Vol 28, No 3 (2021)
Original Article
Published online: 2019-09-06

open access

Page views 1491
Article views/downloads 1248
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Genetic and environmental factors on heart rate, mean arterial pressure and carotid intima–media thickness: A longitudinal twin study

Adam D. Tarnoki12, Laszlo Szalontai1, Corrado Fagnani3, David L. Tarnoki12, Pierleone Lucatelli4, Pal Maurovich-Horvat5, Adam L. Jermendy5, Attila Kovacs5, Andrea Agnes Molnar5, Erika Godor1, Bence Fejer1, Anita Hernyes1, Carlo Cirelli4, Fabrizio Fanelli4, Filippo Farina6, Claudio Baracchini6, Giorgio Meneghetti6, Anna V. Gyarmathy7, Gyorgy Jermendy8, Bela Merkely5, Giacomo Pucci910, Giuseppe Schillaci9, Maria A. Stazi3, Emanuela Medda3
Pubmed: 31489962
Cardiol J 2021;28(3):431-438.

Abstract

Background: Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and carotid intima–media thickness (cIMT) are moderately heritable cardiovascular traits, but the environmental effects on the longitudinal change of their heritability have never been investigated.

Methods: 368 Italian and Hungarian twins (107 monozygotic, 77 dizygotic) underwent oscillometric measurement and B-mode sonography of bilateral carotid arteries in 2009/2010 and 2014. Within- -individual/cross-study wave, cross-twin/within-study wave and cross-twin/cross-study wave correlations were estimated, and bivariate Cholesky models were fitted to decompose the total variance at each wave and covariance between study waves into additive genetic, shared and unique environmental components.

Results: For each trait, a moderate longitudinal stability was observed, with within-individual/crosswave correlations of 0.42 (95% CI: 0.33–0.51) for HR, 0.34 (95% CI: 0.24–0.43) for MAP, and 0.23 (95% CI: 0.12–0.33) for cIMT. Cross-twin/cross-wave correlations in monozygotic pairs were all significant and substantially higher than the corresponding dizygotic correlations. Genetic continuity was the main source of longitudinal stability, with across-time genetic correlations of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.29–0.71) for HR, 0.56 (95% CI: 0.31–0.81) for MAP, and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.07–0.64) for cIMT. Overlapping genetic factors explained respectively 57%, 77%, and 68% of the longitudinal covariance of the HR, MAP and cIMT traits.

Conclusions: Genetic factors have a substantial role in the longitudinal change of HR, MAP and cIMT; however, the influence of unique environmental factors remains relevant. Further studies should better elucidate whether epigenetic mechanisms have a role in influencing the stability of the investigated traits over time.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. World Health Organization 2017. http://www.euro.who.int/en/healthtopics/ noncommunicable-diseases/cardiovascular-diseases/data-and-statistics (Accessed on 15 October, 2017).
  2. Perret-Guillaume C, Joly L, Benetos A. Heart rate as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2009; 52(1): 6–10.
  3. Zheng L, Sun Z, Li J, et al. Pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure in relation to ischemic stroke among patients with uncontrolled hypertension in rural areas of China. Stroke. 2008; 39(7): 1932–1937.
  4. Mayet J, Hughes A. Cardiac and vascular pathophysiology in hypertension. Heart. 2003; 89(9): 1104–1109.
  5. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995; 273(18): 1421–1428.
  6. Jensen MT, Wod M, Galatius S, et al. Heritability of resting heart rate and association with mortality in middle-aged and elderly twins. Heart. 2017; pii: heartjnl-2016-310986.
  7. Osztovits J, Horváth T, Littvay L, et al. Effects of genetic vs. environmental factors on cardiovascular autonomic function: a twin study. Diabet Med. 2011; 28(10): 1241–1248.
  8. Tarnoki AD, Tarnoki DL, Stazi MA, et al. Heritability of central blood pressure and arterial stiffness: a twin study. J Hypertens. 2012; 30(8): 1564–1571.
  9. Medda E, Fagnani C, Schillaci G, et al. Heritability of arterial stiffness and carotid intima-media thickness: an Italian twin study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014; 24(5): 511–517.
  10. Zhao J, Cheema FA, Bremner JD, et al. Heritability of carotid intima-media thickness: a twin study. Atherosclerosis. 2008; 197(2): 814–820.
  11. Jermendy G, Littvay L, Steinbach R, et al. [Heritability of the risk factors characteristic for the metabolic syndrome: a twin study]. Orv Hetil. 2011; 152(32): 1265–1271.
  12. Albarwani S, Muñoz ML, Voruganti VS, et al. Heritability of ambulatory and beat-to-beat office blood pressure in large multigenerational Arab pedigrees: the 'Oman Family study'. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012; 15(6): 753–758.
  13. Egger G, Liang G, Aparicio A, et al. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature. 2004; 429(6990): 457–463.
  14. Weinhold B. Epigenetics: the science of change. Environ Health Perspect. 2006; 114(3): A160–A167.
  15. Horváth IG, Németh A, Lenkey Z, et al. Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2010; 28(10): 2068–2075.
  16. Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness consensus (2004-2006). An update on behalf of the Advisory Board of the 3rd and 4th Watching the Risk Symposium, 13th and 15th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, and Brussels, Belgium, 2006. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007; 23(1): 75–80.
  17. Kyvik KO, Green A, Beck-Nielsen H. The new Danish Twin Register: establishment and analysis of twinning rates. Int J Epidemiol. 1995; 24(3): 589–596.
  18. Heath AC, Nyholt DR, Neuman R, et al. Zygosity diagnosis in the absence of genotypic data: an approach using latent class analysis. Twin Res. 2003; 6(1): 22–26.
  19. Neale M, Cardon LR. Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1992.
  20. Brown WM, Beck SR, Lange EM, et al. Framingham Heart Study. Age-stratified heritability estimation in the Framingham Heart Study families. BMC Genet. 2003; 4 Suppl 1: S32.
  21. Neale MC, Boker SM, Xie G, et al. Mx: statistical modeling (7th edition), Ed. Richmond, VA: Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University. 2006.
  22. Parati G, Mancia G, Rienzo M, et al. Cardiovascular variability is/is not an index of autonomic control of circulation. J App Physiol. 2006; 101(2): 690–691.
  23. Albanese M, Neofytou M, Ouarrak T, et al. Evaluation of heart rate measurements in clinical studies: a prospective cohort study in patients with heart disease. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016; 72(7): 789–795.
  24. Filipovský J, Ducimetière P, Safar ME. Prognostic significance of exercise blood pressure and heart rate in middle-aged men. Hypertension. 1992; 20(3): 333–339.
  25. Palatini P, Casiglia E, Pauletto P, et al. Relationship of tachycardia with high blood pressure and metabolic abnormalities: a study with mixture analysis in three populations. Hypertension. 1997; 30(5): 1267–1273.
  26. Moser M, Lehofer M, Sedminek A, et al. Heart rate variability as a prognostic tool in cardiology. A contribution to the problem from a theoretical point of view. Circulation. 1994; 90(2): 1078–1082.
  27. Palatini P, Thijs L, Staessen JA, et al. Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators. Predictive value of clinic and ambulatory heart rate for mortality in elderly subjects with systolic hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162(20): 2313–2321.
  28. Eppinga RN, Hagemeijer Y, Burgess S, et al. Identification of genomic loci associated with resting heart rate and shared genetic predictors with all-cause mortality. Nat Genet. 2016; 48(12): 1557–1563.
  29. Ma Y, He FJ, MacGregor GA. High salt intake: independent risk factor for obesity? Hypertension. 2015; 66(4): 843–849.
  30. Phillips CL, O'Driscoll DM. Hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. Nat Sci Sleep. 2013; 5: 43–52.
  31. Cabrera CP, Ng FuL, Warren HR, et al. Exploring hypertension genome-wide association studies findings and impact on pathophysiology, pathways, and pharmacogenetics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2015; 7(2): 73–90.
  32. Rossi GP, Ceolotto G, Caroccia B, et al. Genetic screening in arterial hypertension. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017; 13(5): 289–298.
  33. Padmanabhan S, Newton-Cheh C, Dominiczak AF. Genetic basis of blood pressure and hypertension. Trends Genet. 2012; 28(8): 397–408.
  34. Jarosz M, Wolańska D, Stolińska H, et al. Nutrition and lifestyle in patients pharmacologically treated due to hypertensionally treated due to hypertension. Cardiol J. 2016 [Epub ahead of print]; 23(5): 491–496.
  35. Małyszko J, Tomaszuk-Kazberuk A, Dobrzycki K, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and anemia is highly prevalent and dependent on the etiology of heart failure: A pilot study. Cardiol J. 2019 [Epub ahead of print].
  36. Burrello J, Monticone S, Buffolo F, et al. Is There a Role for Genomics in the Management of Hypertension? Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(6).
  37. Wain LV, Vaez A, Jansen R, et al. Novel blood pressure locus and gene discovery using genome-wide association study and expression data sets from blood and the kidney. Hypertension. 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
  38. Oren A, Vos LE, Uiterwaal CS, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors and increased carotid intima-media thickness in healthy young adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Young Adults (ARYA) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163(15): 1787–1792.
  39. Sacco RL, Blanton SH, Slifer S, et al. Heritability and linkage analysis for carotid intima-media thickness: the family study of stroke risk and carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2009; 40(7): 2307–2312.
  40. Cecelja M, Jiang B, Keehn L, et al. Arterial stiffening is a heritable trait associated with arterial dilation but not wall thickening: a longitudinal study in the twins UK cohort. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(24): 2282–2288.