Vol 70, No 2 (2011)
Review article
Submitted: 2012-06-27
Published online: 2011-06-01
A bicarotid trunk in association with an aberrant right subclavian artery. Report of two cases, clinical impact, and review of the literature
K. Natsis, M. Didagelos, S.-M. Manoli, E. Papathanasiou, G. Sofidis, N. Anastasopoulos
Folia Morphol 2011;70(2):68-73.
Vol 70, No 2 (2011)
REVIEW ARTICLES
Submitted: 2012-06-27
Published online: 2011-06-01
Abstract
A combination of an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and a bicarotid
trunk (BCT) appears in up to 2.5% of the population. The aim of this study is to
report the higher total and male incidence of this variation in the literature and
to summarise its clinical impact, providing useful knowledge to anatomists,
radiologists, cardiologists, and vascular and thoracic surgeons in order to avoid
diagnostic pitfalls and therapeutic complications. A total of 72 (43 female and
29 male) Greek Caucasian formalin-embalmed cadavers were studied. The international
literature was reviewed along with the dissection archives of the
Department of Anatomy from 1986 to 2009. Two male cadavers were found
to have an ARSA combined with a BCT (incidence: total 2.78%, males 6.9%,
females 0%). Both aortic arches consisted of three branches: (1) the BCT,
(2) the left subclavian artery, and (3) the ARSA. The common carotids followed
a normal route to the neck; the ARSA passed between the trachea and the
oesophagus in the first case and behind the oesophagus in the second case, and
was accompanied by a non-recurrent laryngeal nerve. In the second cadaver
the ARSA formed a sharp angle (kinking/buckling) on its route to the right arm.
The ARSA is associated with several congenital cardiovascular anomalies and
some chromosomal and other syndromes. It is occasionaly responsible for causing
dysphagia, dyspnoea, or acute ischaemia to the right upper limb, and it may
present as a superior mediastinal mass in cases of aneurysm formation. (Folia
Morphol 2011; 70, 2: 68–73)
Abstract
A combination of an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and a bicarotid
trunk (BCT) appears in up to 2.5% of the population. The aim of this study is to
report the higher total and male incidence of this variation in the literature and
to summarise its clinical impact, providing useful knowledge to anatomists,
radiologists, cardiologists, and vascular and thoracic surgeons in order to avoid
diagnostic pitfalls and therapeutic complications. A total of 72 (43 female and
29 male) Greek Caucasian formalin-embalmed cadavers were studied. The international
literature was reviewed along with the dissection archives of the
Department of Anatomy from 1986 to 2009. Two male cadavers were found
to have an ARSA combined with a BCT (incidence: total 2.78%, males 6.9%,
females 0%). Both aortic arches consisted of three branches: (1) the BCT,
(2) the left subclavian artery, and (3) the ARSA. The common carotids followed
a normal route to the neck; the ARSA passed between the trachea and the
oesophagus in the first case and behind the oesophagus in the second case, and
was accompanied by a non-recurrent laryngeal nerve. In the second cadaver
the ARSA formed a sharp angle (kinking/buckling) on its route to the right arm.
The ARSA is associated with several congenital cardiovascular anomalies and
some chromosomal and other syndromes. It is occasionaly responsible for causing
dysphagia, dyspnoea, or acute ischaemia to the right upper limb, and it may
present as a superior mediastinal mass in cases of aneurysm formation. (Folia
Morphol 2011; 70, 2: 68–73)
Keywords
aortic arch variations; common origin of carotids; dysphagia
Title
A bicarotid trunk in association with an aberrant right subclavian artery. Report of two cases, clinical impact, and review of the literature
Journal
Folia Morphologica
Issue
Vol 70, No 2 (2011)
Article type
Review article
Pages
68-73
Published online
2011-06-01
Page views
711
Article views/downloads
2161
Bibliographic record
Folia Morphol 2011;70(2):68-73.
Keywords
aortic arch variations
common origin of carotids
dysphagia
Authors
K. Natsis
M. Didagelos
S.-M. Manoli
E. Papathanasiou
G. Sofidis
N. Anastasopoulos