Online first
Original article
Published online: 2024-10-21
Morphological observation of occipital condyle position in Chinese skulls and potential clinical significance
DOI: 10.5603/fm.101276
Pubmed: 39469966
Abstract
Background: To study the anatomy of the Chinese occipital condyle and its position relative to the occipital foramen and skull. Materials and methods: Measurements were taken from 106 adult Chinese skulls using a Cartesian coordinate system centered on the foramen magnum. Measurements included the longitudinal diameter of the foramen magnum, distances from various points on the occipital condyles to the foramen magnum and skull landmarks, and the occipital condyle classification index (OCI) and skull-occipital condyle classification index (SOCI). Results: OCI categorized the position of the foramen magnum and occipital condyles into three groups: OCI ≤ 0.40 (3 cases, 2.83%), 0.40 < OCI ≤ 0.50 (75 cases, 70.75%), and OCI > 0.50 (28 cases, 26.42%). SOCI categorized the relationship between the skull and occipital condyles into two groups: 0.5 < SOCI ≤ 0.6 (49 cases, 46.23%) and 0.6 < SOCI ≤ 0.7 (57 cases, 53.77%). Four relationship types were identified based on specific measurements: Type I (23 cases, 21.70%), Type II (42 cases, 39.62%), Type III (4 cases, 3.77%), and Type IV (37 cases, 34.91%). Conclusions: Sagittal movement of the occipital condyle affects the cervical spine’s curvature. Asymmetry between the occipital condyles and the foramen magnum may misalign the skull with the body’s coronal plane.
Keywords: Chineseoccipital condyle positionanatomic measurement
References
- Amaral DM, Cadilha RP, Rocha JA, et al. Congenital muscular torticollis: where are we today? A retrospective analysis at a tertiary hospital. Porto Biomed J. 2019; 4(3): e36.
- Arora J, Mehta V, Abhishek K, et al. Multifaceted profile of an unusual paramedian occipital condyle-anatomical and computerised tomographic evaluation. Clin Ter. 2014; 165(2): 111–114.
- Avci E, Dagtekin A, Ozturk AH, et al. Anatomical variations of the foramen magnum, occipital condyle and jugular tubercle. Turk Neurosurg. 2011; 21(2): 181–190.
- Ben Zvi I, Thompson DNP. Torticollis in childhood — a practical guide for initial assessment. Eur J Pediatr. 2022; 181(3): 865–873.
- Bernstein DN, Ikpeze TC, Foxx K, et al. Anatomical parameters for occipital condyle screws: an analysis of 500 condyles using CT scans. Global Spine J. 2022; 12(7): 1475–1480.
- Beyer B, Feipel V, Dugailly PM. Biomechanics of the upper cervical spine ligaments in axial rotation and flexion-extension: considerations into the clinical framework. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2020; 11(3): 217–225.
- Bogduk N, Mercer S. Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics. Clin Biomech. 2000; 15(9): 633–648.
- Castilla A, Gonzalez M, Kysh L, et al. Informing the physical therapy management of congenital muscular torticollis clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2023; 35(2): 190–200.
- Chu ECP, Lo FaS, Bhaumik A. Plausible impact of forward head posture on upper cervical spine stability. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020; 9(5): 2517–2520.
- Degno S, Abrha M, Asmare Y, et al. Anatomical variation in morphometry and morphology of the foramen magnum and occipital condyle in dried adult skulls. J Craniofac Surg. 2019; 30(1): 256–259.
- Demir BT, Eşme S, Patat D, et al. Clinical and anatomical importance of foramen magnum and craniocervical junction structures in the perspective of surgical approaches. Anat Cell Biol. 2023; 56(3): 342–349.
- Dietz N, Gruter BE, Haegler J, et al. The modified occipital condyle screw: a quantitative anatomic study investigating the feasibility of a novel instrumented fixation technique for craniocervical fusion. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023; 14(2): 175–180.
- Evli C, Kolsuz ME, Orhan K. Retrospective evaluation of the morpometric and morphological anatomy of the occipital condyle, hypoglossal canal and foramen magnum in Turkish populaton with CBCT. Surg Radiol Anat. 2023; 45(7): 795–805.
- Feng DX. Application of the lateral approach for surgery in the clival region — microsurgical anatomy, quantitative anatomy comparison, and clinical research. Fudan University, Shanghai 2007: 63–71.
- Gay RE. The curve of the cervical spine: variations and significance. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993; 16(9): 591–594.
- Grob D, Frauenfelder H, Mannion AF. The association between cervical spine curvature and neck pain. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(5): 669–678.
- Gross PW, Chipman DE, Doyle SM. The tilts, twists, and turns of torticollis. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2023; 35(1): 118–123.
- Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, et al. Comparison of axial and flexural stresses in lordosis and three buckled configurations of the cervical spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2001; 16(4): 276–284.
- Hoover KC, Thomas GP. Sexual dimorphism and biomechanical loading in occipital bone morphological variation. Am J Hum Biol. 2022; 34(10): e23792.
- Kirnaz S, Gerges MM, Rumalla K, et al. Occipital condyle screw placement in patients with chiari malformation: a radiographic feasibility analysis and cadaveric demonstration. World Neurosurg. 2020; 136: 470–478.
- Kumandaş S, Per H, Gümüş H, et al. Torticollis secondary to posterior fossa and cervical spinal cord tumors: report of five cases and literature review. Neurosurg Rev. 2006; 29(4): 333–8; discussion 338.
- Lin G, Zhao X, Wang W, et al. The relationship between forward head posture, postural control and gait: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2022; 98: 316–329.
- Liu J, Liu P, Ma Z, et al. The effects of aging on the profile of the cervical spine. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(7): e14425.
- Ohara A, Miyamoto K, Naganawa T, et al. Reliabilities of and correlations among five standard methods of assessing the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(22): 2585–91; discussion 2592.
- Pang D, Nemzek WR, Zovickian J. Atlanto-occipital dislocation: part 1 — normal occipital condyle-C1 interval in 89 children. Neurosurgery. 2007; 61(3): 514–21; discussion 521.
- Ramos-Dávila EM, Meléndez-Flores JD, Álvarez-Pérez R, et al. Occipital condyle screw fixation viability according to age and gender anatomy: a computed tomography-based analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021; 200: 106358.
- Singhal I, Harinathan B, Warraich A, et al. Finite element modeling of the human cervical spinal cord and its applications: a systematic review. N Am Spine Soc J. 2023; 15: 100246.
- Sun MS, Cai XY, Liu Q, et al. Application of simulation methods in cervical spine dynamics. J Healthc Eng. 2020; 2020: 7289648.
- Theodore N. Degenerative cervical spondylosis. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(2): 159–168.
- Thintharua P, Chentanez V. Morphological analysis and morphometry of the occipital condyle and its relationship to the foramen magnum, jugular foramen, and hypoglossal canal: implications for craniovertebral junction surgery. Anat Cell Biol. 2023; 56(1): 61–68.
- Uribe JS, Ramos E, Baaj A, et al. Occipital cervical stabilization using occipital condyles for cranial fixation: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2009; 65(6): E1216–7; discussion E1217.
- Wang K, Deng, Z, Li Z, et al. The influence of natural head position on the cervical sagittal alignment. J Healthc Eng. 2017; 2017: 2941048.
- Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Zhang J, et al. Physical properties of the human head: mass, center of gravity and moment of inertia. J Biomech. 2009; 42(9): 1177–1192.
- Zhang Y, Schepartz LA. Three-dimensional geometric morphometric studies of modern human occipital variation. PLoS One. 2021; 16(1): e0245445.
