open access
Atrial fibrillation as a prognostic factor in patients with systolic heart failure
open access
Abstract
Methods: A retrospective analysis of the data on clinical presentation of 152 patients (38 women and 114 men) with systolic heart failure (EF < 40%) was performed. The following parameters were compared between patients with and without AF: heart rate and presence of LBBB, several echocardiographic parameters (EF, LVEDV, size of LA, LVEDd, LVESd), oxygen consumption per minute, and frequency of end-point’s (death, stroke, rehospitalization, CABG) during mean 936-day follow-up.
Results: The 53 (35%) AF patients in comparison with 99 non-AF were characterized by: lower exercise performance (VO2max = 10.9 vs. 17.2 ml/kg/min), greater diameter of the left atrium (49.9 vs. 45.9 mm) and decreased end-diastolic volume (LVEDV = 159.5 vs. 183.7 ml), less frequent occurrence of LBBB (7.5% vs. 13.0%), higher overall mortality (28.3% vs. 17.1%), and more frequent rehospitalizations (15% vs. 8%). In patients with persistent AF (40%) with HR < 75/min the mortality was 29% and was statistically significantly lower than in patients with HR > 75/min in whom it was 54%.
Conclusions: Atrial fibrillation in patients with systolic heart failure is a disadvantageous, but not independent risk factor. In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation the control of heart rate < 75/min was associated with significant decrease in mortality.
Abstract
Methods: A retrospective analysis of the data on clinical presentation of 152 patients (38 women and 114 men) with systolic heart failure (EF < 40%) was performed. The following parameters were compared between patients with and without AF: heart rate and presence of LBBB, several echocardiographic parameters (EF, LVEDV, size of LA, LVEDd, LVESd), oxygen consumption per minute, and frequency of end-point’s (death, stroke, rehospitalization, CABG) during mean 936-day follow-up.
Results: The 53 (35%) AF patients in comparison with 99 non-AF were characterized by: lower exercise performance (VO2max = 10.9 vs. 17.2 ml/kg/min), greater diameter of the left atrium (49.9 vs. 45.9 mm) and decreased end-diastolic volume (LVEDV = 159.5 vs. 183.7 ml), less frequent occurrence of LBBB (7.5% vs. 13.0%), higher overall mortality (28.3% vs. 17.1%), and more frequent rehospitalizations (15% vs. 8%). In patients with persistent AF (40%) with HR < 75/min the mortality was 29% and was statistically significantly lower than in patients with HR > 75/min in whom it was 54%.
Conclusions: Atrial fibrillation in patients with systolic heart failure is a disadvantageous, but not independent risk factor. In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation the control of heart rate < 75/min was associated with significant decrease in mortality.
Keywords
atrial fibrillation; systolic heart failure; ejection fraction; exercise


Title
Atrial fibrillation as a prognostic factor in patients with systolic heart failure
Journal
Issue
Vol 13, No 6 (2006): Folia Cardiologica
Pages
503-510
Published online
2006-07-10
Page views
528
Article views/downloads
1229
Bibliographic record
Folia Cardiol 2006;13(6):503-510.
Keywords
atrial fibrillation
systolic heart failure
ejection fraction
exercise
Authors
Rafał Grzybczak
Jadwiga Nessler
Wiesława Piwowarska