Tom 3, Nr 1 (2018)
Artykuły przeglądowe / Review articles
Opublikowany online: 2018-07-10

dostęp otwarty

Wyświetlenia strony 288
Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu 373
Pobierz cytowanie

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Radiobiological rationale for stereotactic hypofractionated radiosurgery Part I. LQED2 or BED formalism

Bogusław Maciejewski, Sławomir Blamek, Krzysztof Składowski, Rafał Suwiński, Leszek Miszczyk, Krzysztof Ślosarek, Marcin Miszczyk
Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Onkologicznego Nowotwory 2018;3(1):9-15.

Streszczenie

In conventional radiotherapy, 5R’s mechanisms influence tumour cell kill, but in SHRS they do not sufficiently explain the biology of large doses. Indirect cell death is also induced by endothelial damage, stem cell death and antitumour immunity are also activated by a single dose ≥ 12–15 Gy. These three processes defined as extra 3R’s are characterizers in details. Despite some controversies, LQED formalism seems not quite adequate for SHRS. Experimental and a few clinical studies suggest BED formalism as much more useful. Both formalisms are compared and discussed. Clinical reports show a monotonical increase in Tumour Cure Probability (TCP) with higher BED doses. The advantage of SHRS results in significant shortening overall treatment time and in delivery of the BED doses higher than 100 Gy, producing an increase in the TCP, likely unachievable by conventional dose fractionation.

Artykuł dostępny w formacie PDF

Pokaż PDF Pobierz plik PDF