open access

Vol 18, No 1 (2011)
Review articles
Published online: 2011-02-08
Get Citation

Efficacy of low energy rectilinear biphasic cardioversion for regular atrial tachyarrhythmias

Sebastian Stec, Tomasz Kryński, Piotr Kułakowski
Cardiol J 2011;18(1):33-38.

open access

Vol 18, No 1 (2011)
Review articles
Published online: 2011-02-08

Abstract


Background: External, rectilinear biphasic cardioversion (RBC), as against monophasic cardioversion, requires lower energy and has been documented to be more effective in restoring sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation (AF). There is, however, limited data on the optimal protocol of low energy RBC in atrial flutter (AFl) and regular atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT).
Methods and results: A prospective, single-center study was conducted, wherein 50 consecutive patients (mean age: 70.8 ± 8.7; 24 males) undergoing cardioversion of persistent or paroxysmal AFl or AT were randomized into two protocols of subsequent RBC shocks: 1) 10 J, 20 J, 50 J, 100 J, 200 J or 2) 20 J, 50 J, 100 J, 200 J. Initial energy was effective in 9/28 (32%) patients using Protocol 1 and in 12/22 (52%) patients using Protocol 2 (NS). In 9/12 patients with pacemakers, energy of 10 J or 20 J restored sinus or atrial-paced rhythm. Mean cumulative energy and number of shocks was 67 ± 70 J vs 64 ± 62 J (NS) and 2.0 ± 0.8 vs 1.6 ± 0.7 (p = 0.05) for both protocols, respectively. Mean successful energy was higher for AFl patients than for AT patients 66 ± 49 J vs 30 ± 19 J, p < 0.04. In approximately 25% of patients, conversion of AFl/AT into AF was observed after initial energy.
Conclusions: Low energy RBC is effective in 32-52% of patients with AFl/AT. Energy of 50 J is effective in 73% of patients and should be recommended as an initial energy in regular AT. Low energy RBC may be especially indicated in patients with pacemakers. (Cardiol J 2011; 18, 1: 33-38)

Abstract


Background: External, rectilinear biphasic cardioversion (RBC), as against monophasic cardioversion, requires lower energy and has been documented to be more effective in restoring sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation (AF). There is, however, limited data on the optimal protocol of low energy RBC in atrial flutter (AFl) and regular atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT).
Methods and results: A prospective, single-center study was conducted, wherein 50 consecutive patients (mean age: 70.8 ± 8.7; 24 males) undergoing cardioversion of persistent or paroxysmal AFl or AT were randomized into two protocols of subsequent RBC shocks: 1) 10 J, 20 J, 50 J, 100 J, 200 J or 2) 20 J, 50 J, 100 J, 200 J. Initial energy was effective in 9/28 (32%) patients using Protocol 1 and in 12/22 (52%) patients using Protocol 2 (NS). In 9/12 patients with pacemakers, energy of 10 J or 20 J restored sinus or atrial-paced rhythm. Mean cumulative energy and number of shocks was 67 ± 70 J vs 64 ± 62 J (NS) and 2.0 ± 0.8 vs 1.6 ± 0.7 (p = 0.05) for both protocols, respectively. Mean successful energy was higher for AFl patients than for AT patients 66 ± 49 J vs 30 ± 19 J, p < 0.04. In approximately 25% of patients, conversion of AFl/AT into AF was observed after initial energy.
Conclusions: Low energy RBC is effective in 32-52% of patients with AFl/AT. Energy of 50 J is effective in 73% of patients and should be recommended as an initial energy in regular AT. Low energy RBC may be especially indicated in patients with pacemakers. (Cardiol J 2011; 18, 1: 33-38)
Get Citation

Keywords

atrial flutter; atrial tachycardia; biphasic electrical cardioversion

About this article
Title

Efficacy of low energy rectilinear biphasic cardioversion for regular atrial tachyarrhythmias

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Vol 18, No 1 (2011)

Pages

33-38

Published online

2011-02-08

Bibliographic record

Cardiol J 2011;18(1):33-38.

Keywords

atrial flutter
atrial tachycardia
biphasic electrical cardioversion

Authors

Sebastian Stec
Tomasz Kryński
Piotr Kułakowski

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl