Vol 73, No 5 (2022)
Original paper
Published online: 2022-09-05

open access

Page views 4394
Article views/downloads 637
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Original paper

Endokrynologia Polska

DOI: 10.5603/EP.a2022.0048

ISSN 0423–104X, e-ISSN 2299–8306

Volume/Tom 73; Number/Numer 5/2022

Submitted: 16.10.2022

Accepted: 06.02.2022

Early publication date: 05.09.2022

Nuclear-targeted EGF receptor enhances proliferation and migration of human anaplastic thyroid cancer cells

Xudong Niu*1Jiaoling Chen*2Ningshun Ma3Ru Huang1Cong Tao1Qiang Dan4Yongpeng Fang5
1Internal Medicine Department, Yinchuan City Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yinchuan city, Ningxia province, China
2Department of Pharmacy, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou city, Guangdong Province, China
3Clinical Laboratory, Yinchuan City Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yinchuan city, Ningxia province, China
4Endocrinology Department, Yinchuan First People’s Hospital, Yinchuan city, Ningxia province, China
5Cardiovascular Section, First Affiliated Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan city, Ningxia province, China
*These authors made equal contributions to this study.

Yongpeng Fang, No.804, Shengli South Street, Xingqing District, Yinchuan City, Ningxia Province, China, 750001; e-mail: Pengpengdoctor@126.com

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially

Abstract
Introduction: Epidermal growth factor (EGF) has various important physiological functions, which it exerts by binding to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Reports show that EGF expression is strongly correlated with the occurrence and development of many types of tumour. To date, however, the relationship between EGF/EGFR and the occurrence and development of thyroid carcinoma remains unclear.
Material and methods: In the current study, we investigated this phenomenon using human anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cell lines (SUN-80).
Results: The results indicated that EGF triggered the EGFR-mediated intracellular signalling pathway, including signal transducers and activators of transcription 1/3/5 (STAT1/3/5) and protein kinase B (AKT) in a time- and dose-dependent manner. In addition, results from EGF-induced EGFR internalization and co-localization analyses showed that clathrin, Rab5/7, and EEA1 play critical roles in the intracellular trafficking of EGF/EGFR. Interestingly, EGF triggered EGFR translocation into the nucleus, while nuclear-localized EGFR affected cell cycle distribution, thereby significantly promoting the ration of S phase. Overall, these findings indicated that nuclear EGFR exerts biological activity and physiological functions, including changing cell cycle, which in turn promotes proliferation and migration of SUN-80 cells.
Conclusion: These findings lay a foundation for further explorations seeking to understand the biological effects of the EGF/EGFR system on the occurrence and development of thyroid cancer. (Endokrynol Pol 2022; 73 (5): 803–811)
Key words: cell behaviour; clathrin; EGF; EGFR; thyroid cancer

Introduction

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a 6045-dalton polypeptide that plays various important physiological roles in organisms. EGF exerts its functions by binding to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a transmembrane glycoprotein that is localized in the nucleus of many tissues and cell lines. EGFR, which belongs to a large family of receptor tyrosine kinases and possesses intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity, comprises extracellular, transmembrane, and intracellular domains, the latter made up of a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase. Previous studies have shown that EGF binds to EGFR to activate the tyrosine kinase domain, which in turn phosphorylates downstream intracellular signalling pathways, including the protein kinase B (Akt), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), signal transducer and activator (s) of transcription (STAT), and NF-kB pathways [1]. The activated signalling molecules translocate into cell nuclei where they mediate EGF’s biological functions.

Previous studies have demonstrated that EGFR is localized in the nucleus of a variety of systems and is not only strongly associated with high tissue proliferation but also mediates survival signalling [2]. Both EGF and EGFR form complexes with chromatin [3], while EGF can induce both DNA synthesis and its mitogenic effect [4]. Lin et al. [2] reported that EGF/EGFR could activate gene expression by binding to specific DNA sequences, whereas numerous studies have demonstrated that EGF is closely related to the development of thyroid carcinoma. For example, Mitsiades et al. [5] found significant expression and phosphorylation of EGFR in thyroid carcinoma cell lines, suggesting that EGF may be a therapeutic target in human thyroid carcinoma. On the other hand, Lee et al. [6] demonstrated that EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) significantly inhibited cellular growth and induced apoptosis in the anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) cell lines. To date, however, the relationship between EGF and occurrence and development of thyroid carcinoma cell lines remains unclear. It is worth noting that the cell characteristics and cell behaviour are closely associated with the biological activities of growth factors.

In this study, we used SNU-80, a rare anaplastic thyroid cancer cell line obtained from Korean thyroid carcinoma patients, to investigate cellular behaviour of EGF. Our results demonstrated that EGF/EGFR was localized in the nucleus, where it regulated proliferation or migration of thyroid carcinoma cells. Taken together, these findings have great significance in the field of medicine because they lay a foundation for future development of therapies for the treatment of thyroid cancer.

Material and methods

Antibodies, reagents, and cell lines

Anti-phospho-specific STAT5/3/1, ERK1/2 and AKT, as well as non-phospho-specific STAT5/3/1, ERK1/2, and AKT, and anti-Ki67 (D3B5) were obtained from Cell Signalling Technology (Boston, USA). EGF was acquired from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), while anti-EGFR (phospho Y1068) (ab40815) and Total-EGFR (ab52894) antibodies, as well as goat anti-Rabbit IgG H & L (FITC), were purchased from Abcam (UK). Cell culture media, RPMI 1640, and foetal bovine serum (FBS) were obtained from Gibco (Grand Island, USA), while Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes were purchased from Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA). Alexa Fluor 555, Alexa Fluor 488, and secondary antibodies were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA), while enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL), cell lysis buffer (RIPA), and BCA kits were purchased from Pierce (Rockford, USA). All other reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (USA) unless otherwise stated.

The human anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cell line (SUN-80) was cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% streptomycin, and 1% penicillin (Biofluids, Rockville, MD, USA) and maintained in a 100% humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and a temperature of 37°C.

Determination of intra-cellular EGF/EGFR trafficking

SUN-80 cells were cultured in a serum-starved medium for 10 h, then subjected to EGF stimulation using 5 nM EGF for 30 min. The cells were washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min, washed again 3 times with PBS, then observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM, Olympus FV1000). Image analysis was performed by using the FV10-ASW 1.7 Viewer and ImageJ software.

Indirect immunofluorescence assay

SUN-80 cells were first starved for 10 h by culturing them in a serum-free medium then stimulated with 5 nM EGF. Next, the cells were washed 3 times with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min, then blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h. The cells were washed 3 times with PBS, incubated with anti-EGF or anti-Ki67 antibodies, washed again, and incubated with FITC-conjugated secondary antibody at 37°C for 1 h in the dark. Cell nuclei were stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), washed 3 times with PBS, then observed under a CLSM (Olympus FV1000). Image analysis was performed using FV10-ASW 1.7 Viewer and ImageJ software.

Colocalization analysis

Analysis of EGFR colocalization was performed using Rab5/7 or EEA1, as described by Vanlandingham et al. [7], Lopez-Alcalá et al. [8], and Gosney et al. [9]. Briefly, analysis was carried out using ImageJ software and the colocalization plug-in to generate a binary image of colocalized pixels from 2 separate channels. ImageJ was used to automate the channel thresholding, and colocalization was established for pixels whose intensities were higher than the threshold and for which the ratio of intensity was greater than 50%. The data were expressed as the ratio of integrated intensity from the 2 images, and were presented as averages of 3 separate experiments, with a total of 50 cells measured per experiment.

Western blot analysis

Cells were first stimulated with varying concentrations of EGF (3, 5, 10, 20, and 40 nM) for 30 min, or with 5 nM EGF for different time points (2, 10, 30, 40, and 60 min). Next, total proteins were extracted from the cells using RIPA buffer, and protein concentrations determined using the BCA kit. Equal protein concentrations (20 μg per lane) for each sample were separated on 4% to 10% SDS-PAGE gels, transferred to 0.2 µm PVDF membranes, and the membranes blocked for 1 h with 5% non-fat milk at 37°C. The membranes were washed 3 times then incubated overnight with phospho- or total- EGFR, STAT5/3/1, ERK1/2, and AKT antibodies at 4°C. They were again washed, incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at 37°C, washed 3 times, and proteins detected on the ECL detection system. Densitometric analysis of the immunoreactive protein bands was performed using Quantity One® software (developed by BioRad Technical Service Department, USA; LSG.TechServ. US@BioRad.com).

Analysis of the cell cycle

Cells were first subjected to EGF stimulation and collected by centrifugation for 5 min at 1000 rpm. Prior to EGF treatment, the cells were treated with Pitstop (20 μm), a specific inhibitor that blocks clathrin-mediated endocytosis. The cells were then fixed in 70% ethanol, stored at 4°C for 30 min, and resuspended in propidium iodide (PI) buffer (20 µg/mL RNase A and 50 µg/mL PI) with a 30-min incubation at room temperature in the dark. DNA content in the cells was analysed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis (FACS) (BD, San Jose, CA, USA), with the percentages of cells of the cell cycle at each stage estimated according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences).

Migration assay

Cell migration was analysed using Transwell chambers (Corning, New York, NY), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells on the upper surfaces of Transwell chambers were removed using cotton swabs, following a 24-hour incubation, and those located on the lower surfaces were fixed in methanol for 10 minutes. Subsequently, the cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet, then photographed and counted in 5 randomly selected fields under a microscope (Olympus, IX71, Japan).

Cell proliferation assays

The effect of EGF or clathrin inhibitor on cell proliferation was measured using an MTT assay. Briefly, cells were seeded in 96-well plates, and incubated with MTT solution (150 μL, 0.5 mg/mL) at 37°C for 5 h. The medium was aspirated from each well and replaced with 150 μL DMSO followed by a 15-min incubation at 37°C. Absorbance was then measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, Multiskan FC, Pittsburgh P K, United States).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software (SAS version 9.0, Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and all data are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD) of the means. Differences between groups were determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s HSD test. p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patterns of EGFR expression in SNU-80 cells

We first detected EGFR expression by indirect immunofluorescence, using an anti-EGFR antibody in SNU-80 cells and found that it was mainly localized in the cell membranes (Fig. 1). Notably, the intensity of the fluorescent signal was low in the cytoplasm, while we found no positive staining in the control antibody (data not shown).

Niu-1.png
Figure 1. Localization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in SNU-80 cells. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h. After washing the cells 3 times with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), they were incubated with anti-EGFR antibody overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, the cells were treated with Alexa 488-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at 37°C in the dark. The cells were observed by laser scanning confocal microscope (CLSM). Scale bar = 10 µm. EGFR (green): Alexa 488 conjugated anti-EGFR. Confocal images shown represent at least 3 separate experiments

EGF/EGFR-induced intracellular signalling

We performed western blot analysis to determine intracellular signalling mediated by EGF in SNU-80 cells. The results showed that stimulation of cells, with varying concentrations of EGF (3, 5, 10, 20, and 40 nM) for 30 min, significantly upregulated intracellular signalling protein phosphorylation (including EGFR, AKT, ERK1/2, and STAT1/3/5), which then gradually declined (Fig. 2A). Notably, this EGF-induced phosphorylation occurred in a dose-dependent manner, while phosphorylation of signalling proteins reached a peak when the cells were stimulated with 5 nM EGF.

Niu-HTML-2.png
Figure 2. A. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), protein kinase B (AKT), signal transducers and activators of transcription 1/3/5 (STAT1/3/5), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) are activated in SNU-80 cells in a dose-dependent manner. The cells were treated with EGF for 30 min in a dose-dependent manner (3, 5, 10, 20, and 40 nM). The expression of phosphorylated and total EGFR (a), AKT (b), STAT1 (c), STAT3 (d), and STAT5 (e), and ERK1/2 (f) proteins were determined by western blotting; B. Activation of EGFR, AKT, STAT1/3/5 and ERK1/2 in SNU-80 cells (time-dependent experiment). The cells were treated with 5 nM EGF for different times (2, 10, 30, 40, and 60 min). Western blots showing expression levels of phosphorylated and total EGFR (a), AKT (b), STAT1 (c), STAT3 (d), STAT5 (e), and ERK1/2 (f) proteins. Data presented are means ± standard deviation (SD) of 3 independent replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05)

Based on the results in Figure 2A, we selected a dose of 5 nM EGF and used it to stimulate the cells across different time points (260 min). Analysis of phosphorylation of intracellular signalling proteins, namely EGFR, AKT, ERK1/2, and STAT1/3/5, indicated that EGF activated their phosphorylation in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2B). Activation of EGFR phosphorylation occurred after 2 minutes of EGF stimulation. Notably, phosphorylation of EGFR first gradually increased, then declined, with the levels reaching a peak after approximately 30 min. Phosphorylation of the other signalling proteins (AKT, ERK1/2, and STAT1/3/5) was also detected after 2 minutes of cell stimulation by EGF.

EGFR-mediated EGF endocytosis

Internalised EGF and EGFR were in the form of EGF-EGFR complex. Previous studies have described multiple pathways of endocytosis into cells, including those that act in clathrin-dependent, caveolin-dependent, and caveolin- and clathrin-independent manners [10]. To further elucidate the mechanism through which EGFR mediates endocytosis of EGF, we performed colocalization assays using CLSM, and detected colocalization signals (yellow) of EGFR (green) and clathrin (red) via confocal microscopy after EGF treatment (Fig. 3A). We also detected colocalization signals between EGFR with Rab5/7 or EEA1 (Fig. 3B), owing to the important role they play in intracellular transportation of EGF/EGFR. Taken together, these findings indicated that clathrin, Rab5/7, and EEA1 play critical roles in the intracellular trafficking of EGF/EGFR.

Niu-HTML-3.png
Figure 3. A. Profiles of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) endocytosis. The cells were stimulated with 5 nM EGF for 2 min, then fixed, permeabilized, blocked, and immunostained using anti-EGFR (green) and anti-clathrin antibodies (red). After washed thrice, the samples were analysed by confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) (FV1200). Scale bar = 10 μm; (B.) Colocalization analysis of EGFR and Rab5/7 or EEA1 under EGF treatment. The cells were stimulated with 5 nM EGF for 2 min, then fixed, permeabilized, blocked, and immunostained using anti-EGFR (green) and anti-Rab5/7 (red) or anti-EEA1. Analysis was performed by CLSM (FV1200). Scale bar = 10 μm. Confocal images represent at least 3 separate experiments
Nuclear localization of EGFR in SNU-80 Cells

Previous studies have shown that nuclear EGFR not only plays important physiological functions but is also strongly associated with high proliferation of tissues [2–4]. Although numerous studies have demonstrated the close relationship between EGF and thyroid carcinoma, the association between changes in cellular behaviour of EGF/EGFR with the occurrence and development of thyroid carcinoma remains unclear [5, 6]. To determine whether EGFR is translocated to the nucleus and elucidate its potential function, we first treated cells with 5 nM EGF for 2, 10, 30, 40, and 60 min, then observed internalization of EGFR in SNU-80 cells. The results showed that small amounts of EGFR (green signal) were translocated to the cell nuclei at 2 min (Fig. 4A). EGFR’s internalization and nuclear localization increased with time, and nuclear fluorescence signals were found to peak at 30 min. On the other hand, cytoplasmic and nuclear fluorescence signals declined slightly at 60 min. These results indicated that EGFR internalization was time dependent. However, nuclear fluorescence signals significantly decreased when the cells were treated with clathrin inhibitor (Fig. 4B). Collectively, these results indicate that EGFR is translocated to the nucleus, possibly through the clathrin-mediated pathway.

Niu-HTML-4.png
Figure 4. Nuclear localization of EGFR in SNU-80 cells. A. SNU-80 cells treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF) (5 nM) for 2, 10, 30, 40, and 60 min. B. Cells pre-incubated with clathrin inhibitor and then treated with 5 nM EGF for 30 min. Cells were immunostained for detection of EGFR (green) and the nuclei were stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue). Detection was done under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Scale bar = 10 μm. Confocal images represent at least 3 separate experiments

Effect of nuclear EGFR on cell cycle distribution in SNU-80 cells

To determine the function of EGFR localized in the nucleus, we performed cell cycle analysis after stimulating the cells with EGF. The results showed that the percentage of cells in the G1 and S phases was 53.26 and 33.06%, respectively (Fig. 5). However, stimulation of cells using clathrin inhibitor resulted in an increase in cells in the G1 phase (69.59%) and a decrease in those in the S phases (17.75%), because it blocked EGFR from entering the cell nucleus and inhibited its nuclear actions. These results indicate that nuclear EGFR affects cell cycle distribution in SNU-80 cells, while EGFR localization in the nucleus causes the cell cycle to be subsequently distributed in the S phase, thereby promoting cell proliferation.

Niu-5.png
Figure 5. Effect of nuclear epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on cell cycle distribution in SNU-80 cells. A. The cells were pre-incubated with clathrin inhibitor and then treated with 5 nM EGF for 30 min; B. The cells were stimulated with 5 nM EGF for 30 min. The cells were fixed in 70% ethanol and stored at 4°C for 30 min, then the cells were suspended in propidium iodide (PI) buffer (20 µg/mL RNase A and 50 µg/mL PI) for 30 min in the dark at room temperature; C. The cell cycle distributions were analysed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis (FACS) (BD, San Jose, CA, USA), and the percentages of cells of the cell cycle were estimated according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences) in each stage. Data presented are means ± standard deviation (SD) from 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01

Nuclear localization of EGFR improves proliferation and migration of SNU-80 cells

We further explored EGF’s cellular behaviour in SNU-80 cells using MTT assays and found that proliferation of these cells improved after EGF stimulation. However, treatment with clathrin inhibitor significantly suppressed cell proliferation (Fig. 6A). Results from CLSM analyses revealed that Ki67, a proliferation marker in human tumour cells, was significantly downregulated in the cells after treatment with a clathrin inhibitor (Fig. 6B). Transwell chamber assay showed that treatment of SNU-80 cells with EGF improved their migratory capacity (Fig. 6C), although this phenomenon was reversed by exposure to the clathrin inhibitor. These results indicate that EGF promotes cell proliferation and migration. As expected, our results indicate that nuclear localization of EGFR promotes proliferation and migration of SNU-80 cells.

Niu-HTML-6.png
Figure 6. Effect of nuclear epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) on proliferation and migration in SNU-80 cells. A. SNU-80 cells were treated with EGF or clathrin inhibitor. The effect of EGF or clathrin inhibitor on cell proliferation were assessed by MTT assay. Data presented are means ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 5). All experiments were performed in triplicate. Viability of untreated cells was set to 100%; B. The cells were fixed with 4% PFA then blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h. After washing the cells 3 times with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), they were incubated with anti-Ki67 antibody overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, the cells were treated with Alexa 488-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at 37°C in the dark. The cells were observed by confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Scale bar =10 µm; C. Transwell assays were used to measure cell migration of SNU-80 cells. The SNU-80 cells were re-plated in serum-free medium after stimulation with EGF or clathrin inhibitor, then layered onto the top chambers and invaded the bottom chamber containing serum-supplemented medium for 24 h at 37°C. The cells that located on the lower surfaces were fixed in methanol for 10 minutes, then the cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet, photographed, and counted in 5 randomly selected fields. Data presented are means ± SD from 3 independent experiments. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01

Discussions

Epidermal growth factor receptor, a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family, mediates many essential physiological processes in both cancerous and normal cells. Previous studies have shown that it plays a central biological role in many human cancers, regulating processes such as tumourigenesis and malignancy [11–13]. Additional evidence has demonstrated that EGF is closely related to tumour development, as shown by frequent mutations, activation, and over-expression [14, 15]. To date, however, the relationship between cellular functions and changes of EGF/EGFR and the occurrence and development of thyroid carcinoma remains unclear. It is worth noting that cellular characteristics and behaviour are closely associated with biological activities of growth factors. The results of the present study demonstrate that clathrin, Rab5/7, and EEA1 play critical roles in regulating intracellular trafficking of EGF/EGFR, while EGFR plays important physiological roles in the nucleus of SNU 80 cells. Notably, this EGFR localization in the nucleus significantly improved proliferation or migration of thyroid carcinoma cell lines.

Previous studies have shown that EGFR is not only widely distributed in the nucleus of a range of cancerous cells and tissues but can also be localized in the inner nuclear membrane [16–19]. EGFR’s most well-known role is its ability to act as a plasma membrane-bound receptor. Specifically, EGF binds to and mediates phosphorylation of EGFR, which in turn recruits and activates downstream signalling molecules to regulate gene expression and exert protein function [20]. In the present study, we found that EGFR is mainly localized in the cell membranes. EGFR phosphorylation is associated with activation of many signalling pathways, of which the MAPK/ERK pathway plays an important role in many cellular processes. For example, Emamian et al. [21] reported that hyperphosphorylation of AKT was part of the pathological process among various kinds of human tumours. The results of the present study indicated that EGF activated phosphorylation of EGFR, STAT1/3/5, AKT, and ERK1/2 in a dose- and time-dependent manner.

Previous studies have demonstrated that multiple pathways play a role in cell endocytosis. For example, clathrin-mediated endocytosis was shown to stimulate internalization of many receptors, which play critical roles in growth control, cell differentiation, cellular homeostasis, and synaptic transmission [22, 23]. Other evidence has shown that clathrin-mediated endocytosis is the major pathway regulating EGFR internalization. Particularly, EGFR was internalized via clathrin-coated pits and subsequently routed to early endosomes [24]. The results of the present study show that EGF/EGFR could enter into the cytoplasm through clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Clathrin, Rab5/7, and EEA1 contribute to intracellular trafficking of EGF/EGFR (Fig. 3). Studies have shown that as well as clathrin-dependent endocytosis, clathrin-independent endocytosis also plays critical roles in internalization [25, 26]. For instance, EGFR was found to enter the cytoplasm through micropinocytosis and caveolin-mediated endocytosis [25]. Therefore, the action of other unknown factors cannot be excluded.

Furthermore, the results of the current study demonstrate that EGFR could internalize and be translocated into the nuclei of SUN-80 cells after EGF stimulation in a time-dependent manner. It is possible that EGFR is translocated into the nucleus through the clathrin-medicated pathway. Previous studies have reported that nuclear EGFR is not only a prognostic indicator for poor clinical outcomes but also might mediate physiological processes that aggravate activity of tumour cells [12, 18, 19]. Other evidence has shown that EGFR elevates cell proliferation and enhances tumour cell motility [27], while Andl et al. [28] found that exposure to EGFR promoted cell proliferation and migration in oesophageal keratinocytes. To determine the functions of EGFR localized in the nucleus, we assessed the cell cycle after stimulating SNU-80 cells with EGF and found that nuclear EGFR affected the cell cycle distribution. Moreover, the cell cycle was mainly distributed in the S phase when EGFR localized in the nucleus, a phenomenon that promoted cell proliferation. Additionally, localization of EGFR in the nucleus upregulated Ki67 expression and improved migration in SNU-80 cells.

In conclusion, EGF effectively activated EGFR-mediated intracellular signalling of proteins, such as STAT1/3/5, AKT, and ERK1/2, in thyroid cancer cells. Furthermore, clathrin treatment caused EGFR to internalize into thyroid cancer cells, while EGFR was successfully translocated into the nuclei of SUN80 cells. Furthermore, localization of EGFR in cell nuclei resulted in various biological activities and physiological functions, including changing cell cycle and promotion of proliferation and migration of thyroid cancer cells. Overall, these findings have great significance in the field of medicine because they lay a foundation for future development of treatment therapies for thyroid cancer. However, the exact mechanisms underlying EGFR’s effect in SNU-80 cells require further exploration.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Child Health Hospital (No. YH20190205).

Funding

This study was supported by Shantou University Medical College.

References

  1. Biswas DK, Cruz AP, Gansberger E, et al. Epidermal growth factor-induced nuclear factor kappa B activation: A major pathway of cell-cycle progression in estrogen-receptor negative breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(15): 85428547, doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.15.8542, indexed in Pubmed: 10900013.
  2. Lin SY, Makino K, Xia W, et al. Nuclear localization of EGF receptor and its potential new role as a transcription factor. Nat Cell Biol. 2001; 3(9): 802808, doi: 10.1038/ncb0901-802, indexed in Pubmed: 11533659.
  3. Rakowicz-Szulczynska EM, Rodeck U, Herlyn M, et al. Chromatin binding of epidermal growth factor, nerve growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor in cells bearing the appropriate surface receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986; 83(11): 37283732, doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3728, indexed in Pubmed: 3012531.
  4. Carpenter G, Cohen S, Cohen S, et al. Interaction of epidermal growth factor (EGF) with cultured fibroblasts. Adv Metab Disord. 1975; 8(4): 265284, doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-027308-9.50024-x, indexed in Pubmed: 1199892.
  5. Mitsiades CS, Kotoula V, Poulaki V, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor as a therapeutic target in human thyroid carcinoma: mutational and functional analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91(9): 36623666, doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0055, indexed in Pubmed: 16822827.
  6. Lee DHo, Lee GK, Kong SY, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor status in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2007; 60(8): 881884, doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.041251, indexed in Pubmed: 17079354.
  7. Vanlandingham PA, Ceresa BP. Rab7 regulates late endocytic trafficking downstream of multivesicular body biogenesis and cargo sequestration. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284(18): 1211012124, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M809277200, indexed in Pubmed: 19265192.
  8. Lopez-Alcalá C, Alvarez-Moya B, Villalonga P, et al. Identification of essential interacting elements in K-Ras/calmodulin binding and its role in K-Ras localization. J Biol Chem. 2008; 283(16): 1062110631, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706238200, indexed in Pubmed: 18182391.
  9. Gosney JA, Wilkey DW, Merchant ML, et al. Proteomics reveals novel protein associations with early endosomes in an epidermal growth factor-dependent manner. J Biol Chem. 2018; 293(16): 58955908, doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000632, indexed in Pubmed: 29523688.
  10. Doherty GJ, McMahon HT. Mechanisms of endocytosis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009; 78: 857902, doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081307.110540, indexed in Pubmed: 19317650.
  11. Lo HW. EGFR-targeted therapy in malignant glioma: novel aspects and mechanisms of drug resistance. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2010; 3(1): 3752, doi: 10.2174/1874467211003010037, indexed in Pubmed: 20030624.
  12. Lo HW, Hung MC, Lo HW, et al. Nuclear EGFR signalling network in cancers: linking EGFR pathway to cell cycle progression, nitric oxide pathway and patient survival. Br J Cancer. 2006; 94(2): 184188, doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602941, indexed in Pubmed: 16434982.
  13. Yarden Y, Shilo BZ. SnapShot: EGFR signaling pathway. Cell. 2007; 131(5): 1018, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.013, indexed in Pubmed: 18045542.
  14. Lo HW, Hsu SC, Xia W, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor cooperates with signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer cells via up-regulation of TWIST gene expression. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(19): 90669076, doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0575, indexed in Pubmed: 17909010.
  15. Lo HW, Cao X, Zhu Hu, et al. Constitutively activated STAT3 frequently coexpresses with epidermal growth factor receptor in high-grade gliomas and targeting STAT3 sensitizes them to Iressa and alkylators. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14(19): 60426054, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4923, indexed in Pubmed: 18829483.
  16. Cordero JB, Cozzolino M, Lu Y, et al. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D down-regulates cell membrane growth- and nuclear growth-promoting signals by the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277(41): 3896538971, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203736200, indexed in Pubmed: 12181310.
  17. de la Iglesia N, Konopka G, Puram SV, et al. Identification of a PTEN-regulated STAT3 brain tumor suppressor pathway. Genes Dev. 2008; 22(4): 449462, doi: 10.1101/gad.1606508, indexed in Pubmed: 18258752.
  18. Xia W, Wei Y, Du Yi, et al. Nuclear expression of epidermal growth factor receptor is a novel prognostic value in patients with ovarian cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2009; 48(7): 610617, doi: 10.1002/mc.20504, indexed in Pubmed: 19058255.
  19. Psyrri A, Yu Z, Weinberger PM, et al. Quantitative determination of nuclear and cytoplasmic epidermal growth factor receptor expression in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer by using automated quantitative analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 11(16): 58565862, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0420, indexed in Pubmed: 16115926.
  20. Wang YN, Hung MC, Wang YN, et al. Nuclear trafficking of the epidermal growth factor receptor family membrane proteins. Oncogene. 2010; 29(28): 39974006, doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.157, indexed in Pubmed: 20473332.
  21. Emamian ES. AKT/GSK3 signaling pathway and schizophrenia. Front Mol Neurosci. 2012; 5: 33, doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2012.00033, indexed in Pubmed: 22435049.
  22. McMahon HT, Boucrot E. Molecular mechanism and physiological functions of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011; 12(8): 517533, doi: 10.1038/nrm3151, indexed in Pubmed: 21779028.
  23. Kaksonen M, Toret CP, Drubin DG. Harnessing actin dynamics for clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 7(6): 404414, doi: 10.1038/nrm1940, indexed in Pubmed: 16723976.
  24. Sigismund S, Argenzio E, Tosoni D, et al. Clathrin-mediated internalization is essential for sustained EGFR signaling but dispensable for degradation. Dev Cell. 2008; 15(2): 209219, doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.012, indexed in Pubmed: 18694561.
  25. Le Roy C, Wrana JL. Clathrin- and non-clathrin-mediated endocytic regulation of cell signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005; 6(2): 112126, doi: 10.1038/nrm1571, indexed in Pubmed: 15687999.
  26. Orth JD, Krueger EW, Weller SG, et al. A novel endocytic mechanism of epidermal growth factor receptor sequestration and internalization. Cancer Res. 2006; 66(7): 36033610, doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2916, indexed in Pubmed: 16585185.
  27. Liu L, Shao X, Gao W, et al. MicroRNA-133b inhibits the growth of non-small-cell lung cancer by targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor. FEBS J. 2012; 279(20): 38003812, doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08741.x, indexed in Pubmed: 22883469.
  28. Andl CD, Mizushima T, Nakagawa H, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mediates increased cell proliferation, migration, and aggregation in esophageal keratinocytes in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(3): 18241830, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209148200, indexed in Pubmed: 12435727.