open access

Vol 29, No 5 (2022)
Original Article
Submitted: 2022-05-31
Accepted: 2022-06-06
Published online: 2022-06-15
Get Citation

Diagnostic value of lactate dehydrogenase in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bartosz Fialek1, Michal Pruc2, Jacek Smereka23, Rafal Jas4, Mansur Rahnama-Hezavah5, Andrea Denegri6, Agnieszka Szarpak7, Milosz J. Jaguszewski8, Frank W. Peacock9, Lukasz Szarpak9
·
Pubmed: 35762075
·
Cardiol J 2022;29(5):751-758.
Affiliations
  1. Rheumatology Department, Marshal Jozef Pilsudski Memorial Hospital, Plonsk, Poland
  2. Research Unit, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
  3. Department of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
  4. Students Research Club, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Medical Academy, Warsaw, Poland
  5. Chair and Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  6. Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
  7. Institute of Outcomes Research, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Medical Academy, Warsaw, Poland
  8. 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
  9. Henry JN Taub Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Houston, TX, United States

open access

Vol 29, No 5 (2022)
Original articles — COVID-19
Submitted: 2022-05-31
Accepted: 2022-06-06
Published online: 2022-06-15

Abstract

Background: This meta-analysis outlines the role of elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in
assessing the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Methods: The current study was designed as a systematic review and meta-analysis. Embase, Pub-
Med, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify
the usefulness of LDH as a marker of COVID-19 severity. All extracted data were analyzed using
RevMan V.5.4 or STATA V.14 software.

Results: A total of 264 records were selected for this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed that LDH
levels were statistically significantly lower in the group of survivors compared to patients who died in
hospital (standardized mean differences [SMD] = –3.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –3.40 to –2.79;
I2 = 99%; p < 0.001). Lower LDH levels were observed in non-severe groups compared to severe course
of COVID-19 (SMD = –2.38; 95% CI: –2.61 to –2.14; I2 = 99%; p < 0.001). The level of LDH was
statistically significantly lower in the severe group compared to the critical group (SMD = –1.48; 95%
CI: –2.04 to –0.92; I2 = 98%; p < 0.001). Patients who did not require treatment in the intensive care
unit (ICU) showed significantly lower levels of LDH compared to patients who required treatment in the
ICU (SMD = –3.78; 95% CI: –4.48 to –3.08; I2 = 100%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that elevated LDH was associated with a poor outcome in
COVID-19.

Abstract

Background: This meta-analysis outlines the role of elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in
assessing the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Methods: The current study was designed as a systematic review and meta-analysis. Embase, Pub-
Med, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to identify
the usefulness of LDH as a marker of COVID-19 severity. All extracted data were analyzed using
RevMan V.5.4 or STATA V.14 software.

Results: A total of 264 records were selected for this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed that LDH
levels were statistically significantly lower in the group of survivors compared to patients who died in
hospital (standardized mean differences [SMD] = –3.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –3.40 to –2.79;
I2 = 99%; p < 0.001). Lower LDH levels were observed in non-severe groups compared to severe course
of COVID-19 (SMD = –2.38; 95% CI: –2.61 to –2.14; I2 = 99%; p < 0.001). The level of LDH was
statistically significantly lower in the severe group compared to the critical group (SMD = –1.48; 95%
CI: –2.04 to –0.92; I2 = 98%; p < 0.001). Patients who did not require treatment in the intensive care
unit (ICU) showed significantly lower levels of LDH compared to patients who required treatment in the
ICU (SMD = –3.78; 95% CI: –4.48 to –3.08; I2 = 100%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that elevated LDH was associated with a poor outcome in
COVID-19.

Get Citation

Keywords

lactate dehydrogenase, LDH, marker, severity, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, meta-analysis

Supp./Additional Files (1)
Supplementary material
Download
53KB
About this article
Title

Diagnostic value of lactate dehydrogenase in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 29, No 5 (2022)

Article type

Original Article

Pages

751-758

Published online

2022-06-15

Page views

5034

Article views/downloads

1013

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2022.0056

Pubmed

35762075

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2022;29(5):751-758.

Keywords

lactate dehydrogenase
LDH
marker
severity
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
meta-analysis

Authors

Bartosz Fialek
Michal Pruc
Jacek Smereka
Rafal Jas
Mansur Rahnama-Hezavah
Andrea Denegri
Agnieszka Szarpak
Milosz J. Jaguszewski
Frank W. Peacock
Lukasz Szarpak

References (38)
  1. Dzieciatkowski T, Szarpak L, Filipiak KJ, et al. COVID-19 challenge for modern medicine. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(2): 175–183.
  2. Ruetzler K, Szarpak L, Filipiak K, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic — a view of the current state of the problem. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2020; 5(2): 106–107.
  3. Smereka J, Szarpak L, Filipiak K. Modern medicine in COVID-19 era. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2020.
  4. Qi K, Zeng W, Ye M, et al. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging features of pediatric COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(15): e25230.
  5. Jain V, Yuan JM. Predictive symptoms and comorbidities for severe COVID-19 and intensive care unit admission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Public Health. 2020; 65(5): 533–546.
  6. Fang X, Li S, Yu H, et al. Epidemiological, comorbidity factors with severity and prognosis of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging (Albany NY). 2020; 12(13): 12493–12503.
  7. Szarpak Ł, Nowak B, Kosior D, et al. Cytokines as predictors of COVID-19 severity: evidence from a meta-analysis. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021; 131(1): 98–99.
  8. Krasiński Z, Chou A, Stępak H. COVID-19, long flights, and deep vein thrombosis: What we know so far. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(6): 941–953.
  9. Szarpak L, Zaczynski A, Kosior D, et al. Evidence of diagnostic value of ferritin in patients with COVID-19. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(6): 886–887.
  10. Coomes EA, Haghbayan H. Interleukin-6 in Covid-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol. 2020; 30(6): 1–9.
  11. Tay MZ, Poh CM, Rénia L, et al. The trinity of COVID-19: immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020; 20(6): 363–374.
  12. Chen G, Wu Di, Guo W, et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019. J Clin Invest. 2020; 130(5): 2620–2629.
  13. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10223): 507–513.
  14. Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020; 5(4): 536–544.
  15. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020; 395(10223): 497–506.
  16. Kim JY, Ko JH, Kim Y, et al. Viral Load Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in First Two Patients in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(7): e86.
  17. Liu Y, Yang Y, Zhang C, et al. Clinical and biochemical indexes from 2019-nCoV infected patients linked to viral loads and lung injury. Sci China Life Sci. 2020; 63(3): 364–374.
  18. Pan Y, Zhang D, Yang P, et al. Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(4): 411–412.
  19. Ruetzler K, Szarpak Ł, Ładny JR, et al. D-dimer levels predict COVID-19 severity and mortality. Kardiol Pol. 2021; 79(2): 217–218.
  20. Phan LT, Nguyen TV, Luong QC, et al. Importation and human-to-human transmission of a novel coronavirus in vietnam. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(9): 872–874.
  21. Ymn E, Demirel B, Yilmz A, et al. Retrospective evlution of lbortory findings of suspected peditric COVID-19 ptients with positive nd negtive RT-PCR. Disster Emerg Med J . 2021; 6(3): 97–103.
  22. Szarpak L, Ruetzler K, Safiejko K, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase level as a COVID-19 severity marker. Am J Emerg Med. 2021; 45: 638–639.
  23. Drent M, Cobben NA, Henderson RF, et al. Usefulness of lactate dehydrogenase and its isoenzymes as indicators of lung damage or inflammation. Eur Respir J. 1996; 9(8): 1736–1742.
  24. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71.
  25. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343: d5928.
  26. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5: 13.
  27. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327(7414): 557–560.
  28. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5: 13.
  29. Fathalla LA, Kamal LM, Salaheldin O, et al. Laboratory biomarker predictors for disease progression and outcome among Egyptian COVID-19 patients. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2022; 36: 3946320221096207.
  30. Gupta GS. The lactate and the lactate dehydrogenase in inflammatory diseases and major risk factors in COVID-19 patients. Inflammation. 2022 [Epub ahead of print].
  31. Li X, Xu S, Yu M, et al. Risk factors for severity and mortality in adult COVID-19 inpatients in Wuhan. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020; 146(1): 110–118.
  32. Gallo Marin B, Aghagoli G, Lavine K, et al. Predictors of COVID-19 severity: A literature review. Rev Med Virol. 2021; 31(1): 1–10.
  33. Bivona G, Agnello L, Ciaccio M. Biomarkers for prognosis and treatment response in COVID-19 patients. Ann Lab Med. 2021; 41(6): 540–548.
  34. Chen YM, Zheng Y, Yu Y, et al. Blood molecular markers associated with COVID-19 immunopathology and multi-organ damage. EMBO J. 2020; 39(24): e105896.
  35. Stringer D, Braude P, Myint PK, et al. The role of C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker in COVID-19. Int J Epidemiol. 2021; 50(2): 420–429.
  36. Luchian ML, Motoc AI, Lochy S, et al. Troponin T in COVID-19 hospitalized patients: Kinetics matter. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(6): 807–815.
  37. Henry BM, Aggarwal G, Wong J, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase levels predict coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity and mortality: A pooled analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2020; 38(9): 1722–1726.
  38. Henry BM, Aggarwal G, Wong J, et al. Lactate dehydrogenase levels predict coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity and mortality: A pooled analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2020; 38(9): 1722–1726.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl