the cutting surface of the head and brain); thirdly, it allowed adjusting the specimens along the table’s scaled margins that represented the x-axis and y-axis of the stereotactic and anatomical coordinate system. Head and brain, though separated from each other, bore identical marks (i.e. external drilling points and target points on the neopallium), which were identically aligned along the Hannover plane and the median plane [13], i.e. two of the three reference planes.
The three established orthogonal planes formed the basis for the three-dimensional-navigation, for the measurements of the horse’s head and brain, and for the distance calculations. In human medicine, similar patient-related coordinate systems and reference planes (like the Frankfurt plane) are commonly used in imaging or surgery [14, 29].
Previous systems for orientation appeared less suitable for this study because they referred to two planes only instead of three [31] or were only used for the examination of the brain [16], i.e. without reference to extracranial landmarks.
The zero point of the head (ZP) within our anatomical coordinate system was a valuable morphometric feature as it could be easily projected onto the surface of the head in the lateral and in the dorsal view. Previously, such central reference points had been used in equine craniometry [11]; however, to calculate virtually instead of physically palpable points and — as such — were not suitable to serve as anatomical guiding structure. The position of the ZP was deduced from the combination of the three designated orthogonal standard planes and, hence, could be regarded as a proportional parameter that partially adjusted imbalances related to individual variations in size and shape of the head and brain.
The distinct, appropriately narrow allocation and designation of sites on the neopallium was challenged by the complex gyration pattern, which is known to be extremely heterogeneous in the equine brain [9, 23, 24]. The subdivision of the facies convexa into 15 sectors, in accordance with the recently introduced cartographic mapping system [5, 13], was the key element for the objective and reproducible orientation on the neopallium. Hence, the use of isolated brain specimens for the unanimous determination of these sectors was regarded as an indispensable technical prerequisite; this method was preferred instead of computer tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging at this initial state of our study. Such imaging procedures are of course in the scope of future investigations now that the basic topographic extra-intra relations (skull vs. brain) and the neopallium’s cartographic pattern (sectors) have been principally elucidated.
The morphometric procedure applied here highlighted the topography of the equine brain in situ be-cause, for the first time, extracranial landmarks were topographically linked to selected cerebral surface structures in horses (extra-intra calculations/measure-ments). The immanent biological variability of both, skull and neopallium [24], commonly influences the results of any morphometric procedure. To exclude growth-related differences, only adult horses (> 5 years) were used in this study, bearing in mind that age-related differences in equine skulls have not been detected in horses older than 5 years [7]. In terms of this, our pool of specimens (adult, warm-blooded horses) was homogeneous.
Considering that morphometric data of two biologically variable systems (skull and neopallium) were linked in this study, one could not expect to find a certain SCP in the precisely identical spot in different horses. Yet, the comparison of data revealed that each SCP was localised in a limited space, i.e. the residence area. This finding is in line with general morphometric principles that apply in a three-dimensional system [7, 26]. Consequently, the residence area is regarded as a valuable descriptive tool of allocation of the SCPs.
Several extracranial landmarks on the equine head had been recommended [7, 20, 28, 36] and were examined in this study. However, our data emphasized that one particular landmark is not equally suitable for all sites on the neopallium in general. Rather, the choice of a distinct, specific landmark (i.e. the guiding structure) is recommended for the most precise navigation to the requested target site (SCP): the lists of selected data of indirect distances presented here and in the much more comprehensive data set including direct distances [13] are also proposed to be used as manuals of reference, indicating the appropriate guiding structure for accurate manoeuvres to an SCP.
The cartographic system of sectors [5, 13] is emphasized as a useful supplementary means for the distinct descriptive allocation of investigated sites in the case that certain techniques like, e.g. previously performed diagnostic electroencephalographic procedures [36], imaging studies [16] or surgery [20] should be further developed and elaborated for the application in horses. For example, the area that was electrophysiologically [3, 6] or histologically [8, 15] identified as the motor cortex is very likely to be partially located in sector XI of the neopallium.
CONCLUSIONS
The elaborated map of standardised sectors on the neopallium was an effective tool to overcome the orientation problems caused by the heterogeneous surface architecture of the equine brain. The proposed sectors were adequately small enough to perform the distinct and unanimous allocation and designation of targeted sites on the brain. The coordinate system specifically elaborated for the equine head facilitated the topographical, metric linkage of extracranial, palpable landmarks and the neopallium’s surface sectors. The choice of the appropriate landmarks on the head’s outer surface enabled the reproducible navigation towards the different sectors. The presented anatomical data are supposed to represent a substantially sound basis for studies by means of diagnostic imaging systems like computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank our native speaker, Mrs. Frances Sherwood-Brock, who most meticulously revised the English manuscript.