Vol 77, No 4 (2018)
Case report
Published online: 2018-03-21
Bilateral bifid mandibular canal: a case report using cone beam computed tomography
Abstract
The mandibular canal (MC) originates in the mandibular foramen and runs bilaterally through the mandibular ramus and body, ending in the mental foramen. One of the most common anatomical variations is bifid MC, the configurations of which have been classified into four categories and sub-categories. The prevalence of these variations depends on the imaging method used. Studies carried out in panoramic X-rays and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) show
prevalences varying between 1% and 20%. In this case report we present the finding of a bilateral bifid MC by CBCT examination; we describe its location and morphological characteristics. The variation found was a type 1 bilateral bifid MC, which consists in an accessory canal originating from a single mandibular foramen and extending to the third molar or its immediate surroundings. In this report we discuss the importance of detecting these anatomical variations, as well as their implications in clinical practice.
Keywords: mandibular canalanatomical variationbifid canalcone beam computed tomography
References
- Akhtar MJ, Parveen S, Madhukar PK, et al. et al.. A morphological study of retromolar foramen and canal in indian dried mandibles. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2014; 3: 13142–13151.
- Anderson LC, Kosinski TF, Mentag PJ. A review of the intraosseous course of the nerves of the mandible. J Oral Implantol. 1991; 17(4): 394–403.
- Bilecenoglu B, Tuncer N. Clinical and anatomical study of retromolar foramen and canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64(10): 1493–1497.
- Castro MA, Lagravere-Vich MO, Amaral TM, et al. Classifications of mandibular canal branching: A review of literature. World J Radiol. 2015; 7(12): 531–537.
- Chávez-Lomeli ME, Mansilla Lory J, Pompa JA, et al. The human mandibular canal arises from three separate canals innervating different tooth groups. J Dent Res. 1996; 75(8): 1540–1544.
- Cheung LK, Leung YY, Chow LK, et al. Incidence of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4338 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39(4): 320–326.
- Das S, Suri RK. An anatomico-radiological study of an accessory mandibular foramen on the medial mandibular surface. Folia Morphol. 2004; 63(4): 511–513.
- Fukami K, Shiozaki K, Mishima A, et al. Bifid mandibular canal: confirmation of limited cone beam CT findings by gross anatomical and histological investigations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 41(6): 460–465.
- Garay I, Cantín M. Accessory mental foramina assessed by cone-beam computed tomography: report of unilateral and bilateral detection. Int J Morphol. 2013; 31(3): 1104–1108.
- Kang JH, Lee KS, Oh MG, et al. The incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans by using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014; 44(1): 53–60.
- Kaufman E, Serman NJ, Wang PD. Bilateral mandibular accessory foramina and canals: a case report and review of the literature. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2000; 29(3): 170–175.
- Kim ST, Hu KS, Song WC, et al. Location of the mandibular canal and the topography of its neurovascular structures. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20(3): 936–939.
- Misch CE, Crawford EA. Predictable mandibular nerve location--a clinical zone of safety. Int J Oral Implantol. 1990; 7(1): 37–40.
- Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, et al. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24(1): 155–159.
- Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Hiraiwa Y, et al. Observation of buccal foramen in mandibular body using cone-beam computed tomography. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 2009; 86(1): 25–29.
- Narayana K, Prashanthi N. Incidence of large accessroy mandibular foramen in human mandibles. Eur J Anat. 2003; 7: 139–141.
- Nortjé CJ, Farman AG, Grotepass FW. Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: A retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg. 1977; 15(1): 55–63.
- Langlais RP, Broadus R, Glass BJ. Bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985; 110(6): 923–926.
- Ossenberg NS. Temporal crest canal: case report and statistics on a rare mandibular variant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986; 62(1): 10–12.
- Ozturk A, Potluri A, Vieira AR. Position and course of the mandibular canal in skulls. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012; 113(4): 453–458.
- Rashsuren O, Choi JW, Han WJ, et al. Assessment of bifid and trifid mandibular canals using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014; 44(3): 229–236.
- Reiser GM, Manwaring JD, Damoulis PD. Clinical significance of the structural integrity of the superior aspect of the mandibular canal. J Periodontol. 2004; 75(2): 322–326.
- Renton T, Dawood A, Shah A, et al. Post-implant neuropathy of the trigeminal nerve. A case series. Br Dent J. 2012; 212(11): E17.
- Sanchis JM, Peñarrocha M, Soler F. Bifid mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61(4): 422–424.
- Schejtman R, Devoto FC, Arias NH. The origin and distribution of the elements of the human mandibular retromolar canal. Arch Oral Biol. 1967; 12(11): 1261–1268.
- Silva FM, Cortez AL, Moreira RW, et al. Complications of intraoral donor site for bone grafting prior to implant placement. Implant Dent. 2006; 15(4): 420–426.
- Suazo GIC, Morales HCA, Cantín LMG, et al. Aspectos biométricos del canal mandibular. Int J Morphol. 2007; 25(4): 811–816.
- Sutton RN. The practical significance of mandibular accessory foramina. Aust Dent J. 1974; 19(3): 167–173.
- Zografos J, Kolokoudias M, Papadakis E. [The types of the mandibular canal]. Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir. 1990; 5(1): 17–20.
