Prevalence and morphology of corona mortis: a systematic study with routine abdominopelvic computed tomography
, 1
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the prevalence, morphology, and anatomical characteristics of corona mortis (CMOR) using routine portal-phase contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT). Corona mortis is defined as the anastomoses between the external iliac and inferior epigastric vessels and the obturator vascular structures. Accidental injury of these vascular connections during surgical operations or damage from pelvic trauma can lead to difficult-to-control pelvic hemorrhages. Matherials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 1593 abdominopelvic CT scans performed between January and April 2023. Patients’ demographics, CMOR prevalence, morphology, and measurements—including vessel diameter and distance from the pubic symphysis—were analyzed. CMOR was classified using the Rusu classification system, and arterial and venous anastomoses were documented. Results: CMOR was identified in 49.3% of patients. Venous CMOR was observed in 34% of cases, and arterial CMOR was detected in 7.1%, with 5.8% of patients exhibiting combined arterial and venous anastomoses. Venous vessel diameters averaged 3.1 mm on the right and 3.2 mm on the left, with significant sex-based differences (p=0.001). The distance from the pubic symphysis to venous CMOR averaged 63 mm. Most arterial anastomoses were Type 1-2 (89.4%), and venous anastomoses were predominantly Type 2-1 (72%). Conclusion: Routine portal-phase CT effectively identifies and classifies CMOR, providing valuable preoperative information. Bilateral and contralateral anastomoses are frequent, highlighting the need for detailed anatomical evaluation to reduce surgical complications. Future studies could enhance detection with advanced imaging techniques such as 3D reconstructions.
Keywords: corona mortisroutine CTobturator vesselspelvic surgery
References
- Al Ta. new concept and classification of CMOR and its clinical significance. Chin J Traumatol. 2016; 19(5): 251–4.
- Baena G, Rojas S, Pena EC. Anatomical and clinical relevance and recurrence in a sample of the Colombian population. Int J Morphol. 2015; 33(1): 130–6.
- Berberoğlu M, Uz A, Ozmen MM, et al. Corona mortis: an anatomic study in seven cadavers and an endoscopic study in 28 patients. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15(1): 72–75.
- Boutefnouchet T, Bassett J, Patil S. Anatomy and clinical relevance of the ‘CMOR’: A review of the literature and current aspects of management. J Orthop Rheumatol. 2016; 3(2): 5.
- Cardoso GI, Chinelatto LA, Hojaij F, et al. Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021; 76: e2182.
- Darmanis S, Teoh KH, Cole AS, et al. et al.. CMOR: An anatomical study with clinical implications in approaches to the pelvis and acetabulum. Clin Anat. 2007; 20(4): 433–9.
- Gobrecht U, Kuhn A, Fellman B. Injury of the corona mortis during vaginal tape insertion (TVT-Secur™ using the U-Approach). Int Urogynecol J. 2011; 22(4): 443–445.
- Han Y, Liu P, Chen C, et al. A digital anatomical study of the corona mortis in females. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017; 26(2): 111–118.
- Larsson PG, Teleman P, Persson J. A serious bleeding complication with injury of the corona mortis with the TVT-Secur procedure. Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 21(9): 1175–1177.
- LEITE T, PIRES L, GOKE K, et al. Corona Mortis : anatomical and surgical description on 60 cadaveric hemipelvises. Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões. 2017; 44(6): 553–559.
- Marsman J, Schilstra S, Leeuwen Hv. Angiography and embolization of the corona mortis (aberrant obturator artery). RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 2008; 141(12): 708–710.
- Masata J, Martan A, Svabík K. Severe bleeding from internal obturator muscle following tension-free vaginal tape Secur hammock approach procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008; 19(11): 1581–1583.
- Missankov AA, Asvat R, Maoba KI. Variations of the pubic vascular anastomoses in black South Africans. Acta Anat (Basel). 1996; 155(3): 212–214.
- Nayak SB, Deepthinath R, Prasad AM, et al. et al.. A South Indian cadaveric study on obturator neurovascular bundle with a special emphasis on high prevalence of 'venous CMOR'. Injury. 2016; 47(7): 1452–5.
- Noussios G, Chouridis P, Kostretzis L, et al. The anatomical characteristics of CMOR: A systematic review of the literature and its clinical importance in hernia repair. J Clin Med Res. 2020; 12(2): 108–12.
- Okcu G, Erkan S, Yercan H, et al. The incidence and location of corona mortisA study on 75 cadavers. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 2009; 75(1): 53–55.
- Pillay M, Sukumaran T, Mayilswanny M. Anatomical considerations on surgical implications of CMOR: An Indian study. Ital J Anat Embryol. 2017; 122(2): 127–36.
- Rusu MC, Cergan R, Motoc AG, et al. Anatomical considerations on the corona mortis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010; 32(1): 17–24.
- Sanna B, Henry BM, Vikse J, et al. The prevalence and morphology of the corona mortis (Crown of death): A meta-analysis with implications in abdominal wall and pelvic surgery. Injury. 2018; 49(2): 302–308.
- Sarikcioglu L, Sindel M, Akyildiz F, et al. Anastomotic vessels in the retropubic region: corona mortis. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2003; 62(3): 179–182.
- Smith J, Gregorius J, Breazeale B, et al. The Corona Mortis, a Frequent Vascular Variant Susceptible to Blunt Pelvic Trauma: Identification at Routine Multidetector CT. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2009; 20(4): 455–460.
- Steinberg EL, Ben-Galim P, Ganel A, et al. et al.. CMOR anastomosis: A three-dimensional computerized tomographic angiographic study. Emerg Radiol. 2017; 24: 519–23.
- Tornetta P, Hochwald N, Levine R. Corona Mortis. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 1996; 329: 97–101.
