English Polski
Vol 14, No 2 (2019)
Original paper
Published online: 2019-04-02

open access

Page views 1102
Article views/downloads 985
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Prevalence of hyperuricemia in very high cardiovascular risk patients — a single centre retrospective cohort study

Marcin Tomasz Wełnicki1, Jakub Żółkiewicz2, Daniel Śliż1, Wiesława B. Duda-Król1, Artur Mamcarz1
Folia Cardiologica 2019;14(2):129-135.

Abstract

Introduction. Asymptomatic hyperuricemia is an established independent risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. However, the awareness of this fact among physicians is still insufficient. Data are also lacking on the prevalence of asymptomatic hyperuricemia in a population of patients potentially requiring drug therapy.
The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of asymptomatic hyperuricemia in the population of patients hospi- talized in an internal medicine unit and the frequency of use of uricosuric drugs in this group of patients. 

Material and methods. Single centre retrospective cohort study — evaluation of medical records of patients hospitalized in an internal medicine unit in the first half of 2018. The analysis included biochemical testing results, data on patients’ medical conditions and drug therapy used. Based on the collected data, a group of patients with a very high CV risk was identified in whom serum uric acid level ≥ 5 mg/dL is considered abnormal. Typical statistical methods were used including descriptive statistics, appropriate parametric and non-parametric tests to evaluate significance of differences in the values of selected parameters between the study groups, and generalized regression models. Statistically signi- ficant differences were conventionally defined as p < 0.05. 

Results. The analysis included data from 354 patients, of whom 194 (55%) met the criteria of a very high CV risk. These patients were older (75 vs. 62 years, p < 0.001) and had lower glomerular filtration rate values (85 vs. 118 mL/ /min/1.73 m2, p = 0.04) and higher mean serum uric acid level (6.6 vs. 5.5 mg/dL, p < 0.001) compared to the control group (non-very high CV risk patients). No significant differences in lipid levels were found between the two groups. Se- rum uric acid level was measured in 55% of patients in the very high CV risk group. Abnormal renal function parameters were an independent predictor of serum uric acid level above 5 mg/dL in this group (R2 = 0.18, p < 0.001). Serum uric acid level was above 5 mg/dL in 70% of very high CV risk patients in whom it was measured. Allopurinol was used in only 25% of these patients, and the mean serum uric acid level in those receiving uricosuric treatment was 8.1 mg/dL. The most commonly used allopurinol dose was 100 mg/day. The mean serum uric acid level in patients not receiving uricosuric treatment was 6.2 mg/dL. 

Conclusions. Serum uric acid level measurement is too rarely considered in the biochemical profile of patients at a very high CV risk. Serum uric acid level may be an indication for the use of uricosuric drugs in most patients at a very high CV risk. In the light of the current expert consensus, allopurinol is underused and underdosed in the very high CV risk group. 

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Raciborski F, Maśliński M, Kłak A, et al. Występowanie i leczenie dny moczanowej w Polsce. Analiza, wskazania, rekomendacje. Instytut Ochrony Zdrowia 2015.
  2. Gińdzieńska-Sieśkiewicz E, Sierakowski S, Domysławska I, et al. Dna moczanowa – aktualne spojrzenie na diagnostykę i leczenie. Reumatologia. 2010; 48(6): 425–428.
  3. Zimmermann-Górska I. Komentarz do pracy Nuki G. Doherty M. Richette P. Aktualne postępowanie w dnie moczanowej. yczne wskazówki z wytycznych EULAR 2016. Med. Prakt. 2017; 5: 35–36.
  4. Khanna D, Fitzgerald JD, Khanna PP, et al. American College of Rheumatology. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012; 64(10): 1431–1446.
  5. Khanna D, Khanna PP, Fitzgerald JD, et al. American College of Rheumatology. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 2: therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012; 64(10): 1447–1461.
  6. Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, et al. 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017; 76(1): 29–42.
  7. Gueyffier F, Boissel JP, Pocock S, et al. Identification of risk factors in hypertensive patients: contribution of randomized controlled trials through an individual patient database. Circulation. 1999; 100(18): e88–e94.
  8. Cannon PJ, Stason WB, Demartini FE, et al. Hyperuricemia in primary and renal hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1966; 275(9): 457–464.
  9. Sundström J, Sullivan L, D'Agostino RB, et al. Relations of serum uric acid to longitudinal blood pressure tracking and hypertension incidence. Hypertension. 2005; 45(1): 28–33.
  10. Kostka-Jeziorny K, Tykarski A. Związek hyperurykemii z innymi czynnikami ryzyka sercowo-naczyniowego u pacjentów z pierwotnym, nieleczonym nadciśnieniem tętniczym w populacji badania RISK. Arterial Hypertension. 2008; 12: 190–199.
  11. Widecka K, Szymański FM, Filipiak KJ, et al. Stanowisko ekspertów dotyczące hiperurykemii i jej leczenia u pacjentów z wysokim ryzykiem sercowo-naczyniowym. Arterial Hypertens. 2017; 21(1): 1–9.
  12. Brand FN, McGee DL, Kannel WB, et al. Hyperuricemia as a risk factor of coronary heart disease: The Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1985; 121(1): 11–18.
  13. Borghi C, Tykarski A, Widecka K, et al. Expert consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patient with hyperuricemia and high cardiovascular risk. Cardiol J. 2018; 25(5): 545–563.
  14. Ndrepepa G, Braun S, Haase HU, et al. Prognostic value of uric acid in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol. 2012; 109(9): 1260–1265.
  15. Cho SK, Chang Y, Kim I, et al. U-Shaped Association Between Serum Uric Acid Level and Risk of Mortality: A Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70(7): 1122–1132.
  16. Ioachimescu AG, Brennan DM, Hoar BM, et al. Serum uric acid is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a preventive cardiology information system (PreCIS) database cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58(2): 623–630.
  17. Bombelli M, Ronchi I, Volpe M, et al. Prognostic value of serum uric acid: new-onset in and out-of-office hypertension and long-term mortality. J Hypertens. 2014; 32(6): 1237–1244.
  18. Liu P, Chen Y, Wang B, et al. Allopurinol treatment improves renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes and asymptomatic hyperuricemia: 3-year randomized parallel-controlled study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015; 83(4): 475–482.
  19. Liu P, Wang H, Zhang F, et al. The Effects of Allopurinol on the Carotid Intima-media Thickness in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia: A Three-year Randomized Parallel-controlled Study. Intern Med. 2015; 54(17): 2129–2137.
  20. Araszkiewicz A, Bandurska-Stankiewicz E, Budzyński A, et al. 2019 Guidelines on the management of diabetic patients. A position of Diabetes Poland. Clinical Diabetology. 2019; 8(1): 1–95.
  21. Tykarski A, Narkiewicz K, Gaciong Z, et al. Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Arterial Hypertension. 2015; 19(2): 53–83.
  22. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, et al. Task Force Members, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines, Document Reviewers. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34(38): 2949–3003.
  23. Wei Li, Mackenzie IS, Chen Y, et al. Impact of allopurinol use on urate concentration and cardiovascular outcome. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 71(4): 600–607.
  24. Golmohammadi S, Almasi A, Manouchehri M, et al. Allopurinol Against Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2017; 11(4): 286–293.
  25. Borgi L, McMullan C, Wohlhueter A, et al. Effect of Uric Acid-Lowering Agents on Endothelial Function: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Hypertension. 2017; 69(2): 243–248.