open access

Ahead of print
Original Article
Submitted: 2021-08-05
Accepted: 2021-11-19
Published online: 2022-05-13
Get Citation

Stabilization of unstable reentrant atrial tachycardias via fractionated continuous electrical activity ablation (CHAOS study)

Eduardo Franco1, Cristina Lozano Granero1, Roberto Matía1, Antonio Hernández-Madrid1, Inmaculada Sánchez Pérez2, José Luis Zamorano1, Javier Moreno1
Affiliations
  1. Arrhythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
  2. Pediatric Cardiology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

open access

Ahead of print
Original articles
Submitted: 2021-08-05
Accepted: 2021-11-19
Published online: 2022-05-13

Abstract

Background: Unstable reentrant atrial tachycardias (ATs) (i.e. those with frequent circuit modification or conversion to atrial fibrillation) are challenging to ablate. We tested a strategy to achieve arrhythmia stabilization into mappable stable ATs based on the detection and ablation of rotors.

Methods: All consecutive patients from May 2017 to December 2019 were included. Mapping was performed using conventional high-density mapping catheters (IntellaMap ORION, PentaRay NAV or Advisor HD Grid). Rotors were subjectively identified as fractionated continuous (or quasi-continuous) electrograms on 1–2 adjacent bipoles, without dedicated software. In patients without detectable rotors, sites with spatiotemporal dispersion (i.e. all the cycle length comprised within the mapping catheter) plus non-continuous fractionation on single bipoles were targeted. Ablation success was defined as conversion to a stable AT or sinus rhythm.

Results: Ninety seven patients with reentrant ATs were ablated. Of these, 18 (18.6%) presented unstable circuits. 13 (72%) patients had detectable rotors (median 2 [1–3] rotors per patient); focal ablation was successful in 12 (92%). In the other 5 patients, 17 sites with spatiotemporal dispersion were identified and targeted. Globally, and excluding 1 patient with spontaneous AT stabilization, ablation success was achieved in 16/17 patients (94.1%). One-year freedom from atrial arrhythmias was similar between patients with unstable and stable ATs (66.7% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.946).

Conclusions: Most unstable reentrant ATs show detectable rotors, identified as sites with single-bipole fractionated quasi-continuous signals, or spatiotemporal dispersion plus non-continuous fractionation. Ablation of these sites is highly effective to stabilize the AT or convert it into sinus rhythm.

Abstract

Background: Unstable reentrant atrial tachycardias (ATs) (i.e. those with frequent circuit modification or conversion to atrial fibrillation) are challenging to ablate. We tested a strategy to achieve arrhythmia stabilization into mappable stable ATs based on the detection and ablation of rotors.

Methods: All consecutive patients from May 2017 to December 2019 were included. Mapping was performed using conventional high-density mapping catheters (IntellaMap ORION, PentaRay NAV or Advisor HD Grid). Rotors were subjectively identified as fractionated continuous (or quasi-continuous) electrograms on 1–2 adjacent bipoles, without dedicated software. In patients without detectable rotors, sites with spatiotemporal dispersion (i.e. all the cycle length comprised within the mapping catheter) plus non-continuous fractionation on single bipoles were targeted. Ablation success was defined as conversion to a stable AT or sinus rhythm.

Results: Ninety seven patients with reentrant ATs were ablated. Of these, 18 (18.6%) presented unstable circuits. 13 (72%) patients had detectable rotors (median 2 [1–3] rotors per patient); focal ablation was successful in 12 (92%). In the other 5 patients, 17 sites with spatiotemporal dispersion were identified and targeted. Globally, and excluding 1 patient with spontaneous AT stabilization, ablation success was achieved in 16/17 patients (94.1%). One-year freedom from atrial arrhythmias was similar between patients with unstable and stable ATs (66.7% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.946).

Conclusions: Most unstable reentrant ATs show detectable rotors, identified as sites with single-bipole fractionated quasi-continuous signals, or spatiotemporal dispersion plus non-continuous fractionation. Ablation of these sites is highly effective to stabilize the AT or convert it into sinus rhythm.

Get Citation

Keywords

atypical atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia, ablation, rotor, high-density mapping

Supp./Additional Files (1)
Supplementary Tables 1 and 2
Download
19KB
About this article
Title

Stabilization of unstable reentrant atrial tachycardias via fractionated continuous electrical activity ablation (CHAOS study)

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Ahead of print

Article type

Original Article

Published online

2022-05-13

Page views

963

Article views/downloads

269

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2022.0036

Pubmed

35578756

Keywords

atypical atrial flutter
atrial tachycardia
ablation
rotor
high-density mapping

Authors

Eduardo Franco
Cristina Lozano Granero
Roberto Matía
Antonio Hernández-Madrid
Inmaculada Sánchez Pérez
José Luis Zamorano
Javier Moreno

References (22)
  1. Anter E, McElderry TH, Contreras-Valdes FM, et al. Evaluation of a novel high-resolution mapping technology for ablation of recurrent scar-related atrial tachycardias. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13(10): 2048–2055.
  2. Patel AM, d'Avila A, Neuzil P, et al. Atrial tachycardia after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: identification of the critical isthmus with a combination of multielectrode activation mapping and targeted entrainment mapping. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008; 1(1): 14–22.
  3. Waldo AL. Pathogenesis of atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998; 9: S18–S25.
  4. Nakagawa H, Shah N, Matsudaira K, et al. Characterization of reentrant circuit in macroreentrant right atrial tachycardia after surgical repair of congenital heart disease: isolated channels between scars allow "focal" ablation. Circulation. 2001; 103(5): 699–709.
  5. Coffey JO, d'Avila A, Dukkipati S, et al. Catheter ablation of scar-related atypical atrial flutter. Europace. 2013; 15(3): 414–419.
  6. Ammar S, Luik A, Hessling G, et al. Ablation of perimitral flutter: acute and long-term success of the modified anterior line. Europace. 2015; 17(3): 447–452.
  7. Winkle RA, Moskovitz R, Mead RH, et al. Ablation of atypical atrial flutters using ultra high density-activation sequence mapping. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017; 48(2): 177–184.
  8. Takigawa M, Derval N, Frontera A, et al. Revisiting anatomic macroreentrant tachycardia after atrial fibrillation ablation using ultrahigh-resolution mapping: Implications for ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15(3): 326–333.
  9. Strisciuglio T, Vandersickel N, Lorenzo G, et al. Prospective evaluation of entrainment mapping as an adjunct to new-generation high-density activation mapping systems of left atrial tachycardias. Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17(2): 211–219.
  10. Baykaner T, Rogers AJ, Meckler GL, et al. Clinical implications of ablation of drivers for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018; 11(5): e006119.
  11. Seitz J, Bars C, Théodore G, et al. AF ablation guided by spatiotemporal electrogram dispersion without pulmonary vein isolation: a wholly patient-tailored approach. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69(3): 303–321.
  12. Waldo AL, Feld GK. Inter-relationships of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter mechanisms and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51(8): 779–786.
  13. Saoudi N, Cosio F, Waldo A, et al. Classification of atrial flutter and regular atrial tachycardia according to electrophysiologic mechanism and anatomic bases: a statement from a joint expert group from the Working Group of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001; 12(7): 852–866.
  14. Narayan SM, Krummen DE, Shivkumar K, et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources: CONFIRM (Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60(7): 628–636.
  15. Calvo D, Rubín J, Pérez D, et al. Ablation of rotor domains effectively modulates dynamics of human: long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017; 10(12).
  16. Navara R, Leef G, Shenasa F, et al. Independent mapping methods reveal rotational activation near pulmonary veins where atrial fibrillation terminates before pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018; 29(5): 687–695.
  17. Quintanilla JG, Alfonso-Almazán JM, Pérez-Castellano N, et al. Instantaneous amplitude and frequency modulations detect the footprint of rotational activity and reveal stable driver regions as targets for persistent atrial fibrillation ablation. Circ Res. 2019; 125(6): 609–627.
  18. Laţcu DG, Bun SS, Viera F, et al. Selection of Critical Isthmus in Scar-Related Atrial Tachycardia Using a New Automated Ultrahigh Resolution Mapping System. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017; 10(1): e004510.
  19. Atienza F, Almendral J, Ormaetxe JM, et al. RADAR-AF Investigators. Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation of drivers and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation: a noninferiority randomized multicenter RADAR-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64(23): 2455–2467.
  20. Steinberg JS, Shah Y, Bhatt A, et al. Focal impulse and rotor modulation: Acute procedural observations and extended clinical follow-up. Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14(2): 192–197.
  21. Honarbakhsh S, Schilling RJ, Finlay M, et al. Prospective STAR-guided ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation using sequential mapping with multipolar catheters. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020; 13(10): e008824.
  22. Jarman JWE, Wong T, Kojodjojo P, et al. Spatiotemporal behavior of high dominant frequency during paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation in the human left atrium. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5(4): 650–658.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl