Vol 54, No 2 (2023)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2023-04-07

open access

Page views 2163
Article views/downloads 449
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Tisagenlecleucel CAR-T for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, one therapy; two different clinical presentations. An urgent need to design adverse event predictors

Jaromir Tomasik1, Joanna Drozd-Sokołowska1, Piotr Kacprzyk1, Agnieszka Tomaszewska1, Rafał Machowicz1, Elżbieta Urbanowska1, Samanta Witkowska1, Grzegorz Władysław Basak1
Acta Haematol Pol 2023;54(2):100-103.

Abstract

Not available

CLINICAL VIGNETTE

Acta Haematologica Polonica 2023

Number 2, Volume 54, pages 100–103

DOI: 10.5603/AHP.a2023.0018

ISSN 0001–5814

e-ISSN 2300–7117

Tisagenlecleucel CAR-T for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; one therapy, two clinical presentations: urgent need to design adverse event predictors

Jaromir Tomasik*Joanna Drozd-SokołowskaPiotr KacprzykAgnieszka TomaszewskaRafał MachowiczElżbieta UrbanowskaSamanta WitkowskaGrzegorz Władysław Basak
Department of Hematology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

*Address for correspondence: Jaromir Tomasik, Department of Hematology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1A, 02–097 Warsaw, Poland, e-mail: jaromir.tomasik@gmail.com

Received: 24.01.2023 Accepted: 23.02.2023 Early publication date: 07.04.2023

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has revolutionized treatment outcomes yet it poses new challenges to clinicians. In parallel with its success, CAR-T will inevitably reach clinical units inexperienced in the use of this treatment type.

That was the case in Poland, where the Ministry of Health launched a reimbursement of tisagenlecleucel for adult patients with CD19-positive lymphoid malignancies only in 2022 [1]. In this article, we aim to compare the first two cases of patients treated with tisagenlecleucel at the Department of Hematology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine in the Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. The two patients developed highly contrasting clinical presentations after CAR-T infusion. The different clinical courses between these subjects constitute a valuable example of the highly variable systemic responses to tisagenlecleucel. In addition, we briefly discuss an adverse event (AE) prediction concept developed by research teams worldwide.

Initially, both patients were diagnosed with DLBCL not otherwise specified (NOS) and were subsequently treated in units not certified for CAR-T. A summary of the patients’ treatment before CAR-T is set out in Table I. Initially, Patient#1 had a stage IV DLBCL compared to a stage II E diagnosed in Patient#2 [2]. Both patients were females with no comorbidities except for obesity in Patient#1. Moreover, both had no bone marrow or central nervous system (CNS) involvement at the time of diagnosis. Their detailed characteristics are given in Table I. Notably, at the time of diagnosis, Patient#2 was in the 24th week of pregnancy.

Table I. Clinical course of patients — general characteristics

Patient#1

Patient#2

Date*

Date*

Sex, age

Female, 45

N/A

Female, 38

N/A

Diagnosis

(IHC confirmed)

DLBCL, NOS, non-GCB, MYC-positive, BCL2-positive

Ki-67 95%

Apr 2021

DLBCL, NOS, GCB, MYC-negative
BCL2-negative

Ki-6 100%
mutTP53-positive

Jun 2021

Disease stage at diagnosis
(Lugano classification)

IV

Apr 2021

II E

Jun 2021

Prephase treatment

CTX + GCs

Jun 2021

First-line therapy

R-CHOP (6 cycles)

2021

CHOP (4 cycles)
R-CHOP (4 cycles)

Jul–Nov 2021

IF-RT

2021

---

Salvage therapy

R-DHAP (1 cycle)

May 2022

IF-RT (50 Gy – 2 Gy × 25 fractions)

Dec 2021–
–Jan 2022

Second-line salvage therapy

R-ICE (1 cycle)

Jun 2022

R-ICE (4 cycles)

May–Aug 2022

Bridging therapy

R-ICE (2 cycles)

Jul–Aug

2022

P + BR
R-DHAP (1 cycle)
GemOX (1 cycle)

Sep 2022
Oct 2022
Nov 2022

Other therapeutic regimens

Intrathecal MTX/DEX

May 2022

mPRED 96mg/day

Aug 2022

Disease status at lymphodepletion

CR

PD

Lymphodepletion

Flu/CTX

Sep 2022

Flu/CTX

Nov 2022

CAR-T infusion

Completed

Sep 2022

Completed

Nov 2022

Treatment result

CR

Dec 2022

PD

Dec 2022

CRS

No

Grade 3

Nov 2022

CRS characteristics

N/A

N/A

Fever >40°C

BP 90/60, peripheral hypoperfusion, HR 150, facial and neck edema, elevated CRP and IL-6

N/A

ICU admission: oxygen delivery 25 l/
/min, vasopressor, tocilizumab administration

ICANS

No

Grade 1

Nov–Dec 2022

ICANS characteristics

N/A

N/A

ICE score 8, confusional state, mental status changes

N/A

EASIX score before lymphodepletion

0.88

Sep 2022

1.50

Nov 2022

EASIX score on infusion day

0.95

Sep 2022

1.08

Nov 2022

EASIX-F score before lymphodepletion

183.54

Sep 2022

682.52

Nov 2022

EASIX-F score on infusion day

149.72

Sep 2022

887.37

Nov 2022

Following the diagnosis, Patient#1 received six cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone) chemoimmunotherapy with subsequent irradiation of the involved areas (IF-RT). Due to progressive disease, the patient received R-DHAP (rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin) salvage therapy. Additionally, MTX/DEX (methotrexate, dexamethasone) was administered intrathecally for CNS prophylaxis. After one cycle of R-DHAP, the treatment was continued with R-ICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) due to a lack of response to the former (disease progression, macroscopic assessment). Subsequently, the patient was qualified for CAR-T and continued R-ICE as a bridging therapy, resulting in remission prior to CAR-T treatment.

On the other hand, Patient#2 received pre-phase treatment with cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoids followed by four cycles of CHOP, four cycles of R-CHOP, and IF-RT. Subsequently, four cycles of R-ICE were administered, resulting in progressive disease and Patient#2 was qualified for CAR-T therapy. Later, due to the large tumor burden, the intention-to-treat was to administer Pola-BR (polatuzumab vedotin, bendamustine, rituximab) as bridging therapy before CAR-T. However, because of progression the patient subsequently received one cycle of R-DHAP, with macroscopic progression during the cycle, and one cycle of GemOX (gemcitabine and oxaliplatin), administered because of a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis at the planned time of the initiation of lymphodepleting chemotherapy. R-DHAP was complicated by sepsis caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Moreover, thrombosis of the right iliac vein was diagnosed one day before the lymphodepletion, as well as acute pancreatitis in the course of lymphoma, infiltrating the pancreas.

In both cases, tisagenlecleucel was administered as initially planned. Following the infusion, Patient#1 experienced no AEs, whereas Patient#2 developed grade 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and grade 1 neurotoxicity [immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS)] [3]. The onset of CRS was on day +1 post-infusion and manifested initially with increasing fever and facial edema. The patient’s condition deteriorated, resulting in a transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). The patient developed tachycardia, hypotension, fever, head and neck edema, and required oxygen therapy (details in Table I). Tocilizumab and vasopressors were administered, resulting in CRS subsiding on day +5 and a return from ICU. On day +6, the patient developed mild neurotoxicity symptoms (grade 1).

These two cases show very different clinical presentations following treatment, which could not be determined in advance. The current guidelines state that CRS prediction is not yet possible, indicating factors such as high tumor burden associated with a higher risk of CRS [3]. Recently, CRS and ICANS have been linked to endothelial dysfunction [4], and various endothelial activation markers have been proposed as AE predictors [5, 6]. The simplest measure of endothelial activation is the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), defined as [lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); U/L] × creatinine [mg/dL])/platelets [PLTs; × 109/L] and its derivatives, for instance: EASIX × ferritin [4, 5]. The EASIX scores for Patients#1 and 2 are provided at the bottom of Table I, and have been calculated for day –7 (i.e. before lymphodepletion) and day 0 (day of CAR-T infusion). Unfortunately, EASIX scores are bias-susceptible. For instance, renal insufficiency or tumor lysis syndrome will lead to changes in creatinine and LDH concentrations, respectively, impacting EASIX.

Nevertheless, Penack et al. [4] have shown that a baseline EASIX of 4.67 could be used as a cutoff for severe CRS prediction (grade ≥3). And according to Pennisi et al. [7], EASIX scores before lymphodepletion are associated with CRS occurrence. The median value was 1.88 in Pennisi et al.’s ‘CRS group’ [7] compared to 1.06 in their ‘no CRS group’.

Even so, EASIX scores are not validated predictors of CRS occurrence, and we cannot draw conclusions from the calculated values. However, as the endothelium can be damaged by factors such as chemotherapy, cytokines, or sepsis [8], it appears reasonable to deduce that Patient#2 developed AEs due to having been previously exposed to infection and more chemotherapy regimens. In addition, other factors predicting CRS are currently under investigation. When endothelial activation occurs, cytokines, adhesion molecules, and other markers such as angiopoietins, are released, and their serum concentrations are being evaluated as potentially more accurate predictors [6, 9].

To sum up, treating DLBCL with tisagenlecleucel may be associated with very different clinical scenarios that pose significant challenges for clinical teams. Therefore, accurate predictors of adverse events would be extremely beneficial, and endothelial activation is emerging as a potential candidate.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally to manuscript preparation. All authors read and agreed to published version of manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Financial support

None.

Ethics

The work described in this article has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans; EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments; Uniform Requirements for manuscripts submitted to Biomedical journals.

References

  1. Obwieszczenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 20 kwietnia 2022 r. w sprawie wykazu refundowanych leków, środków spożywczych specjalnego przeznaczenia żywieniowego oraz wyrobów medycznych. Dz. Urz. Min. Zdr. 2022.41. https://dziennikmz.mz.gov.pl/legalact/2022/41/ (April, ٢٠, ٢٠٢٢).
  2. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, et al. Alliance, Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Consortium, Italian Lymphoma Foundation, European Organisation for Research, Treatment of Cancer/Dutch Hemato-Oncology Group, Grupo Español de Médula Ósea, German High-Grade Lymphoma Study Group, German Hodgkin’s Study Group, Japanese Lymphorra Study Group, Lymphoma Study Association, NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Nordic Lymphoma Study Group, Southwest Oncology Group, United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(27): 3059–3068, doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800, indexed in Pubmed: 25113753.
  3. Kröger DN, Gribben DJ, Chabannon C, Yakoub-Agha I, Einsele H. ed. The EBMT/EHA CAR-T cell handbook. Springer, Cham 2022.
  4. Korell F, Penack O, Mattie M, et al. EASIX and severe endothelial complications after CD19-directed CAR-T cell therapy — a cohort study. Front Immunol. 2022; 13: 877477, doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.877477, indexed in Pubmed: 35464403.
  5. Greenbaum U, Strati P, Saliba RM, et al. CRP and ferritin in addition to the EASIX score predict CAR-T-related toxicity. Blood Adv. 2021; 5(14): 2799–2806, doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004575, indexed in Pubmed: 34264268.
  6. Hong F, Shi M, Cao J, et al. Predictive role of endothelial cell activation in cytokine release syndrome after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. J Cell Mol Med. 2021; 25(24): 11063–11074, doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17029, indexed in Pubmed: 34734474.
  7. Pennisi M, Sanchez-Escamilla M, Flynn JR, et al. Modified EASIX predicts severe cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity after chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Blood Adv. 2021; 5(17): 3397–3406, doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003885, indexed in Pubmed: 34432870.
  8. Palomo M, Diaz-Ricart M, Carbo C, et al. The release of soluble factors contributing to endothelial activation and damage after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is not limited to the allogeneic setting and involves several pathogenic mechanisms. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009; 15(5): 537–546, doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.01.013, indexed in Pubmed: 19361745.
  9. Wei Z, Cheng Qi, Xu N, et al. Investigation of CRS-associated cytokines in CAR-T therapy with meta-GNN and pathway crosstalk. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022; 23(1): 373, doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04917-2, indexed in Pubmed: 36100873.