The depth of arterial supply of forehead: a meta-analysis
, 2, 1, , , , 34, 1, 1
Abstract
Background: The rapid growth of aesthetic medicine has led to an increased demand for non-surgical cosmetic procedures in the frontal region of the face. However, alongside this rise in popularity, there is a growing awareness of the potential complications associated with these procedures especially connected with fillers. The intricate vascular anatomy of the forehead, specifically the supratrochlear (STA) and supraorbital (SOA) arteries, poses significant risks if not thoroughly understood. While the morphological course of these vessels is well-documented and analysed, detailed knowledge about their depth remains vital for enhancing procedural safety.
Materials and methods: Five research papers were analyzed in the meta-analysis. The analyses of STA and SOA were performed in two distinctive places bilaterally: at the level of the glabella and above the eyebrow.
Results: A total of 201 SOA arteries and 282 STA arteries were analysed at the following horizontal levels, respectively: at the level of the glabella and above the eyebrow. The final results were as follows: 5.68 mm, 95% CI (4.58–6.78) for SOA at the glabella, 5.53 mm, 95% CI (4.79–6.28) for SOA above the eyebrow, 4.45 mm, 95% CI (3.43–5.47) for STA at the glabella, and 3.53 mm, 95% CI (3.21–3.85) for STA above the eyebrow.
Conclusions: The supratrochlear artery tends to become more superficial along its path, while the supraorbital artery remains at a consistent depth across various anatomical levels. For injections in the medial part of the forehead, it is advisable to place the needle up to 2.5 mm deep or laterally to the artery's path. In contrast, injections in the lateral part of the forehead can be administered at slightly deeper depths, up to 3.5 mm. To minimise the risk of complications, performing a high-resolution linear ultrasonography (USG) exam prior to injection is recommended, allowing for needle placement either laterally or medially to the vessels.
Keywords: supratrochlear arterysupraorbital arterydepthcosmetic surgeryplastic surgery
References
- Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994; 50(4): 1088.
- Beleznay K, Humphrey S, Carruthers JDA, et al. Update on avoiding and treating blindness from fillers: a recent review of the world literature. Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39(6): 662–674.
- Braz A, Humphrey S, Weinkle S, et al. Lower face: clinical anatomy and regional approaches with injectable fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 136(5 Suppl): 235S–257S.
- Cho KH, Dalla Pozza E, Toth G, et al. Pathophysiology study of filler-induced blindness. Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39(1): 96–106.
- Chun BoY, Kim SuY. Acute visual loss after botulinum toxin A injection in the masseter muscle. Int Ophthalmol. 2018; 38(3): 1339–1342.
- Cochran W. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954; 10(1): 101.
- Colon J, Mirkin S, Hardigan P, et al. Adverse events reported from hyaluronic acid dermal filler injections to the facial region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2023; 15(4): e38286.
- Cotofana S, Alfertshofer M, Frank K, et al. Relationship between vertical glabellar lines and the supratrochlear and supraorbital arteries. Aesthet Surg J. 2020; 40(12): 1341–1348.
- Grippaudo FR, Mattei M. The utility of high-frequency ultrasound in dermal filler evaluation. Ann Plast Surg. 2011; 67(5): 469–473.
- Güvenç U, Ten B, Kaya Tİ, et al. Evaluation of supratrochlear artery depth and course variations by Doppler ultrasonography along the glabellar frown lines for safer filler injections. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022; 21(12): 6717–6726.
- Habib SM, Schelke LW, Velthuis PJ. Management of dermal filler (vascular) complications using duplex ultrasound. Dermatol Ther. 2020; 33(4): e13461.
- Henry BM, Tomaszewski KA, Ramakrishnan PK, et al. Development of the anatomical quality assessment (AQUA) tool for the quality assessment of anatomical studies included in meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Clin Anat. 2017; 30(1): 6–13.
- Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11): 1539–1558.
- Isaac J, Walker L, Ali SR, et al. An illustrated anatomical approach to reducing vascular risk during facial soft tissue filler administration — a review. JPRAS Open. 2023; 36: 27–45.
- Khorasanizadeh F, Delazar S, Gheidari O, et al. Anatomic evaluation of the normal variants of the arteries of face using color Doppler ultrasonography: Implications for facial aesthetic procedures. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023; 22(6): 1844–1851.
- Lee SH, Ha TJ, Koh KS, et al. External and internal diameters of the facial artery relevant to intravascular filler injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143(4): 1031–1037.
- Lee W, Kim JS, Moon HJ, et al. A safe Doppler ultrasound-guided method for nasolabial fold correction with hyaluronic acid filler. Aesthet Surg J. 2021; 41(6): NP486–NP492.
- van Loghem J, Funt D, Pavicic T, et al. Managing intravascular complications following treatment with calcium hydroxylapatite: an expert consensus. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020; 19(11): 2845–2858.
- Loh KT, Chua JJ, Lee HM, et al. Prevention and management of vision loss relating to facial filler injections. Singapore Med J. 2016; 57(8): 438–443.
- Money SM, Wall WB, Davis LS, et al. An anatomical guide to the terminal facial artery: lumen diameter and associated anatomy relevant to dermatologic procedures. Dermatol Surg. 2021; 47(6): 797–801.
- Moodley S, Ishwarkumar S, Pillay P. Localisation of the supraorbital, infraorbital and mental foramina: a review. Transl Res Anat. 2023; 32: 100257.
- Ozturk CN, Li Y, Tung R, et al. Complications following injection of soft-tissue fillers. Aesthet Surg J. 2013; 33(6): 862–877.
- Phumyoo T, Jiirasutat N, Jitaree B, et al. Anatomical and ultrasonography-based investigation to localize the arteries on the central forehead region during the glabellar augmentation procedure. Clin Anat. 2020; 33(3): 370–382.
- Pistoia F, Camerino PL, Ioppi A, et al. High-resolution US of the facial vessels with new facial vein landmarks for reconstructive surgery and dermal injection. Eur Radiol Exp. 2023; 7(1): 49.
- R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/.
- Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ. 2011; 342: d549.
- Rohrich RJ, Stuzin JM, Dayan E, Ross EV, Mohan R, Weir DD. et al.. Facial danger zones. Georg Thieme Verlag, Leipzig 2020.
- Samizadeh S, De Boulle K. Complications of toxins and fillers in facial aesthetics. Prim Dent J. 2023; 12(3): 65–72.
- Samizadeh S, Pirayesh A, Bertossi D, et al. Anatomical variations in the course of labial arteries: a literature review. Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39(11): 1225–1235.
- Shen WW, Du JN, Ma JX, et al. Evaluation of supratrochlear, supraorbital and angular artery course variations and depth by Doppler ultrasound. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023; 47(2): 791–798.
- Sterne JAC, Egger M. Regression methods to detect ublication and other bias in meta-analysis. In: Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. ed. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustment. Wiley, Chichester 2005: 99–110.
- Tansatit T, Apinuntrum P, Phetudom T. A dark side of the cannula injections: how arterial wall perforations and emboli occur. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017; 41(1): 221–227.
- Viechtbauer W. Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. J Educ Behav Stat. 2005; 30(3): 261–293.
- Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package. J Stat Softw. 2010; 36(3): 1–48.
- Viechtbauer W, Cheung MWL. Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010; 1(2): 112–125.
- Villegas Fernández CV, Burón Álvarez I, Fernández-Tresguerres Centeno A, et al. Cutaneous ultrasound and dermal fillers. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2015; 106(Suppl 1): 87–95.
- Vural E, Batay F, Key JM. Glabellar frown lines as a reliable landmark for the supratrochlear artery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 123(5): 543–546.
- Witmanowski H, Błochowiak K. The whole truth about botulinum toxin — a review. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2020; 37(6): 853–861.
- Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Orlandi C, et al. Ultrasound detection and identification of cosmetic fillers in the skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012; 26(3): 292–301.
- Wysiadecki G, Varga I, Klejbor I, et al. Reporting anatomical variations: Should unified standards and protocol (checklist) for anatomical studies and case reports be established? Transl Res Anat. 2024; 35: 100284.
- Young SR, Bolton PA, Downie J, et al. Use of high-frequency ultrasound in the assessment of injectable dermal fillers. Skin Res Technol. 2008; 14(3): 320–323.
- Zhu GS, Liao ZF, Chen CL, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography scanning study of the superior labial artery in chinese individuals for assessing filler injection safety. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; 48(19): 3962–3970.
