Online first
Review article
Published online: 2025-02-21
The role of puboprostatic and pubovesical ligaments in urinary incontinence: a systematic review
1
, 2, 1, 1345
, 2, 1, 1345
DOI: 10.5603/fm.103822
Pubmed: 40007217
Abstract
The puboprostatic ligament (PPL) and pubovesical ligament (PVL) are critical anatomical structures that play a significant role in maintaining urinary continence by supporting the urethra and bladder neck. Despite their well-documented functions, the impact of preserving or reconstructing these ligaments during surgical procedures, particularly radical prostatectomy, on continence outcomes remains underexplored. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on the anatomy, function, and clinical implications of the PPL and PVL. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed following PRISMA guidelines, selecting studies related to the anatomical characteristics, functional roles, and clinical management of these ligaments. Anatomical studies consistently highlight the structural complexity and supportive roles of the PPL and PVL in maintaining urethral and bladder neck positioning, which are essential for continence. Functional studies on the other hand further explain their involvement in the urethral closure process while clinical evidence demonstrates that sparing or reconstructing these ligaments during radical prostatectomy significantly improves both early and long-term continence outcomes, suggesting that their preservation is crucial for enhancing postoperative continence recovery. The findings emphasize the importance of these ligaments in continence mechanisms and advocate for their consideration in future surgical innovations. Further research is needed to refine surgical techniques and to better understand the biomechanical properties of these ligaments to optimize patient outcomes.
Keywords: pubovesical ligamentpuboprostatic ligamenturinary tracturological surgical procedures
References
- Albers DD, Faulkner KK, Cheatham WN, et al. Surgical anatomy of the pubovesical (puboprostatic) ligaments. J Urol. 1973; 109(3): 388–392.
- Asimakopoulos AD, Annino F, D'Orazio A, et al. Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): the new pubovesical complex-sparing technique. Eur Urol. 2010; 58(3): 407–417.
- Assem A, Abou Youssif T, Hamdy SM, et al. Role of sparing of puboprostatic ligaments on continence recovery after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Urol. 2021; 55(1): 22–26.
- Choi HM, Jung SY, Kim SJ, et al. Clinical anatomy of the puboprostatic ligament for the safe guidance for the prostate surgery. Urology. 2020; 136: 190–195.
- Dalpiaz O, Anderhuber F. The fascial suspension of the prostate: a cadaveric study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017; 36(4): 1131–1135.
- Daouacher G, Waldén M. A simple reconstruction of the posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter and sparing of puboprostatic collar reduces the time to early continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2014; 28(4): 481–486.
- DeLancey J. Pubovesical ligament: a separate structure from the urethral supports (“pubo‐urethral ligaments”). Neurourol Urodyn. 2005; 8(1): 53–61.
- DeLancey JOL. Pubovesical ligament: a separate structure from the urethral supports ("pubo-urethral ligaments"). Neurourol Urodyn. 1989; 8(6): 853–861.
- Deliveliotis C, Protogerou V, Alargof E, et al. Radical prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing — effects on continence and positive margins. Urology. 2002; 60(5): 855–858.
- Finley DS, Deane L, Rodriguez E, et al. Anatomic excision of anterior prostatic fat at radical prostatectomy: implications for pathologic upstaging. Urology. 2007; 70(5): 1000–1003.
- Fritsch H. Topography and subdivision of the pelvic connective tissue in human fetuses and in the adult. Surg Radiol Anat. 1994; 16(3): 259–265.
- Fritsch H. Development and organization of the pelvic connective tissue in the human fetus. Ann Anat. 1993; 175(6): 531–539.
- Hudolin T, Kolar Mitrović H, Bakula M, et al. Improvement of quality of life after radical prostatectomy. Psychiatr Danub. 2021; 33(Suppl 4): 1274–1277.
- Huri E, Sargon MF, Tatar I, et al. Novel anatomic mapping of pelvic plexus at prostatic and periprostatic region on fresh frozen cadaveric setting. Urol J. 2017; 14(6): 5064–5067.
- Hurtes X, Rouprêt M, Vaessen C, et al. Anterior suspension combined with posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy improves early return of urinary continence: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. BJU Int. 2012; 110(6): 875–883.
- Ito K, Kenji S, Yoshii H, et al. Modified posterior musculofascial plate reconstruction decreases the posterior vesicourethral angle and improves urinary continence recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013; 1(6): 970–976.
- Kaggwa S, Galukande M. Urinary continence outcomes after puboprostatic ligament preserving open retropubic radical prostatectomy at a sub-saharan hospital. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014; 2014: 986382.
- Katz R, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation. J Urol. 2003; 169(6): 2049–2052.
- Kim M, Boyle SL, Fernandez A, et al. Development of a novel classification system for anatomical variants of the puboprostatic ligaments with expert validation. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014; 8(11-12): 432–436.
- Kuo HC, Chang SC, Hsu T. Application of transrectal sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 1994; 26(1): 77–84.
- Mauroy B, Goullet E, Stefaniak X, et al. Tendinous arch of the pelvic fascia: application to the technique of paravaginal colposuspension. Surg Radiol Anat. 2000; 22(2): 73–79.
- Milley PS, Nichols DH. The relationship between the pubo-urethral ligaments and the urogenital diaphragm in the human female. Anat Rec. 1971; 170(3): 281–283.
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2009; 3(3): e123–e130.
- Muctar S, Ende D, Petros P. Retropubic TFS minisling for postprostatectomy male incontinence: first report. Urol Int. 2022; 106(3): 249–255.
- Noguchi M, Shimada A, Nakashima O, et al. Urodynamic evaluation of a suspension technique for rapid recovery of continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2006; 13(4): 373–378.
- Noh C, Kshirsagar A, Mohler JL. Outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2003; 61(2): 412–416.
- Olesen KP, Grau V. The suspensory apparatus of the female bladder neck. Urol Int. 1976; 31(1-2): 33–37.
- Pacik D, Fedorko M. Literature review of factors affecting continence after radical prostatectomy. Saudi Med J. 2017; 38(1): 9–17.
- Petros P, Abendstein B. The mechanics of urethral closure, incontinence and midurethral sling repair. Part 1 original experimental studies. (1990). Neurourol Urodyn. 2019; 38(2): 809–813.
- Petros P, Abendstein B. The mechanics of urethral closure, incontinence and midurethral sling repair. Part 2 further experimental validation (1993-2003). Neurourol Urodyn. 2019; 38(2): 814–817.
- Petros P, Abendstein B. The mechanics of urethral closure, incontinence, and midurethral sling repair Part 3 surgical applications (1990-2016). Neurourol Urodyn. 2019; 38(2): 818–824.
- Poore RE, McCullough DL, Jarow JP. Puboprostatic ligament sparing improves urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 1998; 51(1): 67–72.
- Puliatti S, Elsherbiny A, Eissa A, et al. Effect of puboprostatic ligament reconstruction on continence recovery after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: our initial experience. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019; 71(3): 230–239.
- Ratanapornsompong W, Pacharatakul S, Sangkum P, et al. Effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on early continence: Randomized controlled trial. Asian J Urol. 2021; 8(3): 260–268.
- Raychaudhuri B, Cahill D. Pelvic fasciae in urology. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008; 90(8): 633–637.
- Roch M, Gaudreault N, Cyr MP, et al. The female pelvic floor fascia anatomy: a systematic search and review. Life (Basel). 2021; 11(9).
- Shafik A. Levator ani muscle: new physioanatomical aspects and role in the micturition mechanism. World J Urol. 1999; 17(5): 266–273.
- Steiner MS. The puboprostatic ligament and the male urethral suspensory mechanism: an anatomic study. Urology. 1994; 44(4): 530–534.
- Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Rabenalt R, et al. Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy — effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol. 2006; 49(1): 103–11; discussion 111.
- Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, et al. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur Urol. 2007; 51(3): 629–639.
- Tewari AK, Bigelow K, Rao S, et al. Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology. 2007; 69(4): 726–731.
- Xu Z, Chapuis PH, Bokey L, et al. Nature and architecture of the puboprostatic ligament: a macro- and microscopic cadaveric study using epoxy sheet plastination. Urology. 2017; 110: 263.e1–263.e8.
- Young HH. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate. Johns Hopkins Hop Bull. 1905; 16: 315–321.
