Introduction
Patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) belong to a high-risk group of invasive fungal disease (IFD) [1]. The distribution of pathogens in an allo-HCT setting include aspergillosis in 55–60%, candidiasis in 25–30%, mycormycosis in 7–8%, and rare species e.g. fusariosis, scedosporiosis, geotrichosis in 2–3% [2]. With the widespread introduction of antifungal prophylaxis with azoles, this epidemiology is tending to change, with the rise of rare and sporadic species. No major differences in etiology between children and adults have been reported [3–6], although in one study the incidence of IFD after allo-HCT was significantly higher in children than in adults [6]. Regardless of age, patients in the following groups are considered high-risk for IFD: acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML); recurrent acute leukemia; allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; and high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [4, 5, 7–9]. Coexisting cytomegalovirus replication increases the risk of fungal complications [9].
Clinical symptoms of IFD in immunocompromised patients are dependent on the localization of the infection, which in most cases involves the lungs, abdomen, paranasal sinuses, skin or brain. In most cases, general symptoms occur including fever, followed by other systemic symptoms and laboratory markers of severe infection (e.g. C-reactive protein, procalcitonin). Fungemia or fungal sepsis might occur in a case of bloodstream infection with Candida; nonetheless septic shock is an infrequent presentation [10]. The objective of this paper was to analyze a series of cases of pediatric and adult patients with non-Candida IFD presenting as septic shock.
Material and methods
Studies and case reports regarding non-Candida invasive fungal disease presenting as septic shock in pediatric and adult patients were searched for in ‘PubMed’. Search queries included ‘invasive fungal disease’ OR ‘invasive fungal infection’ AND ‘septic shock’. The following data was retrieved from these reports: number of patients, age, gender, underlying disease, identification of fungal etiology, antifungal therapy, and treatment outcome.
Papers were included into analysis according to the diagnosis made by the respective authors. No additional judgment of sepsis and/or septic shock was made. According to the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock, sepsis was defined as ‘life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection’ [11]. Septic shock was defined as ‘a subset of sepsis in which particularly profound circulatory, cellular, and metabolic abnormalities are associated with a greater risk of mortality than with sepsis alone’. Patients with septic shock can be clinically identified by the presence of two factors: the need to use a vasopressor and increased serum lactate concentration despite adequate volume resuscitation [11].
Results
Literature data describing etiology, age and outcome is very limited. The available pediatric data includes 22 patients, most of them with an underlying non-hematological disease (Table I) [12–22]. Only 6/22 (27.3%) are reported to have survived this infection, including 2/4 with acute leukemia. Etiology of the infection was highly variable, however infection with Saprochaete spp. (formerly Geotrichum spp., now proposed as Magnusiomyces spp.) presenting as septic shock was reported in four children, all with acute leukemias. Only two of them survived the infection. IFD-related non-Candida septic shock was reported also in 28 adults (Table II) [21, 23–40]. Among them, high mortality has been observed, with only 5/28 (17.9%) patients survival.
Source |
Age |
Primary disease |
Etiology |
Treatment |
Outcome |
Zeng et al., 2021 [12] |
Median age |
Various |
Talaromyces marneffei |
Amphotericin B 7/11 Itraconazole 2/11 Fluconazole 2/11 Voriconazole 3/11 Caspofungin 3/11 |
Died 9/12 Cured 3/12 |
Romanio et al., 2017 [13] |
1-year-old boy |
Down’s syndrome in postoperative period of congenital cardiac disease correction |
Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
Amphotericin B |
Alive |
Watson et al., 2016 [14] |
12-year-old girl |
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis |
Blastomyces |
Amphotericin B, adjunctive inhaled amphotericin; liposomal amphotericin B was changed to amphotericin B lipid complex |
Died |
El Dib et al., 2014 [15] |
5-year-old boy |
Coccidioidomycosis |
Patient died before receiving required antifungal therapy |
Died |
|
Cavalcante et al., 2014 [16] |
10-year-old girl |
JSLE |
Cryptococcus neoformans |
Amphotericin B (liposomal) |
Died |
França et al., 2012 [17] |
14-year-old girl |
JSLE |
Histoplasma capsulatum |
Amphotericin B (liposomal) |
Died |
Pereira et al., 2004 [18] |
2-year-old girl |
Lymphoproliferative syndrome |
Paracoccidioides brasiliensis |
Intravenous sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (10 mg/kg trimethoprim) |
Died |
Hsu et al., 1998 [19] |
23-month-old boy |
AML |
Trichosporon beigelii |
Amphotericin B |
Died |
Wee et al., 2019 [20] |
13-year-old boy |
ALL |
Saprochaete clavata |
Amphotericin B and voriconazole (10 weeks) |
Alive |
17-year-old boy |
AML |
Saprochaete clavata |
Amphotericin B (60 mg/d) |
Died |
|
Parahym et al., 2015 [21] |
15-year-old boy |
AML |
Saprochaete |
Caspofungin, amphotericin B |
Alive |
Trabelsi et al., 2015 [22] |
17-year-old boy |
AML |
Saprochaete |
Amphotericin B (60 mg/d) |
Died |
Source |
Age |
Primary disease |
Etiology |
Treatment |
Outcome |
Caldas et al., 2022 [23] |
43-year-old woman |
Crohn’s disease on treatment |
Saprochaete clavata, Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 |
Amphotericin B |
Died |
Duarte et al., 2021 [24] |
66-year-old woman |
AML |
Saprochaete capitata |
Amphotericin B (liposomal) |
Died |
Lo Cascio et al., 2020 [25] |
20-year-old woman |
ALL |
Saprochaete clavata |
Caspofungin |
Died |
Buchta et al., 2019 [26] |
Patient 1 — 45-year-old man Patient 2 — 61-year-old woman Patient 3 — 58-year-old woman Patient 4 — 50-year-old woman Patient 5 — 66-year-old woman |
1 — AML after 2 — AML 3 — AML after 4 — AML after auto-HCT 5 — DLBCL |
1 — Saprochaete clavata 2 — Saprochaete clavata 3 — Saprochaete clavata 4 — Saprochaete clavate (+ Candida albicans were cultivated from nasopharyngeal swab) 5 — Saprochaete clavata + Candida glabrata |
1 — amphotericin B 2 — amphotericin B 3 — amphotericin B 4 — amphotericin B 5 — micafungin (100 mg), voriconazole (2 × 200 mg) |
1 — died 2 — survived (but died from early relapse of AML later) 3 — died 4 — died 5 — died |
Ben Neji et al., 2019 [27] |
39-year-old man |
AML |
Saprochaete capitata |
Amphotericin B |
Died |
Alobaid et al., 2019 [28] |
67-year-old woman |
Diabetes, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, left ventricular failure, peripheral vascular disease, bronchial asthma and obstructive sleep apnea |
Saprochaete capitata |
No antifungal therapy |
Died |
Bansal et al., 2018 [29] |
29-year-old woman |
AML |
Saprochaete capitata |
Amphotericin B (liposomal) |
Died |
Hajar et al., 2018 [30] |
82-year-old man |
Kidney transplant recipient |
Saprochaete capitata |
Amphotericin B |
Died |
Pamidimukkala et al., 2017 [31] |
48-year-old woman |
Biphenotypic acute leukemia |
Saprochaete capitata concomitant Enterococcus gallinarum |
Died |
|
Fernández-Ruiz et al., 2017 [32] |
55-year-old man |
Refractory acute leukemia |
Saprochaete capitata |
Amphotericin B |
Died |
Del Principe |
50-year-old woman |
Mantle cell lymphoma |
Saprochaete clavate |
Amphotericin B (liposomal) |
Died on day 60 from chemotherapy initiation because of lymphoma progression |
Subramanya Supram et al., 2016 [34] |
Patient 1 — 77-year-old woman Patient 2 — 80-year-old man |
Patient 1 — hypertension, Alzheimer’s disease Patient 2 — COPD, hypertension |
Patient 1 — Saprochaete capitata + Patient 2 — Saprochaete capitata |
Patient 1 — no antifungal therapy Patient 2 — fluconazole (400 mg/day for 4 days) |
Patient 1 — died Patient 2 — died |
Trabelsi et al., 2015 [22] |
Patient 1 — 25-year-old woman Patient 2 — 57-year-old man |
AML |
Saprochaete capitata |
Patient 1 — amphotericin B Patient 2 — amphotericin B |
Patient 1 — died Patient 2 — died |
Picard et al., 2014 [35] |
Patient 1 — 46-year-old woman Patient 2 — 70-year-old man Patient 3 — 63-year-old woman |
AML |
Saprochaete clavata |
Patient 1 — amphotericin B Patient 2 — caspofungin Patient 3 — amphotericin B |
Patient 1 — survived septic shock, died because of hemorrhage Patient 2 — died Patient 3 — died |
García-Ruiz |
55-year-old man |
ALL |
Saprochaete capitata |
Amphotericin B (liposomal) |
Died |
Saghrouni |
47-year-old man |
AML |
Saprochaete capitata |
Amphotericin B (1 mg/kg) |
Died |
Avelar Rodriguez et al., 2017 [38] |
28-year-old man |
Cocaine abuse and Child-Pugh class C alcoholic liver cirrhosis |
Rhinocerebral |
Amphotericin B (liposomal) |
Died |
Fernández- |
56-year-old man |
Solid cancer, abdominal surgery, prolonged ICU stay |
Wickerhamomyces anomalus |
Amphotericin B for 9 days followed by fluconazole for 5 days) |
Alive |
Taniguchi |
18-year-old man |
Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy accompanied by refractory anemia and chronic renal failure |
Lecythophora mutabilis |
Micafungin 5 mg/kg, |
Died |
Hennequin |
47-year-oldman |
Adenocarcinoma of lower esophagus |
Saccharomyces boulardii |
Fluconazole (100 mg/d) initiated on day 35 for six weeks |
Alive |
Discussion
Invasive fungal infections represent a serious medical problem worldwide and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematological malignancies. Other immunocompromised patients are also at high risk of IFD mainly because of the increased use of immunosuppressive and cytotoxic therapies, as well as improved diagnostic techniques. Candida and Aspergillus spp. are major causative agents.
However, with the new prevention strategies, new species are increasingly being reported as agents of bloodstream infections (BSI) or disseminated fungal disease. While Candida spp. is the most common etiology of fungal BSI and septic shock, such presentation is rare in case of other fungal pathogens.
Septic shock is the most dangerous presentation of infection, bringing the risk of poor prognosis. In this paper, we have searched for patients with non-Candida invasive fungal infection presenting as septic shock. We have found a limited number of reports, both in children and adults.
Septic shock is always a medical emergency. It requires the immediate administration of antimicrobials. Usually, bacterial etiology is suspected and adequate empirical treatment broadly covering the most probable pathogens is promptly started. In immunocompromised patients, in the presence of severe infection with symptoms of septic shock, atypical agents including fungal etiology should also be considered. One should also be aware of mixed etiology of septic shock in patients.
The most striking finding of our analysis is the low survival of patients, as only 26.1% of children and 17.9% of adults survived fungal infection with septic shock. Even with the long time period of inclusion, this survival rate was low in comparison with the outcome of IFD seen in leukemic patients both in the first [3, 41] and second [42, 43] decades of this century.
Immunocompromised patients, especially those with hematological malignancy who develop septic shock caused by fungal infection, are at very high risk of mortality. There are two options to improve therapeutic effect. Firstly, starting the empirical antifungal therapy as soon as possible is essential to increase the chance of survival in these patients. Secondly, it is recommended that early source control, including catheter removal, is a key factor influencing the outcome of leukemic or transplant patients with septic shock or sepsis of fungal etiology [4, 8].
The limitation of this study was the heterogenous population in terms of primary diagnosis, primary treatment, and etiology of fungal infection. We also limited the analysis to non-Candida etiology, because the symptoms of sepsis are relatively more frequent in Candida bloodstream infection.
Conclusion
Septic shock is a very rare presentation of fungal infection in immunocompromised patients, but the mortality is very high both in children and adults.
Authors’ contributions
KC, JS — design of study. RD, MRP, KC — provision of clinical data. All authors — analysis of clinical data. TS, JS — literature search and analysis of data. TS, JS — writing manuscript. All authors — critical revision and final approval.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financial support
None.
Ethics
The work described in this article has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans; EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments and uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals.