Physician’s legal liability for making a patient becomes infected with SARS-CoV-2
Abstract
The coronavirus epidemic, lasting from the end of 2019, which quickly gained proportions and the status of a pandemic, has changed the reality in health care for a long time, not only radically testing the endurance of medical personnel and the efficiency of the health system, but also forcing its significant and immediate rearrangement. In the period of the greatest number of infections, in view of disease outbreaks in healthcare facilities, a decision to limit access to health care services both in a timely justified for health reasons (postponement of scheduled admissions) and in a medically optimal form (telephone medical advice) could expose a patient to negative health effects, even though it was epidemiologically justified. The choice between epidemiological risks and patient’s exposure to health consequences due to failure to provide a health care service on time or form was burdening managers of healthcare facilities and their medical personnel. In the light of the above, a decision to provide a health care service as part of hospitalisation was inherently associated with an increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during a hospital stay, which justifies the legal analysis of the possibility of classifying SARS-CoV-2 infection as hospital-acquired infections and all legal consequences related to them.
Keywords: coronavirus infectionhospital-acquired infectioninfection preventioninfection combating
References
- World Health Organization (WHO), BREAKING „We have therefore made the assessment that COVID19 can be characterized as a pandemic”, @WHO, 11 March 2020 (retrieved: 2021-11-02).
- Rzecznik Praw Pacjenta, Raport Rzecznika Praw Pacjenta, Problemy pacjentów w obliczu epidemii choroby COVID-19, Raport opracowany na podstawie sygnałów kierowanych do Rzecznika Praw Pacjenta za okres od stycznia do września 2020, Warsaw, October 2020, pp. 10–15. https://www.gov.pl/web/rpp/problemy-pacjentow-w-obliczu-epidemii-covid-19 (retrieved: 2021-11-08).
- Act of 5 December 2008 on preventing and combating infection and infectious diseases in humans (Journal of Laws 2020, item 1845, as later amended).
- Art. 2 sec. 20 and 21 of the Act of 5 December 2008 on preventing and combating infection and infectious diseases in humans (Journal of Laws 2020, item 1845, as later amended) states that a suspect of an infectious disease is a person with clinical symptoms or abnormalities in additional tests, which may indicate an infectious disease; a person suspected for infection is a person who has no symptoms of infection or an infectious disease, who has had contact with the source of the infection, and the nature of the infectious agent and the circumstances of contact justify the suspicion of infection.
- Michalski A, Bielawska-Drózd A, Cieślik P, et al. Metody diagnostyki laboratoryjnej COVID-19. Wiedza Medyczna. 2020: 1–9.
- https://www.mp.pl/covid19/zalecenia/265853,zalecenia-postepowania-w-zakazeniach-sars-cov-2-polskiego-towarzystwa-epidemiologow-i-lekarzy-chorob-zakaznych-26042021. https://www.mp.pl/covid19/zalecenia/265853,zalecenia-postepowania-w-zakazeniach-sars-cov-2-polskiego-towarzystwa-epidemiologow-i-lekarzy-chorob-zakaznych-26042021 (retrieved: 2021-11-10).
- Recommendations of the NIPH-PZH in the field of SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics updated on 31 May 2021. https://www.pzh.gov.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Rekomendacje-dot.-interpretacji-testow-rtPCR-z-31.05.2021.pdf (retrieved: 2021-11-10).
- Rekomendowane rodzaje środków ochrony osobistej (PPE, ang. Personal Protective Equipment) dla personelu medycznego przy kontakcie z pacjentem z podejrzeniem lub rozpoznaniem zakażenia SARS-CoV-2. https://cm-uj.krakow.pl/cm/cm/uploads/2020/04/PPE-1.pdf (retrieved: 2021-11-10).
- Judgement of the Supreme Court of 22 Feb. 2012, IV CSK 245/11, LEX no. 1164750; Judgement of the Court of Appeal in Poznań of 14 Nov. 2013, I ACa 819/13, LEX no. 1416234; Judgement of the Court of Appeal in Białystok of 29 Sept. 2014, I ACa 233/14, LEX no. 1526918; Judgement of the Court of Appeal in Katowice of 5 May 2016, I ACa 431/15, LEX no. 2061813.
- Judgement of the Court of Appeal in Białystok of 12 Feb. 2021, I ACa 495/20, LEX no. 3154102.
- Judgement of the Court of Appeal in Lublin of 19 June 2013, I ACa 727/12, LEX no. 1342295.
- Judgement of the Court of Appeal in Szczecin of 13 June 2018, I ACa 190/16, LEX no 2688341.
- Par. 3 sec. 1a and 1b of the Regulation and point VI of Annex 1 to the Regulation of the Minister of Health of 26 March 2019 on the requirements which should be met by the premises and equipment of a health care facility in terms of professional and sanitary conditions (Journal of Laws 2019, item 595, as later amended).
- Ministerstwo Zdrowia, Wytyczne dla poszczególnych zakresów i rodzajów świadczeń. https://www.gov.pl/web/zdrowie/wytyczne-dla-poszczegolnych-zakresow-i-rodzajow-swiadczen (retrieved: 2021-11-06).
- Ministerstwo Zdrowia, Zalecenia postępowania przy udzielaniu świadczeń stomatologicznych w sytuacji ogłoszonego na terenie Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej stanu epidemii w związku z zakażeniami wirusem SARS-CoV-2. https://www.gov.pl/web/zdrowie/zalecenia-postepowania-przy-udzielaniu-swiadczen-stomatologicznych-w-sytuacji-ogloszonego-na-terenie-rzeczypospolitej-polskiej-stanu-epidemii-w-zwiazku-z-zakazeniami-wirusem-sars-cov-2 (retrieved: 2021-11-06).
- Zalecenia krajowego konsultanta w dziedzinie chorób zakaźnych z dnia 6.04.2020 dotyczące stosowania środków ochrony osobistej oraz sposób organizacji pomieszczeń, w których udzielana jest pomoc medyczna dla pacjentów z podejrzeniem COVID-19. https://cm-uj.krakow.pl/cm/cm/uploads/2020/04/Komunikat_KK-1.pdf (retrieved: 2021-11-06).
- Wytyczne postępowania w oddziałach zabiegowych szpitali niejednoimiennych podczas pandemii COVID-19. https://cm-uj.krakow.pl/cm/cm/uploads/2020/04/WYTYCZNE-POST%C4%98POWANIA-W-ODDZIA%C5%81ACH-ZABIEGOWYCH-SZPITALI-NIEJEDNOIMIENNYCH.pdf (retrieved: 2021-11-06).