Vol 8, No 1 (2002)
Research paper
Published online: 2002-02-07
Effect of continuous thoracic epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl analgesia on postoperative outcome and mortality after abdominal aortic surgery
Acta Angiologica 2002;8(1):15-22.
Abstract
Introduction. Continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (C-TEA)
allows earlier postoperative mobilisation of
patients and decreases the rate of complications. The above effects should be
more prominent in older
patients, with a higher risk according to American Society of Anesthesiology.
Postoperative outcome and mortality rate were assessed in all patients undergoing abdominal aortic reconstruction surgery during an 18-month period, treated with the postoperative C-TEA (prospective group A; n = 36). Results were compared with patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery during the previous 18-month period, with the conventional postoperative analgesia with systemic analgesics (retrospective group B; n = 38).
Results. Both groups did not significantly differ considering the type of implanted prosthesis (simple/Y; A: 22/14 vs. B: 15/23; p = 0.103), the type of operation (emergency/elective; A: 4/32 vs. B: 7/31; p = 0.554) and gender (female; A: 3/36 vs. B: 5/38; p = 0.769). Between groups the only significant difference was observed in the mean patients’ age (A: 65.4 ± 5.6 vs. B: 68.6 ± 5.7; p = 0.0324, Student’s t-test), and, which was more pronounced, in the mortality rate (A: 3/36 vs. . B: 12/38; p = 0.0280, c2 test).
Conclusions. Concluding, 1) the mortality rate was four times lower in patients treated with C-TEA than in patients with conventional postoperative analgesia, 2) we cannot exclude additional effects caused by the type of prosthesis or general medical patients’ condition on the mortality rate.
Postoperative outcome and mortality rate were assessed in all patients undergoing abdominal aortic reconstruction surgery during an 18-month period, treated with the postoperative C-TEA (prospective group A; n = 36). Results were compared with patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery during the previous 18-month period, with the conventional postoperative analgesia with systemic analgesics (retrospective group B; n = 38).
Results. Both groups did not significantly differ considering the type of implanted prosthesis (simple/Y; A: 22/14 vs. B: 15/23; p = 0.103), the type of operation (emergency/elective; A: 4/32 vs. B: 7/31; p = 0.554) and gender (female; A: 3/36 vs. B: 5/38; p = 0.769). Between groups the only significant difference was observed in the mean patients’ age (A: 65.4 ± 5.6 vs. B: 68.6 ± 5.7; p = 0.0324, Student’s t-test), and, which was more pronounced, in the mortality rate (A: 3/36 vs. . B: 12/38; p = 0.0280, c2 test).
Conclusions. Concluding, 1) the mortality rate was four times lower in patients treated with C-TEA than in patients with conventional postoperative analgesia, 2) we cannot exclude additional effects caused by the type of prosthesis or general medical patients’ condition on the mortality rate.
Keywords: epidural analgesiacontinuous analgesiathoracic analgesiapostoperative analgesiabupivacaine–fentanylabdominal aortic surgeryperioperative mortalityretro- and prospective study