Vol 80, No 4 (2021)
Original article
Published online: 2020-09-23

open access

Page views 7299
Article views/downloads 1577
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Ameliorating effect of selenium nanoparticles on cyclophosphamide-induced hippocampal neurotoxicity in male rats: light, electron microscopic and immunohistochemical study

H. M. Ibrahim1, M. A. Zommara2, M. E. Elnaggar1
Pubmed: 33084015
Folia Morphol 2021;80(4):806-819.


Background: Cyclophosphamide (CPH) is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug that can affect the hippocampal neurocytes with a subsequent effect on memory and cognitive functions. Nanomedicine has the potential to overcome the current chemotherapeutic side effects, because of the unique nanoscale size and distinctive bioeffects of nanomaterials. So, the present study aims to investigate the potential ameliorative effect of the biologically synthesized nano-selenium (nano-Se) on CPH induced hippocampal neurotoxicity.
Materials and methods: Twenty four rats were randomly classified into four groups of 6 rats each: control group, nano-Se group (dose of 0.5 mg biological nano-Se/kg daily via oral gavage), CPH group (dose of 20 mg CPH/kg daily intraperitoneally), and CPH plus nano-Se group. After 4 weeks, the rats were sacrificed and the hippocampus was excised and processed. Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin stain and immunohistochemically stained for caspase-3 (apoptosis marker) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (astrocytic activity marker) (GFAP). Morphometric analysis and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) examination were also done.
Results: Control and nano-Se groups revealed no structural changes. By light microscopy, CPH group showed degeneration and necrosis of hippocampal neurocytes, significantly reduced thickness of the neurocyte cell layers, increased expression of GFAP and caspase-3 immunostains and significantly elevated apoptotic index. Moreover, neurocytes damage, mitochondrial cristeolysis, mild dilation of rough endoplasmic reticulum, and disrupted neurolemmal sheaths of nerve fibres were also demonstrated by TEM. Nano-Se cotreatment in the fourth group reversed all the aforementioned deleterious changes that induced by CPH in the hippocampal neurocytes.
Conclusions: Treatment with CPH caused damage to hippocampal neurocytes that can be reversed by biological nano-Se co-treatment.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file


  1. Abdel-Hakeem EA, Abdel-Hamid HA, Abdel Hafez SM. The possible protective effect of Nano-Selenium on the endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions in a rat model of acute pancreatitis. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2020; 60: 126480.
  2. Akomolafe SF, Olasehinde TA, Oyeleye SI, et al. Curcumin administration mitigates cyclophosphamide-induced oxidative damage and restores alteration of enzymes associated with cognitive function in rats' brain. Neurotox Res. 2020; 38(1): 199–210.
  3. Arumugam N, Sivakumar V, Thanislass J, et al. Effects of acrolein on rat liver antioxidant defense system. Indian J Exp Biol. 1997; 35(12): 1373–1374.
  4. Bancroft J, Layton C, Suvarna S.K. Bancroft’s Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques: Expert Consult: Online and Print, 7e; 2012.
  5. Bancroft J, Stonard J. Classical histochemical methods. Bancroft's Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 2013: 563–575.
  6. Barton D, Loprinzi C. Novel approaches to preventing chemotherapy-induced cognitive dysfunction in breast cancer: the art of the possible. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002; 3 Suppl 3: S121–S127.
  7. Bhattacharjee A, Basu A, Ghosh P, et al. Protective effect of Selenium nanoparticle against cyclophosphamide induced hepatotoxicity and genotoxicity in Swiss albino mice. J Biomater Appl. 2014; 29(2): 303–317.
  8. Bohnenstengel F, Friedel G, Ritter CA, et al. Variability of cyclophosphamide uptake into human bronchial carcinoma: consequences for local bioactivation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2000; 45(1): 63–68.
  9. Boostani A, Sadeghi AA, Mousavi SN, et al. Effects of organic, inorganic, and nano-Se on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, cellular and humoral immune responses in broiler chickens exposed to oxidative stress. Livestock Sci. 2015; 178: 330–336.
  10. Cai SJ, Wu CX, Gong LM, et al. Effects of nano-selenium on performance, meat quality, immune function, oxidation resistance, and tissue selenium content in broilers. Poult Sci. 2012; 91(10): 2532–2539.
  11. Caldwell RB, Toque HA, Narayanan SP, et al. Arginase: an old enzyme with new tricks. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015; 36(6): 395–405.
  12. Christie LA, Acharya MM, Parihar VK, et al. Impaired cognitive function and hippocampal neurogenesis following cancer chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18(7): 1954–1965.
  13. Dkhil MA, Zrieq R, Al-Quraishy S, et al. Selenium nanoparticles attenuate oxidative stress and testicular damage in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Molecules. 2016; 21(11).
  14. Eng LF, Ghirnikar RS, Lee YL. Glial fibrillary acidic protein: GFAP-thirty-one years (1969-2000). Neurochem Res. 2000; 25(9-10): 1439–1451.
  15. Goud KG, Veldurthi NK, Vithal M, et al. Characterization and evaluation of biological and photocatalytic activities of selenium nanoparticles synthesized using yeast fermented broth. Applied Nanomedicine. Published online. 2016.
  16. Hamoud A. Possible role of selenium nano-particles on gentamicin-induced toxicity in rat testis: morphological and morphometric study. Egypt J Histol. 2019; 0(0): 0–0.
  17. Hamza R, EL‐Megharbel S, Altalhi T, et al. Hypolipidemic and hepatoprotective synergistic effects of selenium nanoparticles and vitamin. E against acrylamide‐induced hepatic alterations in male albino mice. Applied Organometallic Chemistry. 2020; 34(3).
  18. Huang G, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, et al. Vacuolization and apoptosis induced by nano-selenium in HeLa cell line. Science China Chemistry. 2010; 53(11): 2272–2278.
  19. Kannan N, Subbalaxmi S. Biogenesis of nanoparticles:a current perspective. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science. Published online. 2011.
  20. Khalaf AA, Ahmed W, Moselhy WA, et al. Protective effects of selenium and nano-selenium on bisphenol-induced reproductive toxicity in male rats. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2019; 38(4): 398–408.
  21. Khan S, Ahmad K, Alshammari EMA, et al. Implication of caspase-3 as a common therapeutic target for multineurodegenerative disorders and its inhibition using nonpeptidyl natural compounds. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 379817.
  22. Khurana A, Tekula S, Saifi MA, et al. Therapeutic applications of selenium nanoparticles. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019; 111: 802–812.
  23. Kitamura Y, Kanemoto E, Sugimoto M, et al. Influence of nicotine on doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide combination treatment-induced spatial cognitive impairment and anxiety-like behavior in rats. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2017; 390(4): 369–378.
  24. Kumar A, Prasad KS. Biogenic selenium nanoparticles for their therapeutic application. Asian J Pharmaceut Clin Res. 2019: 4–9.
  25. Lal Bhatia A, Manda K, Patni S, et al. Prophylactic action of linseed (Linum usitatissimum) oil against cyclophosphamide-induced oxidative stress in mouse brain. J Med Food. 2006; 9(2): 261–264.
  26. Li DRi, Ishikawa T, Zhao D, et al. Histopathological changes of the hippocampus neurons in brain injury. Histol Histopathol. 2009; 24(9): 1113–1120.
  27. Liang XJ, Chen C, Zhao Y, et al. Circumventing tumor resistance to chemotherapy by nanotechnology. Methods Mol Biol. 2010; 596: 467–488.
  28. Ludeman SM. The chemistry of the metabolites of cyclophosphamide. Curr Pharm Des. 1999; 5(8): 627–643.
  29. Lumpkins KM, Bochicchio GV, Keledjian K, et al. Glial fibrillary acidic protein is highly correlated with brain injury. J Trauma. 2008; 65(4): 778–82; discussion 782.
  30. Lyons L, Elbeltagy M, Bennett G, et al. The effects of cyclophosphamide on hippocampal cell proliferation and spatial working memory in rat. PLoS One. 2011; 6(6): e21445.
  31. Martin PM, O'Callaghan JP. A direct comparison of GFAP immunocytochemistry and GFAP concentration in various regions of ethanol-fixed rat and mouse brain. J Neurosci Methods. 1995; 58(1-2): 181–192.
  32. Modica-Napolitano JS, Singh KK. Mitochondria as targets for detection and treatment of cancer. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2002; 4(9): 1–19.
  33. Mohammed ET, Safwat GM. Assessment of the ameliorative role of selenium nanoparticles on the oxidative stress of acetaminophen in some tissues of male albino rats. Beni-Suef University J Basic Applied Sci. 2013; 2(2): 80–85.
  34. Morcos M. Histological and immunohistochemical study on the protective effects of cetrorelix against chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage. Egypt J Histol. 2012; 35(3): 587–597.
  35. Nagy G, Pinczes G, Pinter G, et al. In situ electron microscopy of lactomicroselenium particles in probiotic bacteria. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17(7).
  36. Narayanan KB, Sakthivel N. Biological synthesis of metal nanoparticles by microbes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2010; 156(1-2): 1–13.
  37. Oboh G, Ogunruku OO. Cyclophosphamide-induced oxidative stress in brain: protective effect of hot short pepper (Capsicum frutescens L. var. abbreviatum). Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2010; 62(3): 227–233.
  38. Olasehinde TA, Olaniran AO, Okoh AI. Neuroprotective effects of some seaweeds against Zn - induced neuronal damage in HT-22 cells via modulation of redox imbalance, inhibition of apoptosis and acetylcholinesterase activity. Metab Brain Dis. 2019; 34(6): 1615–1627.
  39. Oraby HAS, Hassan AAM, Af N, et al. Effect of cyclophosphamide on transcription of SOD1mRNA and GPX1 mRNA in mice liver and brain tissues. Published online. 2010: 1736–1742.
  40. Peng D, Zhang J, Liu Q, et al. Size effect of elemental selenium nanoparticles (Nano-Se) at supranutritional levels on selenium accumulation and glutathione S-transferase activity. J Inorg Biochem. 2007; 101(10): 1457–1463.
  41. Prokisch J, Zommara MA. Process for producing elemental selenium nanospheres. 2010;(20100189634). http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2010/0189634.html.
  42. Salem M, Altayeb Z. Light and Electron Microscopic Study on the Possible Protective Effect of Nigella Sativa Oil on Cisplatin Hepatotoxicity in Albino Rats. Egypt J Histol. 2017; 40(1): 68–79.
  43. Seigers R, Loos M, Van Tellingen O, et al. Cognitive impact of cytotoxic agents in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015; 232(1): 17–37.
  44. Shaibah HS, Elsify AEK, Medhat TM, et al. Histopathological and immunohistochemical study of the protective effect of triptorelin on the neurocytes of the hippocampus and the cerebral cortex of male albino rats after short-term exposure to cyclophosphamide. J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2016; 4(3): 123–132.
  45. Shakibaie M, Forootanfar H, Golkari Y, et al. Anti-biofilm activity of biogenic selenium nanoparticles and selenium dioxide against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Proteus mirabilis. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2015; 29: 235–241.
  46. Sheiha AM, Abdelnour SA, Abd El-Hack ME, et al. Effects of dietary biological or chemical-synthesized nano-selenium supplementation on growing rabbits exposed to thermal stress. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(3).
  47. Skalickova S, Milosavljevic V, Cihalova K, et al. Selenium nanoparticles as a nutritional supplement. Nutrition. 2017; 33: 83–90.
  48. Sobaniec-Lotowska ME. Ultrastructure of Purkinje cell perikarya and their dendritic processes in the rat cerebellar cortex in experimental encephalopathy induced by chronic application of valproate. Int J Exp Pathol. 2001; 82(6): 337–348.
  49. Stankiewicz A, Skrzydlewska E, Makieła M. Effects of amifostine on liver oxidative stress caused by cyclophosphamide administration to rats. Drug Metabol Drug Interact. 2002; 19(2): 67–82.
  50. Subramaniam S, Subramaniam S, Shyamala Devi CS. Erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activity in CMF treated breast cancer patients. Cancer Biochem Biophys. 1994; 14(3): 177–182.
  51. Ueno M, Katayama Ki, Yamauchi H, et al. Cell cycle progression is required for nuclear migration of neural progenitor cells. Brain Res. 2006; 1088(1): 57–67.
  52. Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, et al. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007; 39(1): 44–84.
  53. Wang L, Li C, Huang Q, et al. Biofunctionalization of selenium nanoparticles with a polysaccharide from Rosa roxburghii fruit and their protective effect against HO-induced apoptosis in INS-1 cells. Food Funct. 2019; 10(2): 539–553.
  54. Xiao R, Yu HL, Zhao HF, et al. Developmental neurotoxicity role of cyclophosphamide on post-neural tube closure of rodents in vitro and in vivo. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2007; 25(8): 531–537.
  55. Xu C, Shu WQ, Qiu ZQ, et al. Protective effects of green tea polyphenols against subacute hepatotoxicity induced by microcystin-LR in mice. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007; 24(2): 140–148.
  56. Yang M, Kim JS, Song MS, et al. Cyclophosphamide impairs hippocampus-dependent learning and memory in adult mice: Possible involvement of hippocampal neurogenesis in chemotherapy-induced memory deficits. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2010; 93(4): 487–494.
  57. Yu Bo, Zhang Y, Zheng W, et al. Positive surface charge enhances selective cellular uptake and anticancer efficacy of selenium nanoparticles. Inorg Chem. 2012; 51(16): 8956–8963.
  58. Zhang J, Zhang SY, Xu JJ, et al. new method for the synthesis of selenium nanoparticles and the application to construction of H2O2 biosensor. Chinese Chemical Letters. Published online. 2004.
  59. Zhao CY, Cheng R, Yang Z, et al. Nanotechnology for cancer therapy based on chemotherapy. Molecules. 2018; 23(4).