open access
An evaluation of the reproducibility of the measurement of the intima-media thickness of carotid arteries
open access
Abstract
The IMT of CA in 25 subjects (15 post stroke and 10 healthy persons) was investigated with the use of high-resolution ultrasonography. The CA subdivided into the common, bulbs and internal segments were scanned twice with a 3-week interval. Additionally three other readers with different levels of experience and skills in ultrasonography were asked to perform the same measurements in duplicate with at least a 3-week interval between.
A high concurrence for intraobserver variability was detected with a correlation coefficient ranging from 0.92 to 0.95; p < 0.0001, and maximal bias 0.019 mm. Interobserver variability for all four readers also demonstrated a high correlation coefficient ranging from 0.72 to 0.83; p < 0.0001, and the maximal bias of measurements did not exceed 0.08 mm.
The analogue measurements performed by the team demonstrate a reliable reproducibility in terms of the results of morphologic measurements. The differences obtained in the study were less than the error of the method (i.e. 0.1 mm) and should not influence clinical decision-making. Additionally, this study demonstrated that interobserver concurrence increases with the increasing experience of the investigators.
Abstract
The IMT of CA in 25 subjects (15 post stroke and 10 healthy persons) was investigated with the use of high-resolution ultrasonography. The CA subdivided into the common, bulbs and internal segments were scanned twice with a 3-week interval. Additionally three other readers with different levels of experience and skills in ultrasonography were asked to perform the same measurements in duplicate with at least a 3-week interval between.
A high concurrence for intraobserver variability was detected with a correlation coefficient ranging from 0.92 to 0.95; p < 0.0001, and maximal bias 0.019 mm. Interobserver variability for all four readers also demonstrated a high correlation coefficient ranging from 0.72 to 0.83; p < 0.0001, and the maximal bias of measurements did not exceed 0.08 mm.
The analogue measurements performed by the team demonstrate a reliable reproducibility in terms of the results of morphologic measurements. The differences obtained in the study were less than the error of the method (i.e. 0.1 mm) and should not influence clinical decision-making. Additionally, this study demonstrated that interobserver concurrence increases with the increasing experience of the investigators.
Keywords
atherosclerosis; ultrasonography; interobserver; intraobserver; variability
Title
An evaluation of the reproducibility of the measurement of the intima-media thickness of carotid arteries
Journal
Issue
Article type
Original article
Pages
25-31
Published online
2002-12-04
Page views
1621
Article views/downloads
1112
Bibliographic record
Folia Morphol 2003;62(1):25-31.
Keywords
atherosclerosis
ultrasonography
interobserver
intraobserver
variability
Authors
Radosław Kaźmierski
Adam Niezgoda
Przemysław Guzik
Maria Łukasik
Wojciech Ambrosius
Wojciech Kozubski