open access

Vol 14, No 5 (2007)
Original articles
Published online: 2007-08-02
Get Citation

Comparison of outcomes in patients undergoing defibrillation threshold testing at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation versus no defibrillation threshold testing

Burr Hall, Vinodh Jeevanantham, Ethan Levine, James Daubert, Scott McNitt, Fred Morady, Frank Pelosi
Cardiol J 2007;14(5):463-469.

open access

Vol 14, No 5 (2007)
Original articles
Published online: 2007-08-02

Abstract

Background: Inability to perform defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation due to co-morbidities may influence long-term survival.
Methods: Retrospective review at The University of Michigan (1999-2004) identified 55 patients undergoing ICD implantation without DFT testing (“No-DFT group”). A randomly selected sample of patients (n = 57) undergoing standard DFT testing (“DFT group”) was compared in terms of appropriate shocks, clinical shock efficacy and all-cause mortality.
Results: DFT testing was withheld due to hypotension, atrial fibrillation with inability to exclude left atrial thrombus, left ventricular thrombus, CHF and/or ischemia. The No-DFT group had a similar appropriate shock rate, but lower total survival (69.1% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.004) than the DFT group. The No-DFT group had a higher incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes (9.1% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.037), and deaths attributable to VF (3 of 17 deaths vs. 0 of 5 deaths) compared to the DFT group. Multivariate analysis found a trend toward increased risk of death in the No-DFT group (HR 3.18, 95% CI 0.82-12.41, p = 0.095) after adjusting for baseline differences in gender distribution, NYHA class and prior CABG.
Conclusions: In summary, overall mortality was higher in the No-DFT group. More deaths attributable to VF occurred in the No-DFT group. Thus, DFT testing should therefore remain the standard of care. Nevertheless, ICD therapy should not be withheld in patients who meet appropriate implant criteria simply on the basis of clinical scenarios that preclude routine DFT testing. (Cardiol J 2007; 14: 463-469)

Abstract

Background: Inability to perform defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation due to co-morbidities may influence long-term survival.
Methods: Retrospective review at The University of Michigan (1999-2004) identified 55 patients undergoing ICD implantation without DFT testing (“No-DFT group”). A randomly selected sample of patients (n = 57) undergoing standard DFT testing (“DFT group”) was compared in terms of appropriate shocks, clinical shock efficacy and all-cause mortality.
Results: DFT testing was withheld due to hypotension, atrial fibrillation with inability to exclude left atrial thrombus, left ventricular thrombus, CHF and/or ischemia. The No-DFT group had a similar appropriate shock rate, but lower total survival (69.1% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.004) than the DFT group. The No-DFT group had a higher incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes (9.1% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.037), and deaths attributable to VF (3 of 17 deaths vs. 0 of 5 deaths) compared to the DFT group. Multivariate analysis found a trend toward increased risk of death in the No-DFT group (HR 3.18, 95% CI 0.82-12.41, p = 0.095) after adjusting for baseline differences in gender distribution, NYHA class and prior CABG.
Conclusions: In summary, overall mortality was higher in the No-DFT group. More deaths attributable to VF occurred in the No-DFT group. Thus, DFT testing should therefore remain the standard of care. Nevertheless, ICD therapy should not be withheld in patients who meet appropriate implant criteria simply on the basis of clinical scenarios that preclude routine DFT testing. (Cardiol J 2007; 14: 463-469)
Get Citation

Keywords

implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; threshold testing; prognosis

About this article
Title

Comparison of outcomes in patients undergoing defibrillation threshold testing at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation versus no defibrillation threshold testing

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 14, No 5 (2007)

Pages

463-469

Published online

2007-08-02

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2007;14(5):463-469.

Keywords

implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
threshold testing
prognosis

Authors

Burr Hall
Vinodh Jeevanantham
Ethan Levine
James Daubert
Scott McNitt
Fred Morady
Frank Pelosi

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl