Vol 13, No 1 (2024)
Research paper
Published online: 2024-02-12

open access

Page views 529
Article views/downloads 283
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

RESEARCH PAPER

Association between High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components in Older Adults: Findings from Neyshabur Longitudinal Study on Ageing (NeLSA)

Amirhossein Sahebkar12Peyman Habibi3Faeze Sadat Talebian4Saeed Mohammadian Haftcheshmeh3Fatemeh Abdollahi3Nazanin Fekri4Tannaz Jamialahmadi5Željko Reiner6Seyed Reza Mirhafez4
1Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3Healthy Ageing Research Centre, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran
4Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran
5Medical Toxicology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
6Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Address for correspondence:

Dr. Seyed Reza Mirhafez

Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center

Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran

phone: +9851142627520

e-mail: mirhafezr@nums.ac.ir

Clinical Diabetology 2024, 13;1: 52–59

DOI: 10.5603/cd.98280

Received: 22.11.2023 Accepted: 26.12.2023

Early publication date: 12.02.2024

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and metabolic syndrome (MetS), components of the MetS as well as diabetes, and cardiovascular complications.

Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional analysis, the data were collected from the registration phase of Neyshabur Longitudinal Study on Ageing (NeLSA) comprising a total of 6034 people aged 50 and older. Association between hsCRP and MetS and its components was conducted by univariate and multivariate analyses in the presence of covariates and confounding factors.

Results: Baseline data including age, body fat mass, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, fasting plasma glucose, triglyceride, creatinine, albumin, and hsCRP also systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were higher in the MetS group compared to the control group (p < 0.001 for all variables other than hsCRP, which was not significant (p = 0.06)). Also the univariate and multi variate analysis illustrated one-unit increase in the serum level of hsCRP was associated with 18% higher risk for diabetes [OR: 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06–1.30] and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) by 15% (OR:1.15; (95% CI, 1.01–1.29). In subjects with MetS, one-unit (log of 1 mg/L) increase in the serum level of hsCRP was associated with 34% higher risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (OR: 1.34; 95% CI, 1.11–1.63).

Conclusions: There is an association between serum level of hsCRP and the presence of the components of MetS including HDL-C and diabetes, especially in women. (Clin Diabetol 2024; 13, 1: 52–59)

Keywords: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, metabolic syndrome, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes

Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is as a cluster of conditions characterized by insulin resistance/glucose intolerance, abdominal obesity, elevated serum triglycerides (TGs) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels [1–3]. According to this definition, the MetS is characterized by the number of symptoms including insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), dyslipidemia [decreased HDL-C and increased TGs], hypertension (HTN), and central obesity [4]. The presence of MetS in young people may predict the risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in the future [5]. The association between MetS and ASCVD is especially important in the context of present COVID-19 pandemic since MetS is a significant factor for more severe forms of the disease [6].

The prevalence of the MetS is increasing dramatically worldwide. In some countries, the incidence of MetS is considerably higher in women than in men, However, it is more prevalent among men in some other countries [7]. MetS is a low-grade inflammatory condition which is associated with excessive visceral fat tissue. C-reactive protein (CRP) is one of the main inflammatory markers in different conditions, including MetS. High-sensitivity CRP is a pattern-recognition molecule produced by the liver in several inflammatory conditions and it is widely used to indicate inflammatory responses in the body. Evidence suggests that hsCRP could be considered as an independent predictor of ASCVD, but it is also associated with components of MetS [8]. The role of hsCRP as an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease can be explained by several mechanisms [9]. Nevertheless, until now no clear correlation was found between the simultaneous effect of MetS and hsCRP on ASCVD. But as it could be expected, several studies showed that the risk of developing ASCVD increases with more expressed components of the MetS [10]. However, there are few exceptions to these findings that could not associate MetS with the increased risk of ASCVD. Elevated hsCRP is associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death, and peripheral arterial disease and has been independently associated with the prevalence of ASCVD in several prospective studies [11]. It is also used in screening and predicting short-term and long-term cardiovascular outcomes not only in patients with ASCVD but also in seemingly healthy individuals [12]. In this study, we tried to investigate the correlation between hsCRP levels, and MetS and its components as well as with diabetes.

Methods

Study design and subjects

This is a cross-sectional study which is a part of the Neyshabur Longitudinal Study on Ageing (NeLSA). NeLSA is a part of the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (PERSIAN), a national follow-up study which was launched in 2016 [13]. This study was performed in Neyshabur city located in the northeast of Iran with a population of about half a million people. NeLSA is the first comprehensive longitudinal study on ageing among people aged 50 years and older in Iran aiming to assess the different aspects of ageing, monitoring changes in health and wellbeing of older adults using a wide range of data including a detailed questionnaire on demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle, physical and psychological aspects, clinical checkup, as well as mobility assessment, biological samples (blood, urine, nail and hair) and anthropometric measures [14]. Since the data for the current study is based on the registration phase of NeLSA at one point in time, the design and analysis of data were performed as a cross-sectional study. After the registration phase, NeLSA includes longitudinal follow-up phases that will track participants’ health and aging-related changes over time. It is important to note that while the current analysis is a cross-sectional study, it forms a part of the broader NeLSA study, which will allow for the examination of longitudinal trends and patterns in the future.

Written informed consent according to the Helsinki Declaration was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Research and Ethical Review Board of the Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences.

Data collection and measurements

Clinical study measurements were performed by a team of trained research staff. Height and weight were measured using a stadiometer and Seca scale, respectively. BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters (kg/m2). For measuring waist circumference (WC), a non-elastic tape was placed horizontally around the participant’s waist (just above the hipbones) in a standing position. Anthropometric measurements were obtained by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using the InBody 770, Biospace Korea connected to a BSM 370.

MetS was assessed by using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP/ATP) III criteria (2005 revision). Participants with three or more of the following criteria were defined as having MetS: 1) WC ≥ 90 cm in men or ≥ 80 cm in women; 2) HDL-C < 40 mg/dL in men or < 50 mg/dL in women; 3) triglycerides (TG) ≥ 150 mg/dL; 4) blood pressure (BP) ≥ 130/85 mmHg; 5) fasting plasma glucose 100 mg/dL, and/or drug treatment to control hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and hypertension. We used NCEP-ATP III criteria definition for WC in this study because it has more suitable WC cut-off points for Middle Eastern men and women which are 94 and 80 cm, respectively.

Venous blood samples were analyzed after at least 8 hours of fasting. Whole blood samples were collected in blood tubes and fractionated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min to obtain serum. The collected serums were aliquoted into 1.5 mL tubes, and following parameters [normal range (NR)] were analyzed by an analyzer (BT1500, Italy; Pars Azmun kits, Iran): fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (< 100 mg/dL), urea (1944 mg/dL), creatinine (0.7–1.4 mg/dL), total bilirubin (0.3–1 mg/dL), triglycerides (TG) (< 200 mg/dL), total cholesterol (TC) (< 200 mg/dL), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) (0.3–4.78 mU/L), free thyroxine (FT4) (0.8–1.8 ng/dL), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (8–33 U/L), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (7–55 U/L), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (44–147 U/L). Whole blood samples in EDTA-K3 were also obtained for measuring blood cell count. The tubes were immediately inverted several times to mix the anticoagulant additive with blood. The blood was processed within 2 hours after using the automated hematology analyzer (Celltac Alpha MEK-6510 K, Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan). The following parameters (NR) were determined: red blood cell count (RBC) (4–5.4 M/µL), white blood cell count (WBC) (4.5–11.5 K/µL), platelet count (150–450 K/µL), hemoglobin (12–15 g/dL), hematocrit (35–49%), mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (80–94 fL), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) (31–36g/dL), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) (27–33 pg), and mean platelet volume (MPV) (7–12fL).

Potential biases

To minimize sample selection bias in the Neyshabur Longitudinal Study on Ageing (NeLSA), a systematic approach was employed. Random sampling was used to select households from different regions of Neyshabur city, aiming for representative population coverage. However, it is important to recognize that despite random sampling, selection bias can still exist due to non-response rates and potential underrepresentation of certain demographic groups. To mitigate this, efforts were made to encourage participation through community engagement, informed consent, and assuring data confidentiality. Multiple attempts were made to contact selected participants, and non-response analysis was conducted to assess systematic differences between participants and non-respondents. If needed, statistical techniques like weighting adjustments were considered. Measurement bias was minimized by standardized procedures, rigorous training, validated measurement tools, and regular quality control checks. Confounding variables were addressed through careful study design, statistical adjustments, and controlling for potential confounders during analysis. While it may not be possible to eliminate all biases entirely, recognizing and addressing potential biases enhances the validity and reliability of the study findings.

Statistical analysis

The statistical methods employed in this study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis by investigating the associations between hsCRP, MetS and its components, diabetes, and ASCVD. Through the utilization of appropriate statistical techniques and the consideration of confounding variables, the researchers sought to obtain reliable and meaningful results to support their research objectives.

Data management and analysis were performed using the SPSS 20 statistics software program (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). Data were presented as mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) for normally distributed continuous variables, as well as median and inter-quartile range for skewed continuous variables. Frequency and percentage were used for categorical variables. The associations between categorical variables were examined using the chi-square test and Wilcoxon test. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between serum hsCRP levels and MetS components, as well as diabetes ASCVD. In the logistic regression models, covariates such as age, sex, cigarette consumption, education level, physical activity, and body mass index (BMI) were included. These covariates accounted for their potential influence on the relationships of interest. The logistic regression analysis yielded estimates of odds ratios, which quantified the relative likelihood of an event (e.g., having MetS or ASCVD) occurring based on changes in the predictor variable (e.g., hsCRP levels).

To account for potential confounding effects, adjustments were made for confounding variables when analyzing the associations between hsCRP, MetS, diabetes, and ASCVD. The study also explored potential interactions and differences between subgroups. Subgroup analysis allowed for the investigation of variations in associations based on participant characteristics or other factors. In this study, subgroup analyses were performed based on gender and the presence or absence of MetS or diabetes to evaluate whether the associations between hsCRP and ASCVD differed within these groups.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Of 6034 participants, 47% were male and the mean age of participants was 58.9 years. The prevalence of MetS was 48%, 16% were males and 32% females, as shown in Table 1. According to this table, among those with MetS there were more women, less non-smokers, more non-smokers, non-addicted, older and more ASCVD. They had higher BMI, body fat mass (BFM), waist-to-hip ratio, WC, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), TGs, FPG, albumin, and HDL-C (p < 0.05 for all these variables).

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Participants in Total and by Study Groups

Categories

Total

Metabolic syndrome

Yes (N = 2903)

No (N= 3131)

P-value*

Gender, N (%)

Male

942 (16%)

1852 (31%)

< 0.001

Female

1961 (32%)

1279 (21%)

Smoking status, N (%)

Non-smoker

2733 (45%)

2663 (44%)

< 0.001

Daily/sometimes

170 (3%)

468 (8%)

Addiction status, N (%)

No addiction

2500 (42%)

2408 (40%)

< 0.001

Occasional

140 (2%)

204 (3%)

Regular

263 (4%)

519 (9%)

ASCVD, N (%)

No

2696 (44%)

3008 (50%)

< 0.001

Yes

207 (4%)

123 (2%)

Age [year]year

58.92 (54.58, 64.83)

59.42 (55.08, 65.54)

58.58 (54.42, 64.25)

< 0.001

BFM [kg]

26.30 (20.40, 32.80)

30.2 (25.8, 35.7)

21.6 (16.4, 28.1)

< 0.001

BMI [kg/m2]

27.70 (24.80, 30.70)

29.5 (27.3, 32.3)

25.4 (23.0, 28.5)

< 0.001

Physical activity, MET

64.57 (35.82, 146.14)

57.46 (35.25, 116.41)

76.32 (36.75, 160.35)

< 0.001

hsCRP [mg/L]

0.2 (0.1, 0.4)

0.2 (0.1, 0.4)

0.2 (0.1, 0.4)

0.06

Waist-to-hip ratio

0.94 (0.90, 0.98)

0.97 (0.93, 1.00)

0.92 (0.88, 0.96)

< 0.001

WC [cm]

94.20 (86.60, 101.80)

99.1 (93.6, 105.30)

89.2 (82.5, 95.95)

< 0.001

SBP [mmHg]

116 (104, 128)

120 (108, 132)

112 (101, 122)

< 0.001

DBP [mmHg]

70 (63, 79)

73 (65, 80)

69 (61, 77)

< 0.001

HDL-C [mg/dL]

57.25 (50.00, 65.50)

55.6 (48.20, 63.75)

59.0 (51.25, 67.20)

< 0.001

TG [mg/dL]

129.5 (96.5, 177.0)

160 (118, 210.15)

108.9 (84.8, 141.45)

< 0.001

FPG [mg/dL]

105 (95.00, 120.8)

113 (102, 136)

99 (92, 109)

< 0.001

Cr [mg/dL]

1.2 (1.1, 1.4)

1.2 (1.1, 1.39)

1.2 (1.1, 1.4)

< 0.001

Albumin [g/dL]

5 (4.7, 5.2)

5 (4.8, 5.25)

4.9 (4.7, 5.2)

< 0.001

Association of metabolic syndrome and its components and diabetes with high sensitivity C-reactive protein

Table 2 shows the correlation between the serum hsCRP levels and the MetS components. Logistic regression models were performed to determine the effect of hsCRP serum levels on the odds of having MetS components. According to the results, serum hsCRP levels were only associated with HDL-C (OR: 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01–1.29) and diabetes (OR:1.18; 95% CI, 1.06–1.30) in the univariate model. Serum hsCRP levels were only associated with diabetes after adjusting for other variables including sex, cigarette consumption, education level, physical activity, and BMI. By increasing one mg/L of hsCRP, the odds of developing diabetes was increased by 14%. We also analyzed the effect of hsCRP on the MetS in both gender. No statically significant correlation was observed between serum level of hsCRP and the MetS in men. However, women showed a different result. There was an increasing trend in the odds of HDL-C, WC, and diabetes which was parallel with an increase in serum level of hsCRP. In addition, adjustment for other variables showed that with increasing serum level of hsCRP, the prevalence of diabetes also increased with an OR of 1.22 (95% CI, 1.05–1.41) for women. Therefore, increasing the serum hsCRP by one mg/L increased the odds of developing diabetes by 22%.

Table 2. Association between the Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein among Men and Women

MetS/Components+

hsCRP (continuous) OR (95% CI)

Totally (sex adjusted)

Men

Women

Univariate model$

Multivariable-adjusted
model#

Univariate model$

Multivariable-adjusted model#

Univariate model$

Multivariable-adjusted
model#

Metabolic Syndrome

1.03 (0.93, 1.13)

0.92 (0.82, 1.03)

1.02 (0.88, 1.17)

1.00 (0.82, 1.21)

1.02 (0.90, 1.18)

0.89 (0.77, 1.03)

HTN**

1.05 (0.95, 1.15)

0.96 (0.86, 1.06)

1.00 (0.86, 1.15)

0.96 (0.81, 1.12)

1.08 (0.95. 1.24)

0.97 (0.84, 1.12)

HDL-C [mg/dL]

1.15 (1.01, 1.29)*

1.10 (0.96, 1.24)

1.05 (0.77, 1.32)

1.00 (0.73, 1.27)

1.19 (1.03, 1.39)*

1.14 (0.97, 1.32)

TG [mg/dL]

0.96 (0.86, 1.05)

0.92 (0.83, 1.02)

0.90 (0.76, 1.04)

0.91 (0.76, 1.06)

1.01 (0.88, 1.15)

0.95 (0.82, 1.08)

WC [cm]

1.02 (0.92, 1.13)

0.95 (0.89, 1.12)

0.90 (0.78, 1.04)

0.93 (0.75, 1.16)

1.19 (1.01, 1.42)*

1.00 (0.77, 1.31)

Diabetes**

1.18 (1.06, 1.30)*

1.14 (1.03, 1.27)*

1.04 (0.89, 1.22)

1.07 (0.91, 1.25)

1.31 (1.14, 1.53)*

1.22 (1.05, 1.41)*

FPG [mg/dL]

1.06 (0.96, 1.18)

1.05 (0.95, 1.17)

1.00 (0.87, 1.16)

1.05 (0.91, 1.23)

1.12 (0.97, 1.32)

1.05 (0.91, 1.24)

+Metabolic syndrome outcomes and its components were analyzed as dichotomous variables with binary logistic regression; $The crude odds ratio; #Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, education level, and physical activity; *OR (95% CI) of model that were significant; **According to NCEP ATP III criteria

Association between atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and high sensitivity C-reactive protein depending upon the presence or absence of the metabolic syndrome and diabetes

The effect of hsCRP on ASCVD in two groups — with and without MetS — is shown in Table 3. As it can be seen, the association between hsCRP and ASCVD is statically significant in the group with MetS. In this group the odds of having ASCVD increased by 36% when serum hsCRP increased by one mg/L (OR: 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13–1.64). This association was still significant despite adjusting for the effect of other confounding variables (OR: 1.34; 95% CI, 1.11–1.63). Furthermore, men with MetS were more likely to have ASCVD than women after increasing the serum hsCRP by one mg/L of (OR: 1.46 vs. OR: 1.28).

Table 3. Association between Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein According to the Presence or Absence of the Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes among Men and Women

hsCRP (Continuous) OR (95% CI)

Totally (Sex-adjusted)

Men

Women

Univariate model$

Multivariable-adjusted model#

Univariate model$

Multivariable-adjusted model#

Univariate model$

Multivariable-adjusted model#

ASCVD+

MetS Positive

1.36 (1.13, 1.64)*

1.34 (1.11, 1.63)*

1.52 (1.13, 2.08)*

1.46 (1.08, 2,03)*

1.29 (1.00, 1.64)*

1.28 (1.00, 1.64)*

MetS Negative

1.11 (0.80, 1.38)

1.03 (0.72, 1.31)

1.10 (0.75, 1.44)

1.04 (0.67, 1.40)

1.12 (0.53, 1.61)

0.91 (0.43, 1.38)

ASCVD+

Diabetes Positive

1.18 (0.93, 1.45)

1.23 (0.96, 1.52)

1.37 (0.91, 1.96)

1.45 (0.95, 2.12)

1.15 (0.80, 1.48)

1.17 (0.82, 1.51)

Diabetes Negative

1.27 (1.05, 1.51)*

1.17 (0.96, 1.36)

1.25 (1.00, 1,52)*

1.17 (0.90, 1.46)

1.30 (0.88, 1.72)

1.14 (0.75, 1.53)

According to the information provided in table 3, the effect of serum hsCRP on ASCVD is significant only in the non-diabetic group in the univariate model (OR: 1.27; 95% CI, 1.05–1.51). With an increase in the serum hsCRP by one mg/L, the odds of having ASCVD increased by 27%. This figure decreased by 10 % and lost its statistical significance after adjusting for the confounding variables (OR:1.17; 95% CI, 0.96–1.36). Non-diabetic men were more likely to have ASCVD by hsCRP elevated for one 1 mg/L (OR:1.25; 95% CI, 1.00–1.52). However, statistically insignificant relationship was seen after adjusting for other variables in non-diabetic men concerning ASCVD after an increase in hsCRP by 1 mg/L serum (OR:1.17; 95% CI, 0.96–1.46).

Discussion

Based on the findings of this study, with increasing serum hsCRP, the chance of developing ASCVD, especially in men with MetS, increased dramatically. Elevated serum hsCRP levels were observed only in those with low HDL-C, which had an effect on the single-factor model. Serum hsCRP levels were associated with diabetes only after adjusting for other variables such as gender, smoking, level of education, physical activity and BMI. With an increase of 1 mg/L in hsCRP, the risk of developing diabetes increases by 14%.

Insulin resistance, a significant characteristic of both type T2D and MetS, may serve as a plausible underlying mechanism that establishes a connection between diabetes and elevated levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) [15]. The impaired response of tissues to insulin observed in insulin resistance leads to the elevation of plasma glucose. It is postulated that inflammation, as discerned by heightened hsCRP levels, potentially disrupts the intricate pathways involved in insulin signaling, consequently fostering insulin resistance [16]. Consequently, it is hypothesized that heightened hsCRP levels may exert a direct inhibitory effect on insulin signaling, thereby aggravating glucose dysregulation and contributing to the development of diabetes [17]. Data analysis of the current study showed that there was no association between hsCRP and serum MetS in men. However, in women with elevated serum hsCRP the chances of having lower HDL-C, high WC and diabetes were increased. In addition, modulation of other variables showed that with increasing serum hsCRP, the prevalence of diabetes in women increased. This means that an increase of 1 mg/L in serum hsCRP increases the risk of diabetes by 22%. Those with increased hsCRP were more likely to be female, non-smoker, non-addicted, older, without ASCVD, with higher BMI, BFM, waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference, SBP, DBP, TGs, FPG, albumin, and lower HDL-C. Findings from other studies show that an increase in hsCRP is directly related to an increased risk of T2D in patients with MetS [18]. The study of Mirhafez et al. showed that among the MetS components, increased FBG, WC, TGs, and hypertension were associated with hsCRP levels. Recent studies on the relationship between some components of MetS and hsCRP suggest that hsCRP can be used to identify patients with MetS [19].

The findings of this study showed that with increasing serum hsCRP by 1 mg/L, the chance of developing ASCVD increased by 36% are very important. In previous studies, the association of circulating levels of hsCRP with ASCVD and MetS has been confirmed separately. Men with MetS were more likely to develop ASCVD if they had elevated serum hsCRP [20]. According to previous researches, MetS, diabetes, and ASCVD are associated with alterations in lipid metabolism [17]. HsCRP can modulate lipoprotein metabolism, promoting the production of pro-atherogenic lipoproteins, such as very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Elevated hsCRP levels may contribute to dyslipidemia, thereby increasing the risk of ASCVD [21].

However, there are studies that have shown different results [22]. The vast majority of studies have shown that patients with MetS either are at higher risk for ASCVD or already have ASCVD [11]. According to the Framingham database, the age-adjusted relative risk for ASCVD in men with MetS was 2.88, which was higher than in women (1.54) [23]. The risk of ASCVD is doubled in people with a history of MetS who already have T2D or obesity [24]. McNeill et al. found that older people (mean age 72 years) with MetS were 20 to 30 percent more likely to have an ASCVD event than those without it [25]. Finally, as expected, an increase in number and intensity of MetS components increases the risk of ASCVD [26]. Nevertheless, a study on non-diabetic Native Americans found no association between MetS and the incidence of ASCVD [27]. In a study of people with pre-existing ASCHD, MetS was associated with an increased ASCVD-induced mortality in women, while it had no effect on the risk of ASCVD-induced mortality in men [28]. However, the main limitation for comparing the results of different studies are the different criteria used to define MetS. A meta-analysis showed a clear association between MetS and risk of ASCVD even after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors [29]. Nevertheless, there are several studies that showed that the risk of ASCVD in subjects with MetS is not greater than the sum of its components [30]. In the study by Mirhafez et al. which used the definition of the International Diabetes Federation it was shown that most of the components of MetS were associated with an increase in serum hsCRP and the highest correlation was with serum hsCRP concentration and FBG [19]. Another study showed that changes of hsCRP in a multivariate model did not have a significant impact, while in a univariate model the level of hsCRP predicted the risk of T2D [31]. A number of epidemiological studies have indicated that high hsCRP is a significant risk factor for ASCVD in patients with hypertension and diabetes, and even in healthy individuals [32]. According to the results of a multivariate analysis by Velde M et al., including elevated hsCRP and the variables defining the MetS serum levels of hsCRP had added value to predicting new-onset ASCVD but not T2D [31]. There are a few exceptions to these findings. For example: a study on an Italian group of elderly people with T2D showed that MetS does not help predicting ASCVD further than the risks attributed to T2D. In this study, only in the non-diabetic subjects in univariate model, with increasing 1 mg/L hsCRP in serum, the risk of ASCVD increased for 27%. This study also showed that non-diabetic men were more likely to have ASCVD with an increase in hsCRP of 1 m/L. However, after adjusting for other variables in non-diabetic men, no association could be found between an increase of 1 mg/L of serum hsCRP and ASCVD [33].

Conclusions

This study provides evidence of a positive correlation between serum hsCRP levels and the presence of MetS components including HDL-C and diabetes, particularly in women. These findings suggest that individuals with high hsCRP levels should be monitored closely for the development of MetS and its components. However, further research is needed to deepen our understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms driving these associations. Additionally, healthcare professionals should consider incorporating hsCRP measurement into risk assessment and management strategies for MetS, diabetes and ASCVD. Continued investigation and prospective studies are warranted to determine the clinical utility of hsCRP as a predictive marker and to explore potential therapeutic interventions targeting inflammation in individuals at risk of MetS, diabetes, and ASCVD.

Article information

Data availability statement

Data will be made available on reasonable request.

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Research and Ethical Review Board of the Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: AS, SRM

Writing (original draft): AS, MAN

Writing (review) and editing: PH, SMH, NF, FST, ZR, SRM

Approval of the final version: all authors

Funding

This study was supported financially by a grant from Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fahed G, Aoun L, Bou Zerdan M, et al. Metabolic Syndrome: Updates on Pathophysiology and Management in 2021. Int
    J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(2), doi: 10.3390/ijms23020786, indexed in Pubmed: 35054972.
  2. Dobrowolski P, Prejbisz A, Kuryłowicz A, et al. Metabolic syndrome - a new definition and management guidelines: A joint position paper by the Polish Society of Hypertension, Polish Society for the Treatment of Obesity, Polish Lipid Association, Polish Association for Study of Liver, Polish Society of Family Medicine, Polish Society of Lifestyle Medicine, Division of Prevention and Epidemiology Polish Cardiac Society, „Club 30” Polish Cardiac Society, and Division of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Society of Polish Surgeons. Arch Med Sci. 2022; 18(5): 1133–1156, doi: 10.5114/aoms/152921, indexed in Pubmed: 36160355.
  3. Mitrovic B, Gluvic ZM, Obradovic M, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus: where do we stand today? Arch Med Sci. 2023; 19(4): 884–894, doi: 10.5114/aoms/150639, indexed in Pubmed: 37560721.
  4. Santos AS, Rodrigues AP, Rosa LPS, et al. Cardiometabolic risk factors and Framingham Risk Score in severely obese patients: Baseline data from DieTBra trial. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020; 30(3): 474–482, doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.10.010, indexed in Pubmed: 31791637.
  5. Lumieux I, Després JP. Metabolic syndrome: Past, present and future. Nutrients. 2020; 12(11): 3501, doi: 10.3390/nu12113501.
  6. Pećin I, Reiner Ž. Metabolic Syndrome, Morbidity and Mortlity - in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic. Psychiatr Danub. 2021; 33(Suppl 4): 441444, indexed in Pubmed: 34718262.
  7. Azimi-Nezhad M, Aminisani N, Ghasemi A, et al. Sex-specific prevalence of metabolic syndrome in older adults: results from the Neyshabur longitudinal study on aging, Iran. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2022; 21(1): 263273, doi: 10.1007/s40200-022-00969-6, indexed in Pubmed: 35673447.
  8. Reddy P, Lent-Schochet D, Ramakrishnan N, et al. Metabolic syndrome is an inflammatory disorder: A conspiracy between adipose tissue and phagocytes. Clin Chim Acta. 2019; 496: 3544, doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.06.019, indexed in Pubmed: 31229566.
  9. Tayefi M, Tajfard M, Saffar S, et al. hs-CRP is strongly associated with coronary heart disease (CHD): A data mining approach using decision tree algorithm. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2017; 141: 105109, doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.02.001, indexed in Pubmed: 28241960.
  10. Thanabalasingham G, Shah N, Vaxillaire M, et al. A large multi-centre European study validates high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as a clinical biomarker for the diagnosis of diabetes subtypes. Diabetologia. 2011; 54(11): 28012810, doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2261-y, indexed in Pubmed: 21814873.
  11. Silveira Rossi JL, Barbalho SM, Reverete de Araujo R, et al. Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases: Going beyond traditional risk factors. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2022; 38(3): e3502, doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3502, indexed in Pubmed: 34614543.
  12. Shrivastava A, Singh H, Raizada A, et al. C-reactive protein, inflammation and coronary heart disease. The Egyptian Heart Journal. 2015; 67(2): 8997, doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2014.11.005.
  13. Poustchi H, Eghtesad S, Kamangar F, et al. Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (the PERSIAN Cohort Study): Rationale, Objectives, and Design. Am J Epidemiol. 2018; 187(4): 647655, doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx314, indexed in Pubmed: 29145581.
  14. Aminisani N, Azimi-Nezhad M, Shamshirgaran SM, et al. Cohort Profile: The IRanian Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IRLSA): the first comprehensive study on ageing in Iran. Int J Epidemiol. 2022; 51(4): e177e188, doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab272, indexed in Pubmed: 35137100.
  15. Zahedi AS, Daneshpour MS, Akbarzadeh M, et al. Association of baseline and changes in adiponectin, homocysteine, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 levels and metabolic syndrome incidence: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Heliyon. 2023; 9(9): e19911, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19911, indexed in Pubmed: 37809533.
  16. James DE, Stöckli J, Birnbaum MJ. The aetiology and molecular landscape of insulin resistance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021; 22(11): 751771, doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00390-6, indexed in Pubmed: 34285405.
  17. Speelman T. The effect of acute phase proteins on hepatic insulin signalling. Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 2020.
  18. Parrinello CM, Lutsey PL, Ballantyne CM, et al. Six-year change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. Am Heart J. 2015; 170(2): 380389, doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.04.017, indexed in Pubmed: 26299237.
  19. Mirhafez SR, Ebrahimi M, Saberi Karimian M, et al. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a biomarker in patients with metabolic syndrome: evidence-based study with 7284 subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016; 70(11): 12981304, doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.111, indexed in Pubmed: 27460263.
  20. Koziarska-Rościszewska M, Gluba-Brzózka A, Franczyk B, et al. High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Relationship with Metabolic Disorders and Cardiovascular Diseases Risk Factors. Life (Basel). 2021; 11(8), doi: 10.3390/life11080742, indexed in Pubmed: 34440486.
  21. Koley S, Arindam S. Association of Lipid Profile Parameters with HighSensitive Creactive Protein (hsCRP) in Patients with Dyslipidemia. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2018; 8: 105107.
  22. Riaz M, Fawwad A, Hydrie MZ, et al. Is there any association of serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with various risk factors for metabolic syndrome in a healthy adult population of karachi, pakistan? Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2011; 9(3): 177182, doi: 10.1089/met.2010.0113, indexed in Pubmed: 21247270.
  23. Wilson PWF, D’Agostino RB, Parise H, et al. Metabolic syndrome as a precursor of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2005; 112(20): 30663072, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.539528, indexed in Pubmed: 16275870.
  24. Mitra SK, Kanumilli N, Petroni ML, Vora J, Chaudhury T. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in metabolic syndrome. https://hdl.handle.net/11585/948646 (۲۱.۱۱.۲۰۲۳).
  25. McNeill AM, Katz R, Girman CJ, et al. Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease in older people: The cardiovascular health study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54(9): 1317–1324, doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00862.x, indexed in Pubmed: 16970637.
  26. Sidhu SK, Aleman JO, Heffron SP. Obesity Duration and Cardiometabolic Disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023; 43(10): 1764–1774, doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.123.319023, indexed in Pubmed: 37650325.
  27. Resnick HE, Jones K, Ruotolo G, et al. Strong Heart Study. Insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome, and risk of incident cardiovascular disease in nondiabetic american indians: the Strong Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(3): 861–867, doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.861, indexed in Pubmed: 12610050.
  28. Kragelund C, Køber L, Faber J, et al. Metabolic syndrome and mortality in stable coronary heart disease: relation to gender. Int J Cardiol. 2007; 121(1): 62–67, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.04.068, indexed in Pubmed: 17566574.
  29. Alshammary AF, Alharbi KK, Alshehri NJ, et al. Metabolic Syndrome and Coronary Artery Disease Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(4): 1773, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041773, indexed in Pubmed: 33670349.
  30. Meigs JB, Rutter MK, Sullivan LM, et al. Impact of insulin resistance on risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in people with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30(5): 1219–1225, doi: 10.2337/dc06-2484, indexed in Pubmed: 17259468.
  31. van der Velde M, Bello AK, Brantsma AH, et al. Do albuminuria and hs-CRP add to the International Diabetes Federation definition of the metabolic syndrome in predicting outcome? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012; 27(6): 2275–2283, doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr634, indexed in Pubmed: 22231032.
  32. Arima H, Kubo M, Yonemoto K, et al. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease in a general population of Japanese: the Hisayama study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008; 28(7): 1385–1391, doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.157164, indexed in Pubmed: 18403728.
  33. Bruno G, Merletti F, Biggeri A, et al. Casale Monferrato Study. Metabolic syndrome as a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes: the Casale Monferrato Study. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(11): 2689–2694, doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.11.2689, indexed in Pubmed: 15505006.