Vol 31, No 5 (2024)
Original Article
Published online: 2023-09-12

open access

Page views 701
Article views/downloads 367
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

clinicAL CARDIOLOGY

Original Article

Cardiology Journal

2024, Vol. 31, No. 5, 731–739

DOI: 10.5603/cj.92559

Copyright © 2023 Via Medica

ISSN 1897–5593

eISSN 1898–018X

Right ventricle to pulmonary artery coupling as a predictor of perioperative outcome in patients with secondary mitral valve insufficiency

Jolanta Rzucidło-Resil1Karolina Golińska-Grzybała1Barbara Szlósarczyk2Paweł Rostoff23Andrzej Gackowski123Grzegorz Gajos23Bogusław Kapelak34Jarosław Stoliński45
1Department of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Laboratory, the St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
2Department of Coronary Disease and Heart Failure, the St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
3Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
4Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology, the St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
5Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Krakow, Poland

Address for correspondence: Jolanta Rzucidło-Resil, MD, Department of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Laboratory,
John Paul II Hospital, ul. Prądnicka 80, 31–202 Krak
ów, Poland, tel: +48 12 614 30 75, e-mail: resil@onet.eu

Received: 4.11.2022 Accepted: 27.07.2023 Early publication date: 12.09.2023

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to assess some parameters of right ventricle (RV) function as predictors of short-term mortality in patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) after mitral valve surgery.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 112 consecutive patients with severe SMR who had undergone mitral valve repair or replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery. We assessed RV to pulmonary artery coupling by calculating the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to non-invasively estimated RV systolic pressure (RVSP). The study endpoint was 30 days post-procedural mortality.

Results: Overall, the 30-day mortality was 6%. TAPSE/RVSP ratio < 0.42 mm/mmHg was a significant predictor of mortality and remained so after adjusting for age and sex. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with RVSP > 55 mmHg and those with TAPSE/RVSP ratio < 0.42 mm/mmHg had a lower survival probability.

Conclusions: TAPSE/RVSP < 0.42 mm/mmHg is a strong predictor of short-term mortality in patients with SMR when considered for valve surgery. (Cardiol J 2024; 31, 5: 731–739)

Keywords: secondary mitral regurgitation, mitral valve surgery, TAPSE/RVSP ratio

Introduction

Severe secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) is the second most common indication for valve surgery and affects about 2% of the total population [1]. Our patients with severe SMR represented about 28% of all patients operated on due to severe mitral regurgitation (MR) [2]. Preoperative risk assessment plays an important role in selecting patients for a given intervention, particularly in the era of transcatheter procedures. Currently, only a few models estimating the risk of adverse events during cardiac surgery are available. The most commonly used include the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) surgical risk scoring models. However, none of them includes preoperative right ventricle (RV) size and function parameters. Preoperative RV dysfunction, assessed by a composite of echocardiographic variables, is independently associated with a 3.5-fold increased risk of 30-day mortality after left-sided heart valve surgery [3]. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of RV function parameters such as fractional area change (FAC), right ventricle systolic pressure (RVSP), and tricuspid annular plane excursion to right ventricle systolic pressure ratio (TAPSE/RVSP) as a predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with SMR.

Methods

This research was designed as a retrospective cohort study that included 112 consecutively enrolled patients with severe SMR who underwent elective mitral valve (MV) surgery in John Paul II Hospital in Krakow, between 2015 and 2019. The exclusion criteria were urgent and emergency surgery, redo-surgery, coexisting severe tricuspid regurgitation, or aortic valve disease.

Patients underwent detailed clinical evaluation and were qualified for MV repair or replacement as suggested by the appropriate guidelines [4]. High-risk patients with severe SMR and suitable valve morphology were qualified for MitraClip procedure, but this group was not considered in this study. Clinical and laboratory test results and procedural data were collected. Patients with concomitant arterial hypertension or heart failure were treated in accordance with current guidelines.

The primary endpoint of the study was 30-day postoperative mortality, regardless of whether the patient was discharged within this period. In the case of discharged patients, the follow-up was conducted via a face-to-face interview, through medical records (if the patient was re-hospitalized), or via a telephone interview with the patient or the patient’s guardian (if the patient was discharged). The study population was divided into two groups: group A (n = 105) — patients who survived over 30 days after surgery; and group B (n = 7) — patients who died within 30 days of surgery. The follow-up period in the present study was 4–30 days (mean 29.2 ± 4.1 days; median 30 days, interquartile range [IQR] 30–30 days). In group A, the mean, median, Q1, and Q3 of follow-up were 30 days. The follow-up period in group B was 4–30 days (mean 16.9 ± 10.9 days; median 14 days, IQR 7–28 days).

The study was approved by the regional Ethical Review Committee, and the study protocol complied with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Echocardiography

Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed according to the guidelines in all patients, using either iE33 or EPIQ7 machines (Philips Healthcare, Andover, USA) [5]. Mitral regurgitation (MR) severity assessment included the flow convergence method (proximal isovelocity surface area [PISA]); a volumetric method was used in cases with multiple MR jets [6].

In accordance with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines at this time, MR was considered severe when effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) was > 0.2 cm2 or MR volume > 30 mL [4]. To verify the main mechanism of MR (annular dilatation or leaflet tethering) we assessed the tenting area, coaptation height, and annulus dimensions, both anteroposterior (AP) and intercommissural (CC).

Global left ventricle (LV) diameters were obtained from the parasternal long axis view, and LV function was assessed using the Simpson’s biplane method [5]. Basal RV diameter (RVD) was measured in the basal third of the ventricle in a four-chamber RV — focused view. A fractional area change (FAC) was obtained in the same image by tracing the RV endocardium at both end-diastole and end-systole. Longitudinal function of the RV was assessed using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). It was determined using an M-mode cursor, placed through the lateral tricuspid annulus in the apical view, as an excursion of the annulus from the end-diastole to the peak systole. Peak tricuspid regurgitation (TR) jet velocity (V) was measured, and right atrial pressure (RAP) was estimated using the size and respiratory change of the inferior vena cava [7]. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) was estimated as the sum of TR peak pressure gradient and right atrial pressure (PASP = 4V2 + RAP).

The average values of 3 or 5 consecutive measurements were recorded in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation, respectively.

Surgical technique

The surgical approach to MV surgery was conventional median sternotomy or right minithoracotomy. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established by central cannulation of the ascending aorta and the right atrium in the case of median sternotomy or by peripheral cannulation of femoral artery and femoral vein in the case of a less invasive approach through the right minithoracotomy. Cardioplegic cardiac arrest was achieved by antegrade administration of warm blood or cold crystalloid cardioplegia into the ascending aorta. Standard surgical techniques of MV reconstruction or replacement were used. Patients from both groups received uniform postoperative care.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were expressed as median and IQR. The categorical variables were compared by Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test. A logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of 30-day mortality in the study patients. The best cut-off value that maximized sensitivity and specificity, as well as showing those patients who died during the 30-day follow-up, was calculated with the use of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to estimate 30-day overall survival. Two-sided p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All calculations were made using the STATISTICA 13.3 software package (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

Reproducibility

A retrospective analysis of echocardiographic images was performed by the same observer (J.R.R.) and a second, blinded observer (K.G.G.). Intraobserver variabilities were 3%, and interobserver variabilities were 5%. For this purpose, we assessed the following echocardiographic parameters: EROA, TAPSE, RVSP, and LV ejection fraction (LVEF).

Results

Among the 112 patients included, 64 (57%) underwent MV repair, 48 (43%) had MV replacement, and 25 patients were treated surgically for functional tricuspid regurgitation receiving only annular repair. In the MV repair group, we observed a higher prevalence of men (79% vs. 60%, p = 0.025), larger LV end-diastolic diameters (60 vs. 56 mm, p = 0.025; 43 vs. 39 mm, p = 0.044, respectively), and lower LVEF (42% vs. 47%, p = 0.048) when compared with the replacement group (Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study groups

Parameter

Total (n = 112)

Group A (n = 105)

Group B (n = 7)

P

Age [years]

66.5 (60.0–72.0)

68.0 (61.0–72.0)

66.0 (51.0–68.0)

0.312

Male

80 (71.4%)

75 (71.4%)

5 (71.4%)

1.000

BSA [m2]

1.9 (1.8–2.0)

1.9 (1.8–2.0)

1.8 (1.7–2.0)

0.366

BMI [kg/m2]

28.0 (25.5–30.0)

28.0 (25.4–30.4)

26.0 (25.7–28.0)

0.222

NYHA I/II

63 (56.3%)

62 (59.1%)

1 (14.3%)

0.042

NYHA III/IV

49 (43.8%)

43 (41.0%)

6 (85.7%)

0.042

DCM

42 (37.5%)

39 (37.1%)

3 (42.9%)

1.000

Previous PCI

29 (25.9%)

27 (25.7%)

2 (28.6%)

1.000

Previous MI

29 (25.9%)

26 (24.8%)

3 (42.9%)

0.372

Previous stroke

10 (8.9%)

9 (8.6%)

1 (14.3%)

0.490

Diabetes mellitus

29 (25.9%)

27 (25.7%)

2 (28.6%)

1.000

Hypertension

99 (88.4%)

93 (88.6%)

6 (85.7%)

0.589

Preoperative AF

57 (50.9%)

54 (51.4%)

3 (42.9%)

0.714

Preoperative pacemaker

10 (8.9%)

9 (8.6%)

1 (14.3%)

0.490

COPD

9 (8.0%)

9 (8.6%)

0 (0.0%)

1.000

Creatinine [µmol/L]

92.0 (80.0–110.5)

91.0 (80.0–110.0)

103.0 (98.0–114.0)

0.153

eGFR [mL/min/1.73 m2]

67.0 (54.5–74.5)

67.0 (56.0–75.0)

56.0 (40.0–74.0)

0.271

EuroSCORE II [points]

2.4 (1.6–3.7)

2.3 (1.5–3.7)

4.9 (2.0–7.3)

0.116

STS score [points]

1.9 (1.1–2.8)

1.8 (1.1–2.7)

2.4 (1.5–3.8)

0.272

Pharmacotherapy

ASA

74 (66.1%)

69 (65.7%)

5 (71.4%)

1.000

Beta-blocker

76 (67.9%)

69 (65.7%)

7 (100.0%)

0.094

ACEi/ARB

107 (95.5%)

101 (96.2%)

6 (85.7%)

0.280

MRA

53 (47.3%)

47 (44.8%)

6 (85.7%)

0.051

Loop diuretic

95 (84.8%)

88 (83.8%)

7 (100.0%)

0.251

Statin

50 (44.6%)

46 (43.8%)

4 (57.1%)

0.496

Echocardiographic parameters

LVEF [%]

50.0 (30.0–55.0)

50.0 (35.0–60.0)

30.0 (25.0–45.0)

0.044

LVEDD [mm]

57.0 (50.0–66.0)

57.0 (50.0–65.0)

68.0 (65.0–73.0)

0.015

LVESD [mm]

40.0 (34.0–48.5)

40.0 (34.0–46.0)

49.0 (42.0–50.0)

0.071

LVEDDi [mm/m2]

30.8 (27.1–33.8)

30.4 (26.8–33.5)

36.5 (33.6–37.8)

0.002

LVESDi [mm/m2]

21.0 (17.7–25.0)

20.7 (17.6–24.1)

25.0 (22.4–29.5)

0.043

LA area [cm2]

30.5 (27.0–36.5)

31.0 (27.0–36.0)

28.0 (28.0–46.0)

0.652

Tenting area [cm2]

1.9 (1.6–2.1)

1.8 (1.5–2.0)

2.2 (1.8–2.5)

0.282

Coaptation high [mm]

8.2 (7.0–10.0)

8.0 (7.0–10.0)

9.5 (7.8–10.5)

0.407

Annulus diameter [AP] [mm]

39.5 (37.0–44.0)

40.0 (36.0–44.0)

38.5 (38.0–44.0)

0.852

Annulus diameter [CC] [mm]

41.5 (39.5–46.5)

42.5 (39.5–46.5)

40.5 (39.5–50.0)

0.909

RVD [mm]

39.5 (36.0–42.0)

39.0 (36.0–42.0)

41.0 (36.0–43.0)

0.467

FAC [%]

40.0 (32.0–44.0)

40.0 (32.0–44.0)

34.0 (28.0–42.0)

0.151

FAC < 35%

41 (36.6%)

36 (34.3%)

5 (71.4%)

0.098

TAPSE [mm]

20.0 (18.0–23.0)

20.0 (18.0–23.0)

18.0 (16.0–20.0)

0.041

RVSP [mmHg]

40.0 (33.0–55.0)

40.0 (33.0–47.0)

60.0 (55.0–65.0)

0.007

TAPSE/RVSP [mm/mm Hg]

0.54 (0.33–0.66)

0.54 (0.35–0.66)

0.30 (0.28–0.36)

0.009

No significant differences between MV repair and replacement groups were observed in the operative and postoperative variables listed in Table 2, except for a permanent pacemaker implantation, which was higher in the MR replacement group (6.25% vs. 0%, p = 0.043).

Table 2. Operative and postoperative characteristics of the study patients

Parameter

Group A (n = 105)

Group B (n = 7)

P

Aortic cross-clamp time [min]

76.0 (63.0–97.0)

75.0 (68.0–83.0)

0.988

Cardiopulmonary bypass time [min]

119.0 (99.0–158.0)

149.0 (113.0–228.0)

0.211

Type of procedure:

MV annuloplasty

59 (56.2%)

5 (71.4%)

0.697

MV replacement

46 (43.8%)

2 (28.6%)

0.697

Concomitant TV annuloplasty

25 (23.8%)

0 (0.0%)

0.346

Concomitant CABG

47 (44.8%)

2 (28.6%)

0.465

Transfusion (red cells) [units]

0.0 (0.0–2.0)

4.0 (2.0–6.0)

0.006

Transfusion (plasma) [units]

0.0 (0.0–3.0)

3.0 (2.0–4.0)

0.049

Transfusion (platelets) [units]

0.0 (0.0–1.0)

0.0 (0.0–1.0)

0.652

Postoperative drainage > 800 mL

26 (24.8%)

0 (0.0%)

0.198

Rethoracotomy

6 (5.7%)

0 (0.0%)

1.000

Low cardiac output

23 (21.9%)

3 (42.9%)

0.350

Postoperative myocardial infarction

3 (2.9%)

0 (0.0%)

1.000

Intubation time > 24 h

2 (1.9%)

0 (0.0%)

1.000

New postoperative AF

3 (2.9%)

0 (0.0%)

1.000

Permanent pacemaker following surgery

2 (1.9%)

1 (14.3%)

0.178

Wound infection

2 (1.9%)

1 (14.3%)

0.178

Length of hospital stay [days]

10.0 (8.0–14.0)

14 (7.0–28.0)

0.552

Length of ICU stay [days]

2.0 (1.0–4.0)

7.0 (1.0–12.0)

0.092

In the MV repair group, we observed a slightly higher tenting area (1.8 vs. 1.3 cm2, p = 0.027) and a tendency towards higher coaptation height (8.3 vs. 6.8 mm, p = 0.072) in comparison with the MV replacement group. However, annular dimension did not differ between these groups (AP dimension 40.5 vs. 39 mm, p = 0.346, CC dimension: 43 vs. 41.5 mm, p = 0.296, respectively).

In our study, all patients underwent echocardio­graphy before hospital discharge, to assess the effectiveness of MV repair or replacement. In evaluating severity of MR, we used color flow Doppler: regurgitant jet area, vena contracta, and flow convergence. According to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines: Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular Regurgitation, a small noneccentric jet with a narrow vena contracta < 3 mm and no visible convergence region usually indicates mild MR. In our patients we observed only trace or mild residual MR post-operatively [8].

In the MV repair group, we observed a tendency towards higher proportion of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (51% vs. 33%, p = 0.054) and a nonsignificant difference in tricuspid annuloplasty procedure (26% vs. 17%, p = 0.216).

Short-term mortality

Demographic and echocardiographic data of all studied patients and those who died (group B) are presented in Table 1. Operative and postoperative parameters are shown in Table 2.

Overall short-term (30 days) mortality was 6% (n = 7) in the whole study population, which was a surprisingly low number of deaths. Five patients died in the MV repair group (3 of them due to cardiovascular reasons, one because of mediastinitis, and the last in the course of recurrent bladder bleeding). Two patients died in group B due to refractory heart failure during the early postoperative period. Among non-survivors (group B), 5 patients underwent MV repair (including 2 with concomitant CABG), and 2 patients underwent MV replacement. In our study, there were no significant differences in STS and EuroSCORE II between survivors and non-survivors. Among RV parameters, besides RV diameter and RVSP, the TAPSE/RVSP ratio was significantly lower in group B.

Based on ROC curve analysis, RVSP > 55 mmHg was associated with 30-day mortality with sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 78.9% (area under curve [AUC] 0.810, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.690–0.929, p < 0.001; Fig. 1A). In turn, the cut-off value of the TAPSE/RVSP ratio that was indicative of 30-day mortality was 0.42 mm/mmHg (sensitivity 100.0%, specificity 70.5%, AUC 0.795, 95% CI 0.710–0.880, p < 0.001; Fig. 1B).

Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) (A) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to RVSP ratio (B). The outcome investigated in the ROC analysis was 30-day mortality. Optimal cut-offs are presented

Cox analysis showed that TAPSE/RVSP < 0.42 mm/mmHg was a predictor of 30-day mortality in the study patients (Table 3).

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis for prediction of 30-day mortality in the study patients

Variable

Univariate Cox
regression analysis

Multivariate Cox
regression analysis

HR

95% CI

P

HR

95% CI

P

Clinical characteristics and laboratory investigations

Heart failure NYHA class III–IV

8.09

0.97–67.21

0.053

Red cells transfusion

10.20

1.97–52.77

0.006

6.13

1.16–32.26

0.033

Number of RBC units transfused, n

1.19

1.03–1.39

0.023

Postoperative sternal dehiscence

8.92

1.07–74.04

0.043

Hospitalization in ICU [days]

1.20

1.06–1.37

0.004

Serum lactate concentration > 2 mM

4.35

0.97–19.45

0.054

Echocardiographic parameters

RVD [mm]

1.11

1.01–1.22

0.040

RV systolic area [cm2]

1.15

1.02–1.30

0.027

RV diastolic area [cm2]

1.13

1.01–1.28

0.042

RVSP [mmHg]

1.05

1.01–1.09

0.018

RVSP > 50 mmHg

19.78

2.38–164.26

0.006

TAPSE/RVSP [mm/mmHg]

0.001

0.001–0.21

0.012

TAPSE/RVSP < 0.35 mm/mmHg

8.40

1.55–45.39

0.014

TAPSE/RVSP < 0.42 mm/mmHg

15.86

1.75–143.70

0.014

13.54

1.44–127.58

0.023

LVEDD [mm]

1.09

1.02–1.18

0.019

LVEDDi [mm/m2]

1.17

1.05–1.30

0.004

LVEF [%]

0.94

0.88–1.00

0.052

In univariate analysis, TAPSE/RVSP was a significant predictor of 30-day mortality and remained so after adjusting for age and sex (Suppl. Table 1).

The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with RVSP > 55 mmHg and those with TAPSE/RVSP ratio < 0.42 mm/mmHg had a lower survival probability compared with those with RVSP ≤ 55 mmHg (p = 0.002) and TAPSE/RVSP ratio ≥ 0.42 mm/mmHg (p = 0.003), respectively (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for 30-day mortality in patients with right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) > 55 mmHg and those with RVSP < 55 mmHg (A), and individuals with tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to RVSP ratio < 0.42 mm/mmHg and those with TAPSE to RVSP ratio > 0.42 mm/mmHg (B)

Discussion

The importance of the present study was evaluation of the RV function parameters, such as the TAPSE to RVSP ratio, as a predictor of perioperative mortality among patients operated due to secondary mitral valve regurgitation.

The overall mortality in our study was 6%, which is similar to the mortality rates observed in previous studies in comparable populations [9–13]. According to Magne et al. [11], age, recent heart failure, and lower ejection fraction are independent predictors of short-term mortality in patients with SMR, regardless of the type of interventions (MV repair or replacement). Similarly, Noack et al. [12] reported that reduced preoperative LVEF correlates with reduced postoperative survival after isolated MV repair in patients with SMR. Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of death in patients undergoing MV surgery [13]. In the Reisman et al. [14] study, preoperative hematocrit was a significant predictor of short-term mortality after MR repair. Heikinnen et al. [15] observed that the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, patient age, and history of prior cardiac surgery on multivariate analysis were significantly associated with short-term mortality in patients after MV repair. Likewise, in our study the survival rate was lower in patients with higher NYHA functional class, and univariable analysis showed that among others red cell transfusion and TAPSE/RVSP ratio were significant predictors of 30-day mortality.

Although a recent meta-analysis showed reduced perioperative mortality following MV repair [16, 17], in our study short-term mortality was non-significantly lower in patients undergoing MV replacement. This may result from a lower LVEF in the MV repair group.

In our study we observed that LV dimensions, as well as LVEF, were lower in non-survivors, similarly to other research [10].

The presence of RV dysfunction increases morbidity and mortality in patients with MR. In our study a simple and easily achievable TAPSE/RVSP ratio was associated with mortality after MV surgery.

However, data regarding assessment of RV dysfunction in patients undergoing MV surgery due to SMR are inconclusive. Widely used cardiac surgical risk score systems — STS and Euroscore II — do not include parameters of RV geometry or function.

Di Mauro et al. [10] showed that TAPSE was found to be a risk factor for poorer early and mid-term outcomes: ROC analysis in that study identified TAPSE ≤ 12 mm as a predictive cut-off in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy after MV annuloplasty.

In the study of Towheed et al. [3], preoperative RV dysfunction, assessed by a composite of echocardiographic variables, was independently associated with a 3- to 5-fold (95% CI 1.1–11.1) increased risk of 30-day mortality after left-sided heart valve surgery.

Longitudinal markers of RV function like TAPSE and peak systolic RV lateral velocity by tissue Doppler imaging are more accurate than RV FAC to predict cardiac outcomes [18, 19]. The factors that may contribute to RV dysfunction in these patients include pulmonary hypertension, ventricular interdependence, and RV myocardial ischemia [20, 21]. Backward transmission of elevated LV filling pressure into the pulmonary circulation (postcapillary hemodynamic profile) increases RV afterload and may cause some degree of RV dysfunction [22]. Pulmonary hypertension is a well-known mortality risk factor in cardiac surgical patients and is found in 15% to 60% of patients who have valvular heart disease [23–26]. Similarly, in our study, ROC curve analysis showed that an RVSP of 55 mmHg was the best indicator to identify patients with good and poor prognosis. Di Mauro et al. [18] showed that the combination of RV dysfunction and severe pulmonary hypertension may increase mortality even 11.5-fold.

Recently, RV to pulmonary artery (PA) coupling has been identified as an important indicator in patients with heart failure and pulmonary hypertension [27, 28]. In a study by Guazzi et al. [29], the TAPSE to PASP ratio was a strong and independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 10.3), with a threshold of 0.36 mm/mmHg that best identified the population with heart failure independently of LV dysfunction severity.

Trejo-Velasco et al. [30] showed that a TAPSE/PASP ratio ≤ 0.35 mm/mmHg was a prognostic predictor of heart failure readmission and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing MitraClip implantation. Similarly, in the study of Sultan et al. [31], baseline TAPSE to PASP ratio was associated with all-cause mortality in transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients. It has, however, not yet been evaluated in patients undergoing MV surgery. RV to PA coupling assesses the adaptation of RV to the afterload and may be useful to detect pending RV failure [32]. In clinical practice, RV to PA coupling can be quantified noninvasively as the ratio of TAPSE and PASP [33]. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study assessing the prognostic value of TAPSE to PASP after MV surgery in patients with SMR. In our study, the ROC curve analysis showed that TAPSE to PASP < 0.42 mm/mmHg, rather than ≤ 0.35 mm/mmHg, predicted mortality. In our study, patients who met the criteria for MitraClip procedure were excluded from the analysis.

Limitations of the study

Our study has several limitations. The study cohort was limited, with a relatively low number of endpoints. The study was retrospective and performed in a single center. Due to the limited number of events (perioperative deaths) that occurred during the 30-day follow-up, it was not possible to perform a reliable multivariable logistic regression analysis with all significant predictors identified during the univariate analysis. Instead, these predictors were adjusted for age and gender. Secondly, we used simple, easily achievable parameters of RV function, such as TAPSE and FAC, with their limitations. Thirdly, at the time of collecting data, we did not have a chance to perform three-dimensional reconstruction and longitudinal strain analysis.

Conclusions

Despite these limitations, echocardiographic assessment of RV function and right ventricular to pulmonary circulation coupling using a simple TAPSE/RVSP ratio may become a useful parameter associated with mortality after MV surgery. Furthermore, large, prospective studies are needed to prove the efficacy of these parameters in future perioperative risk prediction scores in MV surgery.

Funding: This article was supported by the science fund of the Saint John Paul II Hospital, Cracow, Poland (no. FN/10/2023 to J.R.-R.).

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

  1. Iung B, Baron G, Tornos P, et al. Valvular heart disease in the community: a European experience. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2007; 32(11): 609–661, doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2007.07.002, indexed in Pubmed: 17976510.
  2. Rzucidło-Resil J, Plicner D, Gackowski A, et al. Impact of the mechanism of mitral regurgitation on clinical outcomes in patients after mitral valve surgery. Kardiol Pol. 2019; 77(5): 525–534, doi: 10.5603/KP.a2019.0043, indexed in Pubmed: 30835328.
  3. Towheed A, Sabbagh E, Gupta R, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction and short-term outcomes following left-sided valvular surgery: an echocardiographic study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021; 10(4): e016283, doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016283, indexed in Pubmed: 33559474.
  4. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(36): 2739–2791, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391, indexed in Pubmed: 28886619.
  5. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28(1): 1–39.e14, doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003, indexed in Pubmed: 25559473.
  6. Lancellotti P, Moura L, Pierard LA, et al. European Association of Echocardiography. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 2: mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (native valve disease). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010; 11(4): 307–332, doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq031, indexed in Pubmed: 20435783.
  7. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010; 23(7): 685–713; quiz 786, doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.010, indexed in Pubmed: 20620859.
  8. Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the american society of echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017; 30(4): 303–371, doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007, indexed in Pubmed: 28314623.
  9. Chrustowicz A, Simonis G, Matschke K, et al. Right ventricular dilatation predicts survival after mitral valve repair in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009; 10(2): 309–313, doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen247, indexed in Pubmed: 18820011.
  10. Di Mauro M, Calafiore AM, Penco M, et al. Mitral valve repair for dilated cardiomyopathy: predictive role of right ventricular dysfunction. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28(20): 2510–2516, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm375, indexed in Pubmed: 17890302.
  11. Magne J, Girerd N, Sénéchal M, et al. Mitral repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation: comparison of short-term and long-term survival. Circulation. 2009; 120(11 Suppl): S104–S111, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843995, indexed in Pubmed: 19752354.
  12. Noack T, Marin Cuartas M, Kiefer P, et al. Isolated mitral valve repair in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 25(6): 326–335, doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.19-00093, indexed in Pubmed: 31588074.
  13. D’Agostino RS, Jacobs JP, Badhwar V, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2019 Update on Outcomes and Quality. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 107(1): 24–32, doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.10.004, indexed in Pubmed: 30423335.
  14. Reisman AM, Thomas AT, Boateng P, et al. Predictors of 30-day outcomes following mitral valve repair. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019; 47: 5–12, doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.09.001, indexed in Pubmed: 31641493.
  15. Heikkinen J, Biancari F, Satta J, et al. Predictors of postoperative mortality after mitral valve repair: analysis of a series of 164 patients. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2005; 39(1-2): 71–77, doi: 10.1080/14017430410004605, indexed in Pubmed: 16097418.
  16. Yun-Dan D, Wen-Jing Du, Xi-Jun X. Comparison of outcomes following mitral valve repair versus replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: a meta-analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 65(6): 432–441, doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580603, indexed in Pubmed: 27056301.
  17. Virk SA, Sriravindrarajah A, Dunn D, et al. A meta-analysis of mitral valve repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015; 4(5): 400–410, doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.09.06, indexed in Pubmed: 26539343.
  18. Di Mauro M, Foschi M, Tancredi F, et al. Additive and independent prognostic role of abnormal right ventricle and pulmonary hypertension in mitral-tricuspid surgery. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 252: 39–43, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.031, indexed in Pubmed: 29174017.
  19. Damy T, Viallet C, Lairez O, et al. Comparison of four right ventricular systolic echocardiographic parameters to predict adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009; 11(9): 818–824, doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp111, indexed in Pubmed: 19696055.
  20. Haddad F, Couture P, Tousignant C, et al. The right ventricle in cardiac surgery, a perioperative perspective: II. Pathophysiology, clinical importance, and management. Anesth Analg. 2009; 108(2): 422–433, doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818d8b92, indexed in Pubmed: 19151265.
  21. Borer JS, Hochreiter C, Rosen S. Right ventricular function in severe non-ischaemic mitral insufficiency. Eur Heart J. 1991; 12 (Suppl B): 22–25, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/12.suppl_b.22, indexed in Pubmed: 1936018.
  22. Maslow AD, Regan MM, Panzica P, et al. Precardiopulmonary bypass right ventricular function is associated with poor outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Anesth Analg. 2002; 95(6): 1507–1518, doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00009, indexed in Pubmed: 12456409.
  23. Nicolini F, Agostinelli A, Vezzani A, et al. Surgical treatment for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation: current options and future trends. Acta Biomed. 2015; 86(1): 17–26, indexed in Pubmed: 25948023.
  24. Enter DH, Zaki A, Duncan BF, et al. A contemporary analysis of pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery: Is this a risk factor? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 151(5): 1288–1297, doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.12.063, indexed in Pubmed: 26936008.
  25. Thunberg CA, Gaitan BD, Grewal A, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: pathophysiology, perioperative management, and outcomes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013; 27(3): 551–572, doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.07.017, indexed in Pubmed: 23036624.
  26. Ghoreishi M, Evans CF, DeFilippi CR, et al. Pulmonary hypertension adversely affects short- and long-term survival after mitral valve operation for mitral regurgitation: implications for timing of surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 142(6): 1439–1452, doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.030, indexed in Pubmed: 21962906.
  27. Vanderpool RR, Pinsky MR, Naeije R, et al. RV-pulmonary arterial coupling predicts outcome in patients referred for pulmonary hypertension. Heart. 2015; 101(1): 37–43, doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306142, indexed in Pubmed: 25214501.
  28. Tello K, Dalmer A, Axmann J, et al. Reserve of right ventricular-arterial coupling in the setting of chronic overload. Circ Heart Fail. 2019; 12(1): e005512, doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005512, indexed in Pubmed: 30616360.
  29. Guazzi M, Bandera F, Pelissero G, et al. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure relationship in heart failure: an index of right ventricular contractile function and prognosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013; 305(9): H1373–H1381, doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00157.2013, indexed in Pubmed: 23997100.
  30. Trejo-Velasco B, Estevez-Loureiro R, Carrasco-Chinchilla F, et al. Prognostic role of TAPSE to PASP ratio in patients undergoing MitraClip procedure. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(5), doi: 10.3390/jcm10051006, indexed in Pubmed: 33801311.
  31. Sultan I, Cardounel A, Abdelkarim I, et al. Right ventricle to pulmonary artery coupling in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart. 2019; 105(2): 117–121, doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313385, indexed in Pubmed: 30093545.
  32. Tello K, Wan J, Dalmer A, et al. Validation of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio for the assessment of right ventricular-arterial coupling in severe pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 12(9): e009047, doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009047, indexed in Pubmed: 31500448.
  33. Guazzi M, Dixon D, Labate V, et al. RV contractile function and its coupling to pulmonary circulation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: stratification of clinical phenotypes and outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10(10 Pt B): 1211–1221, doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.12.024, indexed in Pubmed: 28412423.