Anatomic obstacles in cavotricuspid isthmus detected by modified 2D transthoracic echocardiography and long-term outcomes in radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter
, 1, 3, 4, 56, 56, 57, 517
Abstract
Background: Although radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), responsible for sustaining atrial flutter, is a highly effective procedure, in extended patients’ observations following this procedure, more than every tenth becomes unsuccessful. Therefore, this study aimed to provide helpful information about the anatomy of the CTI in transthoracic echocardiography, which can aid in better planning of the CTI radiofrequency ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter.
Materials and methods: 56 patients with typical atrial flutter after radiofrequency ablation were evaluated at the end of the 24-month observation period. With substernal modified transthoracic echocardiographic (mTTE) evaluation, we identified four main anatomical obstacles impeding radiofrequency ablation. These obstacles were tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, cavotricuspid isthmus length, cavotricuspid isthmus morphology, and the presence of a prominent Eustachian ridge/Eustachian valve. All intraprocedural radiofrequency ablation data were collected for analysis and correlated with anatomical data.
Results: In the 24-month observation period, freedom from atrial flutter was 67.86%. The mean length of the isthmus was 30.34 ± 6.67 mm. The isthmus morphology in 56 patients was categorized as flat (n = 27; 48.2%), concave (n = 10; 17.85%), and pouch (n = 19, 33.9%). A prominent Eustachian ridge was observed in 23 patients (41.1%). Lack of anatomical obstacles in mTTE evaluation resulted in 100% efficacy, while the presence of at least two obstacles significantly increased the risk of unsuccessful ablation with more than two (OR 12.31 p = 0.01). Generally, 8 mm electrodes were the most effective for non-difficult CTI, while 3.5 mm electrodes used with a 3D system had highest performance for complex CTI. Notably, aging was the only factor that worsened the long-term outcome (OR 1.07 p = 0.044).
Conclusions: Preoperative usage of mTTE evaluation helps predict difficulty in cavotricuspid isthmus radiofrequency ablation, thus allowing better planning of the radiofrequency ablation strategy using the most accurate radiofrequency ablation electrode.
Keywords: atrial fluttercavotricuspid isthmusradiofrequency catheter ablation
References
- Anderson RH, Brown NA, Mohun TJ. Insights regarding the normal and abnormal formation of the atrial and ventricular septal structures. Clin Anat. 2016; 29(3): 290–304.
- Anderson RH. The cavotricuspid isthmus in the setting of real cardiac anatomy. Heart Rhythm. 2019; 16(11): 1619–1620.
- Asirvatham SJ. Correlative anatomy and electrophysiology for the interventional electrophysiologist: right atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009; 20(1): 113–122.
- Baccillieri MS, Rizzo S, De Gaspari M, et al. Anatomy of the cavotricuspid isthmus for radiofrequency ablation in typical atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm. 2019; 16(11): 1611–1618.
- Bun SS, Latcu DG, Marchlinski F, et al. Atrial flutter: more than just one of a kind. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(35): 2356–2363.
- Cabrera JA, Sánchez-Quintana D, Farré J, et al. The inferior right atrial isthmus: further architectural insights for current and coming ablation technologies. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16(4): 402–408.
- Cabrera JA, Sanchez-Quintana D, Ho SY, et al. The architecture of the atrial musculature between the orifice of the inferior caval vein and the tricuspid valve: the anatomy of the isthmus. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998; 9(11): 1186–1195.
- Cabrera JA, Sanchez-Quintana D, Ho SY, et al. Angiographic anatomy of the inferior right atrial isthmus in patients with and without history of common atrial flutter. Circulation. 1999; 99(23): 3017–3023.
- Chang SL, Tai CT, Lin YJ, et al. The electroanatomic characteristics of the cavotricuspid isthmus: implications for the catheter ablation of atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18(1): 18–22.
- Chen JY, Lin KH, Liou YM, et al. Usefulness of pre-procedure cavotricuspid isthmus imaging by modified transthoracic echocardiography for predicting outcome of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011; 24(10): 1148–1155.
- Da Costa A, Faure E, Thévenin J, et al. Effect of isthmus anatomy and ablation catheter on radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus. Circulation. 2004; 110(9): 1030–1035.
- Da Costa A, Romeyer-Bouchard C, Dauphinot V, et al. Cavotricuspid isthmus angiography predicts atrial flutter ablation efficacy in 281 patients randomized between 8 mm- and externally irrigated-tip catheter. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27(15): 1833–1840.
- Gami AS, Edwards WD, Lachman N, et al. Electrophysiological anatomy of typical atrial flutter: the posterior boundary and causes for difficulty with ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21(2): 144–149.
- Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(5): 373–498.
- January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2019; 140(2): e125–e151.
- Kacprzyk M, Kuniewicz M, Lelakowski J. [Atrial flutter in cardiology practice]. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2020; 48(285): 204–208.
- Kajihara K, Nakano Y, Hirai Y, et al. Variable procedural strategies adapted to anatomical characteristics in catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus using a preoperative multidetector computed tomography analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24(12): 1344–1351.
- Karkowski G, Kuniewicz M, Koźluk E, et al. Non-fluoroscopic radiofrequency catheter ablation of right- and left-sided ventricular arrhythmias. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2020; 16(3): 321–329.
- Karkowski G, Kuniewicz M, Ząbek A, et al. Contact force-sensing versus standard catheters in non-fluoroscopic radiofrequency catheter ablation of idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(3).
- Klimek-Piotrowska W, Hołda MK, Koziej M, et al. Clinical anatomy of the cavotricuspid isthmus and terminal crest. PLoS One. 2016; 11(9): e0163383.
- Knecht S, Castro-Rodriguez J, Verbeet T, et al. Multidetector 16-slice CT scan evaluation of cavotricuspid isthmus anatomy before radiofrequency ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2007; 20(1-2): 29–35.
- Kozłowski D, Hreczecha J, Skwarek M, et al. Diameters of the cavo-sinus-tricuspid area in relation to type I atrial flutter. Folia Morphol. 2003; 62(2): 133–142.
- Lascault G, Copie X, Touche T, et al. [Relation between cavo-tricuspid isthmus anatomy studied by transesophageal echocardiography and the immediate outcome of radiofrequency ablation of common atrial flutter]. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2010; 59(3): 125–130.
- Marcos-Alberca P, Sánchez-Quintana D, Cabrera JA, et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographic features of the inferior right atrial isthmus: the role of vestibular thickness in catheter ablation of atrial flutter. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 15(1): 32–40.
- Natale A, Newby KH, Pisanó E, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic therapy versus first-line radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35(7): 1898–1904.
- Okumura Y, Watanabe I, Yamada T, et al. Relationship between anatomic location of the crista terminalis and double potentials recorded during atrial flutter: intracardiac echocardiographic analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15(12): 1426–1432.
- Osorio J, Hunter TD, Rajendra A, et al. Predictors of clinical success after paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021; 32(7): 1814–1821.
- Saremi F, Sánchez-Quintana D, Mori S, et al. Fibrous skeleton of the heart: anatomic overview and evaluation of pathologic conditions with CT and MR imaging. Radiographics. 2017; 37(5): 1330–1351.
- Shereen R, Lee S, Salandy S, et al. A comprehensive review of the anatomical variations in the right atrium and their clinical significance. Transl Res Anat. 2019; 17: 100046.
- Stambler BS, Wood MA, Ellenbogen KA, et al. Efficacy and safety of repeated intravenous doses of ibutilide for rapid conversion of atrial flutter or fibrillation. Ibutilide Repeat Dose Study Investigators. Circulation. 1996; 94(7): 1613–1621.
- Willems S, Weiss C, Ventura R, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial flutter guided by electroanatomic mapping (CARTO): a randomized comparison to the conventional approach. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000; 11(11): 1223–1230.
- Yokokawa M, Tada H, Koyama K, et al. The change in the tissue characterization detected by magnetic resonance imaging after radiofrequency ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter. Int J Cardiol. 2011; 148(1): 30–35.
