Online first
Original article
Published online: 2024-10-30

open access

Page views 118
Article views/downloads 69
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Radiological study of the ossification process of medial clavicular epiphysis: The influence of sex and laterality

Dominic Marera1, Kapil Sewsaran Satyapal2

Abstract

Background: Radiological examination of bones such viz, clavicle have been developed to estimate the age of an individual without valid identification, or when suspected of providing inaccurate age. However, there is a paucity of information on the influence of sex and laterality on age the estimation process. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sex and laterality in the ossification process of the medial clavicular epiphysis within the South African and Kenyan population.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 1605 digital radiographs selected from South African and Kenyan population aged between 14–30 years were evaluated. The ossification process of the medial clavicular epiphysis was scored in accordance with Schmeling’s (2004) staging system. The difference between the chronological age and estimated age for each sex was recorded in the Bland-Altman chart. A log linear regression test was used to test for bilateral asymmetry in the ossification status of the medial epiphyses

Results: While statistically significant differences between males and females were observed in stages 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the ossification process, a paired sample t-test did not report any statistically significant difference in the asymmetry of the medial epiphysis (P = 0.89).

Conclusions: The present study concurs that the maturation of the clavicle starts earlier in the female population. However, no significant differences were recorded in the time-frame of maturation between the right and left clavicles.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Bilgili Y, Hizel S, Kara SA, et al. Accuracy of skeletal age assessment in children from birth to 6 years of age with the ultrasonographic version of the Greulich-Pyle atlas. J Ultrasound Med. 2003; 22(7): 683–690.
  2. Brown AA, Derkyi-Kwarteng L, Amonoo-Kuofi HS. Study on the time frame for ossification of the medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage by X-ray in ghanaian students. Int J Morphol. 2013; 31(2): 491–496.
  3. Cameriere R, De Luca S, De Angelis D, et al. Reliability of Schmeling's stages of ossification of medial clavicular epiphyses and its validity to assess 18 years of age in living subjects. Int J Legal Med. 2012; 126(6): 923–932.
  4. Dewitte K, Fierens C, Stöckl D, et al. Application of the Bland–Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice. Clin Chem. 2002; 48(5): 799–801.
  5. Flecker H. Roentgenographic observations ot the times of appearance of epiphyses at the medial end of the clavicle. J Anat. 1932; 67(Pt. 1): 118–164.
  6. Galstaun G. A study of ossification as observed in Indian subjects. Indian J Med Res. 1937; 26: 267–324.
  7. Garamendi PM, Landa MI, Botella MC, et al. Forensic age estimation on digital X-ray images: Medial epiphyses of the clavicle and first rib ossification in relation to chronological age. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56 Suppl 1: S3–12.
  8. Giordano D, Spampinato C, Scarciofalo G, et al. An automatic system for skeletal bone age measurement by robust processing of carpal and epiphysial/metaphysial bones. IEEE. 2010; 59(10): 2539–2553.
  9. Hillewig E, De Tobel J, Cuche O, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the medial extremity of the clavicle in forensic bone age determination: a new four-minute approach. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21(4): 757–767.
  10. Ji L, Terazawa K, Tsukamoto T, et al. Estimation of age from epiphyseal union degrees of the sternal end of the clavicle]. Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi. 1994; 69(1): 104–111.
  11. Jit I, Kulkarni M. Times of appearance and fusion of epiphysis at the medial end of the clavicle. Indian J Med Res. 1976; 64(5): 773–782.
  12. Kaur, G. Radiological study of clavicle for age estimation. Ph.D. Thesis in Forensic Sciences. Patiala, Punjabi University, 2013.
  13. Kellinghaus M, Schulz R, Vieth V, et al. Enhanced possibilities to make statements on the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis using an amplified staging scheme in evaluating thin-slice CT scans. Int J Legal Med. 2010; 124(4): 321–325.
  14. Kreitner KF, Schweden FJ, Riepert T, et al. Bone age determination based on the study of the medial extremity of the clavicle. Eur Radiol. 1998; 8(7): 1116–1122.
  15. Lakha, K. N. Standards for epiphyseal union in South African children between the ages of 6 to 24 years using low dose X-ray (lodox). Ph.D. Thesis. Cape Town, University of Cape Town, 2015.
  16. Lampl M, Jeanty P. Timing is everything: a reconsideration of fetal growth velocity patterns identifies the importance of individual and sex differences. Am J Hum Biol. 2003; 15(5): 667–680.
  17. Landis J, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1): 159.
  18. Malina RM, Little BB. Comparison of TW1 and TW2 skeletal age differences in American black and white and in Mexican children 6-13 years of age. Ann Hum Biol. 1981; 8(6): 543–548.
  19. Meijerman L, Maat GJR, Schulz R, et al. Variables affecting the probability of complete fusion of the medial clavicular epiphysis. Int J Legal Med. 2007; 121(6): 463–468.
  20. Ritz-Timme S, Cattaneo C, Collins MJ, et al. Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practise. Int J Legal Med. 2000; 113(3): 129–136.
  21. Robinson C, Eisma R, Morgan B, et al. Anthropological measurement of lower limb and foot bones using multi-detector computed tomography. J Forensic Sci. 2008; 53(6): 1289–1295.
  22. Schmeling A, Geserick G, Reisinger W, et al. Age estimation. Forensic Sci Int. 2007; 165(2-3): 178–181.
  23. Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Loreck D, et al. Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation: consequences for forensic age estimations. Int J Legal Med. 2000; 113(5): 253–258.
  24. Schmeling A, Schulz R, Reisinger W, et al. Studies on the time frame for ossification of the medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage in conventional radiography. Int J Legal Med. 2004; 118(1): 5–8.
  25. Schmidt S, Nitz I, Schulz R, et al. Applicability of the skeletal age determination method of Tanner and Whitehouse for forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med. 2008; 122(4): 309–314.
  26. Schmidt S, Nitz I, Schulz R, et al. The digital atlas of skeletal maturity by Gilsanz and Ratib: a suitable alternative for age estimation of living individuals in criminal proceedings? Int J Legal Med. 2009; 123(6): 489–494.
  27. Schulz R, Mühler M, Mutze S, et al. Studies on the time frame for ossification of the medial epiphysis of the clavicle as revealed by CT scans. Int J Legal Med. 2005; 119(3): 142–145.
  28. Schulz R, Mühler M, Reisinger W, et al. Radiographic staging of ossification of the medial clavicular epiphysis. Int J Legal Med. 2008; 122(1): 55–58.
  29. Singh AK, Mestha P, Tavakkolizadeh A, et al. Clavicle midshaft fracture non-union treated surgically, with bone grafting or demineralised bone matrix: A comparative outcome analysis. Injury Extra. 2011; 42(9): 120.
  30. Todd T, D'Errico J. The clavicular epiphyses. Am J Anat. 2005; 41(1): 25–50.
  31. Udoaka AI, Nwokediuko AU. Radiologic evaluation of clavicular morphology in Southern Nigerians. Int J Morphol. 2013; 31(1): 94–99.
  32. Webb PA, Suchey JM. Epiphyseal union of the anterior iliac crest and medial clavicle in a modern multiracial sample of American males and females. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1985; 68(4): 457–466.