Marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve — anatomical peculiarities and clinical aspects
, 2, 1, 1, 1, 3, 4, 4, 4
Abstract
Background: The expanding number of parotid ablations, reconstructive and aesthetic surgeries of the head and neck, considerably increased the risk of the marginal mandibular branch (MMB) injury. The purpose of our study was to determine the anatomical peculiarities of the MMB depending on the facial nerve branching pattern (FNBP), gender and cephalometric type.
Materials and methods: The MMB was dissected on 75 hemiheads of adult embalmed cadavers. The origin, number of branches, topography and connections of the MMB were analyzed.
Results: Seven FNBP were identified: Type I (18.7%); Type II (14.7%); Type III (20%); Type IV (14.6%); Type V (5.3%); Type VI (18.7%); Type NI (8%, non-identified types). In males 1–3 MMB were determined and in females 1–4 MMB; p = 0.845. In males, bilaterally were identified 1–3 MMB. In females on the right side were found 1–2 MMB and on the left — 1–4 MMB; p = 0.204. A single MMB was revealed in 41 cases (54.7%), 2 MMB — in 29 cases (38.7%), 3 MMB — in 4 cases (5.3%) and in a single case 4 MMB (1.3%) were determined. Depending on the FNBP, the number of the MMB was: Type I — 1.2 ± 0.43; Type II — 1.5 ± 0.52; Type III — 1.6 ± 0.63; Type IV — 1.5 ± 0.52; Type V — 1.3 ± 0.50; Type VI — 1.9 ± 0.95; Type NI — 1.7 ± 0.82. IGFV = 1.403 (intergroup frequency variation); df = 6 (degree of freedom); p = 0.226. According to the cephalometric type the number of the MMB in mesocephalic type (MCT) was 1.5 ± 0.68; in brachycephalic type (BCT) — 1.6 ± 0.52; in dolichocephalic type (DCT) — 1.9 ± 0.60. IGFV = 1.698; df = 2; p = 0.190. A rare variant of the MMB origin from the temporofacial division of the facial nerve was highlighted in 5.3% of cases.
Conclusions: The MMB varies depending on the FNBP, gender and cephalometric type. The highest variation degree was characteristic of females, Type VI and DCT. The lowest variation degree was determined in Type I and in MCT, without gender differences. The risk of iatrogenic lesions of the MMB is conditioned by two important aspects: its anatomical variability and large number of surgical interventions at that level.
Keywords: marginal mandibular branchfacial nervebranching patternvariants
References
- Al-Hayani A. Anatomical localisation of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve. Folia Morphol. 2007; 66(4): 307–313.
- Anbusudar K, Arumugam B. Anatomical study on intra-parotid course of facial nerve and its terminal branches. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013; 2(12): 1828–1839.
- Babuci A, Catereniuc I, Zorina Z, et al. Morphology and variability of the facial nerve trunk depending on the branching pattern, gender, anthropometric type and side of the head in Moldovan population. Folia Morphol. 2023; 82(4): 791–797.
- Babuci A, Palarie V, Catereniuc I, et al. Variability of the cervical branch depending on the facial nerve branching pattern and anthropometric type of the head. Neurol Int. 2024; 16(1): 113–125.
- Balagopal PG, George NA, Sebastian P. Anatomic variations of the marginal mandibular nerve. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2012; 3(1): 8–11.
- Batra AP, Mahajan A, Gupta K. Marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve: an anatomical study. Indian J Plast Surg. 2010; 43(1): 60–64.
- Bruska M, Markowski M, Szyszka-Mróz J, et al. Segmental pattern and nuclei in the human embryonic brain at stage 13. Folia Morphol. 1998; 57(4): 321–330.
- Bruska M, Ulatowska-Błaszyk K, Węgłowski M, et al. Differentiation of the facial-vestibulocochlear ganglionic complex in human embryos of developmental stages 13–15. Folia Morphol. 2009; 68(3): 167–173.
- Das S, Bhattacharjee S, et al. Usual and unusual variations of marginal mandibular branch of facial nerve — nerve that helps symmetrical smile. Int J Anat Res. 2024; 12(3): 8964–8971.
- Davis RA, Anson BJ, Budinger JM, et al. Surgical anatomy of the facial nerve and parotid gland based upon a study of 350 cervicofacial halves. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1956; 102(4): 385–412.
- Dingman RO, Grabb WC. Surgical anatomy of the mandibular ramus of the facial nerve based on the dissection of 100 facial halves. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1962; 29: 266–272.
- Elvan Ö, Örs AB. Relationship between buccal branches of the facial nerve, parotid duct, buccal fat pad and Zuker’s point. Anatomy. 2020; 14(2): 91–96.
- Farahvash MR, Yaghoobi A, Farahvash B, et al. The extratemporal facial nerve and its branches: analysis of 42 hemifacial dissections in fresh Persian (Iranian) cadavers. Aesthet Surg J. 2013; 33(2): 201–208.
- FIPAT. Terminologia Anatomica. 2nd ed. https://fipat.library.dal.ca/TA2/ (11.11.2024).
- Franco FC, de Araujo TM, Vogel CJ, et al. Brachycephalic, dolichocephalic and mesocephalic: is it appropriate to describe the face using skull patterns? Dental Press J Orthod. 2013; 18(3): 159–163.
- Gardetto A, Kovacs P, Piegger J, et al. Direct coaptation of extensive facial nerve defects after removal of the superficial part of the parotid gland: an anatomic study. Head Neck. 2002; 24(12): 1047–1053.
- Guenette JP, Ben-Shlomo N, Jayender J, et al. MR imaging of the extracranial facial nerve with the CISS sequence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019; 40(11): 1954–1959.
- Günenç Beşer C, Erçakmak B, Ilgaz HB, et al. Revisiting the relationship between the submandibular duct, lingual nerve and hypoglossal nerve. Folia Morphol. 2018; 77(3): 521–526.
- Hunt P, Wilkinson D, Krumlauf R. Patterning the vertebrate head: murine Hox 2 genes mark distinct subpopulations of premigratory and migrating cranial neural crest. Development. 1991; 112(1): 43–50.
- Hwang K. Surgical anatomy of the facial nerve relating to facial rejuvenation surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25(4): 1476–1481.
- Ichimura K, Nibu Ki, Tanaka T. Nerve paralysis after surgery in the submandibular triangle: Review of university of Tokyo hospital experience. Head & Neck. 1997; 19(1): 48–53, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199701)19:1<48::aid-hed9>3.0.co;2-v.
- Kim DI, Nam SH, Nam YS, et al. The marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve in Koreans. Clin Anat. 2009; 22(2): 207–214.
- Kim I, Kim Y, Kang D, et al. Neuropeptides involved in facial nerve regeneration. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(11).
- Kirici Y, Kilic C, Kazkayasi M. Topographic anatomy of the peripheral branches of the facial nerve. J Exp Integr Med. 2011; 1(3): 201.
- Kuratani SC, Eichele G. Rhombomere transplantation repatterns the segmental organization of cranial nerves and reveals cell-autonomous expression of a homeodomain protein. Development. 1993; 117(1): 105–117.
- Lumsden A, Keynes R. Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain. Nature. 1989; 337(6206): 424–428.
- Lumsden A. The cellular basis of segmentation in the developing hindbrain. Trends Neurosci. 1990; 13(8): 329–335.
- Marcuzzo AV, Šuran-Brunelli AN, Dal Cin E, et al. Surgical anatomy of the marginal mandibular nerve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Anat. 2020; 33(5): 739–750.
- Marshall H, Nonchev S, Sham MH, et al. Retinoic acid alters hindbrain Hox code and induces transformation of rhombomeres 2/3 into a 4/5 identity. Nature. 1992; 360(6406): 737–741.
- Martínez Pascual P, Maranillo E, Vázquez T, et al. Extracranial course of the facial nerve revisited. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2019; 302(4): 599–608.
- Murthy SP, Paderno A, Balasubramanian D. Management of the marginal mandibular nerve during and after neck dissection. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 27(2): 104–109.
- Nakamura Y, Teramoto Y, Asami Y, et al. The rate of facial nerve dysfunction and time to recovery after intraparotid and extraparotid facial nerve exposure and protection in head and neck cutaneous tumor surgery. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017; 22(5): 843–848.
- Piagkou M, Tzika M, Paraskevas G, et al. Anatomic variability in the relation between the retromandibular vein and the facial nerve: a case report, literature review and classification. Folia Morphol. 2013; 72(4): 371–375.
- Roostaeian J, Rohrich RJ, Stuzin JM. Anatomical considerations to prevent facial nerve injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135(5): 1318–1327.
- Sargon MF, Ogretmenoglu O, Gunenc Beser C, et al. Quantitative analysis of the terminal branches of facial nerve in fresh frozen head and neck specimens. Folia Morphol. 2014; 73(1): 24–29.
- Savary V, Robert R, Rogez JM, et al. The mandibular marginal ramus of the facial nerve: an anatomic and clinical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997; 19(2): 69–72.
- Saylam C, Ucerler H, Orhan M, et al. Localization of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve. J Craniofac Surg. 2007; 18(1): 137–142.
- Sham MH, Vesque C, Nonchev S, et al. The zinc finger gene Krox20 regulates HoxB2 (Hox2.8) during hindbrain segmentation. Cell. 1993; 72(2): 183–196.
- Topilko P, Levi G, Merlo G, et al. Differential regulation of the zinc finger genesKrox-20 andKrox-24 (Egr-1) suggests antagonistic roles in Schwann cells. J Neurosci Res. 1997; 50(5): 702–712, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4547(19971201)50:5<702::aid-jnr7>3.0.co;2-l.
- Trainor PA, Krumlauf R. Patterning the cranial neural crest: hindbrain segmentation and Hox gene plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000; 1(2): 116–124.
- Wang TM, Lin CL, Kuo KJ, et al. Surgical anatomy of the mandibular ramus of the facial nerve in Chinese adults. Acta Anat (Basel). 1991; 142(2): 126–131.
- Weerapant E, Bunaprasert T, Chokrungvaranont P, et al. Anatomy of the facial nerve branching patterns, the marginal mandibular branch and its extraparotid ramification in relation to the lateral palpebral line. Asian Biomedicine. 2018; 4(4): 603–608.
- Weglowski M, Woźniak W, Piotrowski A, et al. Early development of the facial nerve in human embryos at stages 13-15. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2015; 74(2): 252–257.
- Wilhelmi BJ, Mowlavi A, Neumeister MW. The safe face lift with bony anatomic landmarks to elevate the SMAS. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111(5): 1723–1726.
- Wilkinson DG. Molecular mechanisms of segmental patterning in the vertebrate hindbrain and neural crest. Bioessays. 1993; 15(8): 499–505.
- Witt RL, Weinstein GS, Rejto LK. Tympanomastoid suture and digastric muscle in cadaver and live parotidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115(4): 574–577.
- Wu X, Li M, Zhang Z, et al. Reliability of preoperative prediction of the location of the facial nerve using diffusion tensor imaging-fiber tracking in vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021; 146: 351–361.e3.
- Yang HM, Kim HJ, Park HW, et al. Revisiting the topographic anatomy of the marginal mandibular branch of facial nerve relating to the surgical approach. Aesthet Surg J. 2016; 36(9): 977–982.
- Zhang Y, Mao Z, Wei P, et al. Preoperative prediction of location and shape of facial nerve in patients with large vestibular schwannomas using diffusion tensor imaging-based fiber tracking. World Neurosurg. 2017; 99: 70–78.
