open access

Vol 9, No 6 (2020)
Research paper
Published online: 2020-09-30
Get Citation

Diabetes Score questionnaire for lifestyle change in patients with type 2 diabetes

Muhammad Jawad Hashim, Syed Muhammad Nurulain, Maryam Riaz, Arooj Tanveer, Mahwish Iqbal
DOI: 10.5603/DK.2020.0043
·
Clinical Diabetology 2020;9(6):379-386.

open access

Vol 9, No 6 (2020)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Published online: 2020-09-30

Abstract

Background. Designed for use in clinical settings, the Diabetes Score is a 10-item, one-page questionnaire for discussing lifestyle change. We aimed to evaluate the Diabetes Score questionnaire for its validity and acceptability among individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Methods. An observational study was conducted using interviewer-administered questionnaires to adult patients with type 2 diabetes at three ambulatory clinics. We used the Diabetes Score questionnaire for measuring adherence to diet, exercise and other lifestyle recommendations. The questionnaire yields an intuitive score ranging from 0 to 100, by addition of each of the 10 items which are rated as 0, 5 or 10 by the patient. A score of more than 60 was considered
satisfactory.
Results. A total of 311 patients, 56% females, with a median age of 55 years (range: 23 to 87) participated in the study. Diabetes Score correlated with glycemic control, HbA1c (r = –0.20) and blood glucose (r = –0.25; P < 0.001), indicating validity. Reliability was demonstrated by internal consistency (alpha .577) and discriminant factor analysis. Based on multivariate modeling, an improvement of 30 points on the Diabetes Score corresponded to a drop in HbA1c by 1.0%-unit (11 mmol/mol).
Conclusion. Diabetes Score is a valid and reliable tool for empowering lifestyle and behavior modification among patients with diabetes mellitus. This brief and free-to-use questionnaire has the potential to be used in diabetes clinics to discuss behavior change. It can serve as the first-line intervention in diabetes patients while reducing the cost of diabetes care.

Abstract

Background. Designed for use in clinical settings, the Diabetes Score is a 10-item, one-page questionnaire for discussing lifestyle change. We aimed to evaluate the Diabetes Score questionnaire for its validity and acceptability among individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Methods. An observational study was conducted using interviewer-administered questionnaires to adult patients with type 2 diabetes at three ambulatory clinics. We used the Diabetes Score questionnaire for measuring adherence to diet, exercise and other lifestyle recommendations. The questionnaire yields an intuitive score ranging from 0 to 100, by addition of each of the 10 items which are rated as 0, 5 or 10 by the patient. A score of more than 60 was considered
satisfactory.
Results. A total of 311 patients, 56% females, with a median age of 55 years (range: 23 to 87) participated in the study. Diabetes Score correlated with glycemic control, HbA1c (r = –0.20) and blood glucose (r = –0.25; P < 0.001), indicating validity. Reliability was demonstrated by internal consistency (alpha .577) and discriminant factor analysis. Based on multivariate modeling, an improvement of 30 points on the Diabetes Score corresponded to a drop in HbA1c by 1.0%-unit (11 mmol/mol).
Conclusion. Diabetes Score is a valid and reliable tool for empowering lifestyle and behavior modification among patients with diabetes mellitus. This brief and free-to-use questionnaire has the potential to be used in diabetes clinics to discuss behavior change. It can serve as the first-line intervention in diabetes patients while reducing the cost of diabetes care.

Get Citation

Keywords

diabetes mellitus, behavior change, lifestyle modifications, chronic disease care, non-communicable diseases

About this article
Title

Diabetes Score questionnaire for lifestyle change in patients with type 2 diabetes

Journal

Clinical Diabetology

Issue

Vol 9, No 6 (2020)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

379-386

Published online

2020-09-30

DOI

10.5603/DK.2020.0043

Bibliographic record

Clinical Diabetology 2020;9(6):379-386.

Keywords

diabetes mellitus
behavior change
lifestyle modifications
chronic disease care
non-communicable diseases

Authors

Muhammad Jawad Hashim
Syed Muhammad Nurulain
Maryam Riaz
Arooj Tanveer
Mahwish Iqbal

References (23)
  1. Jalilian H, Pezeshki MZ, Torkzadeh L, et al. Health care seeking behaviors in type 2 diabetic patients in East Azerbaijan. Clinical Diabetology. 2020; 8(6): 292–302.
  2. Brzeziński M, Korzeniowska K, Szarejko K, et al. "PoZdro!" as an example of a successful multicenter programme for obesity management and healthy lifestyle promotion in children and adolescents - programme protocol and preliminary results from the first intervention site. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2020; 26(1): 22–26.
  3. McGowan P. The challenge of integrating self-management support into clinical settings. Can J Diabetes. 2013; 37(1): 45–50.
  4. Tang TS, Funnell MM, Sinco B, et al. Peer-Led, Empowerment-Based Approach to Self-Management Efforts in Diabetes (PLEASED): A Randomized Controlled Trial in an African American Community. Ann Fam Med. 2015; 13 Suppl 1: S27–S35.
  5. Vallis M. Are Behavioural Interventions Doomed to Fail? Challenges to Self-Management Support in Chronic Diseases. Can J Diabetes. 2015; 39(4): 330–334.
  6. Stetson B, Schlundt D, Rothschild C, et al. Development and validation of The Personal Diabetes Questionnaire (PDQ): a measure of diabetes self-care behaviors, perceptions and barriers. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011; 91(3): 321–332.
  7. Uchmanowicz I, Krzemińska S, Ausili D, et al. Polish adaptation of the self-care of diabetes inventory (SCODI). Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020; 14: 1341–1350.
  8. Schmitt A, Gahr A, Hermanns N, et al. The Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ): development and evaluation of an instrument to assess diabetes self-care activities associated with glycaemic control. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013; 11: 138.
  9. Hashim, MJ. Diabetes Score - a new behaviorally-oriented questionnaire for assessing and improving patient adherence. In: American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Gulf Chapter 3rd Clinical Conference. Dubai; 2015.
  10. Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res. 2010; 68(4): 319–323.
  11. Ryan P, Sawin KJ. The Individual and Family Self-Management Theory: background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nurs Outlook. 2009; 57(4): 217–225.e6.
  12. Mottalib A, Salsberg V, Mohd-Yusof BN, et al. Effects of nutrition therapy on HbA1c and cardiovascular disease risk factors in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Nutr J. 2018; 17(1): 42.
  13. Franz MJ, Boucher JL, Rutten-Ramos S, et al. Lifestyle weight-loss intervention outcomes in overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015; 115(9): 1447–1463.
  14. Longo DR, Schubert SL, Wright BA, et al. Health information seeking, receipt, and use in diabetes self-management. Ann Fam Med. 2010; 8(4): 334–340.
  15. Schellenberg ES, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B, et al. Lifestyle interventions for patients with and at risk for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 159(8): 543–551.
  16. Irwig MS, Sood P, Ni D, et al. A diabetes scorecard does not improve HbA(1c), blood pressure, lipids, aspirin usage, exercise and diabetes knowledge over 9 months: a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2012; 29(9): 1206–1212.
  17. Babyak MA, Green SB. Confirmatory factor analysis: an introduction for psychosomatic medicine researchers. Psychosom Med. 2010; 72(6): 587–597.
  18. Chen CP, Peng YS, Weng HH, et al. Development and preliminary testing of a brief screening measure of healthy lifestyle for diabetes patients. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013; 50(1): 90–99.
  19. Havele SA, Pfoh ER, Yan C, et al. Physicians' Views of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not on Insulin. Ann Fam Med. 2018; 16(4): 349–352.
  20. Wang ML, Lemon SC, Welch G, et al. Development and validation of the Lifestyle Self-Efficacy Scale for Latinos with Diabetes (LSESLD). Ethn Dis. 2013; 23(4): 428–435.
  21. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23(7): 943–950.
  22. Watanabe T, Berry TR, Willows ND, et al. Assessing intentions to eat low-glycemic index foods by adults with diabetes using a new questionnaire based on the theory of planned behaviour. Can J Diabetes. 2015; 39(2): 94–100.
  23. Wojszel ZB, Kasiukiewicz A. A retrospective cross-sectional study of type 2 diabetes overtreatment in patients admitted to the geriatric ward. BMC Geriatr. 2019; 19(1): 242.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

 

Wydawcą serwisu jest  "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl