Vol 27, No 6 (2020)
Letter to the Editor
Published online: 2020-12-31

open access

Page views 565
Article views/downloads 555
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Cardiac troponin I and T: Exploring popularity with Google Trends

Giuseppe Lippi1, Fabian Sanchis-Gomar2
Pubmed: 33432571
Cardiol J 2020;27(6):902-903.

Abstract

Not available

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Bjurman C, Zywczyk M, Lindahl B, et al. Decreased admissions and hospital costs with a neutral effect on mortality following lowering of the troponin T cutoff point to the 99th percentile. Cardiol J. 2017; 24(6): 612–622.
  2. Lippi G, Cervellin G. Is one cardiac troponin better than the other? J Lab Precis Med. 2019; 4: 19.
  3. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Cervellin G. Is digital epidemiology the future of clinical epidemiology? J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019; 9(2): 146.
  4. Mavragani A, Ochoa G, Tsagarakis KP. Assessing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches in google trends research: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(11): e270.
  5. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Cervellin G. Trends of popularity of cardiac biomarkers: Insights from Google Trends. Emergency Care Journal. 2018; 14(3): 7769.
  6. Rubini Gimenez M, Badertscher P, Twerenbold R, et al. Impact of the US food and drug administration-approved sex-specific cutoff values for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin t to diagnose myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2018; 137(17): 1867–1869.