English Polski
Vol 12, No 2 (2017)
Case report
Published online: 2017-04-20

open access

Page views 1018
Article views/downloads 14910
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The content of this article is also available in the following languages:
Polski

FFR not always conclusive… A patient with a hemodynamically insignificant lesion in coronary artery and myocardial infarction

Paweł Czerwonka, Iwona Gorczyca-Michta, Alicja Stępień-Wałek, Beata Wożakowska-Kapłon
Folia Cardiologica 2017;12(2):211-214.

Abstract

Assessment of partial flow reserve (FFR) is important in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. Its result is an important criterion for further treatment. However, it should be noted that therapeutic decisions should not be made based only on the positive result of the FFR, especially in the blood vessels with subcritical lesions.

Full content:

View HTML

References

  1. Lanza GA, Careri G, Crea F. Mechanisms of coronary artery spasm. Circulation. 2011; 124(16): 1774–1782.
  2. Lanza GA, Crea F. Primary coronary microvascular dysfunction: clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and management. Circulation. 2010; 121(21): 2317–2325.
  3. Ziadi MC, Dekemp RA, Williams KA, et al. Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58(7): 740–748.
  4. De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, et al. FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(11): 991–1001.
  5. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(3): 213–224.
  6. Sels JWEM, Tonino PAL, Siebert U, et al. Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4(11): 1183–1189.
  7. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. Authors. [2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation]. [Article in Polish]. Kardiol Pol. 2015;73(12):1207-94. 2015; 73(12): 1207–1294.
  8. Tonino PAL, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55(25): 2816–2821.