open access
Late phase of repolarization (TpeakTend) as a prognostic marker of left ventricle remodeling in patients with anterior myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention
open access
Abstract
Methods: The study population consisted of 111 patients with first anterior AMI (82 males, age 58 ± 11 years, LVEF 41 ± 7%) treated with the primary PCI of left anterior descending coronary artery. LVR, defined as left ventricle end-diastolic volume increase by > 20% during six months follow-up, occurred in 35 patients (31 males, age 56 ± 10 years, LVEF 37 ± 7%, LVR+), while the other 76 subjects were free of LVR (51 males, age 58 ± 10 years, LVEF 43 ± 7%, LVR–). Holter recordings were performed in the fifth day of AMI. Repolarization parameters: QT, QTpeak and TpeakTend were assessed from one hour of nighttime Holter recording (between 1-4 a.m.).
Results: LVR occurred more frequently in males (p = 0.02). LVEF was lower in LVR+ patients (p = 0.001). QTc was similar: 441 ± 29 ms vs 434 ± 25 ms, p = 0.37 for LVR+ vs LVR–. Patients with LVR had shorter QTpeakc (333 ± 34 ms vs 345 ± 25 ms, p = 0.03) and remarkably longer TpeakTendc (108 ± 15 ms vs 89 ± 17 ms, p = 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed that the best cut-off value for LVR prediction was 103 ms - sensitivity: 65.7%, specificity: 81.6%, positive predictive value: 62%, negative predictive value: 83.8%.
Conclusions: The greater transmural heterogeneity of the repolarization processes described by TpeakTend interval measured at discharge after AMI seems to be a prognostic marker of left ventricle remodeling occurrence during six months follow-up in patients with acute anterior infarction.
(Cardiol J 2010; 17, 3: 244-248)
Abstract
Methods: The study population consisted of 111 patients with first anterior AMI (82 males, age 58 ± 11 years, LVEF 41 ± 7%) treated with the primary PCI of left anterior descending coronary artery. LVR, defined as left ventricle end-diastolic volume increase by > 20% during six months follow-up, occurred in 35 patients (31 males, age 56 ± 10 years, LVEF 37 ± 7%, LVR+), while the other 76 subjects were free of LVR (51 males, age 58 ± 10 years, LVEF 43 ± 7%, LVR–). Holter recordings were performed in the fifth day of AMI. Repolarization parameters: QT, QTpeak and TpeakTend were assessed from one hour of nighttime Holter recording (between 1-4 a.m.).
Results: LVR occurred more frequently in males (p = 0.02). LVEF was lower in LVR+ patients (p = 0.001). QTc was similar: 441 ± 29 ms vs 434 ± 25 ms, p = 0.37 for LVR+ vs LVR–. Patients with LVR had shorter QTpeakc (333 ± 34 ms vs 345 ± 25 ms, p = 0.03) and remarkably longer TpeakTendc (108 ± 15 ms vs 89 ± 17 ms, p = 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed that the best cut-off value for LVR prediction was 103 ms - sensitivity: 65.7%, specificity: 81.6%, positive predictive value: 62%, negative predictive value: 83.8%.
Conclusions: The greater transmural heterogeneity of the repolarization processes described by TpeakTend interval measured at discharge after AMI seems to be a prognostic marker of left ventricle remodeling occurrence during six months follow-up in patients with acute anterior infarction.
(Cardiol J 2010; 17, 3: 244-248)
Keywords
myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; repolarization; transmural dispersion; remodeling


Title
Late phase of repolarization (TpeakTend) as a prognostic marker of left ventricle remodeling in patients with anterior myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention
Journal
Issue
Pages
244-248
Published online
2010-05-28
Page views
533
Article views/downloads
1275
Bibliographic record
Cardiol J 2010;17(3):244-248.
Keywords
myocardial infarction
percutaneous coronary intervention
repolarization
transmural dispersion
remodeling
Authors
Krzysztof Szydło
Krystian Wita
Maria Trusz-Gluza
Zbigniew Tabor