open access

Vol 16, No 5 (2009)
Original articles
Published online: 2009-07-31
Get Citation

Inappropriate cardioverter-defibrillator discharge continues to be a major problem in clinical practice

Łukasz Jodko, Zdzisława Kornacewicz-Jach, Jarosław Kaźmierczak, Ryszard Rzeuski, Joanna Zielonka, Robert Kaliszczak, Krzysztof Safranow
Cardiol J 2009;16(5):432-439.

open access

Vol 16, No 5 (2009)
Original articles
Published online: 2009-07-31

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate and causes of inappropriate rhythm detection, and to compare adequacy of ventricular arrhythmia detection by single-chamber and dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD).
Methods: We evaluated 190 patients (age 57.2 ± 11.2 years) with ICD. Follow-up: 34.3 ± ± 22 months. Dual-chamber ICD was used in 54 patients.
Results: We evaluated 2244 arrhythmia events recognized as of ventricular origin, including ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. 431 events (19.2%) were recognized erroneously and resulted in an inappropriate ICD discharge. Most cases of inappropriate therapies (182 events, 42.23%) were due to atrial fibrillation or flutter. Overall, inappropriate arrhythmia detection was found in 64 (33.6%) of 190 patients. In terms of the number of affected patients, the most common cause of inappropriate ICD discharge was sinus tachycardia - 23 (12.1%) patients, followed by atrial fibrillation - 16 (8.4%) patients. Among 54 patients with dual-chamber ICD, inappropriate therapy was noted in 21 (38.8%) patients, (T wave oversensing, sinus tachycardia and atrial fibrillation etc.). No significant difference was seen in the rate of inappropriate therapy due to a rapid supraventricular rhythm between patients with single-chamber versus dual-chamber ICD. In contrast, patients with single-chamber ICD more often experienced inappropriate therapy due to atrial fibrillation (155 vs. 28 patients) and sinus tachycardia (66 vs. 9 patients).
Conclusions: Despite of introduction of new generations of ICDs, the problem of inappropriate ICD discharge could not be eliminated. The major problem is distinction between supraventricular arrhythmia and ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate and causes of inappropriate rhythm detection, and to compare adequacy of ventricular arrhythmia detection by single-chamber and dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD).
Methods: We evaluated 190 patients (age 57.2 ± 11.2 years) with ICD. Follow-up: 34.3 ± ± 22 months. Dual-chamber ICD was used in 54 patients.
Results: We evaluated 2244 arrhythmia events recognized as of ventricular origin, including ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. 431 events (19.2%) were recognized erroneously and resulted in an inappropriate ICD discharge. Most cases of inappropriate therapies (182 events, 42.23%) were due to atrial fibrillation or flutter. Overall, inappropriate arrhythmia detection was found in 64 (33.6%) of 190 patients. In terms of the number of affected patients, the most common cause of inappropriate ICD discharge was sinus tachycardia - 23 (12.1%) patients, followed by atrial fibrillation - 16 (8.4%) patients. Among 54 patients with dual-chamber ICD, inappropriate therapy was noted in 21 (38.8%) patients, (T wave oversensing, sinus tachycardia and atrial fibrillation etc.). No significant difference was seen in the rate of inappropriate therapy due to a rapid supraventricular rhythm between patients with single-chamber versus dual-chamber ICD. In contrast, patients with single-chamber ICD more often experienced inappropriate therapy due to atrial fibrillation (155 vs. 28 patients) and sinus tachycardia (66 vs. 9 patients).
Conclusions: Despite of introduction of new generations of ICDs, the problem of inappropriate ICD discharge could not be eliminated. The major problem is distinction between supraventricular arrhythmia and ventricular tachyarrhythmia.
Get Citation

Keywords

implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD); inappropriate therapy

About this article
Title

Inappropriate cardioverter-defibrillator discharge continues to be a major problem in clinical practice

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 16, No 5 (2009)

Pages

432-439

Published online

2009-07-31

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2009;16(5):432-439.

Keywords

implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)
inappropriate therapy

Authors

Łukasz Jodko
Zdzisława Kornacewicz-Jach
Jarosław Kaźmierczak
Ryszard Rzeuski
Joanna Zielonka
Robert Kaliszczak
Krzysztof Safranow

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl