open access

Vol 16, No 4 (2009)
Original articles
Published online: 2009-05-12
Submitted: 2013-01-14
Get Citation

RADIal versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (RADIAMI): A prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial

Piotr Chodór, Hubert Krupa, Tomasz Kurek, Adam Sokal, Marcin Świerad, Tomasz Wąs, Witold Streb, Agata Duszańska, Andrzej Świątkowski, Grzegorz Honisz, Zbigniew Kalarus
Cardiol J 2009;16(4):332-340.

open access

Vol 16, No 4 (2009)
Original articles
Published online: 2009-05-12
Submitted: 2013-01-14

Abstract

Background: The transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) seems to be superior to transfemoral. The safety and efficacy of transradial approach for PCI in acute myocardial infarction is not well-established.
Methods: Hundred patients with acute myocardial infarction qualified to PCI were randomly assigned to transradial (group I; n = 50) and transfemoral (group II; n = 50) approaches.
Results: PCI was successful for almost all patients, except one from group II. There were no significant differences between groups in X-ray exposition, volume of contrast and total procedure duration. Small but significant elongation of door to stent time in group I was caused mostly by a longer time between beginning of procedure and arterial sheath introduction. Major bleeding complications occurred in three patients from group I and seven from group II. There were no significant differences observed between the two groups. Time to ambulation in group I was significantly shorter then in group II (22.6 ± 10.3 h vs. 34.7 ± 34.6 h; p = 0.003).
Conclusions: The transradial approach for PCI in acute myocardial infarction has the same efficacy as transfemoral. There are no differences in total procedure duration, X-ray exposition or volume of contrast between the two approaches. A longer time from the patient’s admission to the individual stages of the PCI procedure in group I was mostly due to the longer times of the initial stages of the procedure. The use of transradial approach reduces the time to ambulation and allows rehabilitation to begin sooner. In both groups, bleeding complications occurred rarely.

Abstract

Background: The transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) seems to be superior to transfemoral. The safety and efficacy of transradial approach for PCI in acute myocardial infarction is not well-established.
Methods: Hundred patients with acute myocardial infarction qualified to PCI were randomly assigned to transradial (group I; n = 50) and transfemoral (group II; n = 50) approaches.
Results: PCI was successful for almost all patients, except one from group II. There were no significant differences between groups in X-ray exposition, volume of contrast and total procedure duration. Small but significant elongation of door to stent time in group I was caused mostly by a longer time between beginning of procedure and arterial sheath introduction. Major bleeding complications occurred in three patients from group I and seven from group II. There were no significant differences observed between the two groups. Time to ambulation in group I was significantly shorter then in group II (22.6 ± 10.3 h vs. 34.7 ± 34.6 h; p = 0.003).
Conclusions: The transradial approach for PCI in acute myocardial infarction has the same efficacy as transfemoral. There are no differences in total procedure duration, X-ray exposition or volume of contrast between the two approaches. A longer time from the patient’s admission to the individual stages of the PCI procedure in group I was mostly due to the longer times of the initial stages of the procedure. The use of transradial approach reduces the time to ambulation and allows rehabilitation to begin sooner. In both groups, bleeding complications occurred rarely.
Get Citation

Keywords

radial approach; percutaneous coronary intervention

About this article
Title

RADIal versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (RADIAMI): A prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 16, No 4 (2009)

Pages

332-340

Published online

2009-05-12

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2009;16(4):332-340.

Keywords

radial approach
percutaneous coronary intervention

Authors

Piotr Chodór
Hubert Krupa
Tomasz Kurek
Adam Sokal
Marcin Świerad
Tomasz Wąs
Witold Streb
Agata Duszańska
Andrzej Świątkowski
Grzegorz Honisz
Zbigniew Kalarus

Important: This website uses cookies.tanya dokter More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl