Survey on the use of buprenorphine patches in the palliative care practice
Flora M. Bourne, Zbigniew Zylicz
Advances in Palliative Medicine 2010;9(2):39-44.
open access
Vol 9, No 2 (2010)
Original articles
Published online: 2010-08-25
Abstract
Transdermal buprenorphine is a new formulation of the old drug available for the treatment of cancer and
non-cancer pain. The drug offers number of interesting new features and was found effective in clinical trials in
cancer patients with pain. We performed a survey of the use of buprenorphine patches for one year. In the
survey we included 58 admitted patients (67 admission periods), whose clinical records and drug charts were
subjected to analysis. Opioid naive patients were started either on 5 or 10 μg/hour. Mean buprenorphine dose
was 22.3 μg/hour (95% CI: 16–28.6), increased on day 8 to 25.4 μg/hour (95% CI: 18.6–32) and ended up at the
dose of 31.3 μg/hour (95% CI: 20.9–41.6) on the last day of treatment; day 19 (95% CI: 14.5–23.5). The overall
dose increase was approximately 2% per day. Approximately half of the patients needed beside buprenorphine
other opioids either in a slow release or immediate release form, usually morphine or oxycodone. Swapping from
morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl to buprenorphine was without problems in all of the cases. The doses of
all opioids administered calculated as oral morphine equivalents showed insignificant decreases for morphine
and oxycodone to buprenorphine swaps. In case of fentanyl the oral morphine equivalents of opioids were
significantly lower after swap (p = 0.0039). No signs of antagonism between the drugs were observed. In
conclusion: buprenorphine patches appear to be useful in the treatment of cancer pain, either as monotherapy
or in combination with other opioids. Swap from fentanyl to buprenorphine offers perspective of achievement
of pain control with much less toxicity and should be investigated in more detail.
Adv. Pall. Med. 2010; 9, 2: 39–44
Abstract
Transdermal buprenorphine is a new formulation of the old drug available for the treatment of cancer and
non-cancer pain. The drug offers number of interesting new features and was found effective in clinical trials in
cancer patients with pain. We performed a survey of the use of buprenorphine patches for one year. In the
survey we included 58 admitted patients (67 admission periods), whose clinical records and drug charts were
subjected to analysis. Opioid naive patients were started either on 5 or 10 μg/hour. Mean buprenorphine dose
was 22.3 μg/hour (95% CI: 16–28.6), increased on day 8 to 25.4 μg/hour (95% CI: 18.6–32) and ended up at the
dose of 31.3 μg/hour (95% CI: 20.9–41.6) on the last day of treatment; day 19 (95% CI: 14.5–23.5). The overall
dose increase was approximately 2% per day. Approximately half of the patients needed beside buprenorphine
other opioids either in a slow release or immediate release form, usually morphine or oxycodone. Swapping from
morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl to buprenorphine was without problems in all of the cases. The doses of
all opioids administered calculated as oral morphine equivalents showed insignificant decreases for morphine
and oxycodone to buprenorphine swaps. In case of fentanyl the oral morphine equivalents of opioids were
significantly lower after swap (p = 0.0039). No signs of antagonism between the drugs were observed. In
conclusion: buprenorphine patches appear to be useful in the treatment of cancer pain, either as monotherapy
or in combination with other opioids. Swap from fentanyl to buprenorphine offers perspective of achievement
of pain control with much less toxicity and should be investigated in more detail.
Adv. Pall. Med. 2010; 9, 2: 39–44