Risk factors of cardiac arrest during a percutaneous coronary intervention performed with rotational atherectomy — analysis based on a Large National Registry
, 2, 34, 5, 6, 7, 2, 2, 7, 5, 8, 910, 11
Abstract
Background: Rotational atherectomy (RA) is traditionally administered for patients with heavily calcified lesions and is thereby characterized by a high risk of the performed intervention. However, the prevalence characteristics of cardiac arrest are poorly studied in this group of patients. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and risk factors of cardiac arrest during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed with RA and preceding coronary angiography (CA).
Methods: Based on the data collected in the Polish Registry of Invasive Cardiology Procedures (ORPKI) from 2014 to 2021, we included 6522 patients who were treated with RA-assisted PCI. We scrutinized patient and procedural characteristics, as well as periprocedural complications, subsequently comparing groups in terms of cardiac arrest incidence with the use of univariable and multivariable analyses.
Results: Thirty-five (0.5%) patients suffered from cardiac arrest during RA-PCI or preceding CA. They were characterized by significantly higher rates of prior stroke, acute coronary syndromes (ACS) as indications and higher Killip class (P < 0.001) at the admission time. Among the confirmed independent predictors of in-procedure cardiac arrest, the following can be noted: factors related to patients’ clinical characteristics (e.g., older age, female sex, and disease burden), periprocedural characteristics (e.g., PCI within left main coronary artery [LMCA]), and periprocedural complications (e.g., coronary artery perforation and no-reflow phenomenon).
Conclusions: Severe clinical condition at baseline, expressed by ACS presence and Killip class IV, as well as RA-PCI performed within LMCA and other periprocedural complications, were the strongest predictors of cardiac arrest during RA-assisted PCI and CA.
Keywords: cardiac arrestcoronary angiographypercutaneous coronary interventionrotational atherectomy
References
- Januszek R, Siudak Z, Reczuch K, et al. Current trends and procedural outcomes in the era of rotational atherectomy expansion in Poland in the period 2014-2017 (based on the nationwide ORPKI registry). Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019; 15(2): 158–166.
- Januszek R, Siudak Z, Dziewierz A, et al. Predictors of in-hospital effectiveness and complications of rotational atherectomy (from the ORPKI Polish National Registry 2014-2016). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 92(4): E278–E287.
- Barbato E, Carrié D, Dardas P, et al. European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy. EuroIntervention. 2015; 11(1): 30–36.
- Januszek R, Pawlik A, Staszczak B, et al. Age and gender differences in clinical outcomes of patients with heavy-calcified coronary artery lesions treated percutaneously with rotational atherectomy. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020; 29(2): 225–233.
- Arora S, Panaich SS, Patel N, et al. Coronary Atherectomy in the United States (from a Nationwide Inpatient Sample). Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117(4): 555–562.
- Otsuki H, Jujo K, Tanaka K, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Rotational Atherectomy - J2T Multicenter Registry. Circ J. 2018; 82(2): 369–375.
- Bartuś S, Januszek R, Legutko J, et al. Long-term effects of rotational atherectomy in patients with heavy calcified coronary artery lesions: a single-centre experience. Kardiol Pol. 2017; 75(6): 564–572.
- Januszek R, Siudak Z, Malinowski KP, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and rotational atherectomy. Kardiol Pol. 2020; 78(6): 529–536.
- Januszek RA, Dziewierz A, Siudak Z, et al. Diabetes and periprocedural outcomes in patients treated with rotablation during percutaneous coronary interventions. Cardiol J. 2018 [Epub ahead of print]; 27(2): 152–161.
- Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(2): 87–165.
- Lott C, Truhlár A, Lott C, et al. ERC Special Circumstances Writing Group Collaborators, ERC Special Circumstances Writing Group Collaborators. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2021; 161(4): 152–219.
- Yadav K, Truong HT. Cardiac Arrest in the Catheterization Laboratory. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2018; 14(2): 115–120.
- Webb JG, Solankhi NK, Chugh SK, et al. Incidence, correlates, and outcome of cardiac arrest associated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90(11): 1252–1254.
- Chen YW, Lai CH, Su CS, et al. The Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Rotational Atherectomy in Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9: 846564.
- Mehta RH, Harjai KJ, Grines L, et al. Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) Investigators. Sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory among patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(10): 1765–1772.
- Madsen Hardig B, Kern KB, Wagner H. Mechanical chest compressions for cardiac arrest in the cath-lab: when is it enough and who should go to extracorporeal cardio pulmonary resuscitation? BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019; 19(1): 134.
- Wagner H, Hardig BM, Rundgren M, et al. Mechanical chest compressions in the coronary catheterization laboratory to facilitate coronary intervention and survival in patients requiring prolonged resuscitation efforts. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016; 24: 4.
- Sharma R, Bews H, Mahal H, et al. In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Effective Transition from an ICU- to CCU-Led Resuscitation Team. J Interv Cardiol. 2019; 2019: 1686350.
- Wagner H, Terkelsen CJ, Friberg H, et al. Cardiac arrest in the catheterisation laboratory: a 5-year experience of using mechanical chest compressions to facilitate PCI during prolonged resuscitation efforts. Resuscitation. 2010; 81(4): 383–387.
- Ford TJ, Khan A, Docherty KF, et al. Sex differences in procedural and clinical outcomes following rotational atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 95(2): 232–241.
- Sabatowski K, Malinowski KP, Siudak Z, et al. Sex-related differences and rotational atherectomy: Analysis of 5 177 percutaneous coronary interventions based on a large national registry from 2014 to 2020. Kardiol Pol. 2021; 79(12): 1320–1327.
- Lee MS, Martinsen BJ, Lee AC, et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus on procedural and one year clinical outcomes following treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions with the orbital atherectomy system: A subanalysis of the ORBIT II study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 91(6): 1018–1025.
- Lo WJ, Chen WJ, Lai CH, et al. Rotablation in Patients with Advanced Renal Insufficiency through End-Stage Renal Disease: Short- and Intermediate-Term Results. J Interv Cardiol. 2022; 2022: 7884401.
- Eftychiou C, Barmby DS, Wilson SJ, et al. Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Rotational Atherectomy: A UK Multicentre Experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 88(4): 546–553.
- Kübler P, Zimoch W, Kosowski M, et al. Acute coronary syndrome - Still a valid contraindication to perform rotational atherectomy? Early and one-year outcomes. J Cardiol. 2018; 71(4): 382–388.
- Chiang MH, Yi HT, Tsao CR, et al. Rotablation in the treatment of high-risk patients with heavily calcified left-main coronary lesions. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2013; 10(3): 217–225.
- Dahdouh Z, Roule V, Dugué AE, et al. Rotational atherectomy for left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians: transradial approach in a tertiary center and literature review. J Interv Cardiol. 2013; 26(2): 173–182.
- Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. SYNTAX Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(10): 961–972.
- Januszek R, Siudak Z, Malinowski KP, et al. Aspiration Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction-5-Year Analysis Based on a Large National Registry (ORPKI). J Clin Med. 2020; 9(11).
- Abtan J, Ducrocq G, Steg PhG, et al. MPH on Behalf of the CHAMPION PHOENIX Investigators. Characteristics and outcomes of patients requiring bailout use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for thrombotic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention: An analysis from the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial. Int J Cardiol. 2019; 278: 217–222.
