Online first
Case report
Published online: 2024-10-09

open access

Page views 434
Article views/downloads 138
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

A case report of an Adachi-Williams type CG plus H aortic arch anomaly and implications for the development of the cervicothoracic circulation

Masaharu Yoshihara1, Yoshitoku Watabe2, Momo Morikawa2, Suguru Iwata2, Michito Hamada2, Tetsuya Sasaki2, Noriko Homma3, Yosuke Takei2

Abstract

Background: It is unclear whether the development of the branches of the subclavian artery is dependent on the proximal part of this artery since great vessel formation is partially regulated by haemodynamic stress. For example, the vertebral artery that usually arises from the subclavian artery might be affected by anomalies in the aortic arch branches. This uncertainty is partly due to the limited reports of highly anomalous cases of proximal and distal branching morphologies. Here, we report an Adachi-Williams type CG plus H aortic arch case found during student dissection and discuss the development of the cervicothoracic circulation.

Case report: Here, we report an aberrant right subclavian artery that arose from the aorta distal to the left subclavian artery, via a retroesophageal course, whereas the right and left common carotid arteries arose from a short common trunk from the aorta (the carotid trunk) (Adachi-Williams type H). In addition, the left vertebral artery arose directly from the aortic arch between the carotid trunk and the left subclavian artery (Adachi-Williams type CG). Anomalies in the branching arteries from this aberrant right subclavian artery (the right vertebral artery, internal thoracic artery, thyrocervical trunk, costocervical trunk and thoracoacromial artery) were unidentifiable. The right vagus nerve directly innervates the laryngeal muscles without forming the recurrent nerve.

Conclusions: The development of an aberrant right subclavian artery might affect haemodynamic stress in both the proximal and distal regions of the anterior limb region. The distal branching morphology, however, was normal, suggesting an independence of proximal and distal vasculature development. Since the concomitance of Adachi-Williams-type CG and H is rare, rather than sequentially develop, the distal arteries develop in a fine-tuned manner to adapt to anomalies in the proximal arteries.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Aizawa Y, Isogai S, Izumiyama M, et al. Morphogenesis of the primary arterial trunks of the forelimb in the rat embryos: the trunks originate from the lateral surface of the dorsal aorta independently of the intersegmental arteries. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1999; 200(6): 573–584.
  2. Anderson RH, Bamforth SD. Morphogenesis of the mammalian aortic arch arteries. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10: 892900.
  3. Bhatia K, Ghabriel MN, Henneberg M. Anatomical variations in the branches of the human airtic arch: a recent study of a South Australian population. Folia Morphol. 2005; 64(3): 217–223.
  4. Freed K, Low VH. The aberrant subclavian artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168(2): 481–484.
  5. Hiruma T, Nakajima Y, Nakamura H. Development of pharyngeal arch arteries in early mouse embryo. J Anat. 2002; 201(1): 15–29.
  6. Iimura A, Oguchi T, Tou M, et al. The retroesophageal right subclavian artery — a case report and review. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 2017; 94(3): 75–80.
  7. Iwanaga J, Singh V, Takeda S, et al. Acknowledging the use of human cadaveric tissues in research papers: recommendations from anatomical journal editors. Clin Anat. 2021; 34(1): 2–4.
  8. Kawai K, Honma S, Kumagai Y, et al. A schematic diagram showing the various components of the embryonic aortic arch complex in the retroesophageal right subclavian artery. Anat Sci Int. 2011; 86(3): 135–145.
  9. Kawashima T, Sasaki H. Topological changes of the human autonomic cardiac nervous system in individuals with a retroesophageal right subclavian artery: two case reports and a brief review. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2005; 210(4): 327–334.
  10. Nedelcu AH, Lupu A, Moraru MC, et al. Morphological aspects of the aberrant right subclavian artery — a systematic review of the literature. J Pers Med. 2024; 14(4).
  11. Stone WM, Brewster DC, Moncure AC, et al. Aberrant right subclavian artery: varied presentations and management options. J Vasc Surg. 1990; 11(6): 812–817.
  12. Yashiro K, Shiratori H, Hamada H. Haemodynamics determined by a genetic programme govern asymmetric development of the aortic arch. Nature. 2007; 450(7167): 285–288.
  13. Wang K, Zhang M, Sun J, et al. A right-left aortic arch pattern made up by a bicarotid trunk, a left subclavian, a left vertebral and a right retroesophageal subclavian artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2011; 33(10): 937–940.
  14. Wiley DM, Kim JD, Hao J, et al. Distinct signalling pathways regulate sprouting angiogenesis from the dorsal aorta and the axial vein. Nat Cell Biol. 2011; 13(6): 686–692.
  15. Williams GD, Aff HM, Schmeckebier M, et al. Variations in the arrangement of the branches arising from the aortic arch in American whites and negroes. Anat Rec. 2005; 54(2): 247–251.