Vol 31, No 2 (2024)
Original Article
Published online: 2023-10-16

open access

Page views 888
Article views/downloads 264
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Coronary laser with simultaneous contrast injection for the treatment of stent underexpansion

Mohsen Mohandes1, Alberto Pernigotti1, Cristina Moreno1, Luis Mauricio Torres1, Francisco Fernández1, Diego Zambrano1, Alfredo Bardají2
Pubmed: 37853825
Cardiol J 2024;31(2):235-242.

Abstract

Background: Stent underexpansion is a challenge in interventional cardiology. Some off-label treatments, such as rotational atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and coronary lasing, have been used to overcome the problem. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of coronary laser atherectomy with simultaneous contrast injection and subsequent balloon dilation to optimize stent expansion.

Methods: Coronary laser atherectomy with simultaneous contrast injection was used. After lasing, non-compliant balloon dilation at high pressure was performed to overcome the underexpanded point. The average increase in the minimum stent area (MSA) was measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and any complication related to the technique was evaluated. Additionally, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), consisting of death from any cause, new myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR), were scrutinized in a long-term follow-up.

Results: Sixteen underexpanded stents were treated with laser between August 2017 and November 2022. In all cases but one, IVUS was used to evaluate the MSA before and after lasing. The MSA showed an average increase of 2.34 ± 1.57 mm2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47–3.21; p < 0.001) after laser application and balloon inflation. No complication related to the technique was detected. During a follow-up period of a median (interquartile range) of 457 (50–973) days, the combined MACE assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimator showed an event-free rate of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.59–1).

Conclusions: Coronary laser with simultaneous contrast injection is a safe method to optimize a stent underexpansion, with an acceptable event-free rate in long-term follow-up.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Sonoda S, Morino Y, Ako J, et al. SIRIUS Investigators. Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the sirius trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(11): 1959–1963.
  2. Balaguer-Malfagón J, Pomar-Domingo F, Vilar-Herrero J, et al. Stent thrombosis in the modern era: incidence, outcome, and predictive factors. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2006; 59(8): 842–845.
  3. Chugh Y, Brilakis ES. Intravascular lithotripsy for stent under-expansion: Panacea or Pandora's box? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 97(1): 30–31.
  4. Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M, et al. Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation. 2000; 102(5): 523–530.
  5. Cui K, Shi YQ, Zhang YZ, et al. Optimized strategy of rotational atherectomy of underexpanded coronary stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome. World J Emerg Med. 2021; 12(3): 198–201.
  6. Yeoh J, Cottens D, Cosgrove C, et al. Management of stent underexpansion using intravascular lithotripsy-Defining the utility of a novel device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 97(1): 22–29.
  7. Achim A, Alampi C, Krivoshei L, et al. In vitro effect of intravascular lithotripsy on the polymer of a drug-eluting stent. EuroIntervention. 2022; 18(4): e333–e334.
  8. Tovar Forero MN, Sardella G, Salvi N, et al. Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international & multicentre CRUNCH registry. EuroIntervention. 2022; 18(7): 574–581.
  9. Egred M, Brilakis ES. Excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA): fundamentals, mechanism of action, and clinical applications. J Invasive Cardiol. 2020; 32: E27–E35.
  10. Latib A, Takagi K, Chizzola G, et al. Excimer Laser LEsion modification to expand non-dilatable stents: the ELLEMENT registry. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2014; 15(1): 8–12.
  11. Topaz O, Das T, Dahm J, et al. Excimer laser revascularisation: current indications, applications and techniques. Lasers Med Sci. 2001; 16(2): 72–77.
  12. Mohandes M, Fernández L, Rojas S, et al. Safety and efficacy of coronary laser ablation as an adjunctive therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-centre experience. Coron Artery Dis. 2021; 32(3): 241–246.
  13. Grundfest WS, Litvack F, Forrester JS, et al. Laser ablation of human atherosclerotic plaque without adjacent tissue injury. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985; 5(4): 929–933.
  14. Tcheng JE, Wells LD, Phillips HR, et al. Development of a new technique for reducing pressure pulse generation during 308-nm excimer laser coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995; 34(1): 15–22.
  15. Secco GG, Ghione M, Mattesini A, et al. Very high-pressure dilatation for undilatable coronary lesions: indications and results with a new dedicated balloon. EuroIntervention. 2016; 12(3): 359–365.
  16. Räber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(35): 3281–3300.
  17. Kassimis G, Ziakas A, Didagelos M, et al. How should i get prepared for and treat rota burr entrapment in a focally underexpanded and restenosed stent: a case report. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021; 28S: 197–200.
  18. Giannini F, Candilio L, Mitomo S, et al. A practical approach to the management of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11(18): 1797–1810.
  19. Brinton TJ, Ali ZA, Hill JM, et al. Feasibility of shockwave coronary intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of calcified coronary stenoses. Circulation. 2019; 139(6): 834–836.
  20. Wańha W, Tomaniak M, Wańczura P, et al. Intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of stent underexpansion: the multicenter IVL-DRAGON registry. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(7).
  21. Deckelbaum LI, Natarajan MK, Bittl JA, et al. Effect of intracoronary saline infusion on dissection during excimer laser coronary angioplasty: a randomized trial. The Percutaneous Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty (PELCA) Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 26(5): 1264–1269.
  22. Baumbach A, Haase KK, Rose C, et al. Formation of pressure waves during in vitro excimer laser irradiation in whole blood and the effect of dilution with contrast media and saline. Lasers Surg Med. 1994; 14(1): 3–6.
  23. Ashikaga T, Yoshikawa S, Isobe M. The effectiveness of excimer laser coronary atherectomy with contrast medium for underexpanded stent: The findings of optical frequency domain imaging. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 86(5): 946–949.
  24. Golino L, Caiazzo G, Calabrò P, et al. Excimer laser technology in percutaneous coronary interventions: Cardiovascular laser society's position paper. Int J Cardiol. 2022; 350: 19–26.
  25. Nan J, Joseph TA, Bell MR, et al. Outcomes of excimer laser-contrast angioplasty for stent underexpansion. EuroIntervention. 2021; 17(1): 78–80.