open access

Ahead of print
Original Article
Submitted: 2021-11-20
Accepted: 2023-01-31
Published online: 2023-02-27
Get Citation

Characteristics of women with type 2 diabetes and heart failure in Spain. The DIABET-IC study

Luis Rodríguez‐Padial1, Antonio Pérez2, Manuel Anguita Sánchez3, Vivencio Barrios4, Jose Antonio Gimeno-Orna5, Javier Muñiz6
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2023.0016
·
Pubmed: 36896635
Affiliations
  1. Cardiology Service, Toledo University Hospital, Spain
  2. Endocrinology and Nutrition Service, Hospital of Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, CIBER of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases (CIBERDEM), Barcelona, Spain
  3. Cardiology Service, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain
  4. Cardiology Service, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  5. Endocrinology and Nutrition Service, Lozano Blesa University Clinical Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
  6. University of A Coruña, Department of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research Institute, A Coruña (INIBIC), CIBERCV, Spain

open access

Ahead of print
Original articles
Submitted: 2021-11-20
Accepted: 2023-01-31
Published online: 2023-02-27

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is the second most common initial presentation of cardiovascular disease in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). T2DM carries an increased risk of HF in women. The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical characteristics and the treatment received by women with HF and T2DM in Spain.

Methods: The DIABET-IC study included 1517 patients with T2DM in 2018–2019 in Spain, in 30 centers, which included the first 20 patients with T2DM seen in cardiology and endocrinology clinics. They underwent clinical evaluation, echocardiography, and analysis, with a 3-year follow-up. Baseline data are presented in this study.

Results: 1517 patients were included (501 women; aged 67.28 ± 10.06 years). Women were older (68.81 ± 9.90 vs. 66.53 ± 10.06 years; p < 0.001) and had a lower frequency of a history of coronary disease. There was a history of HF in 554 patients, which was more frequent in women (38.04% vs. 32.86%; p < 0.001), and preserved ejection fraction being more frequent in them (16.12% vs. 9.00%; p < 0.001). There were 240 patients with reduced ejection fraction. Women less frequently received treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (26.20% vs. 36.79%), neprilysin inhibitors (6.00% vs. 13.51%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (17.40% vs. 23.08%), beta-blockers (52.40% vs. 61.44%), and ivabradine (3.60% vs. 7.10%) (p < 0.001 for all), and 58% received guideline-directed medical therapy.

Conclusions: A selected cohort with HF and T2DM attending cardiology and endocrinology clinics did not receive optimal treatment, and this finding was more pronounced in women.

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is the second most common initial presentation of cardiovascular disease in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). T2DM carries an increased risk of HF in women. The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical characteristics and the treatment received by women with HF and T2DM in Spain.

Methods: The DIABET-IC study included 1517 patients with T2DM in 2018–2019 in Spain, in 30 centers, which included the first 20 patients with T2DM seen in cardiology and endocrinology clinics. They underwent clinical evaluation, echocardiography, and analysis, with a 3-year follow-up. Baseline data are presented in this study.

Results: 1517 patients were included (501 women; aged 67.28 ± 10.06 years). Women were older (68.81 ± 9.90 vs. 66.53 ± 10.06 years; p < 0.001) and had a lower frequency of a history of coronary disease. There was a history of HF in 554 patients, which was more frequent in women (38.04% vs. 32.86%; p < 0.001), and preserved ejection fraction being more frequent in them (16.12% vs. 9.00%; p < 0.001). There were 240 patients with reduced ejection fraction. Women less frequently received treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (26.20% vs. 36.79%), neprilysin inhibitors (6.00% vs. 13.51%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (17.40% vs. 23.08%), beta-blockers (52.40% vs. 61.44%), and ivabradine (3.60% vs. 7.10%) (p < 0.001 for all), and 58% received guideline-directed medical therapy.

Conclusions: A selected cohort with HF and T2DM attending cardiology and endocrinology clinics did not receive optimal treatment, and this finding was more pronounced in women.

Get Citation

Keywords

diabetes mellitus, heart failure, women, treatment

About this article
Title

Characteristics of women with type 2 diabetes and heart failure in Spain. The DIABET-IC study

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Ahead of print

Article type

Original Article

Published online

2023-02-27

Page views

585

Article views/downloads

114

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2023.0016

Pubmed

36896635

Keywords

diabetes mellitus
heart failure
women
treatment

Authors

Luis Rodríguez‐Padial
Antonio Pérez
Manuel Anguita Sánchez
Vivencio Barrios
Jose Antonio Gimeno-Orna
Javier Muñiz

References (24)
  1. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017; 135(10): e146–e603.
  2. Lloyd-Jones DM, Larson MG, Leip EP, et al. Framingham Heart Study. Lifetime risk for developing congestive heart failure: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2002; 106(24): 3068–3072.
  3. Hogg K, Swedberg K, McMurray J. Heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function; epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(3): 317–327.
  4. Lam CSP, Arnott C, Beale AL, et al. Sex differences in heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(47): 3859–3868c.
  5. He J, Ogden LG, Bazzano LA, et al. Risk factors for congestive heart failure in US men and women: NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161(7): 996–1002.
  6. Gottdiener JS, Arnold AM, Aurigemma GP, et al. Predictors of congestive heart failure in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35(6): 1628–1637.
  7. Dunlay SM, Givertz MM, Aguilar D, et al. American Heart Association Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and the Heart Failure Society of America. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the Heart Failure Society of America: This statement does not represent an update of the 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA heart failure guideline update. Circulation. 2019; 140(7): e294–e324.
  8. Peters SAE, Woodward M. Sex differences in the burden and complications of diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2018; 18(6): 33.
  9. Ohkuma T, Komorita Y, Peters SAE, et al. Diabetes as a risk factor for heart failure in women and men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 cohorts including 12 million individuals. Diabetologia. 2019; 62(9): 1550–1560.
  10. López-Vilella R, Marqués-Sulé E, Laymito Quispe RD, et al. The female sex confers different prognosis in heart failure: same mortality but more readmissions. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8: 618398.
  11. Greene SJ, Tan Xi, Yeh YC, et al. Factors associated with non-use and sub-target dosing of medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Heart Fail Rev. 2022; 27(3): 741–753.
  12. Ouwerkerk W, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. Determinants and clinical outcome of uptitration of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers in patients with heart failure: a prospective European study. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(24): 1883–1890.
  13. van Melle JP, Bot M, de Jonge P, et al. Diabetes, glycemic control, and new-onset heart failure in patients with stable coronary artery disease: data from the heart and soul study. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(9): 2084–2089.
  14. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study. JAMA. 1979; 241(19): 2035–2038.
  15. Bahrami H, Bluemke DA, Kronmal R, et al. Novel metabolic risk factors for incident heart failure and their relationship with obesity: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51(18): 1775–1783.
  16. Sun LY, Tu JV, Coutinho T, et al. Sex differences in outcomes of heart failure in an ambulatory, population-based cohort from 2009 to 2013. CMAJ. 2018; 190(28): E848–E854.
  17. Jiménez-Navarro MF, Ramirez-Marrero MA, Anguita-Sánchez M, et al. BADAPIC Investigators. Influence of gender on long-term prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure seen in heart failure clinics. Clin Cardiol. 2010; 33(3): E13–E18.
  18. Masoudi FA, Havranek EP, Smith G, et al. Gender, age, and heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41(2): 217–223.
  19. Santema BT, Ouwerkerk W, Tromp J, et al. ASIAN-HF investigators. Identifying optimal doses of heart failure medications in men compared with women: a prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet. 2019; 394(10205): 1254–1263.
  20. Jochmann N, Stangl K, Garbe E, et al. Female-specific aspects in the pharmacotherapy of chronic cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26(16): 1585–1595.
  21. Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Anand IS, et al. PARAGON-HF Investigators and Committees. Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(17): 1609–1620.
  22. Hsich EM. Sex differences in advanced heart failure therapies. Circulation. 2019; 139(8): 1080–1093.
  23. Ghanbari H, Dalloul G, Hasan R, et al. Effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in women with advanced heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(16): 1500–1506.
  24. Arshad A, Moss AJ, Foster E, et al. MADIT-CRT Executive Committee. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is more effective in women than in men: the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57(7): 813–820.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl