Vol 30, No 2 (2023)
Original Article
Published online: 2022-08-25

open access

Page views 2795
Article views/downloads 643
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Proteomics analysis of coronary blood microparticles in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Yiping Ma1, Yujuan Yuan2, Zulipiya Aili1, Miribani Maitusong1, Hao Li1, Muyesai Nijiati1
Pubmed: 36036671
Cardiol J 2023;30(2):286-296.

Abstract

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of death for patients with
cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although researchers have made substantial efforts to elucidate its
pathogenesis, the molecular mechanisms underlying AMI remain unknown. The aim of this study was
to use proteomics to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) and the possible biological functions
and metabolic pathways related to coronary blood microparticles (MPs) in patients with AMI and
stable coronary artery disease (SCAD); this study will allow for the identification of individuals at risk
of acute thrombosis.
Methods: The study was performed on 5 AMI patients and 5 SCAD patients. DEPs were identified,
and Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment and KEGG pathway enrichment analyzes were performed to
determine the relative abundance and biological function of the significant DEPs that were identified
in the present study.
Results: The current analysis identified 198 DEPs in the coronary blood of AMI patients and SCAD
patients, including 85 proteins that were significantly upregulated and 113 proteins that were significantly
downregulated. GO enrichment analysis demonstrated that GDP binding and GTP binding
were enriched in molecular function. Similarly, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed that
the identified proteins were involved in pantothenate and coenzyme A biosynthesis, starch and sucrose
metabolism, and the AMPK signalling pathway.
Conclusions: The proteome of coronary MPs differs between patients with AMI and patients with
SCAD. In summary, the GO terms and KEGG pathways enriched by the DEPs may reflect the possible
molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of acute thrombosis in patients with AMI.

BASIC SCIENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL CARDIOLOGY

original Article

Cardiology Journal

2023, Vol. 30, No. 2, 286–296

DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0081

Copyright © 2023 Via Medica

ISSN 1897–5593

eISSN 1898–018X

Proteomics analysis of coronary blood microparticles in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Yiping Ma1Yujuan Yuan2Zulipiya Aili1Miribani Maitusong1Hao Li1Muyesai Nijiati1
1Xinjiang Emergency Center, People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
2Department of Cardiology, People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China

Address for correspondence: Muyesai Nijiati, PHD, People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,
120 Longquan Street, Urumqi 830001, Xinjiang, China, tel: +86-13899955322, e-mail: muyassar11@aliyun.com

Received: 8.03.2022 Accepted: 23.08.2022 Early publication date: 25.08.2022

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.

Abstract

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of death for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although researchers have made substantial efforts to elucidate its pathogenesis, the molecular mechanisms underlying AMI remain unknown. The aim of this study was to use proteomics to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) and the possible biological functions and metabolic pathways related to coronary blood microparticles (MPs) in patients with AMI and stable coronary artery disease (SCAD); this study will allow for the identification of individuals at risk of acute thrombosis.

Methods: The study was performed on 5 AMI patients and 5 SCAD patients. DEPs were identified, and Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment and KEGG pathway enrichment analyzes were performed to determine the relative abundance and biological function of the significant DEPs that were identified in the present study.

Results: The current analysis identified 198 DEPs in the coronary blood of AMI patients and SCAD patients, including 85 proteins that were significantly upregulated and 113 proteins that were significantly downregulated. GO enrichment analysis demonstrated that GDP binding and GTP binding were enriched in molecular function. Similarly, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed that the identified proteins were involved in pantothenate and coenzyme A biosynthesis, starch and sucrose metabolism, and the AMPK signalling pathway.

Conclusions: The proteome of coronary MPs differs between patients with AMI and patients with SCAD. In summary, the GO terms and KEGG pathways enriched by the DEPs may reflect the possible molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of acute thrombosis in patients with AMI. (Cardiol J 2023; 30, 2: 286–296)

Key words: acute myocardial infarction, microparticles, proteomics, thrombosis, coronary blood

Introduction

Despite substantial advances in the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD), CVD is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and one of the challenges facing global health care systems [1, 2]. Ischemic heart disease (IHD), which affects 128 million people, also causes major socioeconomic burdens [3]. It is estimated that 4 million people die of CVD each year in China [4]. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most emergent form of IHD and involves the rupture of coronary atheromatous plaques. AMI causes acute thrombotic occlusion of the coronary artery, severely restricting or completely blocking blood flow to the myocardium, resulting in cardiomyocyte death [5]. Although biomarkers of myocardial necrosis are widely used in clinical diagnosis, the morbidity and mortality of AMI remain high [6].

Microparticles (MPs) range in size from 0.1 µm to 1 µm and are produced by a variety of cells, including endothelial cells (EMPs), leukocytes (LMPs), monocytes (MMPs), and platelets (PMPs) [7–9]. Studies have proven that MPs are messengers that mediate intercellular communication and play extremely important roles in the occurrence and development of CVDs [10, 11]. Chen et al. [7] showed that MPs may induce endothelial dysfunction and the inflammatory response, which is a key contributor to atherosclerosis, through different mechanisms [12]. Zacharia et al. [13] found that MPs increase inflammation and thrombosis in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, and their concentration is positively correlated with the degree of coronary artery stenosis in ACS patients. A previous study revealed elevated levels of EMPs in AMI patients, and EMP levels are associated with the degree of coronary artery disease and prognostic risk [14].

To explore the molecular mechanism underlying AMI, researchers have conducted proteomics analysis of the proteins in the blood of patients with AMI. One study performed a differential proteomic analysis of plasma from patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) and identified proteins involved in thrombosis [15]. Proteomic analysis of plasma from patients with postmyocardial infarction heart failure revealed 212 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) that were significantly associated with subsequent heart failure events [16]. Proteomic studies have shown that a sustained decrease in the serum levels of the glycated form of apolipoprotein J in the early stages of AMI indicates a worsening of the progression of cardiac events and may identify patients who experience persistent ischemia after AMI [17]. However, these studies focused primarily on peripheral blood, not coronary blood, from patients with AMI. Therefore, proteomic studies of MPs from the coronary blood of patients with AMI may provide meaningful data for the early diagnosis of AMI.

Measuring the expression of specific factors in the plasma of AMI patients is helpful for improving the speed of diagnosis, and we believe that measuring the expression of MP proteins in the coronary blood of AMI patients can better indicate the severity of myocardial infarction and provide an accurate and effective prognosis. This study selected AMI patients and SCAD patients for comparative analysis. In spite of the difficulty in obtaining coronary blood samples and performing proteomics analysis on MPs, the selection of coronary blood, which is an innovative feature of this study, may better reflect the mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of acute thrombosis in AMI patients. Additionally, this approach may have a certain effect on guiding the diagnosis and treatment of diseases in the future.

Methods

Study subjects

Study subjects were selected from among patients who underwent coronary angiography for the evaluation of AMI and SCAD in the Cardiology Department of People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from June 2018 to January 2020. It was declared that all studies in this experimental study involving human participants, human materials or human data are conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (No. 2017041), and informed consent was obtained at enrolment. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria ([18] Refer to the description in our previous article), samples were obtained from 5 AMI patients and 5 SCAD patients.

MPs collection

The subjects underwent percutaneous coronary intervention via a radial artery approach. After rapid deflation of the balloon, 10 mL coronary blood was collected, and the balloon was removed by the guide wire. The specimens were stored in three equal parts in a container containing EDTA. Blood samples were obtained by centrifugation at 3500 × g for 15 min at 4°C, and the MPs were stored at –80°C.

Preparation of protein samples

A certain volume of protein lysis solution (7 M urea, 2% SDS, 1 × Protease Inhibitor Cocktail before use) was added to the samples. Then, the samples were fragmented with an ultrasonic cell fragmentation instrument. The lysis products were centrifuged at ١٣,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C, the middle layers were removed and transferred to new 1.5-mL EP tubes. The aspirated supernatants were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C, the middle layers were aspirated and transferred to new 1.5-mL EP tubes. Finally, the samples were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C, and the precipitates were redissolved in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride and 300 mM TEAB. The concentrations of the samples were determined again. The samples were placed in a refrigerator at 4°C for use, and the concentrations were determined by the BCA method after partial dilution.

Protein filter-aided sample preparation

100-μg samples of protein solutions were mixed with 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate to a constant volume. The samples were then reduced in 1 M dithiothreitol and denatured by incubation for 1 h at 57°C. Then, the concentrates were mixed with 10 μL of 1 M iodoacetamide and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 40 min. Reduced alkylated proteins were added to 10 K ultrafiltration devices and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm. After centrifugation, ammonium bicarbonate buffer was added to the ultrafiltration tubes, and the samples were washed 4 times. Subsequently, trypsin was added to the filters, and the samples were incubated at 37°C overnight. The peptides were collected by centrifugation of the filter units the next day and then dried using heat.

Desalination of the peptides

The desalting method was as follows: (1) The dried mixed peptide was dissolved with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) solution; (2) The desalting column was activated with 100% acetonitrile; (3) The desalting column was balanced with 0.1% TFA solution; (4) The redissolved sample was added to the desalting column and centrifuged; (5) A 0.1% TFA solution was added to clean the desalting column; (6) A 50% acetonitrile solution was added, the tube was centrifuged, the peptides were eluted, and a new EP tube was used to collect the elution; (7) The elution was centrifuged to concentrate and dry to remove acetonitrile.

Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

The vacuum-dried samples were redissolved with 0.1% FA, and a 1–2 µg sample was taken for analysis. The samples were separated using an Easy-NLC 1000 (Thermo Scientific, USA). The peptides were loaded into an analytical column (C18, 2 µm, 75 µm × 20 cm) at a flow rate of 200 nL/min. The mass spectrometer was Orbitrap Fusion (Thermo Scientific, USA). The data-dependent scanning mode was used in tandem mass spectrometry (Data Dependent Acquisitio, DDA). MS spectra were acquired at a resolution of 60,000 FWHM. The mass charge ratio range was set to 400–1,600 m/z. In HCD fragmentation mode, the peptides were fragmented with a collision energy of 35%. The samples were run in duplicate.

Bioinformatics analysis

The Homo sapiens protein database was used for reference in this study. Proteome Discoverer 2.4 software was used for peptide and protein identification. Functional annotation and enrichment analyses were performed for Gene Ontology (GO), including biological process (BP), cellular component (CC) and molecular function (MF). The KEGG database was used to classify the identified proteins. Physical and functional analyzes of the proteinprotein interactions of the selected proteins were performed using STRING v11.0 software (https:/string-db.org/).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (No. 2017041), and informed consent was obtained at enrolment.

Statistical analysis

Measurement data with a normal distribution are presented as the mean ± standard deviation ( ± s), and comparisons between groups were performed by independent sample T tests. Measurement data with a nonnormal distribution are presented as median (P25–P75), and comparisons between groups were performed by the Mann–Whitney test. The classification data are presented as the number of cases (percentage), and comparisons between groups were performed by the Pearson c2 test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The volcano map, heatmap, GO enrichment analysis figures, and KEGG enrichment analysis figures were prepared by R.

Results

Characterization of the study population

Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics and biochemical parameters of the study subjects. There was no significant difference in age, sex, body mass index, smoking habits, drinking habits, hypertension, diabetes, atorvastatin use, acetylsalicylic acid use, or clopidogrel use between the AMI and SCAD groups (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the levels of white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophils, triglycerides (TGs), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or other indicators (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of troponin T (CnT) levels (p < 0.05).

Table 1. General data and clinical indicators were compared between the two groups.

AMI (n = 5)

SCAD (n = 5)

t/χ2/Z

P

Gender:

0.000

1.000

Male

4 (80.0)

4 (80.0)

Female

1 (20.0)

1 (20.0)

Cigarette

2 (40.0)

3 (60.0)

0.400

0.527

Alcohol

2 (40.0)

2 (40.0)

0.000

1.000

Age [years]

57.80 ± 13.35

60.80 ± 3.42

–0.487

0.639

BMI [kg/m2]

27.14 ± 2.12

27.68 ± 4.42

–0.249

0.810

Hypertension

3 (60)

4 (80)

0.476

0.490

Diabetes

2 (40)

2 (40)

0.000

1.000

Atorvastatin

4 (80)

3 (60)

0.476

0.490

ASA

5 (100)

4 (80)

1.111

0.292

Clopidogrel

5 (100)

4 (80)

1.111

0.292

WBC [109/L]

7.71 ± 1.68

7.79 ± 2.78

–0.055

0.957

Neutrophils

4.75 ± 1.24

5.64 ± 3.15

–0.592

0.570

hs-CRP

9.39 ± 7.56

6.09 ± 4.30

0.379

0.714

TBIL

11.4 (8.55–19.26)

18.8 (8.2–22.85)

–0.733

0.463

DBIL

5.8 (3.95–7.88)

8.4 (3.7–14.79)

–0.629

0.530

IBIL

6.7 (4.05–11.38)

7.17 (2.55–10.27)

–0.104

0.917

ALT

28 (22.5–50.5)

32 (17–55.75)

–0.105

0.917

AST

41 (17.5–66)

19 (16.5–40.77)

–0.524

0.600

BUN

6.66 ± 1.78

5.16 ± 1.37

1.494

0.174

Creatinine

68.4 (64.75–77.95)

61.2 (48.85–95.5)

–0.522

0.602

Triglyceride

1.35 ± 0.42

1.54 ± 1.32

–0.307

0.767

HDL

0.86 ± 0.23

0.86 ± 0.22

–0.014

0.989

LDL

1.95 ± 0.28

1.93 ± 0.58

0.063

0.951

Troponin T

0.73 ± 0.27

0.05 ± 0.03

2.500

< 0.001

Analysis of DEPs between the AMI and SCAD groups

A total of 904 proteins and 3010 peptides were identified and quantified in the MPs of all the studied groups. Comparing the AMI group with the SCAD group, a total of 198 proteins were significantly altered, including 85 proteins that were significantly upregulated and 113 proteins that were significantly downregulated. Listed in Table 2 are the top 20 upregulated proteins and the top 20 downregulated proteins. The volcano plots based on the 198 DEPs are shown in Figure 1. The differentially upregulated proteins are presented as red dots, and the differentially downregulated proteins are presented as green dots. The total number of upregulated and downregulated DEPs is shown in a heatmap (Fig. 2). In the heatmap, red represents the differentially expressed proteins with high expression in the samples, and blue represents the differentially expressed proteins with low expression in the samples.

Table 2. These proteins were significantly changed in diferentially expressed proteins between the two groups.

Sequence
number

Accession

Protein symbol

Description

AMI vs. SCAD

Ratio

P

1

P04733

MT1F

Metallothionein-1F

0.00274

0.044

2

P53004

BIEA

Biliverdin reductase A

0.01826

0.034

3

P08779

K1C16

Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 16

0.03368

0.002

4

O43657

TSN6

Tetraspanin-6

0.03922

0.013

5

Q9BWD1

THIC

Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, cytosolic

0.05196

0.005

6

O95436

NPT2B

Sodium-dependent phosphate transport
protein 2B

0.07310

0.049

7

Q7Z404

TMC4

Transmembrane channel-like protein 4

0.08152

< 0.001

8

P13807

GYS1

Glycogen [starch] synthase, muscle

0.08234

0.040

9

O60825

F262

6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-
-bisphosphatase 2

0.08488

0.021

10

Q7L804

RFIP2

Rab11 family-interacting protein 2

0.09502

0.004

11

Q9Y490

Talin-1

Talin-1

0.09549

< 0.001

12

P22059

OSBP1

Oxysterol-binding protein 1

0.09969

0.001

13

P62241

RS8

40S ribosomal protein S8

0.10792

0.028

14

O43598

DNPH1

2’-deoxynucleoside 5’-phosphate
N-hydrolase 1

0.11289

0.040

15

P21980

TGM2

Protein-glutamine gamma-
-glutamyltransferase 2

0.11395

< 0.001

16

P34932

HSP74

Heat shock 70 kDa protein 4

0.11984

< 0.001

17

P23396

RS3

40S ribosomal protein S3

54.46225

0.044

18

P15170

ERF3A

Eukaryotic peptide chain release factor
GTP-binding subunit ERF3A

39.50445

0.005

19

p02724

CD235

Glycophorin-A

28.00383

< 0.001

20

Q9P289

STK26

Serine/threonine-protein kinase 26

25.99137

0.038

21

Q8IXS0

FAM217A

Protein FAM217A

22.67748

0.046

22

Q92598

HS105

Heat shock protein 105 kDa

21.27487

0.030

23

O14672

ADA10

Disintegrin and metalloproteinase
domain-containing protein 10

20.83476

0.017

24

Q6PGP7

TTC37

Tetratricopeptide repeat protein 37

19.71420

0.020

25

Q07866

KLC1

Kinesin light chain 1

15.57566

0.008

26

P62913

RL11

60S ribosomal protein L11

14.08757

0.018

27

Q96DG6

CMBL

Carboxymethylenebutenolidase homolog

12.98631

0.038

28

P02538

K2C6A

Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 6A

12.77784

0.024

29

O60925

PFD1

Prefoldin subunit 1

12.14382

0.020

30

Q96A49

SYAP1

Synapse-associated protein 1

11.71504

0.045

31

O43776

SYNC

Asparagine–tRNA ligase, cytoplasmic

11.63383

0.017

32

P62714

PP2AB

Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2A
catalytic subunit beta isoform

11.39490

0.032

Figure 1. Volcano map of differentially expressed proteins. The red dots represented up-regulated differential proteins, and the green dots represented down-regulated differential proteins.
Figure 2. Heat map of differentially expressed proteins. The red represented the high expression of the differential proteins, and the blue represented the low expression of the differential proteins; sample_I1, sample_I2, sample_I3, sample_I4, sample_I5 = coronary artery disease samples; sample_II1, sample_II2, sample_II3, sample_II4, sample_II5 = acute myocardial infarction samples.
Gene Oncology enrichment analysis of the DEPs between the AMI and SCAD groups

To gain a broader and more accurate understanding of the potential biological relevance of the significantly altered proteins, GO enrichment analysis was applied to determine the relative abundance and biological function of the significantly altered proteins identified in the present study. GO enrichment analysis was performed on the DEPs between the AMI and SCAD groups. In the GO enrichment analysis, the molecular function, cellular component and biological process were examined. For cellular component, the proteins identified in this study were enriched in the cytosol, anchored component of the synaptic vesicle membrane, Golgi membrane, perinuclear region of the cytoplasm, early endosome membrane, microtubule organizing center, and secretory granule lumen. Furthermore, for molecular function, the proteins were enriched in GDP binding, GTPase activity, GTP binding, glucose binding, myosin versus binding, amino acid binding, GTP-dependent protein binding, and protein serine/threonine. Additionally, in terms of biological process, the proteins were enriched in protein transport, neutrophil degranulation, coenzyme A biosynthetic process, antigen processing and presentation, regulation of macroautophagy, Golgi to endosome transport, execution phase of apoptosis, and the cellular protein modification process (Fig. 3). The cytosol was obviously enriched in cellular component. GDP binding was obviously enriched in molecular function. Protein transport was obviously enriched in biological process (Fig. 4).

Figure 3. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of differentially expressed proteins. The 10 items with the lowest p-value were selected to draw the barplot. The red columnar represented molecular function, the blue columnar represented cellular component, and the green columnar represented biological process.
Figure 4. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of differentially expressed proteins. The color of the dots indicated
p-value. The size of the dots represented count. The shapes of the dots represented different categories.
KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the DEPs between the AMI and SCAD groups

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was conducted for the DEPs between the AMI and SCAD groups. To provide insight into the biological pathways in which the MP proteins from this population are involved, the proteins were further mapped with the KEGG pathway database. As shown in Figure 5, the proteins were involved in pantothenate and coenzyme A (CoA) biosynthesis, starch and sucrose metabolism, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, glutathione metabolism, AMPK signalling pathway, insulin signalling pathway, glucagon signalling pathway, renal cell carcinoma, ECM-receptor interaction, fructose and mannose metabolism, and small cell lung cancer.

Figure 5. KEGG pathway analysis of differentially expressed proteins. The color of the dots indicated p-value. The size of the dots represented count. A primary of identified proteins were mapped in pathways with metabolism pathway such as glutathione metabolism and glycerolipid metabolism.
Protein–protein interaction regulatory network analysis

To visualize the predicted interactions between the DEPs in AMI, a regulatory network was constructed from unordered DEPs using the STRING database (Fig. 6). It was found that the DEPs formed a complex regulatory network containing 113 nodes and 111 edges with an average node degree of 1.96 and a clustering coefficient of 0.39. The expected number of edges for this analysis was 58. The protein–protein interactions enrichment p value was 0.046 × 10–12, which indicated that the DEPs were at least partially biologically connected as a group.

Figure 6. Construction of a protein–protein interaction network using STRING tools.

Discussion

Acute myocardial infarction is a serious CVD and a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Atherosclerosis is the most common cause of CVD, and endothelial dysfunction caused by hypercholesterolemia is the first step of atherosclerosis. Endothelial dysfunction results in a decrease in nitric oxide (NO) production and is associated with a trend towards vasoconstriction, thrombosis, and lipid accumulation in the arterial wall. Inflammatory activation and plaque rupture followed by thrombosis usually lead to the onset of AMI.

In this study, proteomic analysis of MPs in the coronary blood of AMI patients suggested the potential pathogenesis of acute AMI events, providing a new direction for understanding the disease. Considering the clinical differences between AMI patients and SCAD patients, which are mainly related to the pathophysiology of the acute and stable states, SCAD patients were selected as the control group. Our team’s previous research found that MPs play extremely important roles in the occurrence and development of CVD [14]. Therefore, in this study, a proteomic analysis was performed of the MPs from the coronary blood of patients with AMI.

A total of 198 differentially expressed proteins were identified in the present study, of which 85 were upregulated and 113 were downregulated. Notably, many proteins are differentially regulated in MPs after AMI, suggesting that MPs are recruited to the site of thrombi and may play an important role in the process of acute thrombosis. It is well known that thrombosis and inflammation are interrelated processes [15]. In the current study, the differential expression of proteins in MPs suggests that neutrophil degranulation is involved in the biological process of GO enrichment analysis. In AMI, proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins at the site of acute thrombosis showed that neutrophils aggregated at the site of thrombosis and participated in thrombosis, contributing to infarct size through specific functions, such as respiratory burst and reactive oxygen species (ROS) release [19, 20]. Therefore, it was concluded that neutrophil secretion of DEPs in MPs plays an important role in acute events of AMI.

Multiple mechanisms can lead to impaired endothelial function, including increased vascular oxidative stress, activation of redox-sensitive transcriptional pathways, and reduced endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS) function. In vascular disease states, MPs promote atherosclerosis and thrombosis by inhibiting the production of NO by NOS and causing endothelial dysfunction [21–23]. RhoA acts as a switch, binding to either inactive GDP or active GTP [24]. GTP-RhoA levels were increased in multiple endothelial injury sites [25]. In addition, proteomics analysis reported the significant enrichment of nucleotide-binding proteins in the proteome, and these proteins included intracellular transport proteins, ATP-regulating molecules, and Ras-related proteins that promote platelet-platelet interactions [26]. Transfer of cytosolic regulatory subunits to the plasma membrane is a prerequisite for oxidase activation and ROS production. Key processes of oxidase activation determine the translocation of cell membranes and the exchange of GDP in the GTP-regulated domain. In GO enrichment analysis, the current study identified that DEPs were enriched in GDP binding, GTPase activity, and GTP binding. Herein, it was speculated that MPs may affect the production of oxidase, leading to the activation of GTP-related signaling pathways, the increase of GTPase activity, and the increase of GTP and GDP exchange, thus causing increased vascular oxidative stress and impaired endothelial function. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed that the identified proteins were mainly involved in amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism and the Ras signalling pathway. In conclusion, the DEPs in MPs may promote GDP-binding and GTP-binding activities at sites of endothelial injury by inhibiting the production of NO by endothelial NOS (eNOS), thus initiating the Ras signalling pathway, affecting platelet-platelet interactions, and promoting the occurrence of acute thrombotic events.

One of the important mechanisms by which MPs cause endothelial dysfunction is stimulating ROS production. Lipid peroxidation is an oxidation process in which oxidants, such as ROS, attack unsaturated lipids and produce a wide range of oxidation products. Pantothenic acid, which is a precursor of CoA, acts as a prosthetic group and participates in lipid metabolism [27]. Chronic inflammation characterized by modified lipid accumulation is a key contributor to atherosclerosis and a gradual process [28]. Bindesboll et al. [29] showed that the Golgi is required for the regulation of cholesterol metabolism. The Golgi is an intracellular component with significantly high abundance and may be one of the key determinants in the development of AMI. Research has demonstrated that the activity of glutathione peroxidases (GPXs) could affect the amount of lipid peroxidation and thereby damage the integrity of cell membranes [30]. Cubedo et al. [31] mentioned that the GPX-2 content in thrombi plays a clear role in oxidative stress. The present study showed that DEPs were enriched in the cytosol, anchored component of the synaptic vesicle membrane, and Golgi membrane. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed that the identified proteins were mainly involved in pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, starch and sucrose metabolism, glutathione metabolism, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, fructose and mannose metabolism, and glycerolipid metabolism. Therefore, the DEPs in MPs may promote the occurrence of acute thrombotic events by influencing oxidative stress and lipid metabolism. The enrichment analysis of the DEPs in the AMI group and SCAD group showed that the Golgi apparatus stood out as a new organelle and may be the key to regulating the pathogenesis of AMI.

However, the present research has some limitations. Because the specimens came from coronary blood, it was not easy to obtain, and considering the lack of funds at that time, these were the selected cases for study. Although the current sample size has certain limitations, it will be expanded in future studies.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the present results identified differences in the expression of coronary blood proteins in AMI and SCAD patients, indicating that MPs play significant roles in accelerating endothelial dysfunction, promoting inflammation occurrence, participating in lipid oxidation, and precipitating plaque rupture followed by thrombosis. These events, in turn, cause the development of acute thrombotic events.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Nanjing Enhancer Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China) for its assistance with mass spectrometry analysis.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 82060076).

Conflict of interest: None declared

References

  1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76(25): 2982–3021, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010, indexed in Pubmed: 33309175.
  2. Goswami SK, Ranjan P, Dutta RK, et al. Management of inflammation in cardiovascular diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2021; 173: 105912, doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105912, indexed in Pubmed: 34562603.
  3. Daiber A, Andreadou I, Oelze M, et al. Discovery of new therapeutic redox targets for cardioprotection against ischemia/reperfusion injury and heart failure. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021; 163: 325–343, doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.12.026, indexed in Pubmed: 33359685.
  4. Li Xi, Wu C, Lu J, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in China: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5(12): e672–e681, doi: 10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30191-2.
  5. Ramachandra CJA, Hernandez-Resendiz S, Crespo-Avilan GE, et al. Mitochondria in acute myocardial infarction and cardioprotection. EBioMedicine. 2020; 57: 102884, doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102884, indexed in Pubmed: 32653860.
  6. Pan Y, Wang L, Xie Y, et al. Characterization of differentially expressed plasma proteins in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Proteomics. 2020; 227: 103923, doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103923, indexed in Pubmed: 32736138.
  7. Chen YT, Yuan HX, Ou ZJ, et al. Microparticles (exosomes) and atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020; 22(6): 23, doi: 10.1007/s11883-020-00841-z, indexed in Pubmed: 32468443.
  8. Fernández M, Calligaris SD. Circulating microparticles in cardiovascular disease: going on stage! Biomarkers. 2019; 24(5): 423–428, doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2019.1616822, indexed in Pubmed: 31068021.
  9. Wang B, Li T, Han X, et al. The level of circulating microparticles in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2020; 13(5): 702–712, doi: 10.1007/s12265-019-09945-7, indexed in Pubmed: 31834597.
  10. Hong T, Shaw RM. Editorial commentary: extracellular vesicles in cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2019; 29(6): 324–325, doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2018.11.007, indexed in Pubmed: 30471985.
  11. Akyurekli C, Le Y, Richardson RB, et al. A systematic review of preclinical studies on the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stromal cell-derived microvesicles. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2015; 11(1): 150–160, doi: 10.1007/s12015-014-9545-9, indexed in Pubmed: 25091427.
  12. Paudel KR, Kim DW. Microparticles-Mediated vascular inflammation and its amelioration by antioxidant activity of baicalin. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020; 9(9), doi: 10.3390/antiox9090890, indexed in Pubmed: 32962240.
  13. Zacharia E, Zacharias K, Papamikroulis GA, et al. Cell-Derived microparticles and acute coronary syndromes: is there a predictive role for microparticles? Curr Med Chem. 2020; 27(27): 4440–4468, doi: 10.2174/0929867327666191213104841, indexed in Pubmed: 31838988.
  14. Yuan Y, Maitusong M, Muyesai N. Association of endothelial and red blood cell microparticles with acute myocardial infarction in Chinese: a retrospective study. Ann Palliat Med. 2020; 9(4): 1564–1570, doi: 10.21037/apm-20-397.
  15. Vélez P, Parguiña AF, Ocaranza-Sánchez R, et al. Identification of a circulating microvesicle protein network involved in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost. 2014; 112(4): 716–726, doi: 10.1160/TH14-04-0337, indexed in Pubmed: 25007837.
  16. Chan MY, Efthymios M, Tan SH, et al. Prioritizing candidates of post-myocardial infarction heart failure using plasma proteomics and single-cell transcriptomics. Circulation. 2020; 142(15): 1408–1421, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045158, indexed in Pubmed: 32885678.
  17. Cubedo J, Padró T, Vilahur G, et al. Glycosylated apolipoprotein J in cardiac ischaemia: molecular processing and circulating levels in patients with acute ischaemic events. Eur Heart J. 2022; 43(2): 153–163, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab691, indexed in Pubmed: 34580705.
  18. Yuan Y, Cheng H, Tao J, et al. IL-33/ST2 signaling promotes TF expression by regulating nf-kb activation in coronary artery endothelial microparticles. Arch Med Sci. 2021, doi: 10.5114/aoms/137377.
  19. Distelmaier K, Adlbrecht C, Jakowitsch J, et al. Proteomic profiling of acute coronary thrombosis reveals a local decrease in pigment epithelium-derived factor in acute myocardial infarction. Clin Sci (Lond). 2012; 123(2): 111–119, doi: 10.1042/CS20110680, indexed in Pubmed: 22315956.
  20. Distelmaier K, Adlbrecht C, Jakowitsch J, et al. Local complement activation triggers neutrophil recruitment to the site of thrombus formation in acute myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost. 2009; 102(3): 564–572, doi: 10.1160/TH09-02-0103, indexed in Pubmed: 19718478.
  21. Douglas G, Hale AB, Patel J, et al. Roles for endothelial cell and macrophage Gch1 and tetrahydrobiopterin in atherosclerosis progression. Cardiovasc Res. 2018; 114(10): 1385–1399, doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvy078, indexed in Pubmed: 29596571.
  22. Voukalis C, Shantsila E, Lip GYH. Microparticles and cardiovascular diseases. Ann Med. 2019; 51(3-4): 193–223, doi: 10.1080/07853890.2019.1609076, indexed in Pubmed: 31007084.
  23. Fu Li, Hu XX, Lin ZB, et al. Circulating microparticles from patients with valvular heart disease and cardiac surgery inhibit endothelium-dependent vasodilation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015; 150(3): 666–672, doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.05.069, indexed in Pubmed: 26145768.
  24. Shimokawa H. Reactive oxygen species in cardiovascular health and disease: special references to nitric oxide, hydro- gen peroxide, and Rho-kinase. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2020; 66(2): 83–91, doi: 10.3164/jcbn.19-119, indexed in Pubmed: 32231403.
  25. Saitoh SI, Matsumoto K, Kamioka M, et al. Novel pathway of endothelin-1 and reactive oxygen species in coronary vasospasm with endothelial dysfunction. Coron Artery Dis. 2009; 20(6): 400–408, doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32832e5c8c, indexed in Pubmed: 19623039.
  26. Alonso-Orgaz S, Moreno-Luna R, López JA, et al. Proteomic characterization of human coronary thrombus in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. J Proteomics. 2014; 109: 368–381, doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.07.016, indexed in Pubmed: 25065646.
  27. Tuunanen H, Knuuti J. Metabolic remodelling in human heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2011; 90(2): 251–257, doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr052, indexed in Pubmed: 21372005.
  28. Bäck M, Yurdagul A, Tabas I, et al. Inflammation and its resolution in atherosclerosis: mediators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019; 16(7): 389–406, doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0169-2, indexed in Pubmed: 30846875.
  29. Bindesbøll C, Aas A, Ogmundsdottir MH, et al. NBEAL1 controls SREBP2 processing and cholesterol metabolism and is a susceptibility locus for coronary artery disease. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1): 4528, doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61352-0, indexed in Pubmed: 32161285.
  30. Zhao WK, Zhou Y, Xu TT, et al. Ferroptosis: opportunities and challenges in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021; 2021: 9929687, doi: 10.1155/2021/9929687, indexed in Pubmed: 34725566.
  31. Cubedo J, Blasco A, Padro T, et al. Molecular signature of coronary stent thrombosis: oxidative stress and innate immunity cells. Thromb Haemost. 2017; 117(9): 1816–1827, doi: 10.1160/TH17-03-069, indexed in Pubmed: 28640320.