open access

Vol 60, No 1 (2022)
Original paper
Submitted: 2021-12-07
Accepted: 2022-01-19
Published online: 2022-02-01
Get Citation

5-fluorouracil suppresses stem cell-like properties by inhibiting p38 in pancreatic cancer cell line PANC-1

Jin Zhao1, Xueying Shi1, Changcheng Dong1, Rui Liu1, Lifu Su1, Cuixia Cao1
·
Pubmed: 35103981
·
Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2022;60(1):55-65.
Affiliations
  1. Department of General Surgery, Baogang Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mogolia, China

open access

Vol 60, No 1 (2022)
ORIGINAL PAPERS
Submitted: 2021-12-07
Accepted: 2022-01-19
Published online: 2022-02-01

Abstract

Introduction. Suppressing the phenotype of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is a promising treatment strategy for cancer. P38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK, p38) play an important role in the occurrence, development, and stemness maintenance of tumors. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of p38 on the stemness maintenance of CSCs in pancreatic cancer cell line PANC-1.

Material and methods. PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells were treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 0.5 IC50, IC50, and 2 IC50 for 24 h. PANC-1 cells were treated for 24 h with 5-FU at 0.5IC50, IC50, and 2IC50 with or without VX-702, p38 phosphorylation inhibitor. Cells were resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, 2% B27, 5 mg/ml insulin, 20 g/ml basic fibroblast growth factor, and 10 μg/ml transferrin. Cells were seeded in ultra-low adhesion 6-well dishes to observe tumor spheroidization. The expression of CDK2, cyclin B1, cyclin D1, OCT4, SOX2, Nanog, and p38 was measured by Western blot. The mRNA expression of p38, OCT4, Nanog, and SOX2 was measured by RT-PCR. Flow cytometry was performed to evaluate the cell cycle, apoptosis, and proportion of CD44+CD133+ PANC-1 cells.

Results. 5-FU decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis. 5-FU suppressed the stemness maintenance of CSCs in PANC-1 cells, as demonstrated by the inhibition of tumorsphere formation, the decrease in CD44+CD133+ cells’ fraction, and downregulation of OCT4, Nanog, and SOX2 expression. In addition, 5-FU inhibited the phosphorylation of p38 in PANC-1 cells. The phosphorylation of p38 was subsequently suppressed by VX-702, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, which exhibited similar effects as those of 5-FU treatment. The effect of VX-702 on PANC-1 cells was further enhanced by 5-FU treatment. Thus, p38 inhibitor decreased the viability and increased the apoptosis of PANC-1 cells. P38 inhibitor suppressed the stemness maintenance of CSCs in PANC-1 cells, as demonstrated by the inhibition of tumorsphere formation, the decrease in CD44+CD133+ cells, and the downregulation of OCT4, Nanog, and SOX2 expression.

Conclusions. These findings indicate that the inhibition of p38 phosphorylation suppresses the stemness maintenance and 5-FU resistance of PANC-1 cells, providing a potential therapeutic target for the prevention and treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Abstract

Introduction. Suppressing the phenotype of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is a promising treatment strategy for cancer. P38 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK, p38) play an important role in the occurrence, development, and stemness maintenance of tumors. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of p38 on the stemness maintenance of CSCs in pancreatic cancer cell line PANC-1.

Material and methods. PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells were treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 0.5 IC50, IC50, and 2 IC50 for 24 h. PANC-1 cells were treated for 24 h with 5-FU at 0.5IC50, IC50, and 2IC50 with or without VX-702, p38 phosphorylation inhibitor. Cells were resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, 2% B27, 5 mg/ml insulin, 20 g/ml basic fibroblast growth factor, and 10 μg/ml transferrin. Cells were seeded in ultra-low adhesion 6-well dishes to observe tumor spheroidization. The expression of CDK2, cyclin B1, cyclin D1, OCT4, SOX2, Nanog, and p38 was measured by Western blot. The mRNA expression of p38, OCT4, Nanog, and SOX2 was measured by RT-PCR. Flow cytometry was performed to evaluate the cell cycle, apoptosis, and proportion of CD44+CD133+ PANC-1 cells.

Results. 5-FU decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis. 5-FU suppressed the stemness maintenance of CSCs in PANC-1 cells, as demonstrated by the inhibition of tumorsphere formation, the decrease in CD44+CD133+ cells’ fraction, and downregulation of OCT4, Nanog, and SOX2 expression. In addition, 5-FU inhibited the phosphorylation of p38 in PANC-1 cells. The phosphorylation of p38 was subsequently suppressed by VX-702, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, which exhibited similar effects as those of 5-FU treatment. The effect of VX-702 on PANC-1 cells was further enhanced by 5-FU treatment. Thus, p38 inhibitor decreased the viability and increased the apoptosis of PANC-1 cells. P38 inhibitor suppressed the stemness maintenance of CSCs in PANC-1 cells, as demonstrated by the inhibition of tumorsphere formation, the decrease in CD44+CD133+ cells, and the downregulation of OCT4, Nanog, and SOX2 expression.

Conclusions. These findings indicate that the inhibition of p38 phosphorylation suppresses the stemness maintenance and 5-FU resistance of PANC-1 cells, providing a potential therapeutic target for the prevention and treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Get Citation

Keywords

PANC-1 cells; tumorspheres; cancer stem cells; stemness markers; p38; apoptosis

About this article
Title

5-fluorouracil suppresses stem cell-like properties by inhibiting p38 in pancreatic cancer cell line PANC-1

Journal

Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica

Issue

Vol 60, No 1 (2022)

Article type

Original paper

Pages

55-65

Published online

2022-02-01

Page views

6128

Article views/downloads

972

DOI

10.5603/FHC.a2022.0004

Pubmed

35103981

Bibliographic record

Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2022;60(1):55-65.

Keywords

PANC-1 cells
tumorspheres
cancer stem cells
stemness markers
p38
apoptosis

Authors

Jin Zhao
Xueying Shi
Changcheng Dong
Rui Liu
Lifu Su
Cuixia Cao

References (41)
  1. Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Miller KD, et al. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65(1): 5–29.
  2. Muniraj T, Jamidar PA, Aslanian HR. Pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive review and update. Dis Mon. 2013; 59(11): 368–402.
  3. Costello E, Greenhalf W, Neoptolemos JP. New biomarkers and targets in pancreatic cancer and their application to treatment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 9(8): 435–444.
  4. Stathis A, Moore MJ. Advanced pancreatic carcinoma: current treatment and future challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010; 7(3): 163–172.
  5. Lawson DA, Bhakta NR, Kessenbrock K, et al. Single-cell analysis reveals a stem-cell program in human metastatic breast cancer cells. Nature. 2015; 526(7571): 131–135.
  6. Prieto-Vila M, Takahashi RU, Usuba W, et al. Drug Resistance Driven by Cancer Stem Cells and Their Niche. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(12).
  7. Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, et al. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001; 414(6859): 105–111.
  8. Pattabiraman DR, Weinberg RA. Tackling the cancer stem cells - what challenges do they pose? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014; 13(7): 497–512.
  9. Sun X, Lv X, Yan Y, et al. Hypoxia-mediated cancer stem cell resistance and targeted therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020; 130: 110623.
  10. Zhou P, Li Bo, Liu F, et al. The epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer stem cells: implication for treatment resistance in pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017; 16(1): 52.
  11. Najafi M, Farhood B, Mortezaee K. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) in cancer progression and therapy. J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234(6): 8381–8395.
  12. Phi LT, Sari IN, Yang YG, et al. Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) in Drug Resistance and their Therapeutic Implications in Cancer Treatment. Stem Cells Int. 2018; 2018: 5416923.
  13. Pearson G, Robinson F, Beers Gibson T, et al. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: regulation and physiological functions. Endocr Rev. 2001; 22(2): 153–183.
  14. Morrison DK. MAP Kinase Pathways. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2012; 4(11): a011254–a011254.
  15. del Barco Barrantes I, Nebreda AR. Roles of p38 MAPKs in invasion and metastasis. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012; 40(1): 79–84.
  16. Paranjape AN, Soundararajan R, Werden SJ, et al. Inhibition of FOXC2 restores epithelial phenotype and drug sensitivity in prostate cancer cells with stem-cell properties. Oncogene. 2016; 35(46): 5963–5976.
  17. Kaushik S, Cuervo AM. AMPK-dependent phosphorylation of lipid droplet protein PLIN2 triggers its degradation by CMA. Autophagy. 2016; 12(2): 432–438.
  18. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001; 25(4): 402–408.
  19. El-Mahdy HA, El-Husseiny AA, Kandil YI, et al. Diltiazem potentiates the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells through inhibition of P-glycoprotein. Life Sci. 2020; 262: 118518.
  20. Cheng Y, Diao D, Zhang H, et al. High glucose-induced resistance to 5-fluorouracil in pancreatic cancer cells alleviated by 2-deoxy-D-glucose. Biomed Rep. 2014; 2(2): 188–192.
  21. Yue F, Hirashima K, Tomotsune D, et al. Reprogramming of retinoblastoma cancer cells into cancer stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017; 482(4): 549–555.
  22. Cao J, Ma J, Sun L, et al. Targeting glypican-4 overcomes 5-FU resistance and attenuates stem cell-like properties via suppression of Wnt/β-catenin pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2018; 119(11): 9498–9512.
  23. Ghadban T, Dibbern JL, Reeh M, et al. HSP90 is a promising target in gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil resistant pancreatic cancer. Apoptosis. 2017; 22(3): 369–380.
  24. Wei X, Wang W, Wang L, et al. MicroRNA-21 induces 5-fluorouracil resistance in human pancreatic cancer cells by regulating PTEN and PDCD4. Cancer Med. 2016; 5(4): 693–702.
  25. Wang WB, Yang Yu, Zhao YP, et al. Recent studies of 5-fluorouracil resistance in pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(42): 15682–15690.
  26. Miyoshi S, Tsugawa H, Matsuzaki J, et al. Inhibiting xCT Improves 5-Fluorouracil Resistance of Gastric Cancer Induced by CD44 Variant 9 Expression. Anticancer Res. 2018; 38(11): 6163–6170.
  27. Hu YB, Yan C, Mu L, et al. Exosomal Wnt-induced dedifferentiation of colorectal cancer cells contributes to chemotherapy resistance. Oncogene. 2019; 38(11): 1951–1965.
  28. Lee JH, Yun CW, Han YS, et al. Melatonin and 5-fluorouracil co-suppress colon cancer stem cells by regulating cellular prion protein-Oct4 axis. J Pineal Res. 2018; 65(4): e12519.
  29. Park S, Kwon W, Park JK, et al. Suppression of cathepsin a inhibits growth, migration, and invasion by inhibiting the p38 MAPK signaling pathway in prostate cancer. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2020; 688: 108407.
  30. Zhong S, Ji DF, Li YG, et al. Activation of P27kip1-cyclin D1/E-CDK2 pathway by polysaccharide from Phellinus linteus leads to S-phase arrest in HT-29 cells. Chem Biol Interact. 2013; 206(2): 222–229.
  31. Hwang YS, Park SH, Kang M, et al. Stemness and differentiation potential-recovery effects of sinapic acid against ultraviolet-A-induced damage through the regulation of p38 MAPK and NF-κB. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1): 909.
  32. García-Cano J, Roche O, Cimas FJ, et al. p38MAPK and Chemotherapy: We Always Need to Hear Both Sides of the Story. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016; 4: 69.
  33. Xu M, Wang S, Wang Y, et al. Role of p38γ MAPK in regulation of EMT and cancer stem cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018; 1864(11): 3605–3617.
  34. de la Cruz-Morcillo MA, Valero MLL, Callejas-Valera JL, et al. P38MAPK is a major determinant of the balance between apoptosis and autophagy triggered by 5-fluorouracil: implication in resistance. Oncogene. 2012; 31(9): 1073–1085.
  35. Wada T, Penninger JM. Mitogen-activated protein kinases in apoptosis regulation. Oncogene. 2004; 23(16): 2838–2849.
  36. Wagner EF, Nebreda AR. Signal integration by JNK and p38 MAPK pathways in cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009; 9(8): 537–549.
  37. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007; 318(5858): 1917–1920.
  38. Lee S, Wottrich S, Bonavida B. Crosstalks between Raf-kinase inhibitor protein and cancer stem cell transcription factors (Oct4, KLF4, Sox2, Nanog). Tumour Biol. 2017; 39(4): 1010428317692253.
  39. Kim RJ, Nam JS. OCT4 Expression Enhances Features of Cancer Stem Cells in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer. Lab Anim Res. 2011; 27(2): 147–152.
  40. van Schaijik B, Davis PF, Wickremesekera AC, et al. Subcellular localisation of the stem cell markers OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, KLF4 and c-MYC in cancer: a review. J Clin Pathol. 2018; 71(1): 88–91.
  41. Yin X, Zhang BH, Zheng SS, et al. Coexpression of gene Oct4 and Nanog initiates stem cell characteristics in hepatocellular carcinoma and promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition through activation of Stat3/Snail signaling. J Hematol Oncol. 2015; 8: 23.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl